Annual Big Brother Award Winners Announced
SteamyMobile writes "Privacy International announced its Sixth Annual Big Brother awards today. These are awards given to the governments, business and individuals who are doing the most to bring us closer to Orwell's world of 1984. Normally this award is reserved for the British, but there are so many great candidates from other countries this year that they had to acknowledge that. So, who won, and who shall we nominate for next year? This certainly is an area with some tough competition lately."
AFAIK, this particular award is for UK only (even when there is an entry for US for immigration fingerprints). A similar award ceremony, for US specific things, will be held in US sometime later...
Actually, it appears that I misread, this isn't an international competition, but a British award which branched out this year due to egregious offenses in other nations. But my comment about Ashcroft stands.
"BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
The Department for Transport won runner-up for its electronic vehicle-identification program, currently under development. Known as the Spy in the Dashboard, the program will embed microprocessor chips into cars. The chips would automatically report any instances of speeding, illegal parking and other grievous offenses to authorities, who would follow up with a summons.
We already have cameras logging every vehicle that drives into London, cameras logging the time it take you vehicle to drive between two points and issuing a sumons, car tax cameras that issue a sumons when its out of date, GATSO camera that automaticly issue sumons, Digital GATSOs and so much more! Also in the area I live in (Bristol) the police equip old ladies with speed guns, and they take down your number plate if your speeding, you don't get a fine just a nasty letter.
Are there any things like this in the states?
BTW. Some guy got his fined nulled because they took a picture of him face on and he was in the car with his lover, this played on some european privacy law.
Avontech | Play dirty! They started it!
He's talking about the UK, where the legal drinking age is 18 everywhere, where we can indeed burn any flag we like without threat of being arrested for it, and we really can protest peacefully without being pepper sprayed or hosed down with high pressure water cannons. All things which I believe have happened within the last few years in the US.
After reading this:/ articles/Elderly_couple_died_after_gas_was_cut_off .htm
http://www.eurosceptic.com/sources_of_information
It really doesn't seem fair to blame British Gas. I agree with the other posters after reading about this incident, I don't see why British Gas gets the award.
Think for yourself, destroy your television.
To be fair, this was enacted by the Brazil justice, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. When the justice learned that brazil citizens were subject to fingerprinting and getting their image taken when entering the U.S. as tourists, he ordered that the same applies to U.S. citizens who enter Brazil as tourists. Basicly the current situation is that whatever a state demands from brazil citizens before entering, the same demands are valid for citizens of this state before entering Brazil.
You've never actually been to the US Mexican border have you? The US has built large walls to keep Mexicans out.
Wired: Beyond the Wall
Operation Gatekeeper
There is also the problem of the US lacking any data protection legislation.
What exactly would you call this?
http://www.usdoj.gov/foia/privstat.htm
Just another day in Paradise
So British Gas gets an "Invasive" award for not passing personal information to the state?
No, they didn't get the award for this at all. They got the award for foolishly cutting off the gas to an elderly couple's house without taking adequate steps to warn them or their family, and then saying "But the privacy laws made us do it!".
When you are dealing with critical infrastructure such as the gas supply, you have a duty of care to ensure that nobody is harmed due to the unavailability of the service. Blaming it on those crazy privacy laws simply isn't acceptable.
Our australian friends can read Orwell's 1984 at Project Gutenberg of Australia.
Us poor sods in the USA have to wait, what, another 70 years or so? Who knows anymore. It's safer and easier to assume we can't do something than it is to assume that we can...
-Adam
Only partially true, try a google news search for "9-11 false passport". Their passports may have been in their names but they were still fraudulent. Try reading the complete 9-11 commission report. Specifically, page 563, note 32 claims that two of the hijackers had fraudulently manipulated their passports and that it is believed that up to 11 others did as well.
Besides, at the time, the US was not actively looking for specific terrorists trying to enter the country. Today, the US is looking for specific known terrorists who might try to enter the country. I seriously doubt that any wanted, would-be terrorist would be brazen enough to use their real passport and try to enter at an official point of entry. Much more likely, they would sneak across a border like this woman, a suspected Al-qaeda member, recently did.... but why?
"It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
The national 55 MPH speed limit was repealed ages ago. Now the speed limit is up to the individual states. Montana, which has many hundred-mile-long perfectly flat and straight freeways, has 'autobahns' in some parts of the state. Washington State has a max of 70 (60 in urban areas.) Etc.
Comment of the year