Slashdot Mirror


CPAN: $677 Million of Perl

Adam K writes "It had to happen eventually. CPAN has finally gotten the sloccount treatment, and the results are interesting. At 15.4 million lines of code, CPAN is starting to approach the size of the entire Redhat 6.2 distribution mentioned in David Wheeler's original paper. Could this help explain perl's relatively low position in the SourceForge.net language numbers?"

20 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. yeah, but try removing the punctuation by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you take out the punctuation, though, it's down to twelve lines of code.

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    1. Re:yeah, but try removing the punctuation by haystor · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean:

      If you take out the punctuation, it's down to twelve lines of comments.

      --
      t
  2. Bahhh! by justanyone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bahhh, I know people richer than that!

    Now compute the economic gain of using Perl vs. any other language:
    Perl vs. Nothing : $677M
    Perl vs. C : $1.25B
    Perl vs. C# : $2.77B
    Perl vs. Hand Optimized Assembly on Honeywell DPS-3E running GCOS operating system: Priceless

  3. Re:Huh? by _14k4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here, I'll repost the link from the article you never read:

    sloccount

  4. Golf? by ellem · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pfft 15.4 Million lines?

    I could write CPAN in a one liner!

    #! /usr/bin/perl
    use warnings ;
    use strict ;

    print "CPAN: ;

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:Golf? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Um... because if it put the string terminator right before EOF you'd, presumably, wind up with one giant print statement that just prints out your source code from the point of the original goof? And that would be stupid?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  5. Relatively low? by stinkyfingers · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's relatively low because that list is in alphabetical order!

    1. Re:Relatively low? by babbage · · Score: 1, Funny
      Yeah, no kidding. Just think about how dejected the Zope guys must feel with their nice modern system when both Ada and APL are blasting from the past ahead of all other languages. Maybe they'll try to get ahead by renaming themselves to "Aaaaaaa Zope".

      :-)

  6. Re:Mining CPan by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 3, Funny

    >"C#"
    You misspelled "INTERCAL".

  7. Re:Huh? by servognome · · Score: 4, Funny

    /. response efficiency warning!
    To conserve server resources in the future please update your response "Did you even attempt to click the underlined word 'sloccount'? If not, do it now and read the first line of the first paragraph." with the more efficient "RTFA" or "RTFA you stupid noob" if you are not into the whole brevity thing.

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  8. Whoa, too much politics lately... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... I thought it said "C-SPAN."

    Although their "Book TV" show is usually as dense as Perl, and often profiles books that are write-only.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  9. Re:What is this post about? by Seth+Finklestein · · Score: 0, Funny

    I think Michael Sims has been slacking from his duties. This article didn't contain a single tinfoil hat conspiracy theory or knee-jerk anti-corporate rant.

    I'd strongly advise that, like me, you boycott Slashdot until the quality of its articles improve.

    --
    I'm not Seth Finkelstein. I still speak the truth.
  10. Re:Perl coders make $135k/year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    since its donated time, could i detuct that on my taxs?

    (not a perl programmer, but if i could, then i probably would start.)

  11. Re:Useless Measurement? by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is more important, lines of code or lines of quality code? People are always so impressed with sheer numbers. Quality is important.

    Seriously.
    And it's Perl.
    I thought the whole point was that you could write a massive Perl program in a single line.
    15.4 million just tells me that CPAN is getting sloppy. Let's knock that down to say, 17 HUGE lines, okay?

  12. Re:Perl coders make $135k/year? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Funny

    In any company employing that many perl programmers, there is at least 1 manager per 2 programmers. Therefor:

    $135,000 per 2 programmers = $270,000 per year

    $200,000 per year for manager
    $35,000 x 2 per year for 2 programmers
    +_______
    $270,000

    Now, it's also quite obvious from this math, that the manager must bring in far more value than a programmer. Which leads me to this conclusion, a software company that fires all its programmers and hires more managers could only become a stronger company.

    Thank you, thank you. No, I do not have my MBA, but I did glean this all from managers at previous employers. Anyone know of job openings for a computer flunky in the Richmond, VA area?

  13. Random perl comments by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2, Funny
    a) I thought there was only one line of Perl that did everything.

    b) Maybe the sloc counter didn't recognize Perl comments, so it overcounted lines. Wait, Perl programs never have comments.

    c) Does this make it "a Perl of great price"?

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  14. Re:Low position? by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but close to 75% of all those PHP Projects are a DVD/CD cataloging system.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  15. Re:Perl coders make $135k/year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, but you have to have an income first.

  16. Re:Subject rejected - looks too much like ASCII ar by paster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look at this: XHTML parser using K programming language
    Perl is really clean language :)

    --
    Create RSS feed from any web page http://Page2RSS.com/
  17. Re:Subject rejected - looks too much like ASCII ar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    TECO (what the original emacs was written in) is even worse. Consdier this TECO program Program to calculate pi. There are explaations of the program out there on the net.
    In article < BZS.95Apr13040535@world.std.com> bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) writes:

    >Then again at MIT a lot of the office people were using TECO, gimmee a
    >break, it was indistinguishable from line noise (hey, I loved TECO, ...

    +0UN QN"E 20UN ' BUH BUV HK
    QN< J BUQ QN*10/3UI
    QI< \+2*10+(QQ*QI)UA B L K QI*2-1UJ QA/QJUQ
    QA-(QQ*QJ)-2\ 10@I// -1%I >
    QQ/10UT QH+QT+48UW QW-58"E 48UW %V ' QV"N QV^T ' QWUV QQ-(QT*10)UH >
    QV^T @^A/
    /

    The above program will calculate an arbitrary number of digits of PI. For TOPS-10 TEC124, the command was "39eiPI.TEC$$" to get 39 digits of PI.