Slashdot Mirror


Linux Jobs on the Rise

Jan Stafford writes "Looking for a job at LinuxWorld and everywhere else? IT recruiting expert Scot Melland says you have more grounds for optimism than in recent years. In this Q&A, he describes where the jobs are and how much they're paying."

219 comments

  1. True by rppp01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My last job was a SCO shop. They were migrating to Red Hat when I left.

    My current job is using linux on a lot of lower end servers.

    This is a far cry from 2000-2001, when no one would even touch the OS.
    Now, it is my desktop, and that of others.

    --
    They stuck me in an institution, said it was the only solution, to...protect me from the enemy, myself
    1. Re:True by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      My last job was a SCO shop. They were migrating to Red Hat when I left.

      If SCO's court claim is correct, they are the same thing :-P

  2. I don't know..... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am working at a Microsoft Gold Certified partner business, and I am impressed by how well Microsoft stuff works. I am not realy that much into Linux, but I have played around with it. Microsoft gives Linux a lot of competition on interoperability, although it is only with other Microsoft products.

    Security isn't that big of a deal to lock down either, as long as you have a decent firewall configured right.

    1. Re:I don't know..... by irokitt · · Score: 1
      Security isn't that big of a deal to lock down either, as long as you have a decent firewall configured right.

      That, and forbidding users to use Internet Explorer or Outlook.

      Just my $0.02
      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:I don't know..... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft gives Linux a lot of competition on interoperability, although it is only with other Microsoft products.

      You keep using that word "interoperability," I do not think it means what you think it means.

      Security isn't that big of a deal to lock down either, as long as you have a decent firewall configured right.

      "security"
      ditto

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:I don't know..... by bob670 · · Score: 1

      and alloting several hours every week to download, test and roll out patches for severe security flaws. I'm going to assume you are just joking...

    4. Re:I don't know..... by One+Louder · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, what you're saying is that Microsoft is good for interoperability as long as you don't have to interoperate?

    5. Re:I don't know..... by irokitt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And doing so for a Linux-run business is also time consuming. That's why companies hire and pay people to do it. Hence the jobs nerds like us work at.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    6. Re:I don't know..... by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      The one nitpick I have with your statement is about security. MS has gotten their act together with reliability and somewhat with 'playing nice', although it pisses me off how they fuck with standards like XML, but they aren't secure at all. Nothing to do with closed source vs open source, but their development model was not designed securely from the start, and now it's biting them in the proverbial ass.

      Hopefully with the inclusion of the NX flag-aware code, most buffer overflow attacks will just throw an exception and DOS the service instead of allowing an attacker to root it, but the fact remains that the service is still down.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    7. Re:I don't know..... by bob670 · · Score: 1
      true, but I know that 99 times out of 100 when I patch a Linux box or app that...

      a) I don't have to reboot and hope the whole machine comes back up

      b) I won't be patchng for the exact same issue several times in the same year

      I cut MS a break for years, always giving the benefit of th doubt, but the shoddy quality of XP, 2000 and 2003 has ended that cycle. I'm quite happy to see Linux on the rise at work, I love it when a superior product wins in the marketplace...

    8. Re:I don't know..... by Sir+William+Gates · · Score: 0, Troll
      I agree with you, I don't have much experience with this Lunix stuff either but Windows Server 2003 is pretty secure, as long as some know-it-all admin doesn't tweak it out and turn off all the security settings... Remember that Microsoft products also interoperate perfectly with SCO Lunix applications if you use Services for UNIX 3.5

      . Regards,
      Trey

    9. Re:I don't know..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, and he also said that security is good as long as you don't need security (have a firewall)

    10. Re:I don't know..... by aldoman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No I totally agree with you. I like Linux, and on servers I just love it. On the desktop, I try to like it but I always go back to my windows/mac land.

      Microsoft's products are really getting a hell of a lot better aswell. They are also being much less 'ghey' towards the OS community overall. Most MS employees will freely admit of liking FireFox, Apache, PHP etc (I've chatted with quite a few). I'm actually quite sure the Billy Boy at the top loves OSS, but Balmer probably despises it. Ever notice how Balmer is always the one saying how OS kills jobs and flies to Munich (I know he's the CEO, but Gates has way more clout than him. IMO).

      Also, some of their products just rock. Visual Studio for example - Whitby (2005) is just plain fantastic. C# is a very nice programming language also. Windows XP, if you like it or not, is a vast improvement over 98, and IMO over 2000.

      Then again, GNOME 2.8 is going to be a really great release. It's starting to fall toghter, and Longhorn is not going to be able to catch up.

    11. Re:I don't know..... by name773 · · Score: 1

      have there actually been exploits for outlook that didn't involve social engineering?

    12. Re:I don't know..... by flacco · · Score: 2, Insightful
      C# is a very nice programming language also.

      i liked it better the first time, when it was called java.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    13. Re:I don't know..... by name773 · · Score: 1

      GNOME 2.8 is going to be a really great release.

      last time i tried gnome it was bloated, why not go for something different and do windowmaker?
      also, try konqueror for webbrowsing (if you haven't already)... it's fast

    14. Re:I don't know..... by character_assassin · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Microsoft gives Linux a lot of competition on interoperability, although it is only with other Microsoft products.

      And in other news:

      Ford Pintos are perfectly safe automobiles, except for all those fiery explosions.

      Peanut M&Ms are extremely healthy food, as long as you don't actually eat them.

      George W. Bush has been completely honest with the American public, although his press conferences and speeches were full of lies.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    15. Re:I don't know..... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      Sorry I wasn't exactly clear with my first post.

      Windows, and Microsoft products are well integrated, not interoperable. It was a poor choice of words. Microsoft products work incredibly well with each other, and an all-Windows and Microsoft network runs really smooth. By smoothly though, I mean the workflow of the end-users. the Microsoft stuff is just top notch for everyday business. Outlook destroys any of the other Email clients I have used. Word and Excel are just as good as their OSS counterparts, but have the "home court advantage" of %100 compatibility with their formats and macros.

      And with the security thing, a Windows box properly set up can be secure, espescially when a firewall is used to stop the vast majority of attacks. It would be the exact same way with Linux.

    16. Re:I don't know..... by Xabraxas · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm actually quite sure the Billy Boy at the top loves OSS, but Balmer probably despises it.

      Really. So what exactly did Bill Gates mean when he wrote this:

      An Open Letter to Hobbyists

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    17. Re:I don't know..... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      Outlook destroys any of the other Email clients I have used.

      It doesn't seem like you looked very hard then.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    18. Re:I don't know..... by no+longer+myself · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Short answer: Yes.

      They're mostly patched now, but there were several cases where vbscripting and the like would automatically execute in Outlook.

    19. Re:I don't know..... by garroo · · Score: 1

      I've been looking for a good Outlook compatible client... so that I can finally pitch Open Office as an alternative, but there is no PIM/Calandering function out there... just nothing that compares to Outlook.

      I am pretty sure if I could run it every day, people would say... "hey, what you got there?" and be piqued. They already are having the print to PDF built into the Open Office.... but they need more to coax them over.

      Until then, Kopete and others just aren't good enough. Maybe Chandler, some day....

      --
      Oh my gawd, they killed kenny's mod points!!!!
    20. Re:I don't know..... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with Evolution?

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    21. Re:I don't know..... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Outlook destroys any of the other Email clients I have used.

      I'll agree with this statement because most E-mail clients can't keep up with all the viral E-mails sent out by Outlook.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    22. Re:I don't know..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are ppl in this forum, including myself, that have years and years of advanced experience in microsoft products.

      it's difficult to read your post without laughing...

      have you ever managed a 15,000 node network?

      have you brought back an exchange server cluster back from the dead? (at 4 in the morning, on monday)

      have you ever wondered how you were going to patch 5,000 desktops when the last service pack rollout has blown up sms in your face?

      please. stop with the infomercial. i can name the names of 100 of my closest friends and relatives whose desktop is CURRENTLY running some sort of virus, trojan, keylogger, worm, and/or enough spyware to cause boot times to hit 20 minutes. (i refuse to help them, i already put in close to 90 hours a week on the job)

      all thanks to integration you so highly praise.

      the very thing you trumpet has put microsoft against the ropes. their release time for longhorn and xp sp2 has just increased by at least an order of magnitude. all because they are the last word when it comes to millions upon millions of installations.

      i'm typing this from XP right now. i'm a senior sysadmin for a large windows network, i had 8 years of NT based experience before I pursued my mcse (and completed the entire thing in under 6 weeks).

      i'm here to tell you that your pollyanna, pie-in-the-sky outlook (no pun intended) would have you absolutely beat to a sniveling pulp by me and my tech staff.

      it's just fucking gay. we work with microsoft because it's the tools we were given. we already have a couple of guys working on linux the last couple of years. it's just another tool.

      you sound like management.

      die.

    23. Re:I don't know..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sunbird from mozilla. pisses on outlook's calendar functions.

    24. Re:I don't know..... by totallygeek · · Score: 2, Informative
      [Microsoft Windows] Security isn't that big of a deal to lock down either, as long as you have a decent firewall configured right.



      And that firewall is usually running...ding, ding, ding...Linux.

    25. Re:I don't know..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " just nothing that compares to Outlook."

      It's called Evolution, and I believe you can now get compatible plug ins to allow it to interoperate with an Exchange server, and I believe SuSE also now sells a server that allows you to replace Exchange server and still serve Outlook clients.

    26. Re:I don't know..... by Spellbinder · · Score: 1

      why does an email client have to remove or add lines to an text attachment?????????

      --


      stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
    27. Re:I don't know..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he was saying "don't steal our shit."

    28. Re:I don't know..... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      So what does he mean by this:

      What hobbyist can put 3-man years into programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product and distribute for free?

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    29. Re:I don't know..... by Uggy · · Score: 1

      XML (Extensible Markup Language) Designed to be well, extensible, so they patented their very own XML format for MS Word documents. Fine, they can do that, because it's XML. That's what it's for. You make make your very own data containers.

      Eskimo XML - Has lots of structure for types of ice, snow, frost... not so heavy on tropical breezes.

      Porn Collector XML - has lots of types of breast size... no so heavy on plot types.

      Different markups for different folks, THAT's the point of XML. MS is free to make their own format, patent the hell out of, and then watch people use OpenOffice, but it's their right.

      --
      Toddlers are the stormtroopers of the Lord of Entropy.
    30. Re:I don't know..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outlook destroys any of the other Email clients I have used.

      Didn't you mean to say 'Outlook destroys everyone's email?

      Because, truly, OE 'features' are responsible for
      at least 80% of the problems which come down the
      net.

    31. Re:I don't know..... by Atrax · · Score: 1

      > have there actually been exploits for outlook that didn't involve social engineering?

      One Word:

      Bubbleboy

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    32. Re:I don't know..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, and forbidding users to use Internet Explorer or Outlook.

      Or MSN messenger. Or Word. Or windows filesharing. Paint is good to go tho.

    33. Re:I don't know..... by Zen+Punk · · Score: 0
      Outlook destroys any of the other Email clients I have used

      Well sure it does, along with with all the rest of your apps when the latest Outlook exploit borks your OS.

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    34. Re:I don't know..... by blahfern · · Score: 1

      "interoperability?" Please explain your version of the term further. The original statement was valid as I see it, and still reflects most of the business sector of the server market. Don't get me wrong, I am not a M$ fan, and believe in the fsf.
      Just curious:)

    35. Re:I don't know..... by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      No you don't. Interoperability is the ability to work together with other software. Microsoft software builds on it's interoperability with other programs. These are all microsoft programs and there is no free standard. But it is interoperability.

      I get what the OP is trying to say, but the linux stuff can usually be knitted together with some scripts and what not. It's pretty easy to manipulate outputs and most solutions that rely on large quantities of data that needs to be passed around simply store it in a database somewhere. You know the format, so it's not that hard to access...

    36. Re:I don't know..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you think you are talking about is properly known as intra-operability -- the ability to operate between members of the same group or family of software, not inter-operability which is the ability to operate between dissimilar and unrelated software.

  3. Nigeria! by urbieta · · Score: 1, Funny

    Go on americans! go get those jobs before africans beat you to them! hehe

    1. Re:Nigeria! by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, and while we are discussing Americans, I would like to ask you to help me move 4.5 million (4,500,00) dollars (UDS) into another account...

    2. Re:Nigeria! by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

      Dear Kind Nigerian Sir; As you know, there has been much polititical disruptions in mine country of the late. My father, former CEO of a major corporation was arreasted, but not before he could hide 27 million dollars....

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    3. Re:Nigeria! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May be modded funny but OP is closer to
      the truth than anything else. Should be
      modded 'Sad'. I'll guarantee you that
      American corporations will make sure
      that a significant portion of available
      jobs will go to Africans, Indians, and
      Asians. If the work can't be sent to them
      in their own countries corporations will
      be falling over themselves to get these
      people to our shores. It's partly about
      economics but it is also very much about
      "diversity". This is something that only
      recently became very real to me. I was
      recently employeed by a fortune 50 company.
      While at the company I was dismayed at
      how many non-White-American individuals
      were employeed there. There was no reason-
      able explanation other than at some level
      a concerted effort was being made to ensure
      that a large staple of non-White-American
      individuals were hired. It wasn't a coincidence
      that this company was diversity gonzo. Once
      or twice a month you got a diversity newsletter
      in your email-box and mandatory annual diversity
      sessions along with diversity and minority
      councils were all the rage. It all comes
      down to the fact that American engineering
      has been overwhelmingly White.
      In todays diversity obsessed corporations
      that is simply unacceptable and any and
      all efforts must be undertaken to un-Whiten
      American engineering.

    4. Re:Nigeria! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If the work can't be sent to them
      > in their own countries corporations
      > will be falling over themselves to
      > get these people to our shores. It's
      > partly about economics but it is also
      > very much about "diversity".

      http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2004/07/min or ity_staffi.php

    5. Re:Nigeria! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops! The submission form inserted a
      space in the link. Take the space out
      of 'minor ity_staffi.php'.

  4. Re:Huh? by StarmanDeluxe · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're referring to set-up and maintenance of Linux workstations, networks, clusters, etc. Unless you're one of Red Hat or the like, yeah, it's pretty difficult to make money developing Linux =P

  5. Re:Huh? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its a combination of things... Ill give a list.

    1: Unexpected program operation
    2: Features not documented (ala commandline arguments)
    3: Poor settings that are not accessable through GUI (ala mozilla about:config )
    4: Bad or lacking help in help file. No exmples are a big concern in many programs
    5: Not working due to silly happenings (lock file in /tmp after program crashes)
    6: Insane setup required or large amount of dependancies on source packages
    7: Just plain bad configs for your system (and youre not a programmer) and doesnt compile

    You support these (or..ahem, make these) and you get money.

    --
  6. Re:Huh? by erick99 · · Score: 1
    Install, customize, maintain, support, etc.

    Cheers,

    Erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  7. Re:Linux Jobs by StarmanDeluxe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Because we have something called an economy here in America that demands that money gets circulated. Russia almost has one, too! Wowie!

  8. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    That's the whole point, that's where all the money is to be made - Support, etc.

    This is as it should be. Support is what's most important.

    1. Re:Dude by SpectralOne · · Score: 1

      You sleep in the bed you make. The only reason you're stuck with service jobs and support is because the Linux crowd the rest of the cow away. Support is NOT the only part of IT, and it's not even close to the most important (I think research, followed by new product development is, because it creates new markets).

    2. Re:Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think research, followed by new product development is, because it creates new markets

      Anybody who uses the words "New markets" is a simpleton, there is only one pie no matter how many segments you cut it into.

    3. Re:Dude by inertiatic · · Score: 1

      Please, MS gave the cow away. Research, followed by new product development, has not resulted in new markets, but has instead been absorbed (or summarily copied and destroyed) into the MS business model. Granted, they've managed to actually license some of these independently of windows, but any market of significance has been absorbed as a feature of windows. The next victim is the AV market.

      For the IT industry (and thus the world) to reap the benefits of capitalism, it first must see a free market. UNIX vendors back in the day got bitchslapped with the SUS and POSIX for their refusal to play nice with each other, and that's what it will come to again. Though, hopefully this time it won't be the government, but instead an educated market that's been let in on the big secret...

      Software matures. What happens when it's all written? What happens when MS buys someone's self-programming technology? Means to an end, my friend. What's our end goal? Well, if we buy all this free-market capitalism crap, it's FREEDOM, not profit.

      One day we will all thank GNU/Linux not for all the open source software we have, but rather for the wealth of ideas formalized in open standards and, of course, a FREE MARKET!

  9. What I've noticed by phaetonic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Major vendors (HP, IBM, Dell) have tech support with Linux savvy techies who can speak to a UNIX admin with very little disconnect. The other day I called HP about an issue with a DL380 G3 running RHEL 3 and they knew exactly what I was talking about and could help me out. They even give you the ability to flash your BIOS IN LINUX, as root of course. It does require a reboot to take effect.

    1. Re:What I've noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What a hack, you have to reboot?

    2. Re:What I've noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The other day I called HP about an issue with a DL380 G3 running RHEL 3 and they knew exactly what I was talking about

      You know whats really disgusting, everyone here knows what you're talking about too.. go outside people.. you know, that place the pizza man comes from?

  10. Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of the open source jobs I see are for BSD stuff. Perhaps it is because of the area in which I work (networking). A robust TCP/IP stack is vital. Linux still has a problem with this. The other issue is the lock-in that the GPL creates. Most corporations prefer the freedom of the BSD-style license.

    1. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're right on the stack thing, but how does the GPL create lock-in? Companies can still write proprietary applications to run on Linux (although why should they?), and this article was saying that most of the demand out there in Linux-IT is for programmers.

    2. Re:Linux? by MikeCapone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The other issue is the lock-in that the GPL creates. Most corporations prefer the freedom of the BSD-style license.

      The BSD license has some things going for it, but if we look at what corporations are backing Linux and what are backing *BSD, it seems that the GPL "lock-in" doesn't bother IBM, Novell, etc.. In fact, it might encourage them since after adding lots of code to Linux, a third party can't just take the code, add a bit to it and then sell it as proprietary software -- they must give back, just like people before them did, and I'd say that's pretty fair.

    3. Re:Linux? by Vicente+Gonzlez · · Score: 1

      I don't think that the locking in the GPL is much of an issue. Most major corporations seem to be doing fine with the expensive and restrictive Micro$oft licences. GPL is a gift from heaven in comparison.

      --
      De Paciencia
    4. Re:Linux? by sloanster · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're right on the stack thing,

      Nah, that's just a troll - no evidence whatsoever, linux networking is excellent - although I will admit, 10 years ago his ideas about bsd networking being better would have been true.

      Companies can still write proprietary applications to run on Linux (although why should they?)

      Why shouldn't they? Linux makes a fine platform for closed source apps, as well as open source ones.

    5. Re:Linux? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Which license causes more worry depends on which side of the development fence you're on. If you're a developer, then the BSD license allows you to close-source your code and, possibly, lock in customers. Some people see this as A Good Thing(tm).

      If you're a non-developing client, then the BSD license allows the developer to close-source their code and, possibly, lock you in as a customer. Some people see this as A Bad Thing(tm).

      the GPL means that the developer can't hold you completely hostage because, if worst comes to worst, you can always take the source code and find another developer. For a developer, it means that the competition can't take your code, change it, and lock you out of the (ultimate) result of your own work. For the greedy developer, it can be something of a double-edged sword.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    6. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      linux tcp/ip stack is wanderful ....

      have you ever played with iproute ,iptables ,zebra ... ?
      you _really_ can do everithing you want,even compared with an high end cisco routers,we have replaced lot of them here .....

      the only thing needed are wel skilled person for configuration and mainterance.

    7. Re:Linux? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      The other issue is the lock-in that the GPL creates. Most corporations prefer the freedom of the BSD-style license.

      I can understand this thought train if you were a development shop, but I can not understand it one bit for in use servers and workstations.

      the GPL does nothing to you if you are using it. I can write closed source evil software in linux with no requirement on license. Hell I can install SCO extensions and software I like and nobody that has anything to do with the GPL or linux can do a damned thing about it.

      This issue of lock-in is non existant. you are locked in to nothing. the only time the supposed "lock-in" is there is when your company takes a GPL'd sourcecode package and tries to use it in a way that is AGAINST it's license. And even then there is no lock in what-so-ever. you still have a choice even then.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are nuts replacing high-end cisco routers with linux boxen. Either that or you are lying. Which is it?

  11. Re:Huh? by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a sysadmin, I build and maintain Linux systems for production use. Others where I work use the OS for various purposes, including software development and embedded systems. Some use it as their primary desktop, as I do. The results of the development, made more productive by a solid IT infrastructure foundation, make the money.

    I suppose one could turn the question around and ask how one makes money using a non-free operating system, when they're not the one selling/developing it. If anything you would seemingly make less because the OS adds an additional cost, but that doesn't show the big picture. It's the results that really matter, the OS is just a means to the end.

    --
    GPL: Free as in will
  12. Re:Thanks for the link to a page of adverts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the link to a page of adverts to a page of adverts and 100 lines of content, when a site has more advertising on it than content it makes you wonder if i value their opinion on anything. ----------- hey hey, that's evil. think about the good folk at msn.com, and imdb.com. imo the page isn't that bad. atleast not in konqueror. all the adverts are in the bottoom :D except for a single square from Computer Associetes. Not sure if that is konqueror frelling the design up, it probably is. But for me it isn't that bad.

  13. Spreading Linux jobs by Tojosan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Linux jobs won't spread until of more there are more Linux installs. This won't happen until Linux becomes easier to use, and more widespread.

    Biggest of all is going to be when big companies can just move their software to a linux box without making software changes. And now since so many companies are still getting locked in MS contracts, this won't happen unless big hardware suppliers start packing Linux on their servers. One company doing this is IBM. Of course they are also packaging systems that will run MS server software, I guess covering their bases.

    Anyway, best way to get Linux on the street would be to give me a prepackaged linux PC my wife could use. When that happens and she can browse the web, send email, and play her favorite games(or equivalent) then she won't be switching. Her and monay others, as another poster mentioned, don't want obscure and undocumented command line only changes to be required to set things up.

    Me, I'm a geekboy at heart and miss a good command line go once in a while. :)

    Later folks,
    Tojo

    1. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by SpectralOne · · Score: 1

      Using Linux does not create jobs. It shifts some of the existing jobs to a new platform (such as admins, product support, etc), lets the specialists of the old platform go, and creates some new specialist jobs. In the end, it does nothing other than cost more or less depending on what platform you moved to. Oh and in the case of OSS non-supported software, it may require you to hire additional devs to maintain your kernel. But you saved some money on your licenses!!! Or did you?

    2. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, but it's not quite that simple.

    3. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by deinol · · Score: 1

      I work as an IT consultant for a number of companies. We always suggest a move toward linux whenever possible. It isn't really feasible on the desktop yet for most of our clients. However, the big growth we see in linux is at the server level. We are often putting in a linux based file server instead of a microsoft advanced server which would be overkill for most of our small business clients. Not to mention the savings the get from licensing fees.

      So I've seen steady linux growth. It will take time, but it has many functions, and is flexible. I see more and more linux installs in the future.

      --
      Got Apathy?
    4. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by bob670 · · Score: 1

      I think this might be what you are asking for? It might not be "geek" pure but it fits your criteria, as do several OEM built Mandrake PCs from HP and Shuttle.

    5. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by Dr.+Descartes · · Score: 1

      Linux jobs really have very little to do with the desktop. Most desktop jobs will be with respect to software development and support. The former currently offers little monetary incentive as many have noted while the latter is an immense undertaking that few engage in unless it's within the enterprise environment. Building a prepackaged Linux PC your wife can use offers little immediate reward. Desktop usability will be slow growth, as it has been.

      On an aside, I have complete non-geek relatives using Suse 9.0 with little trouble, nor more they'd experience in different ways with a Windows desktop.

      It appears that most available Linux jobs are systems positions. A quick survey from the mentioned job site the article, Dice.com, shows a great number of systems development or administration jobs compared to desktop development and support. No need for a pretty prepackaged distro there.

      I'm currently a system adminstrator for a small web hosting company, and we have about twenty systems, and only three of them run Windows server. When I was hired, IIS experience was a plus but not needed. We even had a bit of a laugh at its expense. They were looking for strong Linux skills and logical thinking. I have to learn IIS on the way now and it is challenging. It's even a bit of fun. Also, the documentation availability isn't quite like it is for Linux systems.

      Long story short, I disagree.

    6. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by flacco · · Score: 1
      Biggest of all is going to be when big companies can just move their software to a linux box without making software changes.

      this wouldn't be a problem if the cio's, analysts, and architects would do their jobs correctly and design for platform independence to begin with.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    7. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I do believe that it will create more jobs since it will force people who attended one of those paper mills and got into the IT fields during the boom for the live of money out of the IT job market. This will create more jobs for the people who are in the IT market for the love of IT.

      OSS non-supported software, it may require you to hire additional devs to maintain your kernel.

      Are you on crack? That statement doesn't even make sense.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    8. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are installing 2 Linux servers per day and we are moving towards 5 a day. That is about 1000 per year and we are just a little Linux company.

    9. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife is the anti-geek. She kept bitching that she wanted this and that. I made her clear that I was not going to fix her windows xp when it got owned. After she saw how it happened to 3 other people in her direct environment, she gave her kde 3.2 a try at home. Never looked back. She is not a gamer, by the way, if she were then I would tell her to buy a games console.

    10. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While you make a good point, I think the ease of use issue is mostly irrelevant.

      Regardless of whether or not linux sucks, it will eventually become the defacto operating system because it's cheaper. Without all those monopoly profits flowing into one vendor, there will be more money circulating in the economy to be used for growth.

      When you have the choice as a business user between those $300 licenses (BTW how can you possibly charge that much for something that literally sells billions? The R&D has long been paid for, Bill.) or spending that money on something else that will earn more profit in the end, all while putting up with a crappy linux desktop environment, the choice becomes clear. Even if you're just spending that money on extra support staff and the migration, at least it's going back directly into the marketplace instead of Microsoft deciding how best to spend it.

      I also think that the quality of the desktop is not that huge of a motivating factor for people to begin with. The eMac and iBook are both only slightly more expensive than your average bargain Wintel box and support MS Office, Photoshop, and Macromedia stuff, which would probably cover most non-financial and non-gamer users, but Apple's market penetration is still extremely weak.

      And the Windows desktop isn't the paragon of useability. Log on to any non-technical user's system and you'll see something like 15 icons in the tray all eating up memory, ads that pop-up even when no browser is open, hundreds of icons all over the place for programs they haven't used in years, many of them for readme files and expired shareware, and maybe a few viruses. Quite simply, the average user will put up with whatever shit you put in front of them as long as the price is right. They just don't care as much about the quality of their workspace as we do.

      As more people adopt linux and shape it to their needs, its value rises, overcoming migration costs. But it doesn't really matter whether improvements in the OS relate to increasing its value in some unrelated way or reducing migration costs, either is fine. But really, it just doesn't make sense to pay an inflated price on top almost every computer sold when you don't have to. That money can be used to buy more machines, or more people, or whatever else will help make people more productive. Ultimately, things will improve for everyone but Microsoft.

      That's just my armchair Micro-econ 101 analysis of the situation anyways.

    11. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by totallygeek · · Score: 1
      Linux jobs won't spread until of more there are more Linux installs. This won't happen until Linux becomes easier to use, and more widespread.


      The part that I have trouble with is where you say that Linux must become easier before there will be jobs for it? So, we only find easy work for people? Someone must do the complicated tasks -- and usually they are paid more for it.
    12. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the crack was excellent; the point was that someone has to support your OS. I know of several smaller companies that freeze a particular distribution and attempt to maintain their own private kernels, and in doing so hire a dedicated dev team. This is extremely expensive.

      When a company like RedHat charges $100 for a set of CDs and customer support, you're not far off of just buying Windows and getting the same. Joe User needs customer support, so downloading his own copy and going to town isn't going to work. The "free" OS didn't help so much there, and really RedHat made profits on the work of other people. Why did those people let RedHat eat their lunch? Now RedHat gets paid, and the real Linux authors sit at home in the poorhouse.

    13. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by fymidos · · Score: 1

      The only reason the "specialists" of the old platform will be gone is Microsoft not embracing linux. If there were a Visual Studio for linux i'm sure all those specialists wouldn't mind programming for linux.

      Of course linux and opensource *does* create more jobs: the competition gets so much richer.

      And yes, you hire people for hardware drivers (I assume you meant "OSS non-supported *hardware*"). Just as you do for windows etc.

      You save some money on the license. You save a thousand times more just by working on OSS code

      Imagine a world where there are 20 different openoffice clones each with different strengths that work flawlessly together and the best of the best features stay in the main tree which is forked again, etc etc.

      Do you understand what i'm talking about?

      --
      Washington bullets will simply be known as the "Bulle
    14. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Imagine a world where there are 20 different
      > openoffice clones each with different strengths
      > that work flawlessly together and the best of
      > the best features stay in the main tree which
      > is forked again, etc etc.

      Name one market where this situation exists (hint: there are none). I don't think this will ever happen. OpenOffice will stifle those other flavors, because it's cheaper and easier to modify the source than produce your own. In other words, it produces an equivalent to monopoly.

    15. Re:Spreading Linux jobs by thewebgeek · · Score: 0

      "prepackaged linux PC my wife could use."

      I always love statements like this, because they are bogus. Does anyone remeber an OS back in the 80's call MAC OS. It was really easy to use and everyone loved it, but what is the number OS now.

      Think about it.

  14. Salary vs. contract rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So far in 2004, respondents to the Dice Salary Survey who have Linux skills reported earning an average salary of $67,000 (6% higher than the overall average). Contractors and consultants do even better, earning an average salary of $87,000.

    Does anybody know what this means? Jobs usually have benefits added above the gross salary, don't they? Is the contracting rate really better than the salary in this case?

    1. Re:Salary vs. contract rates by clueless_penguin · · Score: 1
      Is the contracting rate really better than the salary in this case?

      No. A rule of thumb is to add 50% of the salary for benefit costs - vacation, insurance, holidays all add up. This will vary by company, of course, but from my experience it is a reasonable estimate.

      --
      Use the spatula, Luke
    2. Re:Salary vs. contract rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're comparing apples and oranges. Contractors are usually paid by the hour or by the job, so there's is no real "salary" since they get paid more when they work long hours, but don't get paid when they're sick or on vacation, ymmv. Also in USA, if they're contracting through a body shop, they might still get some health insurance and other benefits above their rate.

      "Consultant" can mean anything: an hourly contractor who calls themself consultant to look more sexy, a salaried employee of a contract shop who's called a consultant so the shop can charge more, or a real consultant who gets paid by the hour or job just like real contractors.

      This being Dice, I'm guessing most contractors and consultants are hourly contractors working through body shops. These folks will convert their hourly rate to "salaries" using formulas that makes them look richer, so they can feel good about their choice of career path.

      FTR, I worked as an hourly contractor for most of my career and was happy about it. I used the formula 1600*hourly-rate to convert to annual salary. This accounted for extra health insurance costs, lower taxes, sick days, planned and instant vacations, and retirement fund.

  15. How about Embedded Linux by ClamChwdrMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where I work we are developing a few different boards that all use embedded linux on an Arm9. I think that Linux may develop to take over that market really well. After all, who needs a full blown Windows installation on an embedded device? And is Windows even capable of running on an MMU-less processor?

    1. Re:How about Embedded Linux by rewt66 · · Score: 1
      Well, Linux is fine for embedded systems. There's two fronts where real "embedded" OSes may be ahead, though: Hard real-time and memory footprint. A real-time OS like vxWorks probably beats Linux hollow on things like worst-case latency, and possibly on context-switch time as well. Also, vxWorks lets you only pull in the parts you need. Linux does also, but I suspect that vxWorks can take much less memory than Linux. As time goes on, of course, this becomes less relevant, as memory gets cheaper.

      As to whether Windows can run without an MMU: It originally ran (badly) on a 286, which I believe did not have an MMU. Whether modern Windows can run without an MMU is a different question ;-)

    2. Re:How about Embedded Linux by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      I don't belive any native 32-bit Protected Mode 80386 and above operating environment can run without an MMU. If you could get Windows to run in real mode, I think you could do it.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  16. Call it what you want by bigberk · · Score: 1

    Surfing for pr0n in the dark is not a job :)

    Kidding aside, yeah there is money to be made out there. I do part time work as a consultant and am able to make some cash on the side coding for Linux. But I really think this has much more to do with the growing demand for *NIX people as a whole, as the industry is starting to discover the wonderful fact that properly written UNIX-y software (e.g. in POSIX C) will work beautifully on Linux, BSD, Mac OS X, Solaris, ... etc etc.

    1. Re:Call it what you want by SpectralOne · · Score: 1

      There is plenty of software that works well for most platforms, including Linux and Windows. How does "growing demand" originate from multi-platform *nixware? Properly written Windows software works fine on Windows too. What's your point? You can write bad and good software for any platform, coding for Unix does not make it somehow magically nicer.

    2. Re:Call it what you want by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      Huh?? Plenty of software that works well for both platforms? Oh, wait, you meant plenty of software that works for windows, and plenty of software that works for Linux. Outside of a few of the more polished OSS projects, there is almost no software that runs on Windows and Linux (same program on both platforms)

      That is what the grandparent post meant. There isn't much. But there is a lot of software that runs on Linux and Solaris and AIX and *BSD and ... And corporations are starting to like it.

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    3. Re:Call it what you want by SpectralOne · · Score: 1

      And there is no incentive for it to run on Windows and Linux unless Linux becomes an important consumer market share. And on top of that, if it's compatible with *nix variants only, it doesn't buy you anything anyway.

    4. Re:Call it what you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No incentive" unless "important consumer" market share?

      Hardly.

      If your target is consumers, sure, but if your target isn't consumers, uh-uh.

      For instance in the biosciences - a pretty big industry - compatibility with different *nix variants has really been fruitful. Choice is a good thing. (E.g. In our company our science people mostly use Mac OS X on the front end, while the servers are cheap Linux boxes run by the computer types.) It all makes life a lot easier.

  17. Linux Use VS. Linux Development by redragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The number of job postings on Dice.com that required some type of Linux expertise increased 190% over the past year to over 2,200 positions.

    Not to pooh pooh this kind of increase, but it isn't as cool as jobs actually doing Linux development, or other OSS development. That would be even more exciting. Just because a job has need for Linux experience, doesn't mean that you'll actually have time to work on your favorite OSS project as part of your work. It may just mean that the company is using Linux to power some solution that you'll be working with.

    On the other hand, I've seen data that does show that more developers are getting paid for OSS work. I would like to see a 190% jump there next year.

    CKO

    --
    - Sighuh?
    1. Re:Linux Use VS. Linux Development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For real, boring crap on linux is still boring crap.

    2. Re:Linux Use VS. Linux Development by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      i absolutely agree with your point, but it's just supply vs demand. When there's an increasing demand (need of linux experience), the supply's (linux development) going to increase as well, so in general it's a good sign overall.

    3. Re:Linux Use VS. Linux Development by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      It's coming soon. Alot of shops are switching from heavy iron (outdated Unix/AIX mainframes) and looking towards the future. The future, of course, is a linux cluster that can do more work for less money than the old iron could. Many city news sites (like dallasmorningnews.com) are run on Redhat clusters with load balancing. They can handle a full on slashdotting, with the only limiting factor being their allocated bandwidth. I spoke with the admins post 9/11 and they said the machines all held up nicely, but their connection was overwhelmed within 10 minutes.

      That's just a single aspect of typical corporate users. Financial institutions are next on the list. If you want a job in the next 3 years I suggest you study up on what banks are using and how you can port that to Linux when they decide their old hardware can't cut it anymore. Even a migration tool would get you paid.

    4. Re:Linux Use VS. Linux Development by tweek · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, I've hit a nice mix of development and usage.

      I'm lucky to be at the head of a very large linux migration for our company. I get to suggest, implement and use lots of cool linux and opensource tools every day. One of the nice side effects of this is that I also get to help with bug fixing and reporting on the projects to get them working the way we need them to work.

      A good example of this is CUPS. I've had a chance to find bugs with CUPS and get them fixed as well as feature requests because our entire retail printing solution is driven from clustered CUPS servers.

      I've also gotten to work with firefox and mozilla customization for our stores to resolve some very strict business requirements. We've also forced a few of our vendors to create non-IE compliant b2b apps or else loose our (rather largish) business. It makes me look forward to going to work each day just because I might, in some small way, make the world a better place for the linux and oss community.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  18. Re:Huh? by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's pretty difficult to make money developing Linux =P

    As there is more money to be made overall and more positions to be had in carpentry than there is in designing hammers.

    The primary point of tools being their use.

    KFG

  19. Ontario, Canada.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Linux is getting big here in Markham, Ontario (Home of ATI). A couple years ago IBM built a huge R&D lab right near my house.

    My first linux job was at 17 at the local soctiabank doing simple perl scripts. I had a second job at 18 programming software for a handheld device using linux. At 20 I got a job designing a sprinkler system at a local golf course that used a linux system to manage watering, etc...

    Basically, there are tons of jobs out there that use linux, and I am grateful for that.

    --Using slackware since I was 13 (now 22)

  20. Salaries by blackmonday · · Score: 1

    This is encouraging news, although I develop using WebSphere Studio under Linux, I'm not necessarily coding Linux, but WebSphere. It does make me ponder if I might be able to get a new better job in the future. Anyone know the fate of WebSphere developers?

    1. Re:Salaries by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Those salaries seem misleading. Very few people I know make that... Most are in the $30-40k range. (working on all these cool thingies---yes, even Linux)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  21. will be hiring in 6 months or so by simontek2 · · Score: 1

    I will be hiring for a linux tech in bout 6months or so. you can contact me at Simontek@theopenstore.net

    --
    SimonTek
  22. Re:Linux Jobs by SpectralOne · · Score: 1

    And we saw how well the communist economy, with everyone on a level playing field works. I for one hope that despite the OSS movement, people will be paid to WRITE software, not just be living in the computer equivalent of a McDonalds service-slave job market to everything given away for free. Not everyone dreams of maintaining Linux user accounts for a living.

  23. Server Slowing Down - Article Text by Lord+Haha · · Score: 1, Informative


    LinuxWorld preview: Linux jobs on the rise, so do your homework
    By Jan Stafford
    30 Jul 2004 | SearchEnterpriseLinux.com

    IT pros heading to LinuxWorld next week with resumes in hand, or just looking for a job in their hometowns, have more grounds for optimism than in recent years, according to Scot Melland, CEO and president of Dice Inc., a New York City-based firm that provides online recruiting services for technology professionals. If you're doing some last minute homework before hitting the IT street, read on. Just before he headed out to LinuxWorld, Melland shared Dice's research on the current job market and advised how to stand out from the crowd.

    Has the job market for IT pros, in general, improved in 2004? What's ahead for the next year?

    Scot Melland: The improvement in the IT job market over the past year has been quite dramatic. On Dice.com alone, the number of job postings has more than doubled to approximately 50,000 positions. Hot areas include the defense and financial services industries, as well as the Washington D.C. and New York metropolitan areas. Given the increase in technology spending by corporations during 2004, we expect a steady improvement in the tech job market for at least the next 12-18 months.

    Linux skills haven't been in great demand in corporate IT shops in the near past. Is that changing? If so, why?

    Melland: It's definitely changing. The number of job postings on Dice.com that required some type of Linux expertise increased 190% over the past year to over 2,200 positions. That's a significant increase. With the support of IBM and Novell, Linux is becoming more mainstream, which is leading to increasing demand from the Fortune 1000.

    Where are the hot spots for Linux jobs, in terms of business sectors and geographies?

    Melland: From a geographic perspective, California is the clear leader based on our postings. Thirty-two percent of Linux jobs on Dice.com are located in California, followed by New York and New Jersey with 14% and 6%, respectively. The hot spot in terms of function is clearly programming. More than half of the Linux postings on Dice.com are for programming or developer positions.

    How much clout does a Linux certification have? Do employers value certifications?

    Melland: I wish that I could say that Linux certification carries a lot of clout, but so far it has not taken off the way people expected. Certification doesn't hurt, but what employers are really looking for today is experience. This is true across most technology disciplines. Candidates need to demonstrate that they have "been there, done that" rather than just proving their skills.

    How much can IT pros expect to earn in various Linux IT positions?

    Melland: So far in 2004, respondents to the Dice Salary Survey who have Linux skills reported earning an average salary of $67,000 (6% higher than the overall average). Contractors and consultants do even better, earning an average salary of $87,000.

    Don't IT pros have to have experience in multiple operating systems to be marketable today?

    Melland: Not necessarily. It really depends on the level of the job, industry and size of the company. However, the reality is that most companies, and certainly most consulting firms, will find you much more attractive if you have experience with multiple operating systems.

    Could you offer some dos and don'ts for Linux experts seeking jobs today?

    Melland: I would offer the same advice to Linux professionals as I would other candidates looking to land a great position:

    * Make sure your resume demonstrates your experience -- experience sells.
    * Be flexible with geography -- the opportunities are out there, but they might not be next door.
    * Put as much energy into your job search as you do into your job. If you do, your professionalism will show.

  24. Re:Huh? by irokitt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, RTFA dude. The article states that the largest number of jobs are for programmers. The point is that having a system adminstrator position is one thing, but most companies using Linux also need some people to write custom applications or to port applications from Windows/Unix/Whatever (TM).

    --
    If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  25. Just what I needed to hear! by Stevyn · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm a college student studying computer engineering. I've been learning linux all summer long in the hopes of it helping me get a good job when I graduate. It's nice to know watching all that compiler output will lead to somewhere.

    Although so I don't sound like an anti-linux hitler nazi, I am very happy with the switch to linux and specifically gentoo.

    Ah damn, now I sound like a gentoo karma whore. Oh well. Show me the...high paying salary!

    1. Re:Just what I needed to hear! by hopethishelps · · Score: 0, Troll
      Show me the...high paying salary

      You're dreaming. According to the article, $67,000 in California or NYC. You think that's a high-paying salary? If you work 2000 hours in a year, it's about $33/hour. A very junior lawyer from a second-rate school might start at a similar rate, but lawyer salaries go up with experience much faster than IT salaries.

      And if you can find a plumber who'd be content with $33/hour, let me know, I've got work for him/her. I'll pay travel expenses on top.

      In these days of outsourcing to Asia, an education in Computer Science probably has the worst return on investment of any work-related degree.

  26. More Jobs or Less Jobs? by Matrix272 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm confused... recently there have been several articles about IT jobs getting shipped overseas, outsourcing, and how the IT job market in the US is pathetic compared to the relatively recent past. So does this article by someone who I'd consider to be "in the know" negate all the other articles, or is there a truly dramatic and (presumably) completely unexpected shift in IT hiring?

    --
    "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    1. Re:More Jobs or Less Jobs? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In my opinion, the article is a bit misleading. From my down to earth view (of having contact with literaly hundreds of IT folks) there are more jobs now than there were in the last few years...

      The jobs are different though. Most are doing fairly boring things, and salaries are in the $30-40k range. (very few are in the $50k range). There are obviously exceptions (one of my friends makes $85k), but the average is still ~$35k.

      Then again, that's better than being unemployed... And there are cently more jobs there now than there were a year or two ago. But they're crappy jobs.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    2. Re:More Jobs or Less Jobs? by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      It seems that most of the IT jobs that are outsourced are of programming or very-low end tech support. Imagine what would happen if sys admin jobs get outsourced to India (which is still possible).

      Indian Tech Support Guy (ITSG): How are you gentlemen!!
      Office Manager (OM): I need some tech support.
      ITSG: What Happen?
      OM: I'm calling because our E-mail's broken and the Exchange server has a blue screen with weird charactors on it.
      ITSG: Somebody set up you the bomb?
      OM: That doesn't sound good. I'm sending you a picture I've taken of the screen via my Yahoo E-mail.
      ITSG: We get attachment.
      OM: And???
      ITSG: It say all your E-mails are belong to MS.
      OM: Huh?
      ITSG: You have no chance to E-mail make your time.
      ITSG: Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!
      OM: You Indian tech support suck! Hire systems admins!
      HR Guy: You know what you are doing?
      OM: Hire them! For great justice!

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    3. Re:More Jobs or Less Jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The are statistics, damned statistics, and lies. The article isn't worth the duration it had on my screen.

  27. Re:Huh? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How do you make money in a job working on a free operating system?

    How does a pilot make money flying through free air?

  28. Not in the third world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In the third world (between Kansas City and Denver),
    I find if someone mentions linux in an ad, its something
    like must know MS Active Directory, MS IIS, MS blah blah, and Linux.
    Mostly, linux is used solely as a filter to weed out
    paper MCSEs. As one who uses Solaris, BSD, and Linux
    on a regular basis, I can't get an interview or
    someone to talk with me. Apparently you don't use
    windows, you're incapable of knowing how a computer
    works (to the PHBs). Graduated from college a year
    ago and can't get anything.

  29. This is a joke, right? by walterbyrd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Linux jobs could be going through the roof for all I know, but the apparent "research" done for that article is absolute cr@p.

    Counting the job postings on Dice? Please. This could be due to nothing more than Dice negotiating some special contracts with a few big companies.

    Anybody every notice that big defense contractors, and a few other institutions absolutely flood those job boards lately? Often posting over 100 jobs in a day just for one city.

    I live near Aurora Colorado, good sized Ratheon installation there. If the number of jobs posted just on hotjobs is any clue, then Ratheon must be hirering about 150 new people every day. On Dice, it Lockheed that floods the job boards.

    I don't know what kind of games they're playing, or what of deals are made; but you'd have to an idiot to think all of those advertised jobs are for real.

    Besides that, is Linux a *primary* qualification? Or is just one the many, many, qualifications that are typically thrown in along with everything else but the kitchen sink?

    And, most importantly of all, what is the ratio of new positons vs the number of people flooding into the field?

    1. Re:This is a joke, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you.

      Wondering when somebody might mention that.

    2. Re:This is a joke, right? by DrCode · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My first thought (admitedly not having looked at Dice for over a year), was that they added Linux to the ridiculous lists of qualifications that most ads already have. IE:

      6 years Windows XP experience
      10 years Java 2.459
      5 years JCL
      12 years COBOL ...
      5 years RedHat Linux 9.1

  30. Must be nice... by morgajel · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a college graduate one year out of school with some minor sys admin experience and a couple years of web dev experience, I haven't exactly been getting many interviews. I've been searching monster, dice, career matrix, michworks, mlive and several other sites, and haven't had much luck.

    I guess what I'm trying to say is there aren't many junior linux admin positions open.

    it's a real bummer to be unemployed right now.

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    1. Re:Must be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah. It sucks here in australia for IT too. In my state, Queesland, we have about 6% unemployment. At least %60 is unemployed IT people. Everyone wants candidates with lots of experienc. Which basically rules out anyone who graduated after the bubble burst and didn't allready have a job. Now you have to go for the lowly helpdesk and shitkicker work just to get some exp.

      Thinking of joining the Air Force. Fly around in helicopters and get shot at. Beats the dole queue. Pays better too.

    2. Re:Must be nice... by morgajel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what I've found. Unemployment in the Grand Rapids, MI is between 6 and 7%. On top of that, it's a very conservative area and few are willing to give OSS a chance... There are a few VB and ASP jobs here and there, but since I didn't jump on the .net bandwagon, I'm S.O.L.

      If anyone reading this is looking for a junior Linux sys admin with a web development background, feel free to send me a line. My wife and I are willing to relocate.
      -Morgajel

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
  31. Linux Jobs on the Rise-Plumbing the depths. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh gee. Now he tells us. Anyone need a plumber?

  32. Dude-Holdup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This is as it should be. Support is what's most important."

    Check...invest in pantyhose market.

  33. Linux becomes another HR buzzword by stuntpope · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw a recent posting of Unisys job announcements and was pleased to see Linux among the "looking for" skills, along with the usual J2EE, Oracle, etc etc. But they want someone with 10 to 15 years of Linux experience. Kind of like the postings for Java jobs that only Gosling could qualify for.

    1. Re:Linux becomes another HR buzzword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15 years? Linus doesn't even have that much expierience!

    2. Re:Linux becomes another HR buzzword by elandal · · Score: 1

      10 years would mean experience with Linux since release of 1.0. I know many who would qualify for that (myself included). 15, OTOH, is longer than Linux has existed..

      Just halve the years of experience required (5-8 years) and you should find enough people easily. Add a few years of other *nix OS's and it's just fine.

    3. Re:Linux becomes another HR buzzword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but thats wholly absurd. Linux has changed so drastically since then

    4. Re:Linux becomes another HR buzzword by latroM · · Score: 1

      But they want someone with 10 to 15 years of Linux experience. Kind of like the postings for Java jobs that only Gosling could qualify for.

      That is true if you are talking about the kernel, linux which hasn't been around as long as the other core technologies which are now used in GNU/Linux systems, like X11R6, GNU userland etc. etc. You know, the starting point of this free software thing isn't linux 0.01, it is RMS's GNU manifesto.

    5. Re:Linux becomes another HR buzzword by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      I know the history. The point is, I doubt the people who write the job requirements do.

  34. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I suppose one could turn the question around and ask how one makes money using a non-free operating system, when they're not the one selling/developing it. If anything you would seemingly make less because the OS adds an additional cost,


    I work in a Microsoft Shop, we use .NET on the front end, Java Web Services in the middle tier, and SQL Server/Oracle on the back end. There are 4 developers on my team. The lowest paid one makes 85k a year, the others in the 90k's a year; I make 107k a year as a Lead Developer with 8 years experience. Sysadmins make less than developers because it's an entirely different skillset and less people can be good developers than can be sysadmins.

  35. Agreed, I've had three calls this week by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Out of the blue I've had three calls this week for Linux admin projects. 3 Years and no calls from Dice. Now I have a Baby is due any day and can't leave. :(

    1. Re:Agreed, I've had three calls this week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      be glad you are having a baby, man! :) Work will come later

    2. Re:Agreed, I've had three calls this week by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Congrats on the baby and finding some work!

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  36. Re:Huh? by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

    I work in a Microsoft Shop, we use .NET on the front end, Java Web Services in the middle tier, and SQL Server/Oracle on the back end. There are 4 developers on my team. The lowest paid one makes 85k a year, the others in the 90k's a year; I make 107k a year as a Lead Developer with 8 years experience. Sysadmins make less than developers because it's an entirely different skillset and less people can be good developers than can be sysadmins.


    Less people can be good developers than sysadmins? Forgetting about India?

    BTW, these jobs where the least experienced of you makes 85k, where are they located? Are these figures in US dollars?

  37. Willing to take a pay cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Working as a consultant I have a *very* strong UNIX background, and I can do more in UNIX ;quick and simple stuff; than I can in windows. I like UNIX but I have stopped trying to introduce UNIX into bids, because, well there is nothing that UNIX can do that Windows can't and it doesn't alienate most people[non-geeks] when they try it out.

    Windows puts power in the hands of management: adequate MS Engineers are easy to hire and fire = cheap like electricians

    Most people know windows, and don't want their egos being bashed when they find out they have a learning curve to climb.

    Windows puts power in the hands of management: You don't feel like your forced to use one hardware vendor

    UNIX like ORACLE is seen as stable, secure, and reliable [don't know why - it's no VMS]. BUT Windows can do clustering -> Redundant Array of Inexpensive NT boxes

    Windows puts power in the hands of management: most people use windows these days and on bids you needn't rely on a geeks-eye-view and can go to other companies to ask how they are doing, and allay some of your fears about the perceived costs of some of the shortcomings you have heard about windows servers

    ...added to these arguments Microsoft seem to have done some pretty neat things in W2003 Server that means I might not need Cygwin anymore.

    I like UNIX for so many reasons and it remains my OS of choice for home. But there are so few cases when I can recommend UNIX in a new site if they don't already have in-house UNIX expertise, or have some bright young manager who's read an article on Linux and thinks that they are 'thinking outside of the box'.

    Somebody please dis-agree with me

    1. Re:Willing to take a pay cut? by Sir+William+Gates · · Score: 1, Funny

      Working as a consultant I have a *very* strong Windows background, and I can do more in Windows ;quick and simple stuff; than I can in UNIX. I like Windows but I have stopped trying to introduce Windows into bids, because, well there is nothing that Windows can do that UNIX can't and it doesn't alienate most people[non-geeks] when they try it out. UNIX puts power in the hands of management: adequate Bearded Engineers are easy to hire and fire = cheap like electricians Most people know UNIX, and don't want their egos being bashed when they find out they have a learning curve to climb. UNIX puts power in the hands of management: You don't feel like your forced to use one hardware vendor Windows like SQL Server is seen as stable, secure, and reliable [don't know why - it's no VMS]. BUT UNIX can do clustering -> Redundant Array of Inexpensive Debian boxes UNIX puts power in the hands of management: most people use UNIX these days and on bids you needn't rely on a geeks-eye-view and can go to other companies to ask how they are doing, and allay some of your fears about the perceived costs of some of the shortcomings you have heard about UNIX servers ...added to these arguments Redhat seem to have done some pretty neat things in RHEL Server that means I might not need Wine anymore. I like Windows for so many reasons and it remains my OS of choice for home. But there are so few cases when I can recommend Windows in a new site if they don't already have in-house Windows expertise, or have some bright young manager who's read an article on Microsoft and thinks that they are 'thinking outside of the box'. Somebody please dis-agree with me

    2. Re:Willing to take a pay cut? by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Windows puts power in the hands of management:

      Considering the technical knowledge of management in most companies, these are exactly the hands that you do not want to have power. Come back and troll again when a Windows machine can stay up and running for more than 2 weeks without a crash or major slowdown.

    3. Re:Willing to take a pay cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Considering the technical knowledge of management in most companies, these are exactly the hands that you do not want to have power'

      I agree... but they do.

      Tromp-tramp, tromp-tramp went his hooves

    4. Re:Willing to take a pay cut? by tclark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not really a counterexample, because we have *nix experience in my shop, but if you gave me a bid that recommended Windows, you would not get the job, and you'd be asked not to submit any more bids to my company. There may be some things Windows is good for, but we don't do any of those things.

    5. Re:Willing to take a pay cut? by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows puts power in the hands of management

      That has been the perception and that is the point of the Microsoft ads.
      It doesn't really, but that's another issue.

      Considering the technical knowledge of management in most companies, these are exactly the hands that you do not want to have power.
      Errrr, there's something backwards here. The fundamental nature of management is that it is management that has the power. IT is there to serve the priorities of management, not the other way around.

      What is happening is that Windows is slowly taking over the joint, and to be perceived to be doing so by PHBs. The PHBs will not like that.

      Something I read a long time ago put a value of 85% on the overlap of the skill set for good programmers and good managers. Both have to deal with conflicting priorities and limited resources.

  38. My Linux career. by Nailer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1998 - Finished high school. Was career-minded kinda guy. Decided I'd rather get an exciting job than go to University (I'd done some tertiary stuff in year 12, but three years of Uni just wasn't my thing).

    1999 - I'd already had a lot of experience playing with Windows NT out of interest, so I got an MCSE to try and prove my skills to potential employers. Volunteered to assist my local 1300-member LUG at an IT show. Met my future boss, Con Zymaris from Cybersource *. Ended up being the 'Windows guy' at a Linux / Unix / BSD shop. Spent most of my time learning Linux.

    1999 - Began career as Linux journo - was initially asked to do Linux software for APC magazine's CD ROM, but I went beyong the brief and wrote a 2 page article on Linux gaming. They liked it and put it in the mag. I then worked on Linux workshop, a couple of Linux features, wrote a little under half of the Linux Pocketbook Third Edition, more than half of the Advanced Linux Pocketbook, became PC Authority magazine's Linux columnist, and then was poached back to APC briefly before the editor that got me there left and mag and me went in different directions. **

    During this time, I still got half my income from Linux consulting for Cybersource.

    2002 - Wrote and began teaching a Linux training course for Advanced Training, Melbourne. Again, still worked consulting for Cyber.

    2003 - Got poached by Red Hat Asia Pacific. Teach RHCE courses, and the nifty new RHCA type courses (which cover clustering, packaging, cross platform authentication, etc).

    Spending the weekend learning about Kerberos, LDAP and Active Directory to teach the 423 course.

    * Yes, the current Cyber web site looks terrible in Moz. It used to work ok in every browser - then Moz changed its rendering technique. Since I was respomsible for the original non-standard code, there's a fully XHTML version I templated just before I left here. Hopefully Cyber wil start using that one soon.

    ** I've been told that APC's readers want to do 'the hard stuff'. I disagree - people want to do interesting, useful cool things, regardless of whether they're hard or not. These guys are mbasically Windows power users, who want the basic stuff (installing, setting up a web server) to be easy, so they can focus on doing the cool stuff - anything that's cool or easier / cheaper / better than Windows. I reckon showing people how to do practical stuff with cool apps like QEmu, MythTV, Liferea, etc. is more interesting than yet another guide to installing Apache (including a page of how to compile it, for no other reason than Compiling Makes You Leet).

    If I was gonna wrote about Apache, I'd write about creating a blog or CMS using Movabletype, or show people how to get Apache serving ASP 1.1 with mod_mono.

    I had a great time at APC, and met some cool people, including Ashton Mills (who's now the editor of Atomic) and David Flynn (an editor who's simply damn good at his job). But the mag's editors don't want what I have to offer anymore, and I don't want to write what they offer me. Pity.

  39. Mindshare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just one thing...

  40. Microeconomics vs. Macroeconomics by rewt66 · · Score: 1
    After reading several of your posts on this topic, I have to say that you just don't get it.

    I have something that I want a computer to do. Maybe it's to render frames for an animated movie. Maybe it's to run a database. But it's not to run a particular OS. Nobody (well, almost nobody) in the business world is religious about the OS, they just want to get their work done.

    And very often, what I want the computer to do is to run some custom application. In other words, regaredless of what the OS is, the business still has to hire people to support the custom app. (Note, however, that very few of these apps require custom kernels in Linux. Also note that those that do, require things that would require custom kernels in Windows, too, except that the Windows license doesn't let you do that. In other words, if you have to hire additional devs to maintain your kernel, it probably would not even be possible to do the same thing on Windows. But I digress.)

    Here's the macroeconomic point: This is not a zero-sum game. Switching to an OS with lower total cost of ownership makes things economically possible that were not possible before. In other words, the whole economy grows as people stop wasting so much money on OSes. That means a net increase in jobs.

    And yes, this does apply to Linux vs. Windows. You need to replace your Windows admins with Linux admins, but one Linux admin can take care of more boxes, so you don't need as many admins. You can spend less on admins and more on what your business is really trying to do. This can help your business grow (meaning you can employ more people).

  41. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux, in a way, is a racket similar to the one that IBM has had cornered for so many years. Selling services for products that require service, that is. Note their interest in Linux. It's my opinion that in 10 years, most Linux companies will have folded or been bought by IBM. Sun is now reacting, we'll see what and how they do.

    ps: I am not talking about Linux at home here, but real Linux money making.

  42. Quick survey of my mates Linux careers too... by Nailer · · Score: 1

    Most of my geek buddies ended up working in Linux related areas too...

    * Leigh: Sysadmin / Developer at IT Services company. Also does the Linux column in PCAuthority now.

    * Matt: Sysadmin / Developer. Works for hosting company.

    * Daniel: Young guy, still finishing Uni. Got involved in Freedestkop.org, works as a contractor on Xorg stuff for HP last time I checked, but I hear rumors he's got a new job. Tells me all the cool shit that's happening with X.

    * David: Works for Transgaming coding Winex. Got to live in Canada for a couple of years to do it. Makes Apple's life hard helping people play their itunes music on Linux boxes. Wrote an OSS Warcraft 3 in his spare time once.

  43. I am glad to have found a Linux job. by Eminor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I recently landed a Linux job. It was very hard to find. 99% of the jobs I looked at were Windows based. I stuck to my convictions and I eventually found the job I was looking for. I chalk it up to luck. There aren't that many Linux jobs in my city. Hopefully that is changing.

    In my shop, everyone uses Linux, and most users (and they are not very computer literate at all) don't care that they are not using windows. We have managed to make Linux as user friendly as possible.

    We impress the accountants with how cheap we can do things now. LTSP is a beautiful project which can save you time, money and hassle. I strongly suggest that any system administrator take a look at the project.

    1. Re:I am glad to have found a Linux job. by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I stuck to my convictions and I eventually found the job I was looking for.

      It's refreshing to know that there are people who value their convictions more than a paycheck.

      The research stated that the hot areas include the defense and financial services industries which many slashdotters' believe are evil, so I guess that still means that many Linux loving slashdotters will still be out of work.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  44. Obligatory Monty Python Quote by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

    Sorry, the way you began just reminded me of this:

    "ROGER: Oh, what sad times are these when passing ruffians can say 'ni' at will to old ladies. There is a pestilence upon this land. Nothing is sacred. Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.

    ARTHUR: Did you say 'shrubberies'?

    ROGER: Yes. Shrubberies are my trade. I am a shrubber. My name is 'Roger the Shrubber'. I arrange, design, and sell shrubberies.

    BEDEVERE: Ni!

    ARTHUR: No! No, no, no! No!"

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:Obligatory Monty Python Quote by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      You are truly one disturbed, disturbed individual. I like you.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
  45. Excellent job and salary information by leeum · · Score: 1

    Not directly relevant to the topic, but you can view some pretty comprehensive salary information at

    http://www.h1b.info/lca_search.php

    The information from the database is supposedly taken from the details provided by employers filing for H1B visas, so may not 100% reflect what's out there in the market. However, I've been told the amounts pretty much reflect what US citizens would expect to receive anyway.

  46. Linux certification by Skapare · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How much clout does a Linux certification have? Do employers value certifications?
    Melland: I wish that I could say that Linux certification carries a lot of clout, but so far it has not taken off the way people expected. Certification doesn't hurt, but what employers are really looking for today is experience. This is true across most technology disciplines. Candidates need to demonstrate that they have "been there, done that" rather than just proving their skills.

    Why would he wish that certification carries a lot of clout? And who is it that expected it to?

    Linux is certainly growing in market share, but it's still mostly in environments with management that values the thinking processes and figuring out the right ways to do things. When Linux finally reaches the level where it gets used by managers that don't value the thinking process, and just pick things because it might look good, or because someone wearing another tie said it was good, then we'll see certification in more demand. And they will get what they deserve, too, just like they got when they wanted an MCSE to run their Windows machines. The more the masses get certification, the less value that certification has. But that seems to be when managers want it most. How silly.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Linux certification by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      >>Why would he wish that certification carries a lot of clout? And who is it that expected it to?

      Because he sympathizes with people who are finding it impossible to get started. Can't get a job without experience, can't get experience without a job. In today's market that's not just a cliche.

      I don't think anybody expects a cert to carry a *lot* of cloat, but it would be nice if it carried enough for somebody to get started.

    2. Re:Linux certification by Skapare · · Score: 1

      That's what entry level jobs are for ... to get started. Sure, a cert could be used to get you in. So can intellect. And with Linux jobs still limited to the kind of managers that value thinking, the intellect is likely to hold more value than the cert. But eventually, as Linux continues to grow, and expanding into the "masses" of the job market, more managers will just want certs because they either won't care about intellect, or wouldn't know how to recognize it if it bit them in tha arse.

      In today's job market, there are plenty of people still available with experience. And they can be had for cheap, too. So certs just don't seem to be the thing, yet. But it will happen.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  47. linuxworld expo by stock · · Score: 1

    Being a small single employee company, The Linux-world expo sales reps. contacted me for their Utrecht edition in October. Sadly however it seems that current Linux-world expo's are not what they used to be:

    http://linuxtoday.com/it_management/200407280312 6O PEV

    There's this Linux-World Expo planned in Utrecht (Netherlands) later this fall. Here's todays latest update on the results of attending :

    http://sites.vnuexhibitions.com/sites/linux-world/ nl/page.asp?nav_id=5415

    So what do ya say? Should i, being a small single employee company spend EUR 3.250,= for a "promo-point" on this 2-day Exhibition ? Hard to tell, maybe i get some major deals closed, who can tell? So i was invited, which seems a great thing. However I need to pay the EUR 3.250,= first. Their plan is basicly this : Organize a linuxworld-expo, but only stand-holders and exhibitioners are to 100% pay-up for the costs made: Admittance is 100% free as is gratis. So i asked their sales rep, who will be attending then ? "ehh... a selected public inside the Dutch IT scene "... I almost choked... "whot? no linux hacker at home is able to take the train to Utrecht and pay a fee and get a ticket for a day?" "ehh No sir..."

    Can one honestly believe such things? I decided that organizing exhibitions in this way would be a no-go and a serious offensive show-stopper for me. So no deal. We'll see what happens

    Robert

  48. Re:Huh? by cerberusss · · Score: 1
    I'm a developer in a shop doing custom development in Java, running in/against Oracle. I'm working on Linux, while the other guys in the team all work on Windows. The servers of the client often run Solaris, and Linux is on the rise.

    It's often funny to see the differences. Sometimes specific bugs crop up on Windows, sometimes on Linux.

    (BTW Parent shouldn't have been modded flamebait)

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  49. Re:Linux Jobs by sloanster · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what connection any of your rant is supposed to have with linux... but it sounds like you're confused about a few things, and have several wacky misconceptions about linux.

    I certainly don't work for free - in fact I make better money than most of my windows specialist acquaintances.

    Just an observation -

  50. Re:Huh? by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    There's only one company that's making Windows and the demand for the support for Windows is still great. Even for some unlikely reason that only Linux distro you can buy is IBM Linux, as long as enough companies are using them, there will be a demand for the Linux support.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  51. Re:Huh? by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    BTW, these jobs where the least experienced of you makes 85k, where are they located? Are these figures in US dollars?

    An AC said it so it must be true.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  52. Anyone on Slashdot like Linux and Pron? by Mr.Cookieface · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Found this while searching for tech jobs online.
    Live near Agoura Hills, CA? Get your resume ready.

    Vivid Entertainment is looking for a new PROGRAMMER
    for Vivid Entertainment

    Required Technical Skills:
    Linux, Design, Database design
    Job Description:

    This is an intermediate to mid-level, full-time position. In addition to the programming skills mentioned below, the candidate should have strong database design skills and some clue about Linux system administration and networking.Ability to multi-task; Can-do attitude; Organized; Detail-oriented; Independent, yet team-player; Flexible; Open to new ideas and ways of doing business. Monitor, track and report on progress. Salary is dependent on experience and qualifications. We offer a competitive salary, medical, paid vacation, 401K and more.

    http://www.computerwork.com/cfm-bin/Jobs/Los-Ang el es/1271123.cfm

    1. Re:Anyone on Slashdot like Linux and Pron? by Jhon · · Score: 1

      Splendid! Geek paradise. LINUX AND PORN!

    2. Re:Anyone on Slashdot like Linux and Pron? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Linux and porn? Hmm... I like the name of the website; 'hoovers.com'.
      Specifically because, in the UK, "Hoover" is very common as a generic term for "vacuum cleaner".

      For a brief moment before the site loaded, I was expecting "horny Electrolux will suck you dry" and " Dyson has a 25-inch attachment"....

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  53. Re:Huh? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    To make 85k in today's US market, you need to do alot more than linux.

  54. I'm glad to hear by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    I'm glad to hear someone putting insight into the positive points of Microsoft software in such a way that does not offend anyone or overly extend any truth. It's very hard to make any meaningful discussion when it's all Microsoft or Linux bashing.

    Fanaticism just makes everyone sound incredible.

  55. Re:my email to Glen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's refreshing to know that there are people who value their convictions more than a paycheck.

    It would be sad if people were being paid to do what they like doing.....

  56. Re:my email to Glen by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    So I guess it's more like.

    "Military is evil, greedy corporations are evil, but I LOVE working for them!"

    There are many self-rightous people in here but their true form appears when money's involved...

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  57. Re:Linux Jobs by SpectralOne · · Score: 1

    Read the other messages in this discussion. People are emphasizing how pleased they are to be able to get support jobs in the OSS market, because those are the most important. These jobs exist no matter what platform you use, people will always need support. Why don't you clarify those misconceptions? I don't buy into Linueconomics. It makes as much sense as outsourcing all your IT jobs and becoming utterly dependent on foreign countries. Same thing happens: your population is reduced to service jobs and can't afford the so-called cheap goods that companies are now producing (and selling for the same expensive prices, I might add).

  58. UK stats verify this, by Alex · · Score: 1

    www.jobstats.co.uk is a great website.

    Linux jobs

    Solaris jobs

    Unix job stats

    Bear in mind the scale is different so there are many more jobs listing Unix than Solaris or Linux. But the growth in jobs using Linux as a keyword is much stronger.

    Alex

  59. The takers do, the givers give to linux by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    BSD license is nice if you want to take and give nothing back. the GPL requires you to give back so only companies that want to be part of the community can take part. Now lets have a little check about major companies back Linux vs BSD eh? IBM HP Novell etc etc vs ehm Apple. Oh I am sure there are some BSD users I left out but my excuse for that is that BSD users might never notice as companies that use BSD code never need to tell. Is MS using modified BSD code? Who knows, if they used modified GPL code we would know (MS is a lot of things but would never be stupid enough to set them self up like that, gates is shrewd enough to know wich laws to break and wich not to break)

    BSD license has a "nicer" philopsphy behind it. It basically leaves people free to do whatever they want. Problem is that if you allow people to just take without giving that is exactly what they will be doing. The GPL forces people to play nice. Why should you be free to use my code without ever giving back?

    BSD is old style logging, chop everything down then move on to the next tree. Linux is sustainable logging. Replace each cut down tree with a new one so the next generation will have a forest as well.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  60. Dice.com fanboy by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

    Try to spot a paragraph without a blatant plug for them, so this is bogus and not an article at all, just an advertisement for a job site.

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  61. Skilltracker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Find market trends of whatever IT skills you might have: Skilltracker.

  62. Inconceivable! by patonw · · Score: 3, Informative

    from http://imdb.com/title/tt0093779/quotes: [Vizzini has just cut the rope The Dread Pirate Roberts is climbing up] Vizzini: HE DIDN'T FALL? INCONCEIVABLE. Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    1. Re:Inconceivable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude!
      It's not funny if you have to explain it.
      Let the ignorant mods waste their points taking it down. In the long run, their realworld-karma will catch up with them.

  63. I wonder what the real average pay is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > reported earning an average salary of $67,000

    The national tax preparation company I work for shows very different numbers. For people with Linux in their job description, their pay is an average of just less than $22k per year. The $67k was what a small group *claimed* to have made. You always get much smaller numbers when you look at the truth rather than some "bar room" BS.

    From my experience, the average pay for a Linux programmer around Atlanta, GA, RTP, NC, and St Louis, is about $25k. We pay a little less than that for our 15 sys admins, 4 Oracle on Linux DB admins, and ~20 C programmers. $67k is a lie. I wish I made even half of that managing all of those guys.

  64. u mm.... by zoloto · · Score: 1

    aside from your low UID.

    **I'm an AMERICAN you insensitive clod**

  65. Experience by xyote · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yes, experience counts but not the general all round jack of all trades kind of experience. It's usually pretty specific and involves new technologies which by definition very few people have experience in.

    Here in MA, that ususally means not only have you written a Linux device driver or TCP stack (everybody has done that, right?) but for a new protocol that hasn't even been finalized yet. That pretty much narrows the candidates down to the 3 or 4 companies participating in the standards process with a dozen or so people involved overall.

    I constantly amazed by the lengths companies will go to avoid actually training anybody. It must be some kind of game of coporate chicken where they burn through their window of opportunity trying to get somebody who will hit the ground running, with built in feedback making it all the more so.

    You see job ads indicating those kind of situations which keep getting reposted, which makes you wonder how insane someone would have to be to take the position that late in the cycle.

  66. Watching compiler output is learning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Off to Funroll Loops with you!

  67. Do The Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmmm . . . Linux job postings up 190%. Total job postings more than double. Sounds to me like Linux is LOSING ground.

    1. Re:Do The Math by hugesmile · · Score: 1
      Hmmmmm . . . Linux job postings up 190%. Total job postings more than double. Sounds to me like Linux is LOSING ground.

      Would it be better for you if they said "Linux job postings up 190%. Total job postings up 100%"?

      Remind me to never hire this guy named Coward if I am relying on math and communication skills.

  68. Some caveats by Mike+Hicks · · Score: 1

    A lot of the Linux jobs out there (especially on Dice) are predicated on the idea that people know some of the big-name packages like Oracle and Veritas. There aren't a great many lower-level positions, at least in my region of the country. I did find a low-paying (well, for IT -- about double minimum wage) job about a month ago involving Linux. It might or might not be a steady job. 80% stuff out there is consulting/contract work, but I suppose that's not a Linux-specific problem (er, I personally see that as a problem because it takes me forever to get comfortable in new environments, and I just don't like dealing with the uncertainty -- some people thrive on stuff like that).

  69. There is still a lot of distrust... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ...of Linux based companies towards new employees. It seems that some employers think "I am a company that uses Linux, I am a Linux-professional and everyone else is a Linux-starter".

    I experienced this on a job-interview for a Linux job involving Red Hat and satellite internet. It went quite well and I thought I had made my point in being someone who could handle it, only to be rejected because they thought I wasn't good (at all) on the Linux side.

    If Linux-based employers want to grow, they need to shed some of this (amateuristic) distrust and have some faith in the people they hire. Not everyone is boxed within Microsoft-software.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  70. Linux Replacing Solaris by jared42 · · Score: 1

    I work at a large semiconductor company in the Austin (Texas) area -- we've been running Solaris for years upon years. After a lot of grassroots work we've begun to get Linux desktops to replace the aging Sun workstations.

    Lightning stuck a power pole outside, cycling the power in the building. The Linux boxes were up within a minute, whereas the Sun workstations were busy repairing their non-journaling filesystems and (in many cases) failing.

    I can't wait for them to roll one of those puppies out on my desktop!

    1. Re:Linux Replacing Solaris by Dillusionary · · Score: 1

      Well yeh, aging Solaris sucks, because they lack journaling, and the logging function of the new Solaris functions. What you expect? Old is Old regardless of what OS it is.

    2. Re:Linux Replacing Solaris by jared42 · · Score: 1

      True, true. Still, I'm glad we're replacing Solaris workstations with Linux desktop boxes. Twice the performance at a tenth the cost.

    3. Re:Linux Replacing Solaris by AgentAce · · Score: 1

      You work at a large semiconductor company and your workstations don't have UPS's?

    4. Re:Linux Replacing Solaris by jared42 · · Score: 1

      Sadly no. The fileservers, mailservers, and compute farms are all protected, but for some reason that policy does not extend to valuable compute hardware not actually residing inside a server room. I have never understood this. Then again, our calendar service is through MS Exchange, which is convenient for management but unuseable for almost all of engineering. It tells you which group IT actually serves.

    5. Re:Linux Replacing Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Replace with X86 and Solaris or Redhat
      and the costs aren't much different. Depends if
      you are a able to look after your own deployment or
      require support or not. I think's it fairly
      obvious that sparc is dead on the desktop which is
      why Sun's newest desktop is opteron based:

      http://www.sun.com/2004-0726/feature/

    6. Re:Linux Replacing Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you accept that it's a COMPLETEY vacuous
      argument to compare a modern system to an older one.
      Solaris has had a logging file system for ages now
      - perhaps you should compare Solaris 10 express
      running on X86 or a modern sparc (a more apples to
      apples comparison) before making such statements.

  71. Jobs slashdotted!! by ndogg · · Score: 1

    Yeah, jobs were available. Thanks slashdot. You ruined it all for me!!!

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  72. Ignore the above clueless advice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, the contracting rate is a lot better than the salary rate. The catch is that you have to be good. Plan on it being at least double. If you've done impressive work and have good clients, you'd better be making a lot more.

    Salary benefits and what not adds up to about $10-15K per year tops. That's with a 2 week vacation.

    So yes, the contracting rate is far, far better than what you can do with just a piddling salary. Anyone who tells you otherwise isn't at the top of their field.

  73. WTF does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They are also being much less 'ghey' towards the OS community

    Could somebody translate this into English, please? Or tell me what language "ghey" is so that I can look it up?

  74. I knew Linux was getting popular when .. by Peter_JS_Blue · · Score: 1
    .. elderly customers started to ask if I could install it on their PCs instead of Windows (Which I gladly did). I also get people in pubs asking about it too especialy when they have been infected by the lastest malware, I think these get the point across.
    --
    Art Makers Just an excuse to show photos of naked women !!
  75. Re:Linux Jobs by sloanster · · Score: 1

    I don't buy into Linueconomics. It makes as much sense as outsourcing all your IT jobs and becoming utterly dependent on foreign countries.

    I'm afraid your wacky ideas about linux and the economy have been rather soundly refuted by the likes of IBM, Oracle and Novell. On a personal note, I started making good money after I became linux-savvy.

  76. Certifications that value and expect thinking. by Nailer · · Score: 1

    When Linux finally reaches the level where it gets used by managers that don't value the thinking process...then we'll see certification in more demand.

    You walk in to work. Your machine has been trashed in eight different ways. Fix them.
    You walk in to work. Your machine is trashed again, it won't even boot now.
    You have 2 1/2 hours.

    Your boss asks you to install and configure a box with some combo of RAID/LVM, network auth, a couple of Apache virtual hosts, some samba shares, FTP, iptables, etc. You have 3 hours.

    Fix it. Don't do it any specific way - that's your own personal preference, use whatever tools you want. Just fix it.

    If you can, you've just successfully completed the RHCE exam.

    Someone asks if you know that 'tac' is 'cat' backwards. And various other questions. Welcome to LPI.

    1. Re:Certifications that value and expect thinking. by Skapare · · Score: 1

      I find it sad that a certification has more emphasis on fixing things rather than making things that don't break (as often). Sounds like someone just copied MCSE and changed a few words to make RHCE.

      Also sad, and further sad that it is true, are cases where bosses pick all the details about how a system should be set up, then expect the SA to do it that way. Instead, they should specify what the machine needs to accomplish, and have the SA do what it takes. The SA will figure all that out, or variations on it that might be more reliable or more secure. The job of an SA really is more than just an "install jockey".

      If I am ever hiring an SA (it could be possible sometime next year), be sure to leave all certs off your resume, except for CCIE. Otherwise I'll be wondering why you were wasting your time. Otherwise I consider them to have zero value (except a CCIE would be a plus even for a non-NA job).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Certifications that value and expect thinking. by Nailer · · Score: 1

      I find it sad that a certification has more emphasis on fixing things rather than making things that don't break (as often).

      Then you weren't paying attention to the second paragraph. 2 1/2 hours of troubleshooting . maintenance, 3 hours of installation. This includes making sure things are set up in a secure fashion (although 'properly' is often).

      As I also said above, the instructions for install and configuring only specify the end objectives - not how to install them.

      But don't matter, it sounds like you've already made up your mind, and decided not to lissten to anyone else.

      Good luck with that.

      Why does CCIE, the

    3. Re:Certifications that value and expect thinking. by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Eventually people do make up their minds. I've been dealing with this for many years. I bet I've fired more SA's than you've hired. Technically I'm always open minded. I've just seen more reasons to distrust people wielding certifications than reasons to trust them. And yes, CCIE is the exception. All the people who had CCIE were people I wanted to hire (but didn't have the money get them on board).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    4. Re:Certifications that value and expect thinking. by Nailer · · Score: 1

      Meet some RHCEs sometime. Find out about the exam. Sure, be skeptical. But if you look into it enough, you'll probably like RHCE for the same reasons you like CCIE - they're quite simular, and the only two certs I respect (I've sat and taught a few) for much the same reasons.

    5. Re:Certifications that value and expect thinking. by Skapare · · Score: 1

      I've met several people with RHCE's. I've met lots more with MCSE's. A couple had both. I've met many with various Cisco, Novell, Sybase or Sun certifications. Among them were people who were smart. But the proportion of people who were smart among those who had certifications was less than the proportion of people who were smart among those who just generally had experience in these fields ... except for the CCIE where 100% of the half dozen I met were all very smart people (though I did have to explain to one of them how to set up CIDR delegation of in-addr.arpa DNS zones).

      So in summary, based on my experience of close to 100 technical people I've met in the course of managing systems and networks at 4 different companies, having certification is a slightly negative indicator on the level of intellect to do the jobs I might have for them. But I was hiring for people who could recognize problems, determine their cause, figure out a solution, and deploy that solution without any disruption, all without ever having to consult with me on it (just put it in a line item in the weekly report). I wanted people who didn't just understand how things worked, but could readily figure out how new things worked on their own ... not people who would memorize common steps. These were in businesses that were tech companies, or were deploying a significant high-tech presence. The average manager in the average business does not look for that kind of person; they want someone willing to follow strict directions from a manager who is himself very lightly to be making bad decisions. Such managers need people with certifications to cover their (the manager's) arse.

      I think it comes down to the fact that I am capable of figuring out who can, or cannot, do the job, without having to use the fact that they have certification, and generally have higher level requirements. The only reason I'd even need to see experience on the resume is because of the volume received. If I had only 5 applicants and exactly one of them is qualified for the job, I will be able to figure out exactly which one is during the interview. even of none of them have any experience or training at all.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    6. Re:Certifications that value and expect thinking. by Nailer · · Score: 1

      My experiences simply differ from yours then. I've also meet more certified folk that you have at more organizations. That said, I'm as biased as you are (from your responses it seems like you're not reading much or what I'm writing here, which gives me the impression you've already made up your mind based on emotion rather than fact).

      I also think reverse hosting lookups for non class A B and C subnets is a basic skills one would expect of a competant DNS administrator.

      A good certification - as you admit, there are some out there - is a good test of the skilsl required in particular circumstances. Anything involving rote learning is not a good certification. Certs with practical exam and high failure rates warrant a further look rather than the base dismissal you've given them here. I suggest you consider your experiences may not be universal.

      Your judgement tests more than a practical exam - it tests whether someone conforms to your own notions of best practice, whether they fit into your culture, somebodies ability to learn, and overall whether they'd be suitable for the specific role. That's the best test of whether someone is right for the job. Certification doesn't replace that, not do te good certs seek to. Merely they (should) provide an impartial, standard test of practical skill at a given task. If you have five hundred, rather than five applications for your role, you might find using a certification you value to be an excellent means of getting down to that final five.

    7. Re:Certifications that value and expect thinking. by Skapare · · Score: 1

      If I have 500 to be narrowed down to 5, I doubt a certification will do the job correctly, unless the certification specifically tests for what I'm looking for. And RHCE is simply not an IQ test. It's a knowledge test. And in my opinion, that's only a small portion of the need. I wouldn't want to over-emphasize that ti whittle 500 down to 5 because it can end up throwing out the one ideal person I might have wanted, who might not have a certification at all.

      So in theory, the way to do it is to use the certification as just a weighted measure according to the value of the need of what skill it tests. The trouble is, my experience is that it just doesn't work that way. Now this could be because the proportion of what I'm looking for is very small among the population of those with certification. The trouble is, if I use a certification as a weighted factor at all, it's going to decrease the quality of what I get. That's based on actual experience. Maybe the only thing we can agree on is that I didn't get a fair sampling of the set of people with certifications?

      I've mostly made up my mind. One can't just keep pondering any problem forever. Decisions have to eventually, and sooner than preferred too often, be made. You make a decision and move on. Measuring people is not a field of perfection. But I've had excellent people working for me or with me. And they were not certified in anything (except for college degrees which most, but not all, had).

      If among 500 applicants for a Linux SA job was one with a CCIE, sure, I'd probably be sure to include that one in the short list. But those certs are rare enough there would not likely even be one.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  77. it's not a given that he's nuts by r00t · · Score: 1

    The high-end Cisco gear kind of bogs down if you
    do fancy stuff that can't be done in hardware.
    Sure, for basic IP routing, no PC can keep up.
    Also, extremely large routing tables have to be
    done on Cisco gear due to a patent.

    If we assume that he's doing weird stuff though,
    he certainly could be better off with Linux.
    (the 2.6.x kernel of course -- Linux changes)

    He forgot to mention ebtables, ip, and tc.

  78. If Linux TCP/IP has a problem... by r00t · · Score: 1

    ...then I don't know what you're going to do.
    It was just this past week that FreeBSD finally
    announced that an EXPERIMENTAL option was
    available for SMP-capable networking. Linux has
    had that since the 2.4.xx days.

    Put your BSD on a 4-way box, or better yet an
    8-way box with hyperthreading enabled. Put at
    least 4 gigabit cards in the box. Start routing
    and serving...

    Linux TCP/IP was second to BSD in, oh, 1995 maybe.

  79. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any jobs opened here at Slashdot? Man! more than 13 hours without a single news?

  80. Re:Linux Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The observation about your pay is just silly; Linux jobs are not higher paying than any other job, they should all be about the same. If you think they are, provide some backup besides anecdotal evidence.

    Again, I ask you to provide something other than generalities about Linux and the economy. Let me know what's wrong with the thinking in a logical manner, and I'll consider your point of view.

  81. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's great, until you realize that the ability to design a hammer (in this case) also confers the ability to be a master carpenter. I forsee a lot of unemployment among those only skilled enough to be a carpenter, and a step down for hammer designers.

    As many have said, it's economically inevitable and for the best in the long run, but it's not what I'd consider a happy situation.