Slashdot Mirror


Moving To Linux

norburym writes "This is an interesting format for a techie book geared at non-techies: instead of providing a detailed installation and configuration instruction set for a particular full Linux distribution, Marcel Gagne has included a Knoppix CD with his book, Moving to Linux: Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye! The author's intention is clearly to give the reader a no-risk introduction to Linux. As such, this book is not intended for power users or professionals; there are other books more suited for this market. At the same time, this book is not really for the Dummies style audience, either. It's for the Windows user who is looking to migrate to the Linux platform and find solutions to his or her day to day computing needs." Read on for the rest of norburym's review.
Since the book comes with Knoppix and the author's purpose is to introduce the Linux desktop immediately, the first few chapters of this book only briefly describe what Linux versions are available, how to get a copy and how to install your chosen distro. Gagne gives some example installation choices with Mandrake, Redhat and SuSE. The next two chapters deal with using and customizing the author's desktop environment of choice (KDE) and exploring with Konquerer.

Chapter 7 provides a "release-agnostic" approach to package installation with examples and screen shots from Kpackage, RPM installs via shell and building from source. Most readers will become quite familiar with Chapter 8: Working with Devices, despite the author's exclamation that "Device support under Linux is excellent. No, really." Printing looms large in this chapter and there's some good advice to be had here for the newbie. The next several chapters tackle getting connected to the Internet, email and using Konquerer and Mozilla. In short, mainstream user necessities. Mandrake, RedHat, SuSE, and Ximian are all represented in the chapter on system updates along with a pitch to get involved in the Linux community (this is a good thing).

The make-or-break chapters for those readers requiring office productivity solutions come near the half point of the book. Gagne gives an overview of OpenOffice.org's suite of MS Office counterparts. These are really meant as introductory lessons on migrating from the more familiar, more ubiquitous MS suite of applications and not intended as an in-depth look at OpenOffice.org. Here is where the user will judge whether Linux is a viable alternative to Windows. Productivity is essential. Can you create a document that can be shared in a Windows dominant world? Can you do it without struggling to learn new rules and exceptions to the rules? Gagne makes a strong pitch for ease of use in the Linux world.

The final chapters on multimedia and games round out the topics that every semi-literate computer user has on their "must know how to" list. Under multimedia, KsCD, XMMS and Noatun are covered, including visualization plugins and skins. K3b, Grip and MPlayer are also described. Favorite Linux games are represented: KSirtet, KAsteroids, Frozen-Bubble, KBattleship, KPatience, KPoker ... well, you get the idea!

Care has been taken in laying out the book; from the beautiful typography, the boxed asides with Quick Tips, Shell Outs and Notes to the Resources list at the end of each chapter. The book is easy to read and the author has a crisp conversational style of writing devoid of distracting anecdotes or sophomoric humor (chapter subheadings aside!). Gagne succeeds in providing a guidebook to Linux that should enable the average Windows users to make a smooth transition to a Linux distro of their choice. At the very least, Gagne gives the nervous Windows-to-Linux wannabe an excellent bootable Knoppix CD to test drive while following along in the book. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend this book to someone who is looking to give Linux a spin but is afraid to commit their working PC to Linux entirely. This book and the accompanying CD will ease the way toward independence from Windows.

You can purchase Moving to Linux: Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye! from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews. To see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

25 of 384 comments (clear)

  1. Huh by thephotoman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do kind of like these books that help ordinary people go to Linux. I know one of them even worked for me, and I'm to the point that I'm ready to ditch Windows on my desktop and go with just Linux. Furthermore, the LiveCD distro included is a good idea, just in case the person doesn't like what they see.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  2. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a desktop OS should be easy enough to use that the idea of buying a book on how to run it would be redundant. One can dream.

    1. Re:Irony by fantastic+max · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yet there are plenty of books out there that teaches one how to use MacOS and Windows. So by that logic, all desktop OSes are difficult to use. And these days, any time someone writes a book about how to use these, they instantly call it "Hacking Windows/OSX".

    2. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i also have a dream, that one day, i will no longer need to wipe my ass. hopefully, that one day will come.

      /sarcasm.

      there's nothing ironic about your statement. linux can be pretty difficult to use, and this guy is trying to show people with a cd that it's not so bad. no need to bash him over this. i mean, he's doing more to help make things easier than you seem to be. but i guess nobody wants to tell the armchair quarterback that dreaming won't get him anywhere.

    3. Re:Irony by nz_mincemeat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is one very true ideal!

      However I think the bare minimum needed for anybody contemplating a change of OS would be a functional-equivalent list of applications for both platforms, listed by file type.

    4. Re:Irony by Cromac · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yet there are plenty of books out there that teaches one how to use MacOS and Windows. So by that logic, all desktop OSes are difficult to use.

      They are all difficult to use. Have you ever participated in any usability studies with people who have no computer experience? There is nothing intuititive about using a computer. There are things that seem intutitive after years of using a computer, but to someone with no background they're all overly difficult to use.

    5. Re:Irony by johnny_sas · · Score: 2, Insightful
      True, but if something has too much 'ease of use' then it's usually not powerful enough.

      There's a balance that must to struck between the two, and Linux if finally getting there (Knoppix is a good example I think), where the average Windows "don't bother with IRQs and DLLs"-type users can actually start using Linux without a really steep learning curve, or too much trouble installing it.

    6. Re:Irony by severoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, but I don't think it's useful to dismiss these kinds of comments about Linux not being easy to use. It's true.

      Here's an example...when you have to install an app from a tarball. What's a tarball? It's an aggregated set of files in a tar, for tape archive. No one uses tapes anymore. No one that has this bit of knowledge will necessarily understand the two phase process of aggregating files and then zipping them. No one really deals with zips anymore in the Windows world...now they have installation executables.

      Linux has that too, and that's fine. But can you completely run a Linux system and flex it in all different ways without being a C programmer, or dealing with tarballs, or any of the other myriad arcane activities that Linux home admins eventually find themselves doing?

      I dunno. Maybe. I haven't installed a Linux system for about 3 years, so maybe they've made great strides in this regard. But if they have, I'd have to point out that no one's really waging a campaign to make sure I know about it.

      I'll include my standard caveat with this post. I like Linux, I like what it stands for and what it represents. I like the functionality, the apps, the free software...I like it all. Theoretically, I like it all. In the real world, though, I find myself running Windows. I keep meaning to run Linux up, and someday I will once more. But every time I run into a major problem, I revert back to Windows for a while until I get the time to forge back into Linux. Could I solve these problems and stay true to the Linux ideal? Sure...but I have a life outside of hacking my box.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    7. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There is nothing intuititive about using a computer.

      There is nothing intuititive about using a sewing machine either. A human being can deduce how to use a baseball bat or a crutch, but any complex machinery requires some instruction.

    8. Re:Irony by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So computers are not simple or intuitive to use. Big deal, nothing is.

      Unfortunately, the vast majority of tech reporters not only believe that it's possible, but that it actually exists in whatever OS they're a shill for. To them, Linux/BSD/Unix will NEVER be ready for the desktop, because they're measuring it against an impossible yardstick.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  3. Hardware Issues by jacksonai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the main issues with Linux Live CD's is the fact that it is rare for a live cd to properly initialize ALL the hardware on the computer. (i.e. sound card and wireless 802.11) Until something happens to allow universal driver support, live cd's will leave a bad taste in people's mouths who use obscure / cheap hardware (most windows users)

    --
    Like Sweepstakes? Try out my service @ http://www.yourpowersweeps.com -- Free 21 day trial, no cc needed.
    1. Re:Hardware Issues by magefile · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because of the number of folks using Linux, most hardware companies won't bother. Linux distros already do this - Mandrake has the best compatibility database I've seen so far. And if $Your_Fav_Distro doesn't have a database, google for "$hardware $your_favorite_distro". Just think of it as looking for another review.

    2. Re:Hardware Issues by Homology · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Might add the fact that kernel 2.6 is incompatible with a lot of older hardware.

      Not on OpenBSD, that is for sure. And the same is most likely for the other *BSD. New code will not be introduced if it will break existing installations, and if it breaks, they fix it. As an example, when OpenBSD made changes on i386 so that you could boot with kernel above 8GB on the harddisk, alot of testing and effort went into _making sure_ that nothing breaks. This included testing on ancient 386/486 machines.

      Perhaps try a more stable OS?

  4. Microsoft's not better by RWerp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Compare it with the number of 'Windows XP for dummies' copies sold.

    Will this get my karma raised?

    --
    "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
  5. Kiss the BSoD goodbye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could have been a 1 page book.

    Get off pre Windows 2000.
    Update drivers.

  6. windows isn't easy, per se... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    i disagree. for the non-experts, windows is "easy" to use because it's pre-installed. however, after some months/years of use, things inevitably get messed up under windows. (though spyware/virus aren't exactly windows fault.) then it's also "easy" to just buy another computer, also loaded with windows. so i am not sure if the easiness can be attributed to the OS itself or the fact no one ever bothers with changing what's sold. there are plenty of books on how to keep windows "fresh, clean and fast."


    this sounds like a wonderful book for someone wanting to make good use of older hardware.

  7. Live CDs don't always make good impressions. by Picass0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As great as Knoppix is, I stuck it on my wife's machine when she was having some hardware problems (as a stop gap until I could do a rebuild). All she could do was bitch about how slow everything loaded from CD, such as Open Office. Combine this with the change in gui and CD distros are not always the best way to intro new users.

  8. Interesting by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye!

    Way to go, this is a fantastic argument to use to get people to switch. When was the last time I saw one of those... hmmm. Let's see. Since 1998 when I switched to NT4 and later through W2K, XP and 2003 (yes, as a desktop) on literally dozens of machines, I've seen four blue screens, and they were all on the same W2K box (the one I use for gaming and crap). Two were caused by stupid Creative drivers, and I forget what caused the other two.

    Yeah, four blue screens in (I guess) hundreds of thousands of hours of operation on multiple machines is a definite reason to switch to Linux. I'm sold.

    1. Re:Interesting by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      A couple of months ago I had a machine start act weirdly. When you logged in and walked away, it would lock up solid after a few minutes. No video signal, nothing. Not a BSOD, just mojo lock-up. When doing certain things it would also lock up, but not always. For about a week or so I thought it was a problem with DirectX or something like that.

      Then I noticed that when it didn't lock and I managed to shut it down normally I'd get the "It's now safe to turn off your computer" thing. This is an Abit mobo with an ATX power supply running Windows XP, so that sort of tipped me off that there was probably a problem with the power supply.

      I opened it up and wiggled the ATX connector a bit, then tested the box. No lock ups, nothing. One week went by and no problems.

      It turns out the ATX connector was probably jostled when I put in a DVD/RW and one of the leads got detached. As far as I could tell, when the box reached a certain temperature, it would disconnect and the whole thing would go down.

      I just resoldered the one lead, and that was that.

      My point is that if you have decently mainstream hardware with good drivers, patch Windows regularly and you're careful not to crap up the registry by installing shit you don't need, Windows will run absolutely fine. My last machine at work typically went 60-70 days without a reboot; it was restarted only to apply patches or whatever. For three years, this W2K machine was abused 10-12 hours a day and never once did it lock up, die, bluescreen or otherwise fail in any way shape or form.

      My current workstation is server 2003 standard and it's been performing the same way until now. My primary home box simply is not turned off, ever, except to patch.

      You can fuck up any OS just as readily as you can Windows any day if you try hard enough. Or you can be careful and have zero problems other than the occasional mobo connector going stupid.

  9. Linux by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lately I've been thinking about moving to linux to check it out - Gaming is still important to me , but I'm sorta interested to see how linux has evolved in the past 5 years since I last tried linux - and burned up a monitor since I didn't know what I was doing.

    With that said - the big thing that puts me off from trying Linux (apart from switiching gears) is this "BSOD" reference from folks that are trying to tell me that their software is better.

    Before you mod this "flamebait" just listen for a moment. I've been working as a programmer, and have used win 2k pro extensively over the past five years on at least 7 different machines. The only time I got a BSOD was on a Western Digital Hard Drive failure.

    When I see someone tell me that their software will free me from the "BSOD" - I can't help thinking that they haven't seen or used win2k - or haven't configured their installations properly - and they are trying to tell me "Linux is Better" based off of 95/98/ME or poor computing practices.

    And while that certainly is most likely the case that Linux is Better- I'd like an honest comparison on how it fares against 2kpro? Honestly - if you want to convert folks over to Linux - Do it positively - Tell me what's good about Linux - Don't tell me what's bad with windows - I know what's bad with windows and a Linux guy telling me what's bad with windows will get an eyeroll from me, and will outright be dismissed from conversation if they mistate or are erroneous on the latest platform.

    Campaigns based on Negativity are self defeating. They won't sway the extremes, but they will force the fence sitters away from moving to the negative side. I want to know what I will gain. I want to know why it's right for me. Tell me the good parts and how and why they are so good.

    But above all, Please - Drop the "BSOD" it left with Windows ME.

    by the way - Microsoft does drop the ball - Windows CE

    Win CE

    WinCE - lol

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  10. Captive NTFS and Wireless by the_riaa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Until they start packing better NTFS support (Captive NTFS is a pain in the ass, and still doesn't work for me most of the time) along with 802.11b/g/a card support in Knoppix, it's hard for a lot of current Windows users [XP users, mainly] to switch over. I'd love to try out more in Knoppix as I love that you can pop in a live CD, learn some Linux, and if needed, reboot and go back to Windows - and when I sufficiently knew enough about what I was doing in Linux, only then would I make the permanent switch.

    One thing about all these articles is that they expect users to quit Windows cold-turkey and immediately jump head first into Linux. But from what I've seen personally, that's not necessarily the best approach. Those that I've seen try making the hard switch install their distribution of choice, then after a few hours of trying to regain the functionality of their last OS [figuring out what does what, where it is, etc] they get frustrated with Linux and wonder what made them give up their previous OS when it worked "just fine". I like the gradual approach that Knoppix and other live CD-based distros can afford. You can pop it in, screw with it for a while, learn some, then pop it out and go back to your old OS if you get frustrated or tired. I commend Gagne for using Knoppix as the teaching tool of his book.

  11. Where to buy it? by FlutterVertigo(gmail · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why does everyone insist upon Amazon and B&N? (see suggestive sell above: You can buy...")
    They aren't the only stores in town and they aren't the least-expensive stores in town, either
    Pay attention to where they rank with the suggestions below:
    When one is tempted to buy from Amazon or B&N first, try going here: Moving to Linux via AddAll
    or,
    plug the ISBN into Froogle.Google. On top of that, look in the right margin of the Froogle search - it suggests "Buy 0321159985 for less" at a site named "www.chambal.com".

    Whenever I see a suggestive "buy this book here" link next to a review or announcement and it's B&N or Amazon, it reminds me of those who have 'fessed up and admitted they get a kickback if purchases are made via that link. So either people are ignorant and settle for Amazon and B&N (only) or they are looking to steer some of your ca$h you could be using for Doom 3 into their pocket. (if this is the case, why don't they volunteer this up front?)

  12. Re:For Those That Don't Know by thephotoman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It might be better if he talked less about wine, and more about WINE.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  13. Re:Irony - but it can be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Amazingly, That's exactly what I do for a living. I write aviation safety management software.
    What that means in real life, is my company produce systems that people who have absolutely no previous experience with computers can pick up one of our embedded mobile devices and start reporting incidents/ jotting notes/ assigning tasks to other members of their team etc.

    I stress it again, these people have NO previous experience with computers.
    How do we do it? Simple, we strip all complications from the user, the back end handles them. The front end has a question and a back/next button. Answer the question from a list and press next. (its a lot more involved than that, but you get the idea). basically, the user can't break it because they don't get the opportunity to.

    What this does mean is there is no room for "powerusers" people have to run at the speed of the Lowest Common Denominator.

    I don't get why OS'es don't have different levels of visibility for user level.

    i.e. Advanced user gets everything and probably a different run level that a desktop starts up in

    Starter User starts into a stripped down desktop, with buttons for everything they might need. Even like the TiVo OS where you get page after page from a simple 4 arrow remote.

    anything in the middle. I would expand but as I'm posting as Anonymous Coward this probably won't be read so I can't be bothered to continue.

  14. Who reads anything? by Trailwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are a great many non-readers who have gone from TV to PC. When they screw up their windows install, I just give them a Knoppix disk and tell them to click yes to everything. The only hard part is explaining how to change the boot sequence to boot from their CD player first.

    "What's a bios, is it dangerous?"

    I do not mean illiterates, but people whose lives were formed around staring at a tube. To these people, a PC is just another tube with more variety.