Slashdot Mirror
DEFCON WiFi Shootout Winners Set A Land Record
bscience writes "While attending the DEFCON 12 convention this past weekend I had the chance to see the standing ovation a group of 19 year olds received for establishing a 55.1 mile unamplified WiFi connection!" A snippet from the Wired story linked there: "Mobile warriors having trouble making a wireless connection across the hall might want to give some Ohio teens a call. This weekend they were able to make a 55-mile Wi-Fi connection. ... They might have achieved an even greater distance, Justin Rigling said, "but there was no road left."" (Here's the post from a few weeks back about the competition.)
But kilometres are smaller than miles so surely the distance seems shorter when displayed in miles. I think 55 miles is 88km. That said, I agree that it would make more sense to give the result in km. .
Mention the Lord of the Rings one more time and I'll more than likely kill you.
> Or, if it was established at that distance, why
> wasn't the amplified distance longer than the non?
As the article and summary pointed out, they ran out of road.
And yes, the unamplified distance was merely to maintain the connection and not establish it.
Either way, impressive.. especially as they would have likely gone farther if they had a good place to go to.
I touch computers in naughty places
ou should check your WiFi cards too. My Intel Centrino laptop's wifi just sucks. First I too thought that I have a poor AP, but after buying a cheap USB dongle, I had much better signal and no disconnects.
I was there in the front row at the awards ceremony at DC12. These kids remind me of myself just a few years ago when I just picked up and moved to Vegas. Wasn't even sure if I had enough money for gas (good thing I was driving a Festiva @~45mpg). I guess this is a good case for those who say that all kids today are slackers.
For those who do not know, this contest was held in (and around) Vegas, when it was 110+ outside. These guys were dragging equipment up the side of a mountain to get this link. For those who would give these kids sh**, try dragging a 10ft dish(3.048 meters for you metric weenies) several hundred feet up a mountain, and then getting them aligned 55 miles apart, all in 110+f(43c) weather. There was no big 4x4's, they drove dads busted-a** minivan from Ohio for this. Sure, NASA could probably do better, but come'on, this was an amateur thing, and just something cool to do. No big prizes (they won like a couple-hundred bucks in Best Buy gift certs, and some gear).
If I had a had on, it would be off to these kids for some ingenuity and determination.
All this is true and valid, but it still doesn't fix the problem that it's only marginally usefull, while people would pay big money for a good way to repeat passed walls more cheaply than sticking another AP wired to the LAN on the other side of it.
Never confuse volume with power.
Nahh, it's easy to significantly increse the coverage in a home without much work. In many of the high-brow homes I help a friend of mine install home automation and whole house multimedia I do the networking on the side. One AP can easily cover most fo a 2000Sq foot home. but you need to place the AP in regards to where it will be used most.
rule 1 - make it central to the house. If you use it mostly in your den at the south end of the house then the AP will be in the celing, about 6 feet from the office in the hallway. if your home is larger, buying a pair of low end aftermarket antennas and spreading out the antennas makes a bigger difference. In one home i had the AP in the kitchen, 1 antenna 6 feet from that location and th eother 3 feet in the opposite direction. Adding a 1 foot square piece of sheet metal about 1 wavelength away from the antenna in the direction of the outside wall will also help in two ways. 1 to limit the external radiation to the neighbors. (the best wireless security is to be sure they cant get a signal) and 2 to reflect the signal back to the working area.
I have covered houses of 4000 sq feet with 1 AP and 2 comp-usa grade add-on antennas. no you will not get 100% in all areas of the home, but you will not drop below 40% and some places like the bottom of the closet in the basement guest bedroom do not need woreless coverage.
being realistic about wireless coverage is the first step. the second step is to use the 802.11 repeaters when you only absolutely have to.
but in a home for rich people... multiple AP'
s are not a viable option as it doesn't hand off seamlessly.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
I have an Averatec laptop with built in Wi-fi... I get 100% coverage inside my house, and can even go four or so houses in any direction
I'm seeing similar results with my new Averatec 3220. It's even better than my D-Link DWL-650+ card, which was previously the best I'd found. Having it on depletes battery life quite a bit faster though.
Now if I can just get Linux working on the damn Averatec...
bp