Slashdot Mirror


Portable Digital Voice Recorders for a Singer?

Geek Singer asks: "I've had classical singing lessons for a while now and managed to advance to a level where hearing my own lessons is important for developing my skills. Here in Europe many singers use MiniDisc recorders. As a geek I think that MD recorders are DRM-encumbered, clumsy, slow and obsolete. Especially moving the recordings into my computer can get very troublesome due to nasty restrictions cast by Sony. For these reasons I need to have something else than a MD recorder. There are various portable MP3 players that have a voice recording capability, but I've found none that have all the properties I need: low price, good recording quality, line-in recording, excellent battery life, a good interface, support for Linux or Mac OS X and enough space for tens of hours of decent quality voice recordings or a slot for an exchangeable memory card. I've already checked numerous manufacturers including iRiver. Their players are great, except that the HD-models are too expensive and the flash-based models don't have a memory card slot. What portable digital voice recorders do you suggest?"

44 comments

  1. This is not a task for a portable device... by Gigahertz · · Score: 1

    Record them on a real computer, Listen to them on a portable device.... then, you have no question.

    1. Re:This is not a task for a portable device... by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      RTFA. She wants something she can TAKE to her lessons in order to record them, then listen and archive at home. I doubt lugging a computer to thee lessons is practical.

    2. Re:This is not a task for a portable device... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      These "luggables" you speak of are now called "notebook" computers, which in some cases weight two or three pounds.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    3. Re:This is not a task for a portable device... by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      Which sort of defeats the "low price" quality that was stated as a requirement, unless you think several thousand is a steal for a device that just needs to portably record sound. Did anyone read the article?

      I just don't know how helpful it is to respond to an Ask Slashdot requesting advice on a low price portable with "Don't use a portable" or "Use a laptop".

    4. Re:This is not a task for a portable device... by mikehoskins · · Score: 1

      How about a small laptop?

    5. Re:This is not a task for a portable device... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      Well, since the poster was asking about a device that would make it easy to transfer files to and from a computer, maybe it *does* make sense to get a cheap laptop and use that exclusively for recording and editing. I bought a brand new X31 w/1.6GHz P-M and 512MB RAM last month for ~$1000 USD, so it's not *hugely* expensive.

      That's what's nice about Ask Slashdot: some people will give you the blaringly obvious answer (suck it up and use a MD recorder), and others will give you a slightly different take on the entire problem.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    6. Re:This is not a task for a portable device... by mikehoskins · · Score: 1

      There are used (or EBay/UBid) notebooks out there.... You can pick one up for cheap.

      A used laptop with a few G of HD isn't that bad.

  2. Korg PXR-4 by thenerdgod · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sure it's 300 bucks, sure you'll have to buy a new CF card to get useful space out of it, but if you're thinking of using it anywhere near professionally, it's worth it.

    You can even plug it into your monitor out and record crap at your shows. Korg Pandora PX-4: 299

    1. Re:Korg PXR-4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Problem is that SmartMedia cards are generally small (not nearly the capacity options of CF). And the audio is recorded in a proprietary format I think.

    2. Re:Korg PXR-4 by DiscoFreq · · Score: 1

      Thanks, this might be what I've been looking for...
      Minidisc-players with USB can only transfer files with that USB from the PC to the player (so it's ok to download stuff from internet and play it on the minidisc, but not to record your own sound/music/words).
      Mp3-players (as mentioned in another reaction) often offer voice-recording, but always with built-in microphone, not with a mic-input. Some have line inputs, but then you need a mic-amplifier...
      This Korg costs more, but I can probably use it for more then just recording my music or my grandfather's stories,... :)

    3. Re:Korg PXR-4 by Josh+Booth · · Score: 2, Informative

      This person already said that iRiver IHP's were out of the question due to price. You can get them for $300US - 20 GB of storage.

    4. Re:Korg PXR-4 by xanderwilson · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also look at the Zoom PS series (both the discontinued 02 and the newer, smaller 04 model). I tested out the Korg for a few days and really didn't like it. Musician's Friend doesn't carry the Zooms but they're available at most other online music retailers, but I've really liked everything from Zoom that I've used and/or bought. Very easy to use, well-priced, and generally feature-packed. Visit http://www.2090.org/zoom/bbs/index.php for more info from the user community, or go directly to the Zoom.co.jp site for the horse's mouth.

      That said, MD, while annoying with its DRM and inability to transfer digitally to the computer, does have a lot of uses. When comparing it to your other options, consider it a kick-ass alternative to a microcassette recorder or other portable cassette recorder. There's only the realtime, analog-out to the computer, but the recording quality is much better than most other options out there.

      Alex.

    5. Re:Korg PXR-4 by thenerdgod · · Score: 1

      "Using MPEG-1, Audio Layer 2 data compression, the PXR4 records 24-bit audio at 32 kHz resolution. You must select one of three recording modes -- Hi Quality, Standard, and Economy -- at the beginning of a project. As you'd expect, the higher quality the recording mode, the less recording time you get (see the table "PXR4 Recording Mode Times")."

      I wouldn't call MPEG "proprietary"

  3. Go with MiniDisc by DaRat · · Score: 3, Informative
    There was a very good talk at the recent UPA conference on this very topic. The speaker, an ex sound engineer, concluded that the best recording devices were MiniDisc recorders when sound quality, media flexibility, portability, size, and cost were all considered. He had high hopes that the new MiniDisc format Hi-MD would improve recording capacity and file transfer speed beyond existing recorders.

    The main issue with the IC recorders was with regards to poor recording quality. I know that the local public radio uses MiniDisc recorders for their recording needs.

    1. Re:Go with MiniDisc by pugfantus · · Score: 1

      There's only one problem with that, and it's the very reason I no longer use my very expensive MD (and also stated in parent article), because of Sony placed DRM restrictions, it is extremely cumbersome to move audio from the MD to Computer or any other medium. Plan and simple, Sony has shot themselves in the foot because of this.

    2. Re:Go with MiniDisc by ottawanker · · Score: 3, Informative
      Use HiMD, and you don't have to worry about anything like that anymore.

      The new Hi-MD players are packed with extra features that add convenience and utility to the digital music experience. For example, with the new upload function musicians or note-taking students can use the mic-in feature on several of the models to make a self-recording on the device and transfer the content back to the PC. When connected to the PC, Hi-MD recorders act as an external drive enabling users to store and transfer such data files as presentations, digital images and spreadsheets on the discs. Since the USB will feed power to the unit when connected to a PC, there is no need to worry about draining battery life when transferring to the Hi-MD device.
  4. DAT? by nuxx · · Score: 2, Informative

    How about a portable DAT recorder? They aren't too pricy, if you get a 'pro' level one, there's no serial copy bit, and the sound is excellent.

    They've been the benchmark for non-compressed portable audio recording for years.

    1. Re:DAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DAT media is hard to find and expensive because of it. And you thought MD was obsolete!

      But I agree that DAT is, um, cool.

      But for anybody into DATs, Sony TCD-D8s are the size of a walkman and usually go on eBay for somewhere between $150-300.

    2. Re:DAT? by nuxx · · Score: 1

      My complaint about MD is that it sounds like butt compared to any other decent portable recording. (to memory card / CD-R / HDD / DAT / etc) It's compressed, and on top of it all, none of the players come stock with a digital out. While analog can sound real good, pulling the tracks off via digital is just....nicer.

  5. My suggestion: by Giant+Ape+Skeleton · · Score: 1
    Get *this one*

    And get me one, too! :-)

    --
    The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
    1. Re:My suggestion: by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *Recording Media: Flash Memory Built-In 32MB*

      not quite the thing for him(judging from what he wrote into the article).

      though I think he should just get a decent MD(keyword being a decent and decent meaning coming with usable connectors and without being limited intentionally too much).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  6. I have no troubles with MD by Marillion · · Score: 3, Informative
    I have used my Sony MD to record performance events many, many times. My M-Audio soundcard with optical input is very happy to ignore any DRM that might be in the optical S/PDIF data stream. The only real downside is the ATRAC is a lossey compression system. From there, I save the file, burn to CD convert to MP3, whatever.

    On another note, I recently saw another sound designer use an Archos unit to record a grand piano. I provided the mics and mixer, he preferred to use his own recorder rather than my MD.

    --
    This is a boring sig
    1. Re:I have no troubles with MD by pugfantus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but transfering audio in that manner is slow, since it has to be played in realtime. Where as it takes seconds to transfer minutes of audio over a standard USB connection. Plus you lose all title information.

    2. Re:I have no troubles with MD by vrai · · Score: 1
      If you're using a MD player as a portable recording device then it's unlikely you're going to have much in the way of title information. The real-time transfer is undoubtedly a pain, but most budding musicians are unlikely to be recording Ring Cycle length epics (at least not on a weekly basis).

      All the musicians I know (which I'll admit, isn't a huge number) use MD for ad-hoc recording. The recorders are cheap and durable; as are the discs. They are also so common in the UK that people don't bother trying to steal them anymore.

  7. You Get What You Pay For by rueger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Aside from looking for deals on E-bay, you'll find that the features you want are not availble at a consumer level.

    High end mindisc recorders allow digital dubbing, but not consumer models. An excellent source of information is here.

    By the way, minidisc does not use DRM, it just doesn't have a digital line out jack.

    In broadcast circles a lot of people are moving to various flash media units, and seem quite happy with them. These tend to be "pro" units, with XLR mic jacks and digital in and out.

    You can also check out transom.org for advice on recorders.

    1. Re:You Get What You Pay For by ldspartan · · Score: 1

      By the way, minidisc does not use DRM, it just doesn't have a digital line out jack.

      Um, no. I have several players with digital outs, both optical and copper. They work fine.

      MD does have a rudimentary DRM, wherein you can only make a certain numbers of digital copies of media. This is encoded as two bits in the digital audio stream, and there are a _wide_ variety of devices to strip them out.

  8. Fostex MR-8 by blunte · · Score: 3, Informative

    Fostex MR-8

    I got one for the same reason. It's very lovely, very feature rich, and still pretty simple to use. The only downside is the size (compared to an iPod). It's the same size as a 12" laptop, but thicker. With the manufacturer bag, it's easily portable (with mic, cable, and AC power supply). Of course it also runs on AA batteries, but it's hungry.

    I first tried the iPod with the iTalk, but it couldn't auto-adjust the recording level quickly enough to keep from clipping horribly (a nasty digital trash clip) from piano and higher pitch voice.

    Musician's Friend sells it for a good price, and they also sell some kits that include it, a mic, balanced cable, headphones, and other accessories. Just make sure you buy a Fostex certified memory card if you want to upgrade beyond the card they provide. It needs good, fast cards to do multi-track work.

    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
  9. Aren't there CD recorders out there? by Thag · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Something that will record directly to a CD?

    I had read somewhere that these were good to use for such a purpose, but that was a few years ago.

    It's going to be bigger than a flash-based player, sure, but the convenience of winding up with a CD would be worth it.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  10. my opinion. by RegalBegal · · Score: 1

    Being in the music scene and recording often I know KORG makes a killer little product called the Pandoras Box. It goes for about 300 bucks and it tailored to recording music, it's a portable virtual 8 track studio. You can even record a few times and compare each track to see improvements.

    --
    "It'll destroy you if you try to make it mean anything to anyone but yourself." - Henry Rollins
  11. The downside of nearly every computer... by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... is noise.

    Yes there are silent pc's available. You can even find them with shielded sound cards. They are not going to be under $300 however, unless you want to build your own, including building your own shielding around that sound card. If you are using a PC with a hard drive, you have a power supply fan, the processor fan, the hard drive, and possibly both a video card fan and a bios fan that are all going to introduce background noise into your recordings.

    Most laptops today have a fan in them, and I don't know anyone interested in computers today who would consider the internal microphone of a laptop for any recording beyond very rare sampling.

    Before you suggest using an external mic and headphones, remember that there really isn't a laptop out there with a shielded audio system in it. As a result it is invariably going to pick up electrical noise from components within the computer.

    The last option I would consider is a USB based sound system. Not because I don't trust the quality, but because of the fact that once you add the price of one to your computer, (laptop or otherwise) you could have picked up a profesional grade digital recorder, and been done with it.

    One other thing to take into consideration is the 'setup' and 'teardown' time involved. If you go to a teacher, paying for a 50 min lesson, you are not going to want to spend a significant portion of those 50 min setting up a computer or laptop to start recording your lesson, and your instructor is not going to be pleased if your setup and teardown (especially if you are carrying around mics and stands) eats into some other student's lesson time. Likewise for practice rooms if you need to practice, and can not live with an electronic keyboard in your dorm, appartment or other living arangements.

    If you do go with an MD recorder, and a mic, with an optical connection to a PC that allows you to transfer cleanly, I recomend pre-testing your equipment, or at least finding out if all will work within the return time of whomever you are buying the stuff from. My own MD recorder has a very hit or miss pattern with the various mics I have tried with it. At best I can recognize my voice with the volume cranked all the way up. Occasionally I may even be able to recognize what I was saying at the time. Fortunately I don't need to record with it, as I have other options available. (none of them direct to digital, but my erquirements are not as high.)

    I wish you better luck.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
  12. There goes my Karma by extremescholar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Go ahead and mod this Off Topic, but...

    Here starteth the rant

    Please refer to yourself as a VOCALIST and not a sewing appliance. I, myself, am a VOCALIST and I am trying to correct everyone I can. We refer to people who play instruments as instrumentalists. Also, If people who sing are singers, then people who play are players.

    Here endth the ranting

    --
    Using the Freedom of Speech while I still have it.
    1. Re:There goes my Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Accept the English language and calm down.

      I am a tuba player with a working caps lock key, not a TUBAIST.

    2. Re:There goes my Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I thought the popular term had changed from "singer" to "vocalist" because people recognized that the vocal sounds produced by today's pop bands no longer constitute "singing."

      A vocalist might be someone who raps, bebops (think Fat Boys from the '80s), screams (think heavy metal), yodels, grunts, gurgles, burps, laughs, cries, hiccups, hoots, screeches, squawks, moans, barks, chirps, makes robot sounds, or does anything else with his vocal cords. If you want to lower your label to include the gutteral possibilities of a vocalist, go right ahead.

      No, seriously... if you're a singer, just call yourself a singer. There's no shame in that.

  13. Other iRiver HD models by jutski · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course the new H340 is expensive, but the older non-colour-LCD models (H110, H120, H140) have virtually all the same functions as it does.
    Optical/analog in/out etc.

    1. Re:Other iRiver HD models by rjnagle · · Score: 1

      i have an ihp-140 which I've started to use for recording. A few notes:

      It has lots of capability, but recording has some limitations. First, the record button has a lot of latency. Also, you can't adjust volume (but future firmware will change that. The internal mike sucks (no surprise). And the line in supports stereo mikes instead of mono mikes. Also, you'll need to buy a pre-amp.

      Still, you can record mp3's of various qualities as well as WAV files. It currently sells for $380 on amazon, and by Christmas it should be around $300. For the purpose of recording, the 20 gig should be fine (same firmware) and substantially cheaper (probably under 200 by xmas).

      Please note: iriver is late on firmware updates, and they plan important updates to recording functions on firmware in October (see schedule below).

      firmware schedule for iriver h-models.
      first Upgrade (Expected end of July ~ early August) New features
      1) File delete function supported
      (Files can be deleted from the player itself) - on the fly file delete
      2) Format function supported
      (Will be supported for Window 2000/XP- based devices due to difficulty in formatting 40GB files from the operating platform)
      3) Adjustable playback speed supported
      (Playback speed cannot be manipulated as in the iFPs but adjustments can be made with select speed options)
      4) Gaps between songs can be deleted
      (Gaps are deleted through scanning for silent periods at the end of the music file) - Gapless playback.
      5) DB Unicode is supported
      (Supports technology in Unicode).
      6) DB OGG file adding is supported (OGG is supportd in DB Update).
      7) Hebrew language added.
      8) Sub folders supported for TEXT folders.
      9) SHUFFLE function improved to Real Shuffle.
      10) Problem with ID3 Tags resolved with EX?? (Problems from using MP3GAIN resolved).
      11) Remote control display problems from NAVI functions in PLAYLIST mode fixed.
      12) Internal playlist supported (Programming function supported) on the fly playlist.
      13) Problems of FM tuner display fixed.
      14) Interference on the display from remote control usage is fixed.
      15) External battery supported for H100 series (External batteries will be recognizable for the H100 series).
      16) Problems recognizing select files in Japanese fixed.

      Second Upgrade (Expected in October)
      New features
      1) Recording volume adjustment function supported.
      2) No recording delay from the push of the RECORD button.
      3) MONO recording supported (Supported during VOICE Recording)
      4) Truncated voice recording fixed.
      5) SAD function supported.
      6) AUTO SYNC function supported.

      --
      Robert Nagle, Idiotprogrammer, Houston
  14. Whatever you end up using by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    You're going to want a decent microphone, and as far as I can tell, most of the cheap consumer grade recorders don't have a decent mic. Look for something with either a decent mic or with XLR input and provide your own mic.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  15. Isn't 36 hours enough? by the+Haldanian · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was also looking for a voice recorder, and found they'd all become mp3 players while I wasn't looking.

    I eventually bought the iRiver iFP-395T as it began to stand out of the pack on my checklist.

    The clincher was its ability to record *directly as mp3*.
    Most other devices on the market record to wav format which is very VERY fat in comparison.
    This means the 512Mb version can store about 36 hours of audio, which will probably outlast the battery itself for continuous recording.
    It will also allow me plenty of time to get back to any PC or laptop that understands a generic USB storage device to unburden it.
    It also has the line-in socket if you have a fancy mic.

    Other goodies :

    - Ogg support.
    - Linux support (even for it's alternate proprietary filesystem firmware).
    - Full configuration options for pretty much everything.
    - Small/light/looks funky.
    - Belt and arm (jogging) clips.
    - It *will* survive a heavy drop that any HD based device will *not*.

    All I really need now is one of those 3cm long USB adapter cables the Creative Muvo 2 comes with, so I can add it to my keyrings (Hint to manufacturers!), removing the only minor annoyance there is: forgetting the cable to plug it into a laptop/PC.

    I'm eyeing gutted Muvo2 shells on ebay ;-)

    1. Re:Isn't 36 hours enough? by ksheff · · Score: 3, Informative

      Recording to wav is better if you want to listen to something w/o any compression artifacts. I would be willing to buy something with the capabilities of a Nomad Jukebox 3, but just in a smaller form factor. I've had one for about 1.5 years and it's great for recording concerts.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  16. Hoe about a neuros? by nacks1 · · Score: 1

    I own a neuros and use it just about every day. A while back I saw some info on making digital recordings with the neuros on their forum. The line in on the neuros is unpowered and you would want a good powered mic with preamp.

    Try taking a look at the forum yourself.

  17. it IS a job for portable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an ideal situation for a portable device. Forget lugging a laptop or a computer--that's ridiculous. Every musician needs a portable device to record him/herself for rehearsal purposes. trust me--i'm a musician with geek tendencies.

    I think MD with optical or USB is still one of the better options. They're easy enough to use and the quality is acceptable. Unless you have an old old MD, you shouldn't have problems copying self-recorded audio files via some kind of data link.

    Here's a good MD resource:

    www.minidisc.org

    Here are some tips:

    1.) make sure you have a MIC in, not just a LINE in. a Microphone input is necessary to boost the signal; line in won't give you the gain you need. My MD recorder has a switchable mic/line input
    2.) it's very important to have a decent mic. The best for portable recording are called condenser or electret mics, which take a battery and add some juice to the signal before it even hits the input. Sony makes an affordable stereo mic for like 70 bucks designed for this: the ECM-90x series. There are a bunch of similar things on ebay.

    If you really want to ditch minidisc, get an iPod or a high quality digital voice recorder. I don't know much about these, though. I think they make a mic adapter for the iPod--that would be a simple solution, though theh whoel thing would cost maybe 300-400 USD. As for digital voice recorders, don't get anything below 44.1 kHz, or it'll sound like junk. And once again, the mic is important.

    also, be sure you don't crank the input level too high (if you have a condenser mic and a mic in) or it will distort and sound like utter garbage.

    personally, i like cassette tapes. but luddites have no place on this site, eh?

  18. Palm/Pocket multitrackers by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    We have the Zoom palmtop multritrack recorder, and don't forget your Tascam 5 track pocketstudio.

    Some decent headphones wouldn't hurt, either. Add a decent microphone and you can do some serious work with this stuff!

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  19. FM wireless microphone and RCA LYRA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The newer RCA Lyras (RD2010, RD2012, RD2015) have FM (88-108Mhz) recording capability and also a SD memory slot. I have the 2015 (512MB flash) model and my wireless FM mic works great up to a hundred feet. You just make sure they are tuned to the same frequency obviously.

  20. Jukebox or similar by gidds · · Score: 1
    I do the occasional concert recording. I used to use MD, but the restrictions ( I picked up an old Jukebox (Creative DAP Jukebox, aka NOMAD) for 50ukp; its 6GB HD is physically larger and lower capacity than more recent models, but it's fine for my purposes and a cheap investment. That's enough for almost 10 hours of CD-quality stereo.

    It records as a WAV file, uncompressed (so no ATRAC compression artefacts); it has USB, so I just plug it into my Mac and it appears in iTunes &c, so getting the data off it is a doddle. No DRM or other restrictions.

    A few minor downsides to be aware of. It takes 4 rechargeable batteries. (DON'T substitute alkalines if you're stuck; it ran through 4 fresh Duracells in half an hour! I guess the high current it draws means that only NiMHs or similar will cope properly.) The UI is a bit clunky. And it only records at line level; although there's a booster for lower levels, it introduces a whining noise, so avoid it. And there's no on-screen indication of level or anything.

    I expect that many of these problems have been fixed in more recent versions; you can probably pick up something with larger capacity for a similar price now. And of course, it's a music player too!

    Yes, MD isn't a bad solution. But you probably need convenience more than high sound quality &c. (Gosh, it was only a few years ago that I was recording my singing lessons!) And the ease and speed of getting data off an HD unit compared with MD is probably well worth considering.

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.