Raid 0: Blessing or hype?
Yoeri Lauwers writes "Tweakers.net investigates matters a bit more clearly and decides that AnandTech and Storagereview should think twice before they shout that "RAID 0 is useless on the desktop". Tweakers.net's tests illustrate the contrary"
http://this.color.is.shit.slashdot.org/comments.p
I'm sure that even here on Slashdot there are some people who aren't running huge multi-threaded database applications on their desktop machines, and for them, RAID-0 probably isn't going to help much.
But for the majority of us normal people who are running huge multi-threaded database applications on their desktop machines, RAID-0 is much nicer than having to manually allocate all of your database extents across your disks. Of course, RAID-10 would be better, but that would involve spending money...
Actually, it's bye bye da or bye bye ta.
'RAID 0 (Score:0, Redundant)' LOL!
A friend who works with NAS/SAN systems jokingly told me that a hard drive exists in only 2 states:
1) Failed
2) About to fail
Tb.
An OPEN mind is a beautiful thing...
Makes you wonder why Linux and other Unices have everything under one "/"... the convenience factor is amazing :)
/mnt/ , life is a lot easier .
/dev/sda1 /dev/camera /dev/camera /mnt/camera
With NFS, cdroms , USB cards and harddisks in
Imagine this
bash$ ln -sf
bash$ mount
One "/" to root them all , eh ?
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur