Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Deploy Solar Sail

Chuck1318 writes "The Japanese ISAS (Institute of Space and Astronautical Science) announced the launch and deployment of the first ever large-scale solar sail. In the news release they state "Because it carries no fuel and keeps accelerating over almost unlimited distances, it is the only technology now in existence that can one day take us to the stars.""

55 of 433 comments (clear)

  1. Stellar Pong? by infonick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "...it is the only technology now in existence that can one day take us to the stars." Well, unless the Japanese can automate retraction of the sails, it wont reach any stars. While it's powered by solar wind, it will slow down and reverse as it gets farther from the original star and closer to the destination star.

    --

    You are confusing me with someone who cares.
    1. Re:Stellar Pong? by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What if it's only reflective on one side?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Stellar Pong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I call baloney. Doesn't a solar sail work because of it's high reflectivity? Isn't that high reflectivity only on one side of the sail?

      And what's so difficult about retracting the sail? The force on the sail at any given time is so miniscule it's trivial to retract them (as opposed to, say, when you have intense winds blowing on your sailboat's sail).

    3. Re:Stellar Pong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually you want to slow down when you reach the other star. Or else you miss your stop. Once there, you jettison the sale, or use it to fly around the star system.

      Read "Flight of the Dragonfy"/"Rocheworld" (they are the same book) by Doctor Robert L. Forward for an informative and entertaining novel using (laser pumped) solar sails.

    4. Re:Stellar Pong? by Marsala · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's why one crew member will be trained extensively in the use of tin snips in zero-gee environments.

      Although that'd be a great way to freak out an alien race... Kind of like pulling a Rama on 'em.

    5. Re:Stellar Pong? by pclminion · · Score: 5, Informative
      What if it's only reflective on one side?

      A perfectly non-reflective surface (i.e. a black surface) would experience half the force that a perfectly reflective surface would. In other words, a black sail will work, but only half as well as a mirrored sail would work.

      This is due to conservation of momentum. If a photon is reflected, its momentum p is reversed to be -p. Thus the sail must acquire a momentum 2p to conserve momentum. Whereas if the photon is absorbed, its momentum changes from p to 0, thus the momentum of the sail must increase by p, again to preserve momentum.

      The difference in kinetic energy is converted into heat. A black sail heats up. An ideal, perfectly reflective mirrored sail does not heat up at all.

    6. Re:Stellar Pong? by Igmuth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And alot sooner than you would think... Once you cross the heliopause, the solar wind is basically moot.

    7. Re:Stellar Pong? by halowolf · · Score: 4, Informative
      Also the The Mote in God's Eye is a good read that has a solar sail powered craft, however a huge assortment of lasers were used to propel it up to speed, far beyond what solar energy would of provided. And its also not the focus of the book. But hey read it and find out!

      There is also a sequel but I will leave that up to you as a project to find out what it is.

    8. Re:Stellar Pong? by JVert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WHAT?
      no.
      try sailing upwind in a circular boat.

      Regardless of how late it is, you should have caught this one before you hit 'post'... or am I about to Have A Nice Day?

    9. Re:Stellar Pong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unless I am misunderstanding your post, your physics is incorrect here. A modern sailboat, with the triangular sail, angles the sail somewhat into the wind, creating a pressure difference that pulls the sail in the direction of lower pressure. However, most of that pull is not linearly forward, but instead rotationally sideways - the only reason the ship does not immediately flip over is because of the keel, that being the strip of material that runs along the boat's centerline, on the bottom. The keel sticks out beyond the smooth hull, and as the sail tries to make the boat rotate, the keel pushes against the water, and the rotational motion is (partially) converted into fowards linear motion. This system does not work without three elements: sail, keel, and a fluid to flow in, that the keel pushes against. Older, square-rigged ships, like the workhorses from the 1800s back, simply work by having the wind push against the sails from behind, propelling the ship forward. This is how a solar sail works, except with light rather than wind. Check it out here:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing#How_sailing_w orks

      Cheers!

    10. Re:Stellar Pong? by Famatra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Once there, you jettison the sale, or use it to fly around the star system."

      Perhaps you'd like to explain how jettisoning a solar sail has enough force to slow down the craft.

      That sail would have to be pretty massive, like the mass of a planet, in order to counteract years of acceleration so you could push it away from yourself to slow down ;).

      That is the problem with getting somewhere in space. To get there the fastest you have to accelerate continually there till the 1/2 way point, turn the ship around around and use an equal force / fuel to decelerate. Reminds me of a scene in Battle Star Galatica Crew Member: "Sir we've ran out of fuel", Admiral "Come to a complete stop", The right reply: "But Sir, I said we ran out of fuel".

    11. Re:Stellar Pong? by FireFury03 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Same principles apply as in Earth-based ocean sailing - if you angle the sail, you can deflect the particles, thus allowing you to use the solar wind of another star even though you are approaching it rather than leaving it.

      I'm not so sure that's the case - when we sail in water, we can either be on a run (the wind directly behind us, as you would expect a solar sail to work) or on a reach (the wind to one side).

      On a reach the sail acts more or less like an aeroplane wing because of it's curved surfaces and as well as generating a forward force it generates a lot of lateral force too. The closer to the wind you sail, the greater the proportion of lateral force.

      The only reason that's not a big problem for us is that your craft has a centreboard which greatly reduces it's ability to slide sideways, especially at speed - when I'm windsurfing in a reasonable wind, I will be doing about 30-35 knots and can easilly sail upwind with about 300cm^2 of fin area, but I won't be able to go upwind if the wind drops off because my speed will have greatly dropped. In space there is no way to have a centreboard to prevent the lateral forces pushing you sideways since there is nothing for it to react against.

      I'm also not sure about the "aerodynamics" of a solar sail - as I described above, a modern sail works very much like an aeroplane wing when reaching and relies on the air have a laminar flow over both sides of the sail. I very much doubt photons are going to have a laminar flow over your sail so the sail isn't going to be anywhere near as efficient for reaching as boat or windsurfing sail. In windsurfing the most efficient point of sailing is on a slightly broad reach - i.e. the wind is coming from one side and slightly behind you, I would expect the most efficient use of a solar sail would be on a run.

    12. Re:Stellar Pong? by Phanatic1a · · Score: 4, Informative

      Using onboard rockets to steer doesn't help you slow down. As you point out, the gravitational pull of the destination star will cause you to accelerate even more. You'll end up heading towards your destination at greater than the escape velocity for that system.

      This doesn't help you stop. To do that, you flip yourself around so that the sail is pointing towards the destination, and you use the radiation pressure from that star to kill your velocity. Can't do this if you're already jettisoned it.

      And, no, chemical rockets won't work to shed that much velocity. If you get get that much delta-v from chemical rockets, you'd just use chemical rockets to get on your way as well. But that's precisely why you're using a solar sail instead: chemical rockets suck in terms of specific impulse.

    13. Re:Stellar Pong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      far beyond what solar energy would of provided

      It's would have, you blithering idiot.

    14. Re:Stellar Pong? by nacturation · · Score: 4, Informative

      Same principles apply as in Earth-based ocean sailing - if you angle the sail, you can deflect the particles, thus allowing you to use the solar wind of another star even though you are approaching it rather than leaving it.

      Regardless of space or the ocean, basic principles of physics apply. Action and reaction.


      Uh, that's a resounding negative, Houston. In the ocean, we have this thing called *water* in which one sails. Action: wind pushes against sails from somewhere near the front. Reaction: sail pushes back agains wind and pushes into the water; water pushes back, and ship tends to go forward. In space, there is no dense medium through which one sails. Action: photons from a star push against sails from somewhere near the front. Reaction: ship pushes back and moves further away from the star. You can't "tack" in a vacuum.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    15. Re:Stellar Pong? by Scarblac · · Score: 4, Funny

      The right reply: "But Sir, I said we ran out of fuel"

      "and besides, complete stop related to what, Sir?"

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    16. Re:Stellar Pong? by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative


      Actually, I was reading up on this a while back.. They'd use the gravity of the star to tack. Well, kinda.

      It seems like a good idea, if they want to send something away from Sol for a long duration in one direction. Not too much navigation necessary (or possible).

      The one thing I don't see really mentioned is debris in space. You know, micrometeors, and the like. It should make for a nice shreaded solar sail by the time it gets to the edge of the solar system. Hopefully it didn't encounter enough debris hitting it to knock it off course, or stop it all together.

      But hey, if they're just looking to find out how fast a solar sail will accelerate away from SOL at Earth's distance, cool. It'd probably make for a faster way to get from Earth to our neighboring (outward) planets, if they can point it in the right direction. 1 degree makes a big difference over a few million miles. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    17. Re:Stellar Pong? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why retract? Just release. It's not like it's going to be used again.

      Why not? Return trip? On to next destination?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    18. Re:Stellar Pong? by pclminion · · Score: 4, Informative
      I was thinking about how a radiometer works to measure thermal energy. Is this the same property that pushes the sails?

      You are asking a textbook question :-)

      No, the radiometer works in a different way. Notice in the radiometer that the rotation is clockwise when the black "sail" is exposed on the LEFT. If this were due to light pressure, the pressure would be greater on the RIGHT (reflective) sail and the radiometer would be spinning in the opposite direction.

      What happens in the radiometer is the black sail heats up because it absorbs radiant energy. The gas around the sail (the glass bulb is very low pressure but not a perfect vacuum) conducts heat away from the sail, heating and expanding in the process. The expanding gas reacts against the sail, pushing it away.

      If the radiometer bulb was evacuated to a perfect vacuum, the radiometer would actually spin the opposite direction because the light pressure effect would dominate.

  2. Ironically by chancycat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ironically, this technology can take us to 'the stars' but not toward our own. Better not change your mind and want to turn around less than half-way to Alpha Proxima...

    --
    Evan - needs to hit preview before submitting
    1. Re:Ironically by andreMA · · Score: 5, Funny
      Why would you want to go to the sun. You'll just die.
      That, of course, is why you go at night!
    2. Re:Ironically by gibodean · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm surprised that no-one else has mentioned this.

      The truth is that a solar sail doesn't get you away from the sun by just having the sail aimed straight at the sun. It does it much more trickily than that :).

      What happens is that you orientate the sail at 45% (or something like that) to the sun. That way, a large amount of the force from the sun actually goes to changing your orbital speed, and not just pushing you away from the sun. By orienting the sail so that it increases your orbital speed, you end up making greater size orbits around the sun, until you are far enough away from the sun and you can do some other tricky stuff to leave the solar system.

      But, it works the opposite way too. Orient your sail so that you are decreasing your orbital speed. You go slower, and therefore your orbit size decreases, and you start approaching the sun.

      Of course another poster queried why you would want to travel to the sun. Good question. But how about Mercury or Venus ?

    3. Re:Ironically by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ironically, this technology can take us to 'the stars' but not toward our own.

      And, why not?

      Sailing ships have sailed "upwind" for many centuries.

      In outer space, you are either in orbit, or falling directly towards the nearest large body. A solar sail can be used to slow down or accellerate lateral speed simply by rotating it 45 degrees.

      A simple google search turned up this in case you are curious.

      Although they are right, in that solar sails do accelerate the entire trip and carry no fuel, I don't think that sails are "the way to go" unless we're talking about a ten thousand year multi-generational ship.

      I consider the Bussard RamJet the "only way to fly". It carries no fuel, but is powered by carving a planet-sized swath out of the ambient hydrogen atoms out of interstellar space and fusing them.

      With interstellar distances, the real issue is: how quickly can you get to relativistic speeds? Because, at .5 C, it'd take thousands to millions of years to get anywhere. But, at relativistic speeds, it'd still take thousands of years, but to the crew on board, it'd be like mere hundreds or even tens of years.

      You need power to get you there in less than hundreds of years - thus the RamJet.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:Ironically by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 3, Funny
      Homer: All that counts is that we're alive and rubbing elbows with the greats. [gasps] Ooh, there's Ross Perot, Dr. Laura, Spike Lee.

      Bart: Wait a minute, they're not so great.

      Homer: Okay but there's Dan Quayle, Courtney Love, [increasing panic], Tonya Harding, Al Sharpton, Ah! Tom Arnold! What the hell's going on?

      Bart: [looking out porthole] Wait! Only that ship's going to Mars. Ours is headed for the sun.

      Arnold: Yeah, ain't that a kick in the teeth? I mean, my shows weren't great but I never tied people up and forced them to watch. And I could've, because I'm a big guy and I'm good with knots.

      Homer: So we're all going to die?

      Arnold: 'Fraid so, but, hey, the grub's pretty good, huh? [chuckles, and then pours a can of peaches in his mouth]

      Homer: The sun? That's the hottest place on Earth.

      Shore: Gonna work on my tannage, buddy.

      Arnold: Pauly Shore? Wow! Hey, we should do a show together, man. That's a sure cure for the blues!
    5. Re:Ironically by stevelinton · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately, it turns out that the interstellar medium is much thinner, in most places and in particular around the Sun, than Bussard thought. Even if you could somehow persuade protons to fuse in the few nanoseconds while they are passing through your ship at nearly the speed of light (and on average it takes about 15 billion years for any given proton to fuse in the core of the Sun), there just aren't many of them around here.

      A beamrider of some kind (leave the engines at home and ship momentum up to the spacecraft in some convenient form) or an antimatter rocket are looking like the best ideas at present.

      Steve

    6. Re:Ironically by FireFury03 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is probably some engineering trick to work around this. It might be possible to use mirrors to shine on the opposite side of the sail. Almost surely wouldn't be as fast, but seems like it would be doable.

      Interesting idea... you wouldn't be able to carry the mirror with you once you turned around (since the mirror would be producing exactly the opposite force of your solar sail), but you could probably drop it in space pointing in the right direction - the mirror would accellerate backwards because of the light pressure but it would still reflect the light forwards which I guess you could use.

    7. Re:Ironically by atcurtis · · Score: 3, Informative


      You're forgetting the biggest drawback of the Bussard Ramjet... That is the gas collection.

      The gas collection mechanism will create such resistance at high velocities that it would jam up and slow the device down a lot.

      I believe that there has been some research done which suggest that it would never be able to obtain velocities exceeding 0.1c let alone 'relativistic velocities'.

      I think we are more or less stuck on this island Earth, until we can think of something better than Newtonian physics to traverse the gap between the stars... Some revolution akin to Gene Roddenberry's Warp drive or Iain Banks's Exotic Matter drive - something which doesn't require a reaction mass.

      OT: Early STTOS was fun - somehow the warp drive sound effects always sound like the London Underground trains...

      --
      -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
      -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
  3. Solar sail by Uplore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What I dont understand is how they intend to protect these massive sails from being shot full of holes by meteorites and space dust as it propels its way through space.

    Also, seing as how it is powered by solar wind, what happens when the craft is between 2 or more stars which are all exerting equal force on the sails. With no fuel it is doomed to slow down and be 'blown' around in space.

    --
    I couldn't think of a sig.
    1. Re:Solar sail by whopis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ever seen a radiometer? or hear about the radiation pressure equation?


      This is a common misconception... one that even Maxwell mistakenly believed. Apparently along with the folks at Encyclopedia Britannica as well.

      Pay attention to which way a radiometer turns. If it were turning due to radiation pressure, it should act as if a force were pushing on the white side of the plates. Since the white plates reflect the light, there should be twice as much pressure on them as there is on the black plates which absorb the light. (It takes a greater transfer of momentum for something to bounce off of you than for you to catch it... think of the conservation laws).


      The problem with the radiometer is that it turns the wrong directions... it acts as if something is pushing on the black side of the plates. And there is... air pressure. The black side will reach a higher temperature than the white side, and then due to the thermal transpiration, the gas near the edges moves from the hot side to the cool side, and in doing so it pushes the blades along.


      Radiometers are in a near vacuum, but there is enough air pressure inside to allow this effect to happen.

    2. Re:Solar sail by serutan · · Score: 4, Informative

      The article was short on technical details. A lot more info can be found easily on the net, such as here.

      To clear up one point, solar sails are not powered by the solar wind, which is a stream of particles. They are powered by light, which exerts several thousand times more force than the solar wind.

      The sail is not direction. It is affected by light coming from all directions, but it "blows" in the direction of the prevailing light, which would come from the brightest/closest star. To change direction a solar sail ship must change the angle of the sail in relation to the nearest star.

      At the start of a journey the sail would be ahead of the ship, towing the ship behind it. Sometime between stars the ship could use small maneuvering jets or something to flip itself around and put the sail behind it. The increasingly strong light from the destination star would gradually slow it down.

      More likely though, the sail would be retracted or jettisoned in mid-journey, when the light from the destination star equalled the light from the original star. This is when the ship would be at its maximum velocity. It would then coast at that speed for the rest of the trip and use the gravity of the destination star or planets to decelerate much more quickly.

    3. Re:Solar sail by JohnPM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nice post, but one detail has to be wrong. If you could use the destination system for gravity braking then you would be able to equally use our own system for gravity acceleration. The only way the destination is more effective is if you actually slam into it (or perform aerobraking).

      The speeds involved in inter-stellar are so high that gravity assisted decelleration is probably out of the question. Aero-braking in an atmosphere is certainly not an option. There have been some proposals for braking on interstellar hydrogen I believe (ramjet concept).

      --
      Karma police, I've given all I can, it's not enough, I've given all I can, but we're still on the payroll.
  4. What Solar Sails Are by SlashChick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In case you, like me, didn't know that much about solar sails, there's a great article at How Stuff Works about them: How Solar Sails Will Work. Looks like a pretty interesting technology!

  5. Physics by caitsith01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone care to fill us in on the rate at which the energy received by a surface decreases with distance? I imagine that, given the incredibly weak force applied by light, it would take one HUGE sail to get anything like meaningful acceleration for space travel. Surely be the time you are a few million kilometres from the Sun the amount of force being applied will have dropped off by a huge amount?

    Anyway, we should get to Mars and back a few times before we try to get to the stars... baby steps.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Physics by CrankyFool · · Score: 4, Informative

      The amount of force exerted on the sail decreases as a square of the distance (since the amount of light reaching the sail decreases by a square of the distance). We're not talking about 'meaningful acceleration' in anything like our current thinking of space travel -- this isn't "get on this space yacht and a few months down the road you'll get to the other star," but rather "put something on this vessel and several hundred/thousand years from now it'll get to where you wanted it to get."

      This isn't about travel.

      Either way, the Japanese are trying to make this look cool by saying it's star-faring technology. Probably true, but only because we're not likely to put humans on this thing -- so it's possible we'll do this before we get to Mars, because the expense and risk could be vastly lower.

  6. Wrong by HeghmoH · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...it is the only technology now in existence that can one day take us to the stars.

    Orion can take us to the stars, and it can be done with today's technology, not something that's just starting to enter the very earliest test phases. But it's nuk-yu-ler, so it doesn't count.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    1. Re:Wrong by gilroy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Orion can take us to the stars, and it can be done with today's technology, not something that's just starting to enter the very earliest test phases.

      Because Orion needs to carry its fuel, its period of acceleration is necessarily limited. If you count Orion as a star-faring technology, then you need to count chemical rockets, too... Just ask Pioneer 10.
  7. Obvious Answer by rf0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Solar Anchor :)

    Rus

  8. Re:Wrong-A "glowing" recommendation. by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry, but that is incorrect. There is a design from the late 60s for an Orion starship that could get to Alpha Centauri in 130 years, for the whopping cost of $1 trillion. Thats much faster than a solar sail could ever hope to do.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  9. Not a working solar sail as such by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 4, Informative
    Quote from article:
    ISAS succeeded in deploying a big thin film for solar sail in space for the first time in the world. ISAS launched a small rocket S-310-34 from Uchinoura Space Center in Kagoshima, Japan, at 15:15, August 9, 2004 (Japan Standard Time). The launch was the culmination of a historic new technology, the world-first successful full-fledged deployment of big films for solar sail.
    My interpretation of this and the rest of the article is that they were testing deployment mechanisms for sail material, rather than deploying a working solar sail.

    The pictures in the article which show the test sail deployed immediately behind the launch vehicle imply the same thing. The following text says that the launch vehicle reentered and splashed down 400 seconds after liftoff. This can only mean that both the LV and the sail experiment were in ballistic flight when the latter was deployed. For a solar sail to work, it would need to be deployed after orbital insertion (or after escaping the magnetosphere.) The article does not mention orbital insertion, nor was there time for this to occur.

  10. Good to see by T.Hobbes · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It's very good to see this branch of space technology getting funding. I'd rather travel in a starship with warp drive, but until then we need some feasable way to get to other stars. There's no reason, in my mind, why we shouldn't send a few of these off to nearby stars with the sole purpose of taking some close-in measurements and somehow getting the data back here (getting the data back would probably be harder than getting the spacecraft there in the first place). The very fact that it would take hundreds or thousands of years for them to get there is the best reason to start sending them now.

    Let's all raise a glass of Sake to the engineers behind this project!

  11. Interstellar travel it wasn't. by Alsee · · Score: 4, Informative

    They deployed a sail less than two minutes after launch, had it in place less than two minutes, threw it away, deployed a second sail, then less than three minutes later it crashed into the ocean.

    Total trip, liftoff to crash-down, less than 7 minutes.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  12. Not wind! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just to clarify what people seem to be mistaking, the sail is *not* powered by Solar Wind, it is powered by the light of from the sun. The idea is that each photon of light that reflects off of the surface of the sail transfers a little bit of it's momentum to the sail.

  13. Solar sailing by antikarma · · Score: 4, Funny

    It won't be a viable method of transportation between solar systems until it has an anti-pirate defense system. Giant solar sails just scream "come and get me space pirates."

  14. Re:Not so fast... by gilroy · · Score: 4, Informative
    Blockquoth the poster:

    This may be true, but it'll take another technology to take you there safely: brakes.


    Um, no. As you approach the destination star, its light pressure will start to counteract your velocity and slow you down. The "brakes" are built in.
  15. 2 questions (Earth altitude, Sol heliosphere exit) by MMHere · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1. Did they get high enough above Earth to enter the inter-planetary "void," and thus avoid the significant effects of Earth's atmosphere? 100, 230, and 400 seconds after liftoff hardly seem "high enough."

    2. What happens to such sails when they cross the heliosphere of a regionally prominent star such as Sol? Is it all chaotic photons and miscellanous radiation in the interstellar "void?" Or are conditions regulated by the nearest stellar bodies?

    -- In other words, how would one navigate effectively once the prominent wind from Sol fades and is replaced by other forces? Are you doomed to follow your trajectory mainly established by Sol once you leave its heliosphere, possibly modifed by various minor (uncontrollable) forces from other winds in the void? Can you take advantage of such extra-Solar winds to go where you want?

  16. Just a question... by ScottZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How do you run against the solar wind? What are the appropriate forces to run your 'keel' against when you want to track across a solar system (say, to somewhere useful)?

    Anyone got any pointers?

  17. calculations from NASA by gentoo4ever · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These solar sails are pretty useless. Here http://solarsails.jpl.nasa.gov/introduction/design -construction.html are calculations from NASA guys. It looks like this Japanese sail has acceleration of few mm/s^2 and is not able to get out of sun gravitational field (and, of course, the Earth's one). It would take solar sail 100 years to get to alpha centauri if it had acceleration 10 m/s^2 (table 3 in the above link, there is "-" in the table for 5 m/s^2 and less , that is it will never get away from sun ). There was a good idea though to build a huge mirror to focus sunlight on such sail. This would effectivly increase surface area of a sail and pressure would not drop as square of the distanse from the sun.

    1. Re:calculations from NASA by Johnny+Vector · · Score: 4, Informative
      3 millimeters per second squared, and after a week you're moving at 1.8 kilometers per second. After a month, 7.2 kilometers per second. After 2 months, you've already exceeded Earth's escape velocity from the surface, let alone from orbit. Solar escape velocity at 1 AU is about 48 kilometers per second, so it would take you half a year to get fast enough to escape the solar system altogether. Actually, less than that, because as you're accelerate you're moving outward and so the solar escape velocity from your present position is continuously decreasing, but I'm in no mood for calculus right now.

      Except you're losing thrust faster than the escape velocity decreases. Escape velocity goes as 1/sqrt(r), whereas the light intensity (hence thrust) goes as 1/r^2. Solar sails probably aren't the best way to go interstellar. But then, neither is anything else we can imagine at the moment. sigh

      And now, safely buried in the comments because I have limited bandwidth...

      Photos of the Uchinoura Space Center, from back when they called it Kagoshima Space Center. (Kagoshima is the prefecture, Uchinoura is the town. Nobody in Japan has heard of Uchinoura, so they called it Kagoshima Space Center until with the increased level of joint projects with a certain American space agency they decided 'KSC' was too easy to confuse with Kennedy Space Center.)

  18. Re:Solar vs. wind sail by CrowScape · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where wind sails have Bernoulli to work off of to go against the wind, solar sails have Newton. What the gp is saying is you start off in orbit around a star. If you want to get away from that star, you angle your sail +45 degrees, which reflects the light back along your orbit. Thanks to conservation of momentum you gain tangental velocity which propells you in a spiral outwards as you slowly break the sun's gravitational pull. If you want to go towards that star, you angle your sail -45 degrees, reflecting the light forward along your orbit. You lose tangental velocity and the sun's gravitational pull reels you in. You're right, completely different principles are at work, but you get a similar result.

    --
    common sense: noun
    What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
  19. Featured in a BBC documentary by O0o0Oblubb!O0o0O · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you who are - like me - not experts in physics, this technology was featured in the BBC documentary "Space" presented by Sam Neill.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0273608/

    http://www.bbcshop.com/invt/bbcdvd1090&bklist=ic at ,5,,11,science,831

    One of the chapters discusses how travel to other stars would be possible. As far as I remember there is another technical solution in discussion which would involve nuclear detonations as part of a propulsion system. (I might have confused something there, though)

  20. solar wind by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Solar sails do not use (or not primarely, exept maybe when close to the star, in the beginning) solar wind to propel itself. It uses the reflection of the sunlight; thus, photons, rather then ions.

    It's also not correct that solarsails can't be used to reach other suns, because the sun there gives an oposite force. It's quite trivial, when using adaptive (rotating) solarsails, which have only one higly reflective side, to slow down or accelerate when nearing a solarsystem. And even withing a solarsystem; for an interesting project in that regard, see the planetary society where they plan to launch the first non-gov solarsail-powered probe.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  21. Re:Limitations of Solar Sails by Ronny+Cook · · Score: 3, Informative
    Solar sails can be used to move towards or away from a star. The trick is that the sail is not generally perpendicular to the star but at a 45 degree angle, so that light is reflected behind the vehicle (to accelerate), in front of it (to slow down) or at some sideways angle (for a sideways vector).

    If you accelerate, you move into a higher orbit (and move away from the star). If you decelerate you move into a lower orbit (towards the star). Sideways vectors are used to change the plane of your orbit.

    All this acceleration lasts as long as you have light. So even if the sail only gives you 0.001g of acceleration, after three hours that's as much acceleration as a one second, one gee burn... but you have not used any fuel. This can carry on for many months, and at the end of that time you have as much "fuel" as you started with.

    I actually agree that, barring powerful lasers to "push" the sail, solar sails are not an interstellar technology; they don't build up enough speed quickly enough. However it's not true that interstellar debris will slow the sail down substantially. The amount of interstellar material is just not enough to affect it. The density of the local interstallar medium is actually around 10^5 atoms per cubic metre. That is an *incredibly* hard vacuum. One hydrogen atom is about 1.67x10^-27 kg; a 1km square sail will hit 10^14 of these for each kilometre of travel. The sail will have to travel roughly 6x10^12km to encounter one kilo of hydrogen. Alpha Centauri is about 4x10^13km away; in getting there you'll encounter about six kilograms of material.

    That's simplifying a bit, as matter is much denser than that before you hit the heliopause. On the other hand, once radiation pressure becomes negligible, turn your sail sideways to the interstellar medium and it won't hit *anything*.

    Within a solar system, they are an incredibly efficient means of transportation, because they give constant acceleration with no fuel cost. Outside of the solar system, they are much less useful without the aid of lasers boosting your radiation pressure.

    Robert Forward's "Rocheworld" (AKA Flight of the Dragonfly) is SF but covers interstellar use of solar sails fairly well. The SF short "The Wind from the Sun" by Arthur C Clarke (I think I have that title right) gives a good overview of use within a solar system.

  22. dumb shmuck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What the hell is wrong with you? You hear of a well-thought-out idea developed, examined, and approved by physicists, and without looking into it, you dismiss it with your first couple of off-the-top-of-your-head thoughts.

    OF COURSE it's not shining laser light into the sails from the ship itself, like a sailboat with a fan on it, you unbelievable moron. And as for getting "worse and worse with aim", you DO NOT TRY AND POINT THE LASER AT THE FAST-MOVING AND LIGHT-YEARS-DISTANT SPACESHIP, AND DO COURSE CORRECTIONS BY MOVING THE LASER, you just keep the laser pointed at the destination, and do course correction at the ship.

    The problem here is not so much that you completely misunderstood the whole concept, it's that you so vastly overestimate your intelligence and knowledge that you didn't recognize your stunning incapacity to evaluate this suggestion.

    So let's review:
    1- you're not as bright as you think
    2- other people are brighter than you think
    3- other people have often evaluated things a lot more thoroughly than you are capable of doing in 30 seconds
    4- if you don't understand something, it's more likely your own defect than a problem with the expressed idea
    5- sit down and shut the fuck up, you arrogant ignoramus

    Now that that's out of the way, there certainly are practical issues with this method of space travel. It's just that they have absolutely nothing to do with what you thought they were.

  23. Other Existing Technology by Edward+Faulkner · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is another existing technology that could travel interstellar distances. NASA's Orion project designed a starship propelled by nuclear weapons and a big pusher plate. And yes, the crew can be properly shielded.

    Of course what we really should be working on is actual nuclear rockets - controlled nuclear burn instead of explosives. Nuclear gas core rockets are really not beyond present technology, their exhaust is cleaner than the space shuttle's, and they're so powerful you can build big, heavy, safe vehicles.

    --
    "The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is unfit to govern." - Lord Acton
  24. Limited directions? by wikdwarlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can someone in the know answer me this:

    Since a solar sail needs light pressure to accelerate, can it only accelerate in a direct line away from a star?

    also

    Isn't there a problem, once the sail gets far enough from its original star, that pressure from other stars will interfere w/ the path?

    --

    "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear