Wired on Defeating the Olympics Censorship
An anonymous reader writes "As discussed on Slashdot recently, Internet footage of Olympics events are being censored for US citizens. Wired.com is covering the issue in a recent story, discussing ways of defeating these measures. Duane Wessels, developer of the Squid caching proxy, and Len Sassaman, Mixmaster anonymity software author, are interviewed. Are they correct? Is geolocation content censorship impossible?"
They have to pander to the gov't more than other channels as ultimately the gov controls the tax fee we brits have to pay.
Prohibition never works.
> We the british public fund the BBC through our licence fee, it is because of this fee that we
> have impartial, and world wide recognised excelelnt broadcasts from the BBC.
There is no such thing as an impartial broadcast. No human or group of humans is capable of being truly impartial, unbiased, etc. Everybody has an agenda. It is the way of things. I'm sick of high-and-mighty Europeans telling us how corrupt we are in America. You're all either hypocrites or even more naive than most Americans.
And FYI, NBC's prime time coverage is tape-delayed because "prime time" here is the middle of the night in Athens... I'm sure were missing whole lot of fascinating olympic action at 3 am! There are plenty of live events broadcast on NBC's cable networks between 4 am and noon our time.
Maybe, you know, people want to see and hear about people that they can fucking UNDERSTAND and have HEARD OF BEFORE. Check the Spanish language coverage. Your main coverage is of Spanish, Puerto Rican, and Mexican competitors. Those people are known better in Spanish speaking countries than most American competitors are, BECAUSE THAT IS WHERE THEY ARE FROM. The Olympics are ALL ABOUT making your country look like the best, and if you haven't learned this in the thousands of years the Olympics have existed, you're a fucking idiot.
A quick Google search turns up no mention of any kind of replica Parthenon in Georgia. There is one in Nashville, however. What this means is that you're either mistaken or a fucking moron, and I'd bet the latter.
'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.