Slashdot Mirror


Not Enough Ads? Install Adbar.

An anonymous reader writes "Jesse Ruderman brings the worst feature of Opera, Advertisements, to Firefox with his extension Adbar. According to the page, 'adbar displays Google ads related to pages you view. Because the ads are relevant, they are occasionally useful. When adbar isn't displaying ads from Google, it displays Firefox-related things such as silly Firefox slogans, ads for other Mozilla software, and requests for donations to the Mozilla Foundation.'"

19 of 451 comments (clear)

  1. Does Google know about this? by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google is very strict about where they allow their ads to be shown. For example, Google will not feed ads to sites that express extreme political views, or deal with taboo topics such as internet gambling.

    So, I'm wondering if they approved this project. If they haven't, then Google will be pulling the plug very shortly...

    1. Re:Does Google know about this? by KrispyKringle · · Score: 2, Informative

      ``adbar uses the `test' adsense mode, so advertisers don't pay Google and Google doesn't pay anyone.'' Always good to click the links. That's what they're there for. ;)

    2. Re:Does Google know about this? by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      A: Take this "test" feature offline. It wasn't that useful anyway.

      B: Require that an AdSense publisher have a cookie linking them to an AdSense account, and kill off any account that doesn't play by the rules.

      C: Limit the number of requests per day in the same way they limit the Google API.

    3. Re:Does Google know about this? by jesser · · Score: 4, Informative

      Correct, the reason it runs in test mode is that I haven't asked the Adsense folks at Google for permission yet.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
  2. Re:cashola! by GregChant · · Score: 2, Informative
    Who gets the Google-bucks from the Google Ads?? Dang, now I wish I wrote that adbar thingy...

    RTFA.

    Who gets money?
    adbar uses the "test" adsense mode, so advertisers don't pay Google and Google doesn't pay anyone.
  3. Re:Well by GregChant · · Score: 4, Informative
    I think people should support advertizing projects that take the high moral road. I'm going to reward these guys for staying legit and we'll see how it turns out.

    But you're not helping anyone other than the advertisers. The adbar is run in test mode: the developer doesn't make a dime, and google doesn't make a dime.

    So, unless you're referring to the moral high road of all advertisers who display web ad content, which I find hard to believe, you're just another schmuck who hasn't read the damn article

  4. Jesse Ruderman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't that the same guy who runs Pornzilla?

  5. Re:Registering to get rid of ads? by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Informative

    That and people are stupid enough to actually pay him.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  6. Re:Well by DetrimentalFiend · · Score: 2, Informative

    RTFA...er...page

    they don't

  7. Re:That's the thing about ads by jesser · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are two ways advertisers can "violate your privacy".

    * They can send you unwanted advertisements (spam e-mail, junk faxes, telemarketing, adware). With spam and ads from adware, it is often difficult to tell where the ad came from and how to stop receiving ads from that source.

    * They can select which ads to show you based on information you consider private, such as demographic information or the contents of e-mails you receive.

    I don't mind the second, as long as I don't see ads for porn while someone is looking over my shoulder. Google was wise to make Gmail select ads based only on the current message.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  8. Re:Speaking of ads...how can I get more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    some sites use a redirect from their own site url for the images, or use a subdirectory within their own url for image serving. Any way of blocking, for example, a single subdirectory of images for a specific site (ie: http://nytimes.com/ads/intrusive.jpg, blocking http://nytimes.com/ads/ without blocking content from http://nytimes)?

    Use adblock. For those pesky IPs /123.456.789.012/ will block from that IP. /ads/ will block any URL that contains that string ads. http://nytimes/ads/*.jpg will block jpgs from that directory. http://nytimes/ads/* will block everything from that directory.

    It's very simple to use. Use wildcards and regexes to block whole categories not just individual ads.
  9. Re:BAH! Missing features! by jesser · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you upgrade from Firefox 0.9.x to a branch nightly build (or wait for Firefox 1.0 Preview Release), middle-clicking and control-clicking the ads will do the right thing.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  10. Re:license by jesser · · Score: 2, Informative

    My initial plan was to use the MPL. mozilla.org provides a combined MPL/GPL/LGPL boilerplate block, so it's just as easy to tri-license the code as it is to MPL it.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  11. Re:Yeah, ok. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  12. Re:Get rid of the ads? by jesser · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're "test ads" in that they don't generate revenue, but they're still loaded from pageads2.googlesyndication.com.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  13. Re:I find the Opera thing quite useful by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unregistered Operas have an ad box. I'm using one now. As I said before this doesn't bug me except from chomping some screen space.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  14. Re:Opera users by LPetrazickis · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is still no way to have a vertical tab bar, quickly toggle on/off all formatting, or quickly cycle between All Images/No Images/Loaded Images.

    Also, Opera still has a magical interface. If I misclose a window, I can hit Ctrl+Z/Ctrl+Alt+Z and it is magically restored. I don't need to install extensions to get tabs to behave sensically.

    And so on.

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  15. He did buy the uid on ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    who modded this as funny? he did buy the uid on ebay A very little amount of research will also reveal the uid of the user who bought it.

    1. Re:He did buy the uid on ebay by bgarcia · · Score: 4, Informative
      Good god!

      He paid $115 for that ID! I guess he was sick of his current low karma

      LOL!

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.