Slashdot Mirror


Television On Your Cell Phone

XopherMV writes "MobiTV is billed as the first streaming service to broadcast real-time video to cell phones. Offered by Sprint, it costs an additional $9.99 monthly, is adding new channels, and supports various handsets. My phone features 21 channels, some of them typical broadcast channels like Fox Sports and MSNBC, while others are designed for the mobile environment, such as NBC Mobile. What's it like to watch TV on a cell phone? The TV junkie in me says it's great. I really like the idea that I can pull my cell phone out of my pocket and catch up with the latest news and sports scores in an instant. Read on at MSN."

17 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Boston suffers season long recession by fishdan · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Good Lord. If they can get the Red Sox broadcasts fromNESN on this, I predict a HUGE work impact. I know other cities love their sports, but the Red Sox are bigger than Jesus in Boston. If people could watch games on their cellphone, there would be no work done during day games.

    I do wonder what the impact on people's driving will be.

    --
    Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
  2. I just don't see it by Nos. · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure this is going to be aimed more at people wanting to catch up on the latest news and sports, but personally, this is not a service I would pay for. If I'm looking for up to date news/sports/stocks etc. I'd be more likely to want a phone with wireless Internet. I would want the information now, and want to be able to drill down to my own intrests as opposed to waiting until the TV finally gets to the little bit of information I actually want to hear. Lets face it, you're not going to "see" very detailed pictures on your cell phone.

  3. good idea? by dncsky1530 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its great that companies are able to offer TV on cell phones, but it is really necessary? I for one have a camera phone with wireless internet and most of the features on that phone go unused. Internet enabled cell phones are usefull for stock quotes and news, and mabey checking mail. Having TV on the phone would not only drain the battery but people would have to watch the news for 10 minutes to get to a story that affects them instead of having it on demand like the internet. Thanks, but no thanks, i'll save my battery life for making calls.

  4. Cue the phone Ludittes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I give it 10 minutes before the first phone Luditte who comes complaining that nobody makes good plain phones anymore gets modded up.

    1. Re:Cue the phone Ludittes by gusgizmo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Man, I hate how no one makes good, plain cell-phones anymore. I mean, what has this world come to? But all silliness aside, it would be cool if someone came up with a really simple phone that could be mass-produced, then coupled it with a really cheap unlimited plan. Then I could hack the phone and use it for mobile access to slashdot ;)

  5. Sports scores? by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 3, Insightful

    really like the idea that I can pull my cell phone out of my pocket and catch up with the latest news and sports scores in an instant.

    I've been doing that for decades. l use a radio. It's free.

  6. Not Again by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful


    My kingdom for a cellphone that concentrates on 1 thing PHONE CALLS...Oh yea and this includes coverage quality and battery life.

    I may be a technogeek -- but I discovered that my last 2 cellphones sure have had lots a little gadgets and cost oodles of money, but were sorely lacking in the old business of using as a phone.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  7. when you thought TV couldnt get worse by to+be+a+troll · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we can only imagine how crappy TV can become... with the current incoherent and pathetic state television programming is in, combined with the highly developed yet second rate connection a cell phone provides, i am sure this will be beyond irritating...
    technology yet again takes bold a step forward...
    and the show must go on!!

    --
    ~slashdot are my only freinds ):
  8. Instant Updates? by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I can pull my cell phone out of my pocket and catch up with the latest news and sports scores in an instant.

    I'm sick and tired of the instant-info-internet too. I'm moving back to TV where I have to watch for 20 minutes to see the sports scores or news that I want.

  9. More is better, but... by NEOGEOman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Japanese phones have had the ability to receive broadcast TV (via the internal antenna, not a re-packaged pay-to-view version) in several phones for a while now. Have a look at this Vodafone NEC unit.

    It's not about the extra abilities in my phone, it's the disabilities that are newsworthy. The TV phone linked above has ridiculous DRM - you can save video clips and screenshots, but not transfer them. The powers that be fear losing what control they've got that you can't transfer the images or video clips you make with your phone, not to your computer. They're locked on the phone. Java apps are locked to the phone, if you have to replace the phone you're f**ked, unless you can transfer them to the SD card - if the phone has a slot - and even then only if your new phone is the same manufacturer and the same phone number. The phones are locked to the carrier, there's absolutely no way no how to use a Vodafone on DoCoMo's network, end of story. You can play music files, but only ones encoded by the locked-down software app, so they're useless to any other music device.

    On the bright side, mine has a 2megapixel camera that does pretty nice work, so it's mad handy when I don't want to lug around the real camera and see something neat.

    Where was I... Oh yeah: More features are good, but please - make these features useful and not more restrictive than the alternatives, ok? Anyone listening?

    nope...

  10. is it better by elinenbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    than Ad in your Slashdot? I sure hope so, because these ads disguised as "stories" are getting a bit old.

    --
    -eric
  11. The real question is this by Slinky+Saves+the+Wor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Are you willing to PAY some amount of money, to see the sports score or whatever, in your cellphone NOW, OR will you wait until you're at home/work where you can see the same score from the Internet for NO COST?

    I usually go for no cost, i.e. home or work or friend's place, although I could check using the cellphone... but it's just too cumbersome and slow. In short, inconvenient. And this even though I don't pay for my phone bills!

    The "services" and whatever, those are just too difficult and cumbersome to use or start using.

    --
    I do not moderate.
  12. just another step by bwy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This just seems to never end. I have no argument with technology of any kind- I think it is great. But the way people use the technology gets on my nerves.

    This is just another tool for people to act like asses- now watching TV on their phone while you're eating dinner with them or catching sports scores while in a staff meeting. People already walk around in a complete daze while on cell phones, seemingly unaware of anything around them. I wonder why people can't just enjoy themselves doing whatever they are doing? I guess I just don't understand the need to always be glued to a blackberry or cell phone. What stock quote is so important or what conversation is so critical that it has to take place while you're getting checked out at the supermarket? Or during one of a thousand other inappropriate times.

  13. What about RSS instead? by Silwenae · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I understand in a society of instant gratification TV on a cell phone could be cool.

    But how often do you turn on MSNBC or Fox Sports and get the news you want right then without having to wait for the top of the hour news or ticker scores instead.

    What I would actually use on a cell phone is some kind of customized RSS feed, but more than what exists today. I'd think there has to be a way for a Fox Sports or an ESPN to create an RSS feed every 15 minutes with the latest scores. Let me subscribe to that over a cell internet connection, and let me pick the feed (for example NHL, NBA, NFL, MLB etc) or do the same for customized news.

    This way you can avoid televesion commercials and have some content on your phone personalized for what you want instead of taking what the big media companies give you.

  14. The first? by interactive_civilian · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So said the submitter:
    MobiTV is billed as the first streaming service to broadcast real-time video to cell phones.
    The first? Well, maybe in the US, but I believe Vodafone Japan has had TV on some of their phones for a little while now...

    The PDF about the V402SH describes one such phone...

    Of course, on the one hand it is different from the service mentioned above in that it is not a streaming service but rather a built-in tuner, but on the other hand it has no additional cost...

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  15. propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I really like the idea that I can pull my cell phone out of my pocket and catch up with the latest news and sports scores in an instant.

    catch up with the latest propaganda, you mean. And pay for it too..

    If you want to catch up with the latest news, better use a simple RSS feed reader on your mobile and tune in to the alternative media. Real News, and alot cheaper too.

  16. Re:I'd rather have annotated radio by j3110 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >> The screens are too small for good TV watching.

    I know exactly what you mean... When are cell phone makers going to get it. All I want is a 52" Plasma Screen HDTV Dolby 6.1 system built into my phone, and why does no one make a 6MP camera phone with live video conferencing? Why can't I play the latest games on my phone... I'm tired of connect 4, I want to play something with great graphics like Doom 3. I hate getting disturbed while I'm taking pictures, watching tv, playing games, and browsing the internet, so why don't these companies give me the option to turn off incoming calls?

    Ok... I think I'm done ranting sarcasticly now.

    Isn't there more important things for these phone makers to be worrying about... you know... like security? With all those recent articles about how bluetooth phones just surrender to anyone clever enough to know what bluetooth is, one would think that would be a priority. Maybe they could put their R&D team to work on finding a way to not rape their customers.

    --
    Karma Clown