Slashdot Mirror


Dozens Charged in Spam Crackdown

JohnnyGTO writes "Federal and state law enforcement agencies have quietly arrested or charged dozens of people with crimes related to junk e-mail, identity theft and other online scams in recent weeks, according to several people involved in the actions."

28 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. Dozens? by Klar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shouldn't it be a lot larger number? I mean, I'm glad that they are trying to stop this stuff, but please. Make a big impact showing how much we hate spammers, and maybe, just maybe, it will scare a bunch and lower our spam in our inboxes.

  2. Hmmm... by Megaweapon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But Mr. Linford of Spamhaus said he thought that the current wave of prosecutions had the potential to at least temporarily diminish the flood of spam.

    Does ANYONE think that this will reduce spam in the near future? I'm still getting flooded, and I'll bet anything that my spam filters won't get any kind of a breather just because of a few arrests.

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    1. Re:Hmmm... by king-manic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does ANYONE think that this will reduce spam in the near future? I'm still getting flooded, and I'll bet anything that my spam filters won't get any kind of a breather just because of a few arrests.

      isn't that a great defeatist attitude. Spam is not like an inevitable problem. It can be dealt with. A email system with authentication, A tougher stance from the law, it all helps.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  3. they'll need money by Texodore · · Score: 4, Funny

    They may have to keep all the money from the prince of Nigeria, who died 10 years ago in a terrible plane crash, to pay attorney fees. At least they have that.

  4. "Quietly?" by Caradoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't part of the punishment for the crime supposed to be that it serves as a deterrent for other's who'd do the same thing?

    To quote Dr. Strangelove:

    "Of course, the whole point ... is lost, if you keep it a *secret*! Why didn't you tell the world, eh?"

    --
    Specialization is for insects. - R.A.H.
    1. Re:"Quietly?" by Performer+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There will be a press conference later today, if you're rounding up crooks in a crackdown you don't announce the fact after the initial arrests because you tip off everyone else. I expect they didn't have enough computer forensic specialists to do the classic coast to coast simultaneous door knock. Computer forensics will play a huge part in catching phishers.

      This is a good thing, phishing & identity theft is evil and the scumbags doing it have assumed that they can get away with brazen theft. It's about time some serious attempt to jail these a*holes was made.

  5. Yes, but... by gillbates · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many of them had the FBI break down their doors and seize their computers? Or was it more like "Mr Spammer, after you've called your attorney, we'd like you to come down to the station for a few hours..."

    I mean, it's not like they're hackers....

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Yes, but... by Ignignot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know you were being ironic, but I think it will be missed by most people reading your post.

      So: spammers do fit the popular definition of hackers as people who do bad things to other people's computers without their permission. Even leaving aside how sending spam to someone could be construed to be damaging, they almost certainly use zombie hosts to send emails - this is definitely "evil hacking". So for once I hope the FBI and Secret Service go in and take all their computer stuff, then lock them in a room with a large lonely man named bubba.

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
  6. Ashcroft is now good? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does this mean that Ashcroft is now our friend or is this the wrong week?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Ashcroft is now good? by mwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You haven't grasped the essence of the situation.

      Whoever Mr. Ashcroft is in private life, the Attorney General of the United States is not your friend or your enemy; he has a job to do and we expect that he is doing it. One day that will work for you; another day it will work against you. You may agree or disagree with the way that he does it, but it shouldn't be anything personal, on his part or yours.

      Business is not about friends and enemies. Business is about achieving objectives.

    2. Re:Ashcroft is now good? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 4, Informative
      Whoever Mr. Ashcroft is in private life... he has a job to do... You may agree or disagree with the way that he does it, but it shouldn't be anything personal, on his part or yours.

      Well, what I know about him personally isn't much, but what there is of it I don't like (e.g. the 'covering up' of the justice statue because of (heaven forfend) a breast).

      The way he has carried out his job, however, I find abhorrent. Pushing the "PATRIOT Act", all by itself, would warrant my condemnation. But looking into how much torture U.S. interrogators could get away with, and refusing to own up to it, is beneath contempt.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  7. Public executions for spammers. by azav · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd pay for a ticket - or at least a web cast.

    Sell "execution privs" on a ebay to the highest bidder.

    Use licensed Marshals and bounty hunters to capture them.

    Put a bounty on their heads.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Public executions for spammers. by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Sell "execution privs" on a ebay to the highest bidder.

      "chmod +x *", hardly used, $500 OBO

  8. And in other news... by gowen · · Score: 4, Informative

    The US is still the biggest source of spam on the net, pumping out nearly 3 times as much as its closest competitor.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  9. Re:Quietly Arrested by mwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Patience! We have to convict them first. Arrested != proven guilty.

    After the proof, go for it. Don't bother with helmets when you drag them to the moon; the enclosure would restrict their freedom of speech. :-}

  10. About time by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's about time that law enforcement began to see spam for what it is -- not just an annoying bulk mailing operation, but part of a larger racketeering operation that's primarily focused on defrauding people.

    I've long advocated RICO-style investigations (if not actual RICO prosecutions) of the entire world of spam. This doesn't just mean the bulk mailing operations, but the people behind the actual spamvertised businesses and their legitimate-world suppliers.

    Broad-based prosecutions promising long prison time not only for spammers, and spam businesses but for people who knowingly make money off of spammers (banks, ISPs, list vendors, etc) will go a long way towards demotivating people in the legitimate business world from working with spammers/spam businesses.

    Spammers and spam businesses need a certain cooperation and acceptance in the legitimate business world to make money. Without that, they'll be far less effective.

  11. Missed the most interesting part by pertinax18 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The submitter missed the most interesting part of the entire article: the fact that this crackdown is financed mainly by spammers (the direct marketing assoc)! They probably are just trying to get rid of the most blatant illegal stuff so they can further their goal of legitamizing spam. Or they could just be cracking down on competitors with the Fed's help.

    Much of the financing for the efforts, known as Operation Slam Spam, comes from the Direct Marketing Association, a trade group that wants to promote what it sees as the legitimate use of e-mail marketing.

  12. The DMA just wants to kill the competition by Secrity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to the article, the DMA is funding this "crackdown". They are trying to make it easier for DMA members to get their spam noticed. The DMA got the you CAN Spam law written they way that they wanted it written, now they are using it to kill the competition. This is just one more example of an industry cartel using laws that they bought and paid for to kill anybody who is not a member of the cartel.

    1. Re:The DMA just wants to kill the competition by Ignignot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its fine with me if they kill off all the underground spamming from zombie'd windows boxes. If all spam originates from a cartel it will be much easier to regulate down to some sort of rational amount of communication. Right now we can't regulate spam because most of it is done outside of the law anyway. Aside from that, if all spam came from one group of people then it would be much easier to filter / block.

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
  13. Don't forget to blame the idiots by Laimbrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spammers get a lot of blame for all this, and they should - they're evil. But don't forget two important parties in all of this - the advertisers and the fools that actually READ their spam.

    Any company willing to spam others needs to have its practices reexamined. How can the justice department go after spammers and not even blink at the advertising firms that PAY to have it all done? It's like putting the hitman in jail and ignoring the mobster that hired him.

    And let's not forget that sending out mass emails has to be worth it to companies, otherwise one would think they wouldn't do it. There's a reason that you keep getting reminders to have your penis enlarged, and it's not because they found your email address on slashdot. People are buying this crap, and these morons need to be stopped now.

    I'd call for more education on the subject ("How not to click on that popup" or "How to ignore or filter your spam email"), but due to the fact that it is much more gratifying and probably cheaper overall to just throw the emailers into jail, as well as the fact that I'm a nobody, my calls would proabably go unheeded.

  14. Re:T-Minus Five Minutes & Counting... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Finding every penny can be difficult when the larger spammers route money overseas into foreign bank accounts. Then there's the Florida bankruptcy laws which make it nearly impossible to take the spammer's multi million dollar mansion (many spammers have one in Florida for this reason). I do agree, however, that more efforts like this will decrease the profitability of spamming and cause more people to come to the conclusion that spamming is not worth it. Then of course they'll go back to selling used cars, bouncing checks, or whatever they did before the internet became popular.

  15. Re:Well by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Legit" my ass.

    It's an pyramid scheme, and I'm surprised they're still running, being as such operations are illegal in the US, and most other first world nations. They must be running offshore somewhere.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  16. Spam consequences by Joe+'Nova' · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know it clogs servers, but PHBs are still fear mongering to charge $.01 for each sent email, idea being spammers will have to pay for the right(?) to abuse. I see it as punish the rest for a few, the few who will never care what happens to the innocent, they still make money.
    As a public service, the following domains have been banished, as well as 95% of Megs of spam a week:
    @2243.ewsifh398.com
    @mx31.blindu89.biz
    @o ptin1.clickformail.com

    Before I banned them, I got at least 1 meg spam/3 days. That'll kill my inbox, and my provider was kind enough to remove all my old, dust covered emails I was saving so they could provide me this bright, shiny new spam! AGH! Wanted to KILL!

    If servers would route this junk to an universal delete before it got to destination, the spammers would be out of business. There would have to be a distributed system for qualifying what was spam, and just not allowing the system to send it. Attatchments are another peeve of mine, with 30k virus attatched(Would you like to open this?). If I have never sent to the email in question, then I sould never see a Re: coming from them, filter! It would save gigs for provider alone!
    Just my thoughts, and you are entitled to them >:{

    --
    This mind intentionally left blank.
    The KKK a bunch of sheetheads? You decide!
  17. Thank God by kneecarrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whew... thank God. My penis was getting so long I was starting to trip over it.

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

  18. Re:Well by Aliencow · · Score: 5, Informative

    as I posted before, I registered a special email address on FreeIpod just for fun. Just this morning, I got 3 spams on it. "Advance in Pay; On the way!" "Validation ticket for extra funds attached" "Payday advance pending. Please inquire within"

  19. Re:Well by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they don't encourage spamming but their (semi scam) business model causes normal people to spam, and then invent all kinds of crazy reasoning how their spam isn't spam. that line of theirs encourages things like comment spamming on blogs and so on.

    i don't mind if someone wants to advertise that they're gullible in their sig tho... the whole point is that they want you to get your friends to buy expensive services or products, and actually they want you to fail after you've gained 2-3 friends who've done it. the point is that you could just ask each of your friends for 40-50$ or screw 'em over in arranged poker game(but nobody really gets 5 of his friends to do the stuff so you need to find willing people online).

    funny how people defend the program how it works _BEFORE_ they get their ipods too.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  20. Re:Quietly Arrested by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I totally agree with you. I don't see why these people are getting "quietly arrested". The number of actual scam mail (which is clearly illegal, as opposed to spam mail, which is just annoying) I've been getting recently is alarming. I'm up to getting 1 to 2 a day of the various Citibank/PayPal/eBay scam phishing mail. I don't get caught with them because I very carefully check URLs (and I use Thunderbird and Firefox so I'm not vulnerable to URL masking attacks). But I can imagine the average Joe Schmoe very easily getting taken with these scams. Law enforcement needs to track down these criminals and give them hard time. Heck, it's not even that hard ... all of the phishing scams have to rely on a faked site that is hosted somewhere on the net. Whenever I come across one of these, I check its whois data, and if it's located in the U.S., I send something off to the registrar telling them the domain is being used for something clearly illegal. Usually, within a day, the domain no longer works. Heck, about half of the phishing mail I get these days points to links that are already taken down!

  21. Re:Quietly Arrested by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    > I don't see why these people are getting "quietly arrested".
    Is it not obvious? Spammers are all being shipped to a secret government location.
    At these secure sites, Chairs, tables, projectors, and Powerpoint presentations are being prepared even as we speak.
    Clueless bureaucrats are covertly stepping out of their dreary cubicles to attend these highly classified seminars
    Within a year, "W3 R the G0vernment and R H3re 2 hep U" will be flooding the inboxes of the land.

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.