Slashdot Mirror


Internet Meltdown Predicted for Tomorrow

Kobalt writes "A few news services are reporting that Russian computer expert, Aleksandr Gostev from Kaspersky Labs, has predicted that a large chunk of the Internet will be shut down tomorrow by cyber terrorists."

12 of 914 comments (clear)

  1. Erm... by Hungry+Student · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    why?

  2. The end is near. by iamdrscience · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The end is near! Repent internet sinners, for tomorrow will be the second coming of eJesus and we will all be judged.

  3. WIll it also be toasty like a Quizno's sub? by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Then how bad can it be?

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  4. Re:google..... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So it's very likly that more than 50% of people are dumber than the average.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  5. Re:google..... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I would expect dumbness to have something closer to a normal distribution. In that case, roughly 50% of the population would be dumber than the average. Is there a reference for the distribution of dumbness?

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  6. Re:google..... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Murray and Hernstein, the Bell Curve? Seriously, I don't know if you believe that IQ really corresponds to what most of us mean when we say "smartness" or "dumbness", but it appears that these sorts of tests measure something that has some vague correspondence to the meaning we ascribe to being smart or dumb, though it's very far from perfect, and certainly fails to measure a lot of important characteristics of the mind that can be very valuable.


    Anyway, I don't think IQ distributions are perfectly normal, but they do look pretty roughly bell-like (if you don't believe that IQ has any correlation to intelligence, then I guess you can't really conclude much from the bell-like distribution). Of course, if you use some other, non-linearized scale for measuring intelligence than the mean and median will be nowhere near each other (i.e. if you consider the difference between Goethe and Joe Sixpack to be substantially more or substantially less than the difference between Joe Sixpack and a cucumber).

  7. LAST POST! by gosand · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    LAST POST!

    Just getting a jump on the competition....

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  8. Re:e-jihad perhaps? by Jord · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Even more proof that people mod at random.

    Now will this get a funny mod or off-topic? I am betting on funny since it is off-topic

  9. Re:google..... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    that is only correct 50% of the time.

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  10. Re:google..... by johnnyb · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Here's the big question (on a somewhat serious note): are made-up statistics any less accurate than those done "scientifically" but with bad questions and bad methodology?

  11. Mod Parent Up by Powercntrl · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's a rare thing that a Soviet Russia meme is on-topic. This is perfect too, because the following is true:

    A Russian computer expert, Aleksandr Gostev from Kaspersky Labs, has predicted that a large chunk of the Internet will be shut down tomorrow by cyber terrorists.

    Chernobyl is well-known for a famous meltdown.

    Too much Internet usage possibly could melt your brain.

    In light of the evidence, I say the parent post is quite funny. Besides, it's an AC, you can't karma-whore as an AC (not that funny mods count towards karma anyway).

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  12. Re:google..... by FryGuy1013 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    67% of people are more gulliable than average.

    --
    bananas like monkeys.