Slashdot Mirror


Blade Runner Is The Best Sci-Fi Film

Delchanat writes "Now there's scientific proof: according to 60 of the most influential scientists in the world, including British biologist Richard Dawkins and Canadian psychologist Steven Pinker, Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982) is the best science fiction film. Late Mr. Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) finished 2nd, followed by George Lucas' Star Wars (1977) and The Empire Strikes Back (1980)." There are several other stories as well: favorite authors, the basics of science fiction, and an excerpt of a new Iain M. Banks novel.

5 of 972 comments (clear)

  1. Logan's Run by James+Turpin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although Logans Run is one of the best sci-fi films from its era (possibly ever), most people have never heard of it, including people who have actually watched it. And this is coming from an avid fan of the series. Oh, you didn't know they made a series too? That's exactly the type of ignorance I'm talking about.

    --
    Mathematics is not a crime.
  2. Brazil by wigle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Brazil should have made top ten if for anything because of its visual and somewhat frightening view of the future. Of the best sci-fi movies Brazil is one of the least outdated (technology wise). Its theme, very similar to 1984, I suspect will always be relevant.

    --
    ::wigle::
  3. Re:Clarke's Three Laws by kalidasa · · Score: 5, Informative

    Clarke's First Law:

    "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."

    Clarke's Second Law:

    "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."

    Clarke's Third Law:

    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

    The sibling post was quicker on the gun with the third law, though it's obviously from memory.

  4. Blade Runner not all that special by Simonetta · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually Blade Runner didn't seem all that special. It was a 1940's detective story with a few 22nd century visuals. It is Humphrey Bogart film set in the future with Harrison Ford as Bogart. Rutger Hauer and Daryhl Hannah looked great in the film, the best-looking film for either of them.
    My favorite scene is Harrison Ford talking to the computer to examine in great detail the random digital photograph for clues. Each time I consider buying a digital camera, I wonder if it can get a level of detail described in that scene.

    The greatest science-fiction film ever is La Jetee (1964) by French director Chris Marker. This was the inspiration for 12 Monkeys, but it is a much better film. It's quite short at 29 minutes, but still leaves people in deep cinema shock whenever it gets shown in festivals or on campus. It's widely available in video and may be at your local library for checkout. It's a collage of black and white photos zoomed and panned like Ken Burn's documentaries with narration and music. French with English subtitles. It was written during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 when the Americans and Soviets came far too close to nuclear war than anyone wants to talk about.

    2001 was OK, but extremely slow. It does hold up after 35 years only if you have a lot of patience and are not expecting a Star Wars type of movie.

    Science Fiction is always better in books than it is in film. It's a genre that needs one's individual imagination projecting imagery from written text.

  5. Re:Non sequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This site does a very good job.

    Link