Slashdot Mirror


Logitech Gives A Mouse A Laser

Kaveh writes "Looks like Logitech has introduced a successor to its popular MX line of cordless mice. In addition to a more ergonomic design, lithium ion battery, tilt wheel (read horizontal scrolling), and battery indicating LEDs, this mouse introduces laser technology. According to the Logitech this allows the MX1000 to be 20x more precise than optical mice, not to mention work on any surface, including a mirror! Check out the 3DGPU forums for pics and more info."

16 of 511 comments (clear)

  1. Slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  2. Clickable like ;) by kunjan1029 · · Score: 4, Informative

    opps

    here's the clickable one

    Mirror

    Damn have to wait 2 minutes~

  3. Picking nits. by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just to be a dick, this isn't the first mouse that uses a laser. There were a few laser mice (pre "optical" mice) but they required a special pad so the advantages over a regular mouse were minimal (really just that you didn't have to clean them).

  4. Power effeciency of lasers by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lasers actually don't take all that much power- they're highly efficient. Then again, the LED which they're replacing doesn't usually take too much power either. My guess is that it's not a significant change.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  5. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Informative

    FUNNY!? /sorry, couldn't resist //watch this get modded informative

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  6. Re:A mirror? by peipas · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am holding the box for the MX1000 in front of me right now and it begs to differ in fine print after an asterisk:

    "The laser sensor will not work on surfaces that reflect, like mirrors or glass."

  7. Re:Class of Laser? by grondin · · Score: 3, Informative

    The picture of the bottom of the mouse shows the laser label. "Class 1 laser device"

  8. Re:Finally! by BillyBlaze · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lasers are absolutely not inherently more dangerous than any other form of light. The danger comes from the amplitude of light that enters your eye, which is a function of the power of the source, the distance, and the focusing. So assuming they focus the laser as diffusely as they focus the red light from current optical mice, it's no more dangerous.

  9. Re:A mirror? by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the forum post linked in the article:

    "Already you might be surprised to know that this mouse has had no issues with any surface I have tried it on, including a mirror. It states that you shouldn't use it with reflective surfaces but I wanted to see what this thing could do."

  10. Re:Class of Laser? by Technician · · Score: 5, Informative

    The picture of the bottom of the mouse shows the laser label. "Class 1 laser device"


    If memory serves me right, a class 1 LASER device has a totaly enclosed interlocked LASER system.

    This means no external radiation of LASER light unless the device is opened and interlocks are defeated. It's the same rating CD drives have. The drive must be opened (cover removed) and tricked into operation without a CD in place to turn on the LASER and cause any exposure.

    If it truly uses a LASER to track and is class 1, it must have another LED to sense the presence and movement of the target (table, pad, etc) before it will turn on the laser. Otherwise it would have a class 2 or 3b rating like a supermarket UPC scanner. They may have done this to save power when the mouse is not moving (low power LED when stationary or not on a surface) and to get the safer LASER class 1 rating.

    I imagine it will only kick on the LASER when the low power light detects movement and kicks on the LASER for the resolution.

    LASER is an acronym. I'm not shouting.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  11. Some pictures of the MX1000 by z3021017 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the site is /.ed:
    Picture One

    Picture Two

    --
    Bored? Visit my exciting counter page!
  12. Re:A mirror? by gregh2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I currently own a MX1000, and I have tried it on a mirror, and my computer's monitor and neither of them work. I wonder if the mirror they used had a bunch of dust on it and it was tracking the dust, or what the deal is, but it doesn't work on mine.

  13. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Something actually informative for those who don't know what this is about...

    If you give a mouse a cookie...

  14. Re:Finally! by spectecjr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lasers are absolutely not inherently more dangerous than any other form of light. The danger comes from the amplitude of light that enters your eye, which is a function of the power of the source, the distance, and the focusing. So assuming they focus the laser as diffusely as they focus the red light from current optical mice, it's no more dangerous.

    1. In that case, why use a laser at all? Why not use an ultrabright red LED? To have any benefit in using a laser at all, they must be making use of interference effects, which means they need a coherent light source. Which meas that no, they won't diffusely focus the light at all.

    2. The danger comes from the fact that laser light is planar, and because of this not only will your eye will attempt to focus it, and will open the pupil wider in response to it at the same time, for maximum retinal damage.

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  15. Re:LASER by mkro · · Score: 4, Informative
    could this double as a laser pointer? Imagine a cordless laser-driven mouse that also had pointing capabilities for presentations and such. that'd be rad.
    No, it can't. The laser under the MX1000 has no visible light.
    --
    I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
  16. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by MikeXpop · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dude, calm down.

    I remember I did something like this awhile ago. There was a comment that gave WAY too much information about that guy's life. The comment was meant to be funny, but in an attempt to be funny myself I modded him informative.

    I was metamodded unfair. It sucked. I mean, the guy already had perfect karma (as do I, and I believe the guy replying to me). I was just having a little fun. Where's the harm?

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.