Slashdot Mirror


Googling Behind China's Great Firewall

xcham writes "The OpenNet Initiative, a joint project of the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto, the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School, and the Advanced Network Research Group at Cambridge, have released a bulletin regarding the type of filtering applied to Google by the Chinese government. Most notably, certain keywords are filtered, as well as Google's 'cache' function. More information on how the keyword filtering is implemented is available in a previous bulletin."

27 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. tunneling by Raleel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet those in the know get a free shell account in another country and ssh tunnel all their web traffic through it.

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:tunneling by secolactico · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I bet those in the know get a free shell account in another country and ssh tunnel all their web traffic through it.

      ... because a high volume of encrypted traffic would never attract the attention of the authorities...

      --
      No sig
    2. Re:tunneling by Shisha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Read the parent please! SSH tunneling means that the even "HTTP GET" will come accros as something totally garbled. Whether they'll come after you, just because of encrypted connection, or whether they found a way of cracking SSH on the fly is another question (unlikely thought).

      BUT! They're not bothered. If a few geeks read forbidden stuff, that won't change much. I'm sure there's already dissident minority. What they don't want is some critical mass of people getting the wrong idea. Which won't happen for a while, because most Chineese haven't seen a PC. On the other the peasants never really mattered in China, so maybe they (Chineese government) have a good reason to be paranoid.

  2. We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As our tests below indicate, China blocks access to the Google cache and to searches that contain certain keywords

    I can't help but wonder how long until this begins to happen in the US, all in the name of fighting terrorism

    1. Re:We're next by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People don't care about viruses, worms, trojans, MPAA/RIAA funded relgulations in the government, political parties, voting/e-voting, wars, etc, but they do care about something...

      And that something is the freedom to view porn. Once the US government decides that it is acceptable to expand their reaches to cover the indecency of porn on the net people WILL get pissed off enough to end that bullshit.

    2. Re:We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe when the government stops taking away our rights.

    3. Re:We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you read the Patriot Act?

    4. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The right to live my life knowing that the government can't detain me indefinitely. I no longer have that right post-9/11/PATRIOT Act.

    5. Re:We're next by nanter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That is not an answer to my question. Name one right.

      The right to due process of law as granted in the 5th Amendment.

      Want more to be listed, smart guy?

    6. Re:We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK, since you obviously have not read it (like most members of Congress). How about my right to privacy. The government, for whatever reasons they choose, can wiretap my phone, find out what I read at the library. How about my right to a fair and quick trial - they again can detain me without cause - just because my name is not Abdul does not mean that it won't happen. Wake up.

    7. Re:We're next by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1st adm via campaign finance reforms. Look what Bush and Kerry say about 527's.

      Corps paying for the convention and all the closed door parties at it is OK but if normal people spend their personal money it's a crime.

      Tell me how that makes sense.

    8. Re:We're next by psidon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The proper thing for the government to do is to allow its citizens access to the content... and to log all the traffic instead. You're free to read whatever you want. Most people Googling for sensitive topics are merely researching them. If your clickstream indicates otherwise, then it's time for the hammer to come down.

      And what would you use to define a "clickstream" that should trigger the hammer to come down?? That's still invasion of privacy if you ask me. What I look at is my own business. If it's criminal, that's one thing, but tracking what everyone does all the time and then waiting to pounce is ridiculously invasive IMO.

  3. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems you lack some sense of humour! You've been staying in China for a too long time...

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Re:I'm behind the by nkh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Chinese (mandarin) is not the most difficult language to understand in a conversation. The difficult part is to speak it. Japanese is easier to speak (from a french background).

  6. missing the whole point by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    attacking the west all the time is not intelligent

    i would have thought that this slashdot story would have served as an object lesson of something to be thankful for in the west: a tradition of adherence to free expression not found in other areas of the world

    this is of course a right we must always be vigilant of encroachment upon and something we must always fight for

    but how you can still find reason to attack the west is laughable to me in the context of this censorship by the chinese government, a lesson in how rights of free expression don't exist in other places, and must be fought for in those places

    silly me, the real lesson here is for me, not you: some people are just hell bent on attacking the west for whatever it does, whether it is an intelligent criticism or not, simply because, apparently, that is all they know how to do

    how about you fight the real fight for free expression: not on hypersensitive esoteric issues like security patches for software, but instead on real, fundamental issues like some of the words you find in the censorship list on the link in the story

    i will of course get angry replies to this diatribe of mine if this gets modded up

    proof that those who obsess over molehills, while missing the mountains, need a heated rhetorical approach to maintain their pov

    always attacking the west is simplistic and navel gazing

    there are great fights, much more important fights, going on outside the borders of the western democracies for rights most of us take for granted, and that is a shame, as real good can be done if the children of the western democracies took up ideological and rhetorical arms in that fight, rather than obsessing over comparatively much more minor issues in their home countries

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:missing the whole point by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Dude, calm down, take a deep breath, and meditate on the value of punctuation and SHIFT keys.

      The grandparent poster was pointing out, quite correctly, that there are individuals in public office and private business who would like to see some 'objectionable' content on the Internet filtered. (What precisely constitutes such objectionable content is the subject of heated debate, of course.) Internet access in the United States is often screened for content in certain contexts--many public schools, workplaces, and public libraries.

      The grandparent also observed that the Chinese firewall is a very solidly executed proof-of-concept, that demonstrates that such large-scale filtering is technically possible and at least reasonably effective, though it may have a few holes that the technically adept can slip through.

      The grandparent did not presume that politicians in the West would automatically abuse such technology now that it is available and amply demonstrated. On the other hand, the grandparent poster quite correctly observed that there were individual politicians, political organizations, and lobbyists who would be more than happy to push for its adoption...and that it behooves us to watch that we don't slip into hypocrisy.

      there are great fights, much more important fights, going on outside the borders of the western democracies for rights most of us take for granted, and that is a shame, as real good can be done if the children of the western democracies took up ideological and rhetorical arms in that fight, rather than obsessing over comparatively much more minor issues in their home countries

      The reason why things are 'better' and freer in the West is because of the vigilance of people like the grandparent poster. The notion that encroachments on civil liberties in the West should be tolerated or just not spoken of because things are much worse elsewhere is...decidedly unpalatable. Why should it be impossible to take up 'ideological and rhetorical arms' to support freedom of expression and conscience everywhere, locally and abroad? "It could be worse"--the rallying cry of the indifferent and downtrodden.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:missing the whole point by l4m3z0r · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would seem you would rather I pay no attention to the domestic workings of the country in which I reside. Would you also suggest that if your faucet has a leak it should not be fixed until the neighbor of yours has a cracked foundation fixed? That you should abandon your concern with your leaky faucet and instead use your money and time to fix his foundation? Without any concern at all for the business of your own household?

      You may find this analogy simple but I do believe its accurate. Furthermore how can you suggest that western children should take up "arms" in order to help other countries when they don't vote or care about their own country enough to be informed about the things that affect them on a daily basis?

      On the contrary it is you who have attacked the west by saying western children have acted improperly and should instead help the rest of the world. It is you who are suggesting that the west is currently committing some great evil act(that of apathy). I on the other hand only sought to make sure we are ever mindful that freedoms can be taken away all the time. You can never sit back and enjoy your freedom you must struggle constantly to keep it and to use it.

      Whether it be a molehill or a mountain its still a blemish that should be dealt with, I for one advocate the removal of said blemish by that countries native inhabitants. Of course there are exceptions such as when lethal force is being used against a population in order to keep it in check. But to suggest that it is imperitive that I act to help china is rediculous. Times change and perhaps in 20-50 years that government will fall and the possibility for a more free one will arise.

      Also when the west does act to help free a people we generally cause more damage than if we had left them to their own devices(I will not use Iraq as an example of this but Cuba is a perfect example, the US blockade and restrictions has done nothing besides starve and deprive Cubans of necessary goods like medicine).

      The point in all this is that its not true that freedoms are granted by governments. The people grant governments specific powers and this is just one of the many places where a government has over stepped its boundaries. West, East, South it doesn't matter we need to be mindful of this all the time.

  7. Re:Or Copyrights? by Macrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't forget about copyrights, mp3 files, and other 'bad' things the corporation backed government doesn't want us to have access to.

  8. The "banned" mathematics problem... by mikael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looking at the list of banned words, the following mathematics question is also banned:

    How do I calculate the GCD of the sides of a simple triangle that is drawn out on a sheet of paper?

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  9. Re:What they're gonna do with Gmail? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think they only block the search terms. Otherwise, I wouldn't be seeing this page now (221.136.x.x).

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  10. Re:This is insane by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    How would you know? Did you try it? I dare you.

    I used to work in intelligence for the US Army. The first thing you do is filter out the crap (e.g. random losers saying "bearded middle east man") so you don't waste limited resources chasing dead ends. Believe it or not, intelligence professionals look at context. In fact, context often gives produces better intelligence than the initial flag. Contrary to the beliefs evinced by their paranoid rantings, most people will never warrant a second look, no matter what they say in email, on the phone, etc. Like most of us, they're not that fuckin' important because they're just another random slob. The best defense against government poking its nose into your business is to be boring and lame. Fortunately, most of us here already qualify in that regard.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  11. If only they turned that blocking . . . by base3 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    . . . to limiting the tidal wave of spam coming from China.

    Seriously, the people at Yahoo and Cisco that helped them implement this filtering regime (custom firmware for routers and consulting services), along with the executvies, should be tried for crimes against humanity and hanged. Slowly (the hanging, not the trial).

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  12. i am of the belief... by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that the fight for uplifting the rights outside of the west to very basic levels is of greater import than the fight against esoteric threats to rights within the west

    call me crazy, but i think the mountain is more important than the molehill

    to say that, as a citizen of the west, you don't have control over things outside your country, is wrong on 2 counts:

    1. then you are guilty of navel gazing and selfishness, thinking basic rights end at the rio grande, a sin of xenophobia more commonly used as a criticism of conservative westerners but perfectly appropriate to liberals who are hypersensitive to minor abuses within the west but deaf and dumb to outrageous abuses outside the west (it is a grand liberal tradition i might add to have a global, rather than a provincial outlook)

    2. as one can plainly see by the text in the slashdot article above, it is entirely possible to fight evil happening outside of the west from the vantage point of the west: "The OpenNet Initiative, a joint project of the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto, the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School, and the Advanced Network Research Group at Cambridge, have released a bulletin regarding the type of filtering applied to Google by the Chinese government."

    so by all means, continue obsessing over your molehills, and ignore mountains of evil, but don't expect me to respect you for continuing to do so after i have brought this discrepancy to your attention

    all i ask for is intelligence, and i see none in the obsession over the minor intrawestern threats, and the ignoring of the major extrawestern threats, by all measures of what is a minor and major threat to a person's basic human rights

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  13. hyperbole by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    look up the word "hyperbole" in the dictionary of your choice

    As of now, I AM treated like the people in China.

    this is patently false, and reveals in you an ignorance of the rest of the world, and perhaps even the country you live in

    We need the voters to take action...

    reason number one why you are not treated like the people in China

    you are full of some major hyperbole

    and a good dose of fear, uncertainty and denial as well

    what i am looking for you to have instead is wisdom, and intelligence

    you have not demonstrated any of that

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  14. Re:Freedom by dustmite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China is friends with the US, foreign-policy-wise, in spite of being a massive aggressive communist country with ongoing gross human rights violations and a stated desire to invade other democratic countries. The US government seemingly has no pro-democracy agenda whatsoever, nor are they 'defenders of democracy and human rights' in any sense, in spite of what they claim are amongst the main reasons for spending billions of dollars of tax-payer money, sending thousands of Americans to die, and killing many thousands more innocent foreign civilians.

  15. Re:I'm behind the by xyr0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    im currently behind the Great Firewall and without a proxy i can access most of the sites i usually visit: nytimes, the post, guardian, der spiegel, newsweek, grouphug o.O & co., scmp and of course /. with this story. also, other good things that will get you around the wall (and that i am also normally using at home) are p2p software and freenet. and for your IM needs, use trillian with encryption, nothing will be blocked.