Slashdot Mirror


MST3K Rightsholders Sue Over Theater Commentary

An anonymous reader writes "How can people who parody people sue people who parody them? Mr. Sinus is being sued by Best Brains Inc. the owners of the rights to Mystery Science Theatre 3000 because they are using a name/format that is too similar to their own. Here is the story." Evil thought: Apple should include a "three silhouettes yakking on merged soundtrack" mode in iMovie.

4 of 312 comments (clear)

  1. Muppets From Space? by PythonCodr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does this mean that Disney licensed the MST3K parody commentary bit for their DVD's commentary track on Muppets From Space?

  2. Re:Um, because. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting
    They aren't suing for the parody in the usual sense (with respect to copyrighted material), they are suing for trademark infringement. Parody is an affirmative defense for trademark infringement, but it's apparently very narrow in scope, more so than the copyright infringement defense.


    This isn't such a clear cut case - are they really trying to parody Mystery Science Theater 3000 or are they trying to sell tickets to their live show which uses a similar format and trade off of the MS3TK brand name?


    So as far as I can tell, as long as they don't use a name that is deceptively similar to "Mystery Science Theater 3000" or "MST3K" they are probably fine. "Mister Sinus" or "Mister Sinus Theater" is probably still deceptively similar. Nobody is trying to stop them from doing their show under some other name. So... they would have to convince a judge that they are really making a parody of MST3K itself, AND that what they do does not carry a substantial chance of being confused with the original (i.e. something endorsed by the original company), AND that their use of adult material does not run a substantial risk of harming the business of the MST3K people.


    Alright, now back to our normal business of feeling sorry for people who steal music.

  3. Re:Um, because. by Gooba42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's the JibJab argument about the definition of parody in a copyright sense.

    A parody is a derivative work which pokes fun at the original work. If this was making fun of MST3k then it is a parody. Since it is only imitating MST3k rather than parodying it, they have grounds on which to sue.

    --
    I just found out there's no such thing as the real world. It's just a lie you've got to rise above. - John Mayer
  4. Same/Different by Luyseyal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mr. Sinus vaguely follows the format of 3 individuals making fun of a movie. Making fun of movies in public has been done since, what, probably the 1890s? Another poster mentioned Rocky Horror.

    Mr. Sinus uses no characters from MST3K. If MST3K thought the idea of making fun of movies was original, they should have filed a business method patent. So, MST3K's only real problem is a possible confusion of names, thus, Mr. Sinus' dropping the "Theatre 3000". Consequently, while Mr. Sinus is a partial tribute to MST3K, as is evident from their theme song, it doesn't violate any of MST3K's rights.

    Frankly, I'm highly disappointed in Best Brains, Inc. Apparently, they're not using their namesake.

    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!