Slashdot Mirror


A GMail-based blog With 1000 MB of entries

Jean-Luc R. writes "Via mediaTIC blog. Gallina is a GMail blog tool created by Jonathan Hernandez that uses GMail messages as "entries" (so 1000 MB of entries!!), replies to conversations are the "entry comments", uses Libgmailer (gmail-lite project) to connect to GMail. It uses XML/XSLT and by the way it's a GPL software. You can download it there. See the Gallina Demo Blog as for an example."

29 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    people are making so much use of gmail for different things
    i wonder when ill be able to run off a remote OS installed on a gmail account

    1. Re:hmm by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 5, Funny
      Actually, I've realised that one untapped source of data storage space is in Slashdot comments. Untold gigabytes of free storage space at our fingertips, just waiting to be tapped!

      I've decided I'll be uploading an encrypted backup of my hard disk with my new SlashdotFS. Yeah, it's slow, yeah, it's against untold numbers of terms of service, but who cares. It's free, and it's huge!
      ---slashdotfs.v1.337---
      48101bbdd897877cc62b8704a 293a436
      55bc3937bb9c3b6a010b11d3887fed42
      6894952 b2cd2b995d6153149867fb861
      8a22d33414aae8228a623f0 1da53ed6a
      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:hmm by dzym · · Score: 5, Funny

      After running that block of data hrough decryption, I've determined that block of hex is a picture of petrified Natalie Portman and hot grits.

    3. Re:hmm by barfomar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I bet Oreilly is writing up Gmail Hacks as we speak....

  2. Google is going to be upset by Seoulstriker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google was pissed at third-party tools which check emails. Now I wonder what Google is going to think of a program or script which uses the Gmail email directory as a sort of web-hosting deal. I'm not too optimistic about Google's response. :-(

    --
    I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
    1. Re:Google is going to be upset by wviperw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well what response should we expect from Google? Euphoria? For any company, even Google, it would make absolutely no sense to essentially provide free hard drive space to anybody and everybody on the planet. Of course they are not going to like it.

      --
      Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
  3. gmail has terms of service that disallow this by benasselstine · · Score: 5, Informative

    from the just because you can doesn't mean you're allowed dept. http://gmail.google.com/gmail/help/terms_of_use.ht ml

    --
    My other car is a slashdot UID.
  4. New gmail auth? by J-bob2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How are they getting past the new gmail authentication?

    1. Re:New gmail auth? by coandco · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There isn't any 'new GMail authentication', at least not in a form that would affect this program.

      If you have GMail, you probably won't have noticed anything different in your login screen. The only time that their extra authentication measures kick in is when someone tries to log in to an account tons of times in a short period with the wrong password. It's not meant to block all external programs, just prevent automatic password-guessing type attacks.

  5. Not so sure by mcc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many of Google's other functions, like the search, they openly published interfaces to via web services and such. They explicitly disallow in the GMail TOS using web-fetching "screen scrapers" like this thing uses, but I'd imagine their main objection would be not so much the loss of control as that they don't want to be locked into a specific set of HTML-- if they significantly change their page layouts then any program which fetches and reprocesses GMail web pages will break.

    But this bloggy thing is a very cool feature and Google might well publish a public web-services interface to GMail as well to allow things like this to happen before the end.

  6. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can I now mount my blog using gmailfs?

    Seriously, this is getting silly. It's supposed to be an email system and it's going to be financed by google targeting ads specificly to their users (based on their emails, but who cares about privacy anyway?), so I don't think google will let these things survive.

    Now I could understand if someone developed a technique that allowed for bigger attachments (pr0n anyone? ;-D)but a blog????

  7. Yeah by mcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What, Google create an free, optional service that you aren't personally interested in? How dare they?

  8. Re:Sick of gmail by Dr+Tall · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gmail is invitation only because it is in beta and they want to scale up their size slowly. When it is completed, it will be open to everyone. And good luck not using Google; a lot of other search engines use Google indirectly.

  9. Re:Sick of gmail by AC-x · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's because Gmail is currently in BETA. They want to test it with a lot of accounts, but they still want to control the number of accounts so their system doesn't get overloaded before it's ready.

    Having an invitation system seems a good way of getting a good number of test accounts.

    I suggest you read the FAQ as it talks about this and POP access etc.

  10. Re:Sick of gmail by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From what I remember they are working on allowing you to access it all via POP. It's BETA, what do you expect? You can't expect them to give an account to everyone who wants one, i think a lot of what they're doing is trying to slowly roll it out so they can test scaling and such while they do the testing of the interface and stuff. by slowly rolling it out they get an idea of just how the 1000 megabytes of space grow from user to user and can try to balance things better.

    As mentioned already it seems they do it to create a bit of hype. Is the hype all it's cracked up to be? Eh, not really but it DOES work really well and I use gmail over yahoo now for my email, it also makes organizing my mail a hell of a lot easier in terms of mailing lists and such (that's really all i use it for, all my normal mail goes through my websites email addresses).

    You just need to calm down and chill, if you want a gmail account ask and i'll gladly give you one of my invitations.

  11. Use it for email by cmallinson · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If google built a blog tool that oculd hold 1000MB of data, someone would figure out how to get it to store email.

    I'm a bit concerned that everyone seems to want to find a way to fill up their Gigabyte on Gmail. If storage becomes the main feature of Gmail, people will eventually open up 500 accounts and built a Gmail array for their file storage. This will force Google to lock down their application, and those of us using it for EMAIL will suffer.

    1. Re:Use it for email by jsebrech · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If storage becomes the main feature of Gmail, people will eventually open up 500 accounts and built a Gmail array for their file storage.

      The delay and throughput of internet-based file storage is just not worth it, and with the gmail interface in between it would be even slower. People are doing these things for the novelty factor, but as soon as they figure out that there are easier ways to get the same things done, they'll move on, and this won't be a problem anymore.

      Besides, if you're using gmail for personal storage, you can just email yourself the files you want as attachments. And if you're using it to host stuff, you're going to have to run elaborate scripts, which waste tons of bandwidth uselessly copying data, and since bandwidth is more expensive than disk space, it would be more cost-effective to just get more disk space on your webserver account than to use elaborate gmail-interfacing scripts.

  12. This is all well and good, but by AC-x · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought Google already provided a free blogging service?

  13. flexibility vs reality by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There are several applications that are trying to use gmail as its backend. GmailFS, this blog, and probably exist several more right now. If google open up a bit more their API, other applications and uses around gmail could grow exponentially.

    But even google with all its servers have limitations. Would love to see gmail grow in kind of uses it could have, but simplicity and speed are some of its strengths that it could lose if it is abused.

  14. 1000MB may sound like a lot... by baywulf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1000MB may sound like a lot but at current hard drive pricing that is only about a half dollar if you buy a 100GB drive. Why do people go to so much trouble to redirect GMail for other uses? If people do things that make their advertising less valuable then they will strike hard on everybody and that only hurts us normal users if they make it harder to login or use as an email service.

  15. Harrumph by Trailwalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone who needs a gig of space to write down what is on his mind has a bigger problem than finding space online.

  16. Re:Sick of gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. - September 6, 2004 - Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) announced today that they are discontinuing the popular beta trial of their "Gmail" personal e-mail service. "When we realized that Slashdot user thammond had pledged not to use the service, we decided there was no point in continuing," said Larry Page, Co-Founder & President, Products. While the service had appeared to be gaining momentum as an alternative to other free e-mail services, thammond's pledge, announced today on the popular technology news site Slashdot, made it clear to company management that there was no future in the offering. Existing users of the service will be notified early this week and Google assured concerned shareholders that "future innovations will be submitted to thammond for approval prior to release in the future."

  17. Online MP3 Storage by Kraegar · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Having gotten an extra account invite from google, and not knowing anyone who was interested, I decided to start a new account myself, and email mp3's to it. In the emails I include the artist, album, and lyrics. I group styles using the "label" feature.

    So now I have 1gb of online, searchable mp3's.

  18. Do you really want to entrust your data to others? by John+Jorsett · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Email. Blogs. Mountable drives. And all built on GMail. I'd be quite concerned about becoming too dependent on the good graces of a third party for maintaining my data. I recall the number of people who got caught flat-footed when free email services and photo hosting went belly-up with little or no notice. Not to mention putting potentially sensitive material in a convenient place for hackers to target, or law enforcement or aggrieved spouses to subpoena.

  19. What is so cool about these hacks .... by pvera · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is that they force us to look at Gmail in many different ways beyond the "Jesus Christ, look at all that space" factor.

    When I started using Gmail I really liked the threaded messages feature and the search engine. Having to use labels instead of folders was (and still is) annoying, but I still place more value in the threading of the messages so all is well.

    Some of my friends put more value in the fact that they can pretty much forget about their mailboxes getting too big and their PC choking on it. The mailbox here can be almost a gig and all your PC sees is just a web page.

    Some friends also discovered that it is a great way to store memos, since is is very easy to pull them back between the labels and the search engine. I liked the idea so much that I sent myself every shareware license and CD key I have as separate emails so I can easily pull them.

    The blog thing will probably break by the time it hits production, but it tells us (and Google too) that Gmail is so versatile that you can do all these crazy things with it.

    Now Google can look at it and go uhm, maybe this is faster than whatever it is we are doing to store Blogger entries, and it also takes care of the post comments! And since you are already giving people a Gig of space, you can in theory claim that your *hosted* Blogger option is now free and allows you to share your 1GB of Gmail space. Then later plug the whole thing into an Orkut that doesn't suck and also into Google Groups.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  20. For fucks sake by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stop doing shit like this. Yeah, it's "fun", yeah it's "cool", but it's gonna piss Google off so much that they'll just put more and more limits on the service which piss off the majority to stop the minority.

    I don't know about you, but I want to READ MY FUCKING EMAIL with GMail, not use it as some file storage solution, file system, blog client and kitchen sink. Leave it be. Google is generous, they've released APIs and other fun shit to do with their service, and they've been nice enough to let people try their beta service. If I lose that service because morons like fucking with it to store their porn, I will be MAJORLY pissed off.

    Don't be so fucking selfish and stick to the friggin' ToS already.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  21. Re:Sick of gmail by jericho4.0 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Ah yes, I remember the morning I got my gmail account. We had just returned the hounds to the pen and stabled the horses when the ambassador arrived with my invite. I was worried it would be over run with riffraff, but after reciving assurances from the Kennedys that invitations were strictly for the better class of people, I joined up, and golly I'm happy I did.

    Seriously, it took me 5 min after I read about gmail to get an account. Have you no friends? There are _millions_ of invites out there.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  22. Is this really a good idea? by Temporal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, sure, let's use a blogging script which uses a webmail service as its database. It can fetch data from this service by internally connecting to the web site, parsing the HTML, and pulling out the relevant data.

    Uh.

    Seriously, people, install a fucking SQL server. Not only is this going to be extremely extremely inefficient for you, but you are basically taking a nice service provided to you free by a nice company and exploiting the hell out of it. I am quite certain that if this thing gets a lot of use, Google will implement measures to break it. And I'm guessing Slashdot will whine when that happens, and I will be disgusted.

    Really... When your girlfriend offers you a blow job do you forcefully ram your dick down her throat until she vomits? Why on Earth would you do this to Google?

  23. Google will be forced to be smarter by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Google will realize what Yahoo realized years ago - your users are not necessarily friendlies. Many will exploit and manipulate services for their own purposes. A few years ago a company was linking Yahoo IDs to provide a backup system for his entire company's data via Yahoo Briefcase.

    Google will need to start doing this - just stating an abuse policy is not good enough, they will need to start detecting abuse and counteracting, otherwise they will go broke trying to buy enough drives to make the exploiters happy.