Slashdot Mirror
Mozilla's Goodger on Firefox's Future
An anonymous reader writes "The New Zealand Herald has an interview with Ben Goodger, lead engineer for Firefox at the Mozilla foundation. In it he describes how he got started, his reasons for Firefox's existence and what the future may hold for the little browser that could."
That's not spyware. That's multiple IE windows :)
Aww, Mozilla, the touchy feely browser. It hugs my resources!
1) Take 90% of browser market share
2) Integrate into Windows Explorer and tell judges it can't be ripped out
My best sig is this one.
An easier wish might be "Slashdot updates its HTML for 2001."
2. Firefox renders slashdot correctly, since this is the site that promotes it the most.
No, the IT theme is meant to be like that
...just cracks me up. "Mozilla's Goodger on Firefox's Future"
It just sounds DIRTY... If there was some guys Goodger in my future, I'd certainly try to do something about it...
"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
What's wrong with Ponsonby or Remuera - much classier. Or Manukau, Otahuhu, Papatoetoe - much more authentic. They could offer a porn-optimised version of Firefox codenamed "K-Road".
Of course, I personally downloaded 300,000 of them myself, just to stuff the ballot box, so to speak... :-) :-)
It's well known (by me, and for no good reason at that) that they don't use CSS because they think HTML should be enough for any web page. After all, everyone knows that CSS is for LiveJournal lusers to set their scroll bar colors, and could not possibly have any practical application. Real men use tables for layout, and that's that. A real programmer would never prefer CSS's long spelled out english words like border-color in favor of HTML's ULs and TDs. People who use CSS to obtain some result that could be possible with straight HTML are obviously being inefficient. They are probably wasting several bytes on those long, spelled out words. /. in Netscape Navigator 3.0. It will surely choke on the CSS, and give some unpredictable result.
The content is the only thing matters is the content anyway. If it's so bad, why don't you make your own front end for the RSS feed? That's the true Open Source way! Plus, what if someone tries to access
Better safe than sorry.
I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
Alright, it's make fun of Techefnet's comments day! Here we go...
Thats so unfear.
Techefnet does not fear the undead, but he sure unfears the dead!
That sucked. Damn. Forget I said anything...
Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
And here chimes in Mr. Doesn't-Get-The-Joke to spoil everyone's fun.
Comment of the year
No, he'll get modded up for saying 'Now mod me down'. Didn't you get the memo?
I'm an undergrad that saw both the Firefox and Linux light. I'm now prostletyzing for both.
Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
No. This is normal... they're just dupes.
But seriously, I am getting current articles from the feed.
Try blocking port80, that should get most of them. If that doesn't work, try port 21 as well.
Can I get an eye poke?
Dog House Forum
i was going to blame /. for the way the web site renders in Firefox.
,its actually firefox.
/. since its HTML is not valid.
/. or shall i play safe and blame MicroSoft.
Then i read that its not Slashdot
Then i read that it actually is
So can i continue blaming
many thanks for your invaluable opinions.
Wanted : A Signature.