Slashdot Mirror


A Wi-Fi/VoIP Phone Booth In the Burning Man Desert

Brad Templeton writes "I, (of EFF/ClariNet/rec.humor.funny) along with Brent Chapman (Majordomo/Building Internet Firewalls) and the satellite dish of John Gilmore (EFF/Cygnus/Cypherpunks/etc.) put together an engaging hack -- a battery-powered free phone booth using 802.11, VoIP and a satellite IP uplink. This was placed in the desert at the Burning Man arts festival deep in the remote Nevada Black Rock playa, exactly where you wouldn't expect a working phone booth to be. With cheap VoIP people were able to call all over the world. The reactions of people to such incongruous technology were great fun and emotional as well. There's a page about the phone including details of building it and live experiences including totally non-gratuitous photos of naked people using technology. (There, that ought to stress-test my new server!)"

214 comments

  1. Nice but, by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Very nice but it may effect electrical equipment in places like hospitals and such. Now while it maybe useful in a place like that as anything but a gimmick it seems a bad idea to try it in any serious numbers.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Nice but, by Aadain2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's my opinion that the equipment in places like hospitals should design themselves to be hit by a nuke and still function. If something like a little WiFi+VoIP causes an piece of equipment to stop working then the equipment needs to be replaces/reengineered, because WiFi is here to stay and VoIP is gaining momentum, so it will have to be done sooner or later.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    2. Re:Nice but, by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I agree, but this technology could be useful in remonte areas ( ie deserts in the article) or alpine areas where communication is essencial but putting a wire in would be too costly

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    3. Re:Nice but, by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      A cell phone may effect electrical equipment in places like hospitals and such. Now, while it may be useful in a place like that, as anything but a gimmick they seem like a bad idea to try in any serious numbers. According to equipment manfactureers, everything from portable cd players on up interfere with hospital equipment. Every hospital i've been in says 'turn off cellhpones - they interfere with equipemt', but every doctor has one, and the phones are on. Lots of telephone booths, those that still exist, use wireless connections, as opposed to land lines (which used to be the only option). Hospitals, last i looked, were still doing ok (except when they leave oxygen canisters in the room while they're running an mri. oops)

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    4. Re:Nice but, by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's my opinion that the equipment in places like hospitals should design themselves

      Working on AI nanotech, are we?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Nice but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent as funny!!!!

      Please...

    6. Re:Nice but, by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Most stuff in hospitals is pretty well shielded. Most of the doctors have phones that they leave on, and although lower power, everywhere has a pager system. They tell people to turn off their phones so they dont bother patients and doctors working. If the sign says "danger cell phones interfere with equp." people will be worried enough about killing some guy w/ a pacemaker to turn it off than they are remembering to silence their phone in a movie theater.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    7. Re:Nice but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent (and child) as ot!!!! Please...

    8. Re:Nice but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mod parent (and child) as ot!

      But your post doesn't have a child...

    9. Re:Nice but, by bonytony · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. I work in a hospital, and the "cell" phones you see doctors talking on are a low frequency, short range, in house system that won't work 15 yards away from the building. I work in the Trauma Neuro ICU in a large urban hospital, and I have SEEN cell phones interfere with monitoring equipment.

    10. Re:Nice but, by bhima · · Score: 1

      Which monitoring equipment? I ask because I develop medical diagnostic devices and we are required to shield the devices from far more than potential cell or WiFi interferences.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    11. Re:Nice but, by bonytony · · Score: 1

      We use HP monitoring equipment for vital signs.

    12. Re:Nice but, by bhima · · Score: 1
      Ahhh... that would be the antenna like leads, I don't have to deal with those and didn't think of it.

      Still I think leads typically are shielded, I wander down the hall and look.

      Eventually they'll have to be more robust!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  2. Jerry Maguire by rpbailey1642 · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...including totally non-gratuitous photos of naked people using technology. (There, that ought to stress-test my new server!)"

    Mmmm, you had me at naked.

    1. Re:Jerry Maguire by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Warning: one of the photos contains somebody in a furry suit.

      There, that oughta help throttle back the server, at least for somethingawful.com types who might be viewing the page.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    2. Re:Jerry Maguire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if anyone want's to know what a bunch of wacked out, half-baked hippies talk about, we could setup a sniffing post some many miles away (whilst we also observe activities with a telescope from within our air-conditioned, cave like van.

      The face, it burnessss us.

    3. Re:Jerry Maguire by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Funny

      He must be talking about haxxxor.com

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    4. Re:Jerry Maguire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mmmm, you had me at stress-test my new server

    5. Re:Jerry Maguire by cooley · · Score: 1

      OK I hate to encourage the AC, but that's freaking funny.

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    6. Re:Jerry Maguire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck would waste their time provided a bunch of hedonistic stinky disgusting unbathed hippies in the middle of the fucking desert with a god damned wifi voip phone?

      The only thing I'd provide those lazy, self-indulgent fucks is a nice little nuke in the heart of their fucking desert-homeless-camp.

    7. Re:Jerry Maguire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was sickened by the photos.

      Couldn't you find any **HOT Chics**? Seems the women have more hair on their bodies than I do! Aarg!

    8. Re:Jerry Maguire by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      "Tell Apple [tinyurl.com] to let you browse iTunes by any criteria like on the iPod."

      I've been thinking about this for a couple of days. What on earth are you talking about? You CAN browse iTunes by any criteria? Or do you mean by Composer as well? Because you can browse by Artist, Genre and Album already.

      What am I missing?

    9. Re:Jerry Maguire by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      Composer is what I was getting at, and the only one I care about. But instead of just adding composer, why not make it so you can set the criterion for each column to any attribute in the song information (even the ones that aren't part of id3 tags)? It would be a lot more elegant I think.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
  3. Free porn? by shfted! · · Score: 5, Funny
    There's a page about the phone including details of building it and live experiences including totally non-gratuitous photos of naked people using technology. (There, that ought to stress-test my new server!)"

    Never underestimate the power of horny nerds.

    But I gotta ask... would this lower my 1-900 bills?

    --
    He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    1. Re:Free porn? by SIPVoIP · · Score: 1

      Na, I gave him free US and International, we can't do 900. -Nathan

    2. Re:Free porn? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Funny
      Never underestimate the power of horny nerds.


      Because one major thing the Internet lacks is unlimited access to free pornography. Just this morning I was thinking to myself: "Self... wouldn't it be cool if some entrepreneur put pictures of naked women on the Internet? Then we wouldn't have to visit those skanky adult bookstores in the seedy district anymore."

      Who am I kidding though... if pornography was available on the Internet, how would we keep children from gaining access to it? Our entire society could collapse.

    3. Re:Free porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps requiring a credit card... not for charging... but because you can only have a credit card if you're over 18.

    4. Re:Free porn? by trippinonbsd · · Score: 1

      Explain how i have had a credit card since the age of 15 then?

    5. Re:Free porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably by breaking the law, or not actually having a credit card in your own name.

    6. Re:Free porn? by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      yes, because people browsing porn are really going to want to have to pull something else out of their pants.

      let alone send their credit card number to a porn site.

    7. Re:Free porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it was your parents credit card, with your name on it.

      If they saw a test charge for 'ccbill.com', they just might ask you about it.

    8. Re:Free porn? by camzacid · · Score: 0, Redundant

      heard of pr0n torrents ? they rock.

    9. Re:Free porn? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      I guess you never heard of empornium.us then...

    10. Re:Free porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody who pays for porn is a clueless moron.

  4. As if... by alexcampbell · · Score: 5, Funny

    "including totally non-gratuitous photos of naked people using technology"
    As if photos of naked people could ever be gratuitous to Slashdot readers!

  5. Cool by pHatidic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you want to read a great story about Burning Man then read this, from Kuro5hin. One of the best stories from that site in a while.

    1. Re:Cool by WiPEOUT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just don't overlook that this story is just that... fiction.

    2. Re:Cool by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Anyone which finds it informative that an article from the Onion is fictional doesn't have the common sense to deserve oxygen.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  6. damn you all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    the naked people picture page got slashdotted.

  7. congrats by mrpuffypants · · Score: 4, Funny

    and it did. you're truly lucky. please, next time, don't have the connection for your server reside in a phone booth in the desert.

  8. Results of new server stress-test: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Failure at three comments.

    1. Re:Results of new server stress-test: by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Failure at three comments.

      At 31 it seems to be working fine.

    2. Re:Results of new server stress-test: by btempleton · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am curious about this. I wasn't here when the page went up. (My mother was desperately calling because her PVR had crashed. Don't we all sysadmin for our families blind over the phone?)

      But now that I come to it the traffic is indeed heavy but the load average is less than 1, so I am not sure what failed earlier on.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    3. Re:Results of new server stress-test: by grozzie2 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Lots of folks are under the mistaken impression that a /. attack takes out servers. It rarely does that. What it does do, is totally flood the incoming/outgoing network pipe. If your server is on the far side of a t-1 or equivalent connection, the connection doesn't stand a chance, and the episode ends up being just like a distributed syn flood, all the incoming connections, but not enough bandwidth to deliver the responses. *nix boxes tend to survive fine, some flavours of windows boxes will do the bsod in this case, tcpip stack blows buffers in ring0 driver code. OTOH, if you are sitting in a data center with a 100 mbit connection to the upstream router, which has gigabit feeds to the internet, you should have no problem withstanding the onslaught of the /. crowd.

      I will admit, on a new server, this is a pretty slick trick to stress test the whole system. Just suggest nudie pics available to the /. crowd, sit back, and watch to see if the upstream routers can deal with the loads. It's a far better way to see if your upstream providers have problems than sitting back and waiting till there's real business/money on the line. I've got a new load balanced cluster going live for a client in a couple weeks, probly gonna steal a page from your book here, I've always known the /. test was a good one, never thought to spice the blurb with the hint of nudie pics.

    4. Re:Results of new server stress-test: by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I remember the Slashdot test of BitTorrent, a 140 meg porn vid! :D I was able to download it in 5 minutes flat, a resounding success.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  9. Voip by Crystalmonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem with VoIP is that whenever the power goes out, your phone cannot work. If you have a regular phone (as in anything not cordless or doesn't need charging) then the phone company powers the phone through the line. If you get solar power... then it might be a very interesting idea indeed.

    1. Re:Voip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then what's a ups for? you ignorant clod

    2. Re:Voip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APC...generator...

    3. Re:Voip by hai.uchida · · Score: 1

      Amen. I spent a few years in the Midwest growing up where both thunderstorms and intense snow and ice could knock out power for days at a time. One particularly harsh ice storm knocked out power for a week. But the phones always worked...

      Add to that you're connecting over broadband-- my DSL is out for half a day at least once a month, and my digital cable screws up for an hour or two almost every week. Not the worst thing in the world... Unless that's your phone, too.

      Also keep in mind VoIP doesn't "trace" you if you call 911, at least not yet.

      --
      my password is private, but unchanged.
    4. Re:Voip by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Then what do you do at night when you want to call Peggy Sue?

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    5. Re:Voip by sllim · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That is all fine and dandy, but your point is moot.

      Most people I know would rather carve out there eyes with butter knives then talk on corded phones at home. Off the top of my head myself, my parents and my best friend all have nothing but cordless phones.
      We are SOL during power outages anyways.

      But then again we all have cell phones and those are backups for power outages.

    6. Re:Voip by jpmkm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Could this have anything less to do with the article? Did you just see 'voip' in the title and decide to karma whore? These guys are way the fuck out in the desert. They don't have a landline phone that the phone company powers. This is more than they previously had.

    7. Re:Voip by diggem · · Score: 1

      My phone line currently runs through my cable along with my TV and Internet. That's why they added a UPS to the line. Basically my entire house is VOIP because they cut it off at the box rather than at the phone. But I still get a dial-tone when the power is out because the UPS is there to save my arse.

      That's basically when the phone comany does anyway. They have lots of batteries connected to the lines to provide juice for when THEIR power goes out.

    8. Re:Voip by Crystalmonkey · · Score: 1

      Even the article, if you read it, points out the problems they had about reception and such. This article will cause people to think that VoIP is some wonderous new thing, when it still has flaws they may not know about.

    9. Re:Voip by jpmkm · · Score: 1

      They were in the middle of a fucking desert with a satellite uplink. There were no landline phones available. This is the only phone they had out there. You think they cared about some reception problems? If you had a choice between a phone with reception problems and no phone at all, which would you choose?

  10. Not convenient for me by zaxios · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I'm out of change, it's probably easier to go home and get some than walk deep into a Nevada desert for a free call. A good idea but some more thought could have gone into it, in my opinion.

  11. About that load testing..... by itriedeverythingelse · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's quite ready. Especially for something with nudity in the title.

  12. /.'ed? by sqrt(2) · · Score: 0, Redundant

    He must be hosting it from the phone booth too!

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    1. Re:/.'ed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke actually hadn't been made yet, and there are more posts about the /. effect AFTER this one that are more worthy of the redundant mod. But, you chose HIS post to waste a mod point on.

      *sigh* oh well.

  13. Mirroring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think those pictures of naked people are going to be Slashdotted very quickly...um...not that I want to go back and look...but any chance of people mirroring them?

    I swear! I don't want to just look at the pictures!

  14. Stress test your new server? by ToadMan8 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You put too much money into the phone booth - we broke your server already and there aren't even 20 comments yet ;)

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
    1. Re:Stress test your new server? by ToadMan8 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Ah, I know why, you mentioned naked people. Easy way to attract three times the traffic.

      --
      I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
  15. Do the Math by serutan · · Score: 4, Funny

    naked pictures + slashdot = horked server

    1. Re:Do the Math by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 2, Informative

      his server is probably fine, it's just the connection that has problems....

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    2. Re:Do the Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Do the Math by HawkingMattress · · Score: 0, Redundant

      -1, redundant.

      I'm so sick of ppl paraphrasing the post i've read two pages ago. Maybe it's not your case and you just happened to say the same thing without reading the other post, but... i read thousands of slashdot posts mentionning the slashdot effect taking down servers, and this is the first one where i see someone mentionning that of course it's the network capacity, not the server. And there you are, 5 posts later, saying the same thing like if you were very insightfull or something...
      But in most cases it's much worse, you'll see 10 peoples paraphrasing a previous post with the logic articulations and everything. Like, 200 posts without the mention of a specific point, and suddently, 10 posters have the same idea and post it... And they'll all be modded insightful or informative. What are moderators doing ?? Ah but i forgot, most of slashdot readers are just math geeks and think litteracy skills are worthless. As a concequence, They're unable to see that two posts phrased differently can mean exactly the same thing, they're not using the same words, after all. seesh...

      Besides, we all understand that of course it's the network that runs out of bandwith, and not the server itself who dies. Still, the server (like in the soft that serves content to the network) is "dead", like in it cannot be used from the network any more during the slashdot effect. It's just a language shortcut...

      Please don't take all of the above for yourself, you just happened to be the first paraphrasing poster that i read today.

  16. Burning Man Website Down. by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linking to public nudity pics on Slashdot is not advised. Guess I'll have to settle for "Burning Server".

    1. Re:Burning Man Website Down. by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      Just how often is there going to be public nudity that a geek would *want* to see though? Especially at some large outdoor carni show!

  17. don't need to read the article by kLaNk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    pictures of nudity at burning man? STAY AWAY!

    1. Re:don't need to read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this should have been modded up as insightful. I HAVE read the article.

  18. Sick Bastard by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A post to /. with reference to nudity. Just to stress test a server. What, are you sick? I don't care what you are running - it just can't be done. If this link lasts for more than 20 minutes, this guy should be given a medal and hired by the US government on the spot.

    --
    Stay tuned for new sig...
    1. Re:Sick Bastard by Yehtmae · · Score: 0

      Guess he's hired then, because it's still lightning fast. :)

    2. Re:Sick Bastard by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

      I'm sure working for the US gov't is high on Brad's list. I hear it's every Canadian's dream!

  19. Douglas Adams, where areyou now? by davejenkins · · Score: 4, Funny

    If we ever really needed a telephone sanitizer... this would be it.

    1. Re:Douglas Adams, where areyou now? by metlin · · Score: 1


      Am guessing all the telephone sanitizers are busy with their rubber err... ducks? No, just rubber, I suppose ;-)

    2. Re:Douglas Adams, where areyou now? by calculadoru · · Score: 1

      all the telephone sanitizers are busy with their rubber err...ducks?

      Nah, they're all busy collecting dead leaves so they can be filthy rich. Before they decide to burn down the forests to stop inflation, of course.

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
  20. Just asking for trouble... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 3, Funny

    "(There, that ought to stress-test my new serv-"

    CB

  21. Naked, Partying, Burning People in a Phone Booth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My only question - does the phone booth have a web cam?

  22. owch by BMojo · · Score: 1

    I wasn't even going to check out the link till he mentioned something about stress testing the server.. that was a bad move on his part.

    --


    -BMojo

    1. Re:owch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah sure - the stress testing part, riiiiight.

  23. cool idea by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most ppl that I know that have gone to burning man focus on the lack of technology, or at least a misuse of current technology, as a gateway to experimentation. This turns that ideal on it's head...I wonder, did he stick around the phone, or just set it up and watch from a distance? I'd like to see the reactions of folks when they realize that the phone worked, and wasn't just a prop.

    CB^%&*(__.

    1. Re:cool idea by pixel.jonah · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think your estimation is 1/2 right: unlike say the rainbow gathering - the BM crowd is quite tech heavy - Space battle ships built on ram 3500 trucks with turreted fire cannons? giant 16' solar (and battery) powered tricycles? Extremly powerful lasers? yeah - some pretty cool s**t out there!

    2. Re:cool idea by iriles · · Score: 1


      Actually there's tons of tech at Burning Man. For me the festival is all about re-inventing reality. And DIY tech is a great way to achieve that.

    3. Re:cool idea by jcdill · · Score: 1

      I wonder, did he stick around the phone, or just set it up and watch from a distance?

      s/he/they

      The answer is "yes". The phone was up for a week, we stopped by periodically to work on it and see what people were doing, but we also spent a lot of time in camp or out and about on the playa.

      Here is one story about using the phone.

      --
      "I'd much rather be mistaken as a lesbian by a bigot than be mistaken as a bigot by a lesbian."
    4. Re:cool idea by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

      brilliant! that was a really cool thing to do, musthave blown some ppls minds in the process.

      on an aside, great sig line, I agree 100%.

      CVB

  24. Sever in the desert too? by SlongNY · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hows that new server going. Poof.

  25. Emotional reactions to technology? by ShatteredDream · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One day I'd love to get a chance to go to Burning Man, especially seeing blurbs on Reason Online about how one of the editors went and loved it. Anyway, what I don't get is why people would see something like VoIP as an issue. VoIP/Wifi are of course made by corporations, but they aren't **run** by corporations necessarily.

    There seems to be too much of a false dichotomy that is present. Either you're an artsy, expressive person or you're one of those technology nerds that is cold to creativity. Maybe the worst nightmare to the artsy extremists is the idea that they don't have a monopoly on aesthetics anymore than the nerds on functionality. Would not the greatest triumph be a blending of beauty and functionality? Of course, harmonization of the two would naturally result in the nerds and artsy types having to meet half-way and *gasp* learn to communicate and appreciate each other.

    But then what do I know? I'm one of the only geeks in my CS department that can actually excel at human languages while suffering in my math skills. I picked up basic scheme programming in one or two classes and finished the projects quickly, and beat most of the math people because my brain is more used to switching between fairly starkly different logic paradigms. Going between English and Spanish requires more mental flexibility than from C->Java.

    At this point I just don't understand why people who pride themselves on how well-developed their intellects are would limit themselves instead of building on that so they could stay on top. I am just reminded of some of the math nerds, whose coding skills aren't as good as mine, said that a math minor should be a prereq. When I retorted, "fine then let's add a foreign language minor since that would be just as useful for helping programmers think flexibly" they just... shut up.

    Nerds, go to a coffee shop when local bands are jamming and maybe take an artsy chick out to a musical or something. Artsy types, try math, programming, anything to gain an appreciation for the value of logic. It'd do so many of you good.

    1. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by joemontoya · · Score: 0

      I for one, miss the artsy side of my brain. It went on vacation to Paris, but I had to stay and take that circuits final.

    2. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      While I'm admit that knowledge of linguistics is lacking in most CS programs, I think your rant is more of an emotional reaction than anything in the article. Programming is generally building mathematical structures in your mind. Which is why most CS departments are crowded with the math nerds you are discussing. For several areas of AI though you need indepth knowledge of both languages and math, but it is easier to fake the language than the math. And those skilled at languages become lawyers, not artsy types. Those are two different groups of people you are lumping together.

      And last time I checked, good pickup lines are less effective than an "in" outfit or a buff body. And if you want to go to Burning Man to see a phone booth you are seriously missing the point of Burning Man. Hint: it is to see things, things that aren't really there but the drugs add for you.

    3. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by btempleton · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, a lot of Burning Man is about the marriage of art and technology. There's no fear of tech, and it's proof that there are lots of people who do combine technology and art. That's part of why I go. I do too many projects at Burning Man. Some are pure tech as art (like the phone.) Some are a mixture like digital photography. One I did this year was a star map, which while I used Photoshop to build it, was really 99% graphic arts. And many others are like this.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    4. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by metlin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You raised a valid point, but I have just one problem with the artsy folks - they wear their non-technical fronts as something of an identity.

      I play in a band, and I'm the only technical person in it. However, the rest of them take PRIDE in the fact that they cannot, or rather, will not - do math or science.

      On the other hand, almost all the technical people I've seen make a conscious effort at *something* artsy or the other (languages, music, painting, dramatics, martial arts, etc) - something or the other, at the very least. And they are seldom proud of the fact that they cannot do artsy stuff - I've always wished that I could paint or do dramatics.

      That is a kind of defeatist attitude, especially since communiation has to be two way - it does not help if only the geeks made an effort to get into arts, there has to be cooperation from the other side, too.

    5. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by iriles · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand what he means by emotional response to technology. Maybe you couldn't read the article but he talks mostly about how people are overjoyed by talking to loved ones in far off places. and generally just suprised at being able to make phone calls when they wheren't expecting to be able.

      Having been to burning man six times I can assure you that there is very little contempt for technology. Quite to the contrary technology is seen as a driving creative forces. Every where you go there are dozens of art pieces that utilize sometimes quite advanced technology. In fact I don't think you could find another example of so much technology used in art in any other place. Everything from gigantic lazers, custom built LED displays, LE wire is everywhere, a Wireless network is set up for community use, there are 3D sound installations, video projetors are used quite frequently. And we can't forget doctor mega-volt. (he's puts on a conductive suit and has it out with a giant tesla coil, it's quite amazing to watch)

      You have to realize that most people go out at night, when it's cooler, so art pieces/costumes that involves light are quite popular.

      Anyway, here in San Francisco I feel like it's generally seen as pretty hip to be a nerd, especially one that works on creating cool new techno art hacks.

    6. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by Vlion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've noticed that reaction in art people.
      A fair sample of the CS people I know have a minor in humanities.

      Myself, I play music and have a german minor.

      German English requires shades of meaning that are inexpressible in code, thats for sure!
      Which is an interesting thought WRT AI, but I digreess.

      Your point seems to be more correct than not.

      --
      /b
      |f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)
      /a
    7. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      German English

      What?

    8. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I retorted, "fine then let's add a foreign language minor since that would be just as useful for helping programmers think flexibly" they just... shut up.

      Being programmers, they probably decided that if that's how your logic works, then you're a write-off and not worth talking to. Just like Windows ME.

      Sorry.

    9. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went this year, drove all the way from NC. I have to make one suggestion. Please find a camp and join it. Things are much easier if you know people and go with them. The dust is very, very bad, so be prepared for that. Otherwise, you should have a nice time. You'll bring too much water, put some back.

    10. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by geeber · · Score: 1

      You claim that you excel at human languages, and yet in the same paragraph use a phrase such as "fairly starkly different logic paradigms."

      Give me a fricken break!

    11. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by StM.Rawder · · Score: 0
      Hmmmm....If your going to give me advise, can you do it quickly?

      Dude, you are soo cool! Im one of the nerds, and I just cant wait to go hang out with some l0ser band in some coffee shop with some durty l0sers talking some l0ser shit.
      • I dont care if you can hable espanole and sprechanzie deuche and write some code also! haha takes more than that to impress people around here llamas.
      --

      ---
      My sig was stolen - the insurance company replaced it with this one.
    12. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Because, in American 'culture', it is cool to be stupid.

    13. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Most people reject the emphasis on scholastics to the exclusion of everything else (for good reason - even for the very smartest people, intelligence without social skills isn't of much use). But being "stupid" isn't celebrated. Most characters in American movies have special skills that put them ahead of the others. Most rappers will go on and on about how perfected their technique is.

    14. Re:Emotional reactions to technology? by Vlion · · Score: 1

      German to English and back again

      --
      /b
      |f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)
      /a
  26. Just need number 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Burning Man
    2. Phone booth
    3. ???
    4. Prophet!

    1. Re:Just need number 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Burning Man
      2. Phone booth
      3. ???
      4. Prophet!

      ??? = Change name to Nostradamus
    2. Re:Just need number 3 by FauxReal · · Score: 0

      Actually there was another phone in one of those booths that Superman used to change in at Burning Man this year that was a "direct line to God".

  27. No solar power? by jeffs72 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Preamble: I'd rtfa but the site is /.'d right now. I'm suprised to not see any mention of this thing being solar powered with a decent rechargable battery system attached.

    Call me crazy, but a wireless based phone booth in the middle of a desert just begs for solar power, then it's truely a portable, viable option for these types of gatherings, plus public beaches during vacation season, etc. Heck the department of natural resources could put them out on hiking trails and bring them back in during the winter

    But all that would require the thing to not require an electricty plug where ever you needed it. If you're going to go through the trouble of providing 120volts whats the point?

    --
    This article has recently been linked from Slashdot. Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.
    1. Re:No solar power? by btempleton · · Score: 4, Informative

      There was some mention as I recall about debating solar powering it. Part of the mystique of it was to look like a phone booth sticking out of the desert, yet with no wires, no power going into it. (Alas, we did have to expose a small 802.11 antenna.)

      So a solar panel could have been added but it would have been out of place on the image I wanted to create. Indeed, one way to do the panel would be just a bit more powerful than the phone needed, so to recharge the battery a bit, and then just die when the battery ran out, and start again at dawn.

      A traditional (superman) booth could have a panel on the roof that nobody would see, though a horizontal panel is not as efficient as one tilted to the latitude.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    2. Re:No solar power? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2, Informative

      They already make those. They're called "call boxes" and they are placed every mile or so along many California freeways outside of cities, in case you get stranded. Pretty neat actually, though with cellphones being so common now they're sorta useless, and I'll bet they cost a lot of money that California shouldn't have spent.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    3. Re:No solar power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>I'll bet they cost a lot of money that California shouldn't have spent.

      They were installed 20 years ago, when few people had cell phones. And those call boxes exist where cell phones don't reach.

      Moron.

    4. Re:No solar power? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1
      Almost all call boxes exist where cell phones work perfectly. In fact, the kind I'm talking about use the cellular phone system to make their calls. Your juvenile slander is uncalled for.

      Maybe they had more of a point 15 years ago when most of them were being installed (at great expense I'm sure due to the newness of the technology), but they are hardly a necessary service, and now they're practically useless. All I'm asking is, were they really worth the money?

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    5. Re:No solar power? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Disguise the solar panel as the top and sides of the phone booth. Or would that not give enough power? I would think even if it didnt give quite enough power, it might help the battery longevity. But what do I know? :-)

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    6. Re:No solar power? by Eristone · · Score: 1

      Almost all call boxes exist where cell phones work perfectly. In fact, the kind I'm talking about use the cellular phone system to make their calls. Your juvenile slander is uncalled for.

      Maybe they had more of a point 15 years ago when most of them were being installed (at great expense I'm sure due to the newness of the technology), but they are hardly a necessary service, and now they're practically useless. All I'm asking is, were they really worth the money?


      Actually, a long time ago - these were all wired to land lines. It was actually cheaper to install the cellular/solar ones as they really could be placed anywhere that the sun could shine and a cell tower reached vs. having to run miles of telephone wire out to each location. And although it seems like everyone and their brother have cell phones, everyone really doesn't. Or their battery may die (especially going up I-5 when there were large stretches of analog service only zones at one time...) In general, everyone is going to call in accidents, but a flat tire or car stalling - how often have you whizzed by at 85+ 30 miles outside Kettleman City and seen a car on the side of the road with someone standing next to it? That call box is available for those who aren't as lucky to own a cell phone - or for some reason their phone isn't working.

  28. Hippies aren't sterile?!?!?!?! by Excen · · Score: 0

    I would think all that acid and 'shrooms consumed out there in the desert would kill off any disease-causing bacteria that would inhabit their unwashed, naked bodies.

    That being said, a quote from Ron White comes to mind about the naked pix:
    "Once you've seen one woman nekid... you wanna see the rest of them nekid! Maybe not more than once, but. . ."

    --
    "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
  29. Mod Parent -1 Insecure Prick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jesus you are a fucking prick who's stuck on themself. Plenty of CS majors are well-read, speak foreign languages, etc., but most of them don't put up page-long posts to Slashdot about how cool and well-rounded they are, and about how more people should be like them, and do the things they like to do.

    1. Re:Mod Parent -1 Insecure Prick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod Parent +1 TOTALLY AWESOME!

      t o t a l l y a w e s o m e

  30. non-naked burning man phone pics by jcdill · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is a link for those of you who want to see the phone and don't mind that these particular photos show people wearing clothes. (I'm curious how this website stands up to being slashdotted. :-)

    jc

    --
    "I'd much rather be mistaken as a lesbian by a bigot than be mistaken as a bigot by a lesbian."
    1. Re:non-naked burning man phone pics by abb3w · · Score: 1
      Here is a link for those of you who want to see the phone and don't mind that these particular photos show people wearing clothes.

      Although the chick in the blue TShirt might as well be wearing paint.

      (I'm curious how this website stands up to being slashdotted. :-)

      Apparently quite well. Brad's a VERY old net hand, and ran a commercial UPI/Reuters news relay service via NNTP. The man understands bandwidth. I doubt his server could handle the 500 million hits that CNN took September 11 and 12 in 2001, but the pitiful hundred thousand hits that a typical slashdotting seems to generate is probably just a good routine server test for a pro like him.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  31. VoIP's problems by DriedClexler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There are some major problems with VoIP. For example, if you make an emergency call, rescuers can't automatically locate you (with cell phones they can triangulate). Also, it's a lot easier for people to manipulate this technology to make anonymous calls and thereby threaten and harass others. These are things people need to think about before concluding VoIP is good for mankind.

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    1. Re:VoIP's problems by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      And if it's not good for mankind, what do we do, ban it?

    2. Re:VoIP's problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember -- if a technology can be abused, we should abandon it immediately. RUN FROM THE MACHINES!

      Tell you what -- you think about it, we'll use cheap VoIP once it's out, and you can keep paying the phone company. Consider it a tax on inability to adapt.

    3. Re:VoIP's problems by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Think of it as population control in a post-modern society. Its not like someone could not add a GPS + VOIP module to there service in the future, for those that seem to be scared shitless of not being able to contact 911.

      I think you have too much invested in telco stock, I would suggest diversifying your portfolio.

    4. Re:VoIP's problems by MemoryAid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There are some major problems with freedom of speech. For example, if you make an original thought, party officials can't automatically discredit you (with scripted monologue they can pigeonhole you). Also, it's a lot easier for people to manipulate this freedom to make provocative statements and thereby threaten and harass others. These are things people need to think about before concluding freedom of speech is good for mankind.

      Mad-Libs for trolls. Nothing to see here, move along.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    5. Re:VoIP's problems by ces · · Score: 1

      Man ... that was art.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  32. A Phone booth in the Middle of nowhere? by POTSandPANS · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Does this remind anybody else of the famous Mojave Desert Phone Booth? http://www.deuceofclubs.com/moj/mojave.htm

    A satellite/wi-fi booth seems cool, but somehow lacks something the old wired booth had.

    1. Re:A Phone booth in the Middle of nowhere? by jpoint15 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A satellite/wi-fi booth seems cool, but somehow lacks something the old wired booth had.

      Yeah...duh...wires?

  33. Re:Lucky people. by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm sure that really stops people from taking pictures.

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  34. My cheesy personal experience with the booth by NMSpaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Brad, Thanks for installing the booth. I didn't see it during the week, but I did come by your camp for the save-the-man protest, and you showed it to me and had me make a test call (nobody was home). I came back later and was able to get through to my parents who informed me that I had become a first-time uncle (of twins!). It was a great way to get the news. Thank you!

  35. how did they get the bandwidth to work??? by woodsrunner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I want to know is what sort of satellite link did they use???

    I am only familiar with the Hughes Directway system and that has such a slow round trip that I doubt it would work for VoIP. Often times the uplinks are slower that a 14.4 modem on a bad wire... Are there better products on the market? I didn't see any mention of what they used. There was a cursory explaination that he tweaked the equipment to work with slower speeds, but how!?

    Does anyone know of a more reliable sat connection than the directway? Maybe something that uses Low Earth satellites rather than geosyncronous... or pose the threat of burning flesh of anyone walking in front of the transmitter?

    1. Re:how did they get the bandwidth to work??? by btempleton · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a Tachyon dish, 2 megabits down, 512k up. The latency is annoying, but you can work around it if the parties know not to speak on top of one another.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    2. Re:how did they get the bandwidth to work??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, if they're gonna call it Tachyon, latency shouldn't be a problem.

  36. Next up: Man sees "Aero Plane"; Soils Trousers! by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    When was the last time anyone printed a story about people going ape over a phonebooth..?

    Seriously though, it is kind of a neat achievement, I just think that the potential for a very ironic phone call to the fire department could erupt at any moment..

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Next up: Man sees "Aero Plane"; Soils Trousers! by christopher240240 · · Score: 1

      When was the last time anyone printed a story about people going ape over a phonebooth..?

      Don't you read 2600?

  37. Cheap? by freitasm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "...with cheap VoIP people were able to call all over the world."

    I'm sure the VoIP solution could be cheap to implement, but what about "...and a satellite IP uplink.".

    I think this last bit would make the cost of this solution go up a little, wouldn't it?

  38. Re:Lucky people. by AlexMidn1ght · · Score: 0, Troll

    I seriously doubt I'd be revolted by seeing her naked...

  39. Another good (but inaccessible) story... by geekotourist · · Score: 3, Funny
    From the ever accurate Onion newspaper (but article hidden in the premium section now):

    "GERLACH, NV -- The Burning Man festival, a prominent artistic and countercultural event that draws tens of thousands of people to the Nevada desert annually, is in danger of cancellation this week because "no one had their shit together enough to even make it," organizers said Tuesday. "Jesus Christ, this is pathetic," said event coordinator Ethan Moon as he angrily gestured toward the empty Black Rock Desert basin expanse, known as the playa. "We've been promoting this thing all year. You can't start panhandling quarters for gas the week before the festival and expect to make it here in time, man."

    Moon listed some of the most common no-show excuses, among them oversleeping, forgetting to request time off work, faulty van-borrowing arrangements, a shortage of ochre body-paint, and the last-minute realization that transportation to the Burning Man festival requires money.

    ...Hippies were not the only counterculture group to miss the Burning Man festival. Portland-area Linux user and self-described cyber-conceptualist "Free" Lance Kaegle explained his absence in an instant message from his studio.

    "I was organizing this boss techno-art project called 'Off The Grid,'" Kaegle wrote. "We were going to set up computer terminals in various parts of the playa and have people use them. Then we'd feed the binary data from those terminals into this fractals program that [Silver Lake, CA software designer] Ricky [Thomas-Slater] wrote. Those fractals would be sent, on the fly, to a group of exiled Buddhist monks I befriended online. The monks would transform the fractals into a temporal sand painting, the making of which we would webcast live to everyone on the playa."

    Added Kaegle: "But I had to stop working on the monk thing to finish up this Pam's Country Crafts web site I'm working on. I really need the money..."

  40. I wouldn't call that a phone "booth" by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't call that a phone "booth."
    But I guess you can't call it a "payphone" if it's free.

    1. Re:I wouldn't call that a phone "booth" by btempleton · · Score: 3, Informative

      Technically it's called a kiosk today, but most people still call it a phone booth. I wanted a real booth, but couldn't find one cheap and locally when I was hunting, so Brent bought the pedestal and kiosk.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    2. Re:I wouldn't call that a phone "booth" by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      Probably a good thing you went with the kiosk style, I can't begin to imagine how hot the inside of real phone booth would get in the middle of a desert! :D

  41. Cordless phones by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

    Hope you (or they) never have to call 911 (or whatever your emergency number is) during a power outage.

    There are way too many points of failure for VoIP to be my sole link to the outside. A good ol' local-only landline has its uses.

    1. Re:Cordless phones by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Hopefully you know your address at your home before you have to call 911.

      Anyway, 'round here, if you dont have time to tell the 911 op' your address, you'll probably be dead before help arrives anyway.

    2. Re:Cordless phones by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Hopefully you know your address at your home before you have to call 911.

      Hopefully you know your address at your home before you have to call 911.


      I don't think he's concerned about the 911 operator finding locating your address. I think he's talking about the fact that your cordless phone won't work during a power outage. When that earthquake/tornado/hurricane knocks out the power, the last thing you want to be doing afterwards is searching old boxes in your closet for a corded phone to call 911.

      The Emergency Prep people around here (Earthquake country) keep talking about how the cell phone towers are more fragile then the landlines.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    3. Re:Cordless phones by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      A good ol' local-only landline has its uses.

      It sure does, you plug it into the asterisk box, so you have a method or routing local calls from the rest of your voip devices....

    4. Re:Cordless phones by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      What percentage, do you think, of 911 calls involve children too paniced to tell their phone numbers, people too injured to tell their numbers, people hitting a panic button during a struggle, people hitting a panic button during a heart attack, people hitting dialing 911 while the room burns down around them... etc, etc, etc. Sometimes when you really need 911 it's for more than just reporting a robber, and sometimes you don't have time to talk at all, you just have to pray they can find you.

  42. Well that isn't going too well... by fisternipply · · Score: 0, Funny

    "(There, that ought to stress-test my new server!)"

  43. At least once a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose _some_ non-geeks went to Burning Man also :-)

  44. Re:Lucky people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recognize those boots.

    Those are the "come fuck me" boots, as my fiancee so elegantly puts it. (Of course, she wears the same ones....?)

  45. Re:Lucky people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    We hope you enjoy the booth, which will start its life at 4:44 and Mercury but will move a couple of times. However, it also has a phone number 213 634 1441 (during the event only, please,) which outsiders can call and it will ring.

    Has anyone called it yet?

  46. stress test by junk · · Score: 1

    "There, that ought to stress-test my new server!"

    While you're not dead yet, with only 47 comments, you're not showing good signs. Took about 15s to start loading. Wait until the rest of the /. cult jumps up and hammers you. Good luck...

  47. Naked folks at Burning Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...are mostly old fat, hairy men... burned out acid-head hippies from California who should have quit exposing themselves in public at least four or five decades ago.

  48. Oh boy. I wish I had that excuse by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

    Always wanted to see the burning man. Not to mention
    the pretty girls.

    Nice engineering. We applaud you. Honest. I have to
    put up with the misery of walking around in the evening in this horrid climate of Athens Greece so
    (hey: let's wind up all the poor bastards in Chicago,
    London, Bristol and Calcutta).

    But I have a deeply technical question. What do you do in your *day* job?

    1. Re:Oh boy. I wish I had that excuse by JambisJubilee · · Score: 2
      I made a phone call there while at BM. It worked some of the time, but most times I got the "fast busy" signal.

      While I do applaud the engineering, there were other art projects which would appeal even more to the ./ crowd. I could go on forever. One thing I did see that was interesting was a giant (maybe 6x6 feet?) colorful LED matrix. Each 25x25 LED section of the matrix had it's own ethernet connection, which fed into a large switch. A computer program (a java program written on a powerbook in emacs) sent packets over ethernet to the nodes describing what they should display. It felt really awseome to stand in front of the "screen" with all the music going and look at the colors.

      Also, I was high.

    2. Re:Oh boy. I wish I had that excuse by btempleton · · Score: 1

      Trying to build a new startup to reinvent the phone call. Just means I had familiarity with the tech to build the phone, since what I am doing is somewhat orthogonal to VoIP. Hey, I'm always ready for programmers willing to work for lottery tickets (options.)

      And I am also chairman of the EFF, a free speech group you may have heard about in /. sometimes. That's even more fun.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    3. Re:Oh boy. I wish I had that excuse by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Eh. You mean Music over IP or Voice over telepathy.
      We'd love to contribute to the EFF. The bad news is
      that until a while back I was homeless and out on
      the street. Sorry. Still broke.

      I'm still struggling to come to terms with being able
      to laugh about it.

      Wish you well.

    4. Re:Oh boy. I wish I had that excuse by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I love these walls of color more or less than the "cube" voxel-display art piece that was on the Playa (IIRC, somewhere around 4:30 or so, not to far out toward the man from the Esplanade), called the Cubatron by Mark Lottor...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  49. Cell-phone like 802.11 phone by sstidman · · Score: 1

    From the article: "I had a cell-phone like 802.11 phone"

    Anyone know what he is talking about? I looked around but cannot find anything like what Brad describes.

    Brad, I know you are lurking on these pages ... may I ask what were you referring to?

    --
    Send/track messages to 100K people: www.xPressAlert.com
    1. Re:Cell-phone like 802.11 phone by btempleton · · Score: 1

      It is linked to in the articles. Jeff Pulver's WiSIP phone is what I had.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  50. Great, cater to the lowest common denominator... by b00m3rang · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ooh, NAKED PEOPLE! Oh my god, it's so unusual, and taboo, and stuff. Let's all put our pants around our ankles and start drooling like idiots. Thanks for reinforcing the antithesis of Burning Man's ideals of freedom, and making it look like some kind of a live porn show. People like you are why idiots show up, inappropriately photograph, grope, and rape innocent ladies at the event. Someone's nudity does not automatically indicate any sexual context, contrary to what the small head in your pants might tell simpletons like yourself.

    Couldn't you showcase the technology, and then shut your fucking hole?

    Dick.

  51. Not to mention by commodoresloat · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The phone call is free, but it costs $250 or so to get onto the grounds where the phone is.

  52. Re:Great, cater to the lowest common denominator.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like someone forgot to take their happy pills today.

  53. RMS sends his love. by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

    No really. Emacs and Java. Oh it's so pretty isn't it. (Except it should have been in Lisp).

  54. Gratuitously, Oliver Twist in Nevada by kgbspy · · Score: 2

    "Please sir, can I have some more?"

    --
    ~
    ~
    ~
    -- INSERT --
  55. Re:Great, cater to the lowest common denominator.. by emcdermid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, come on. All Brad did was provide, in a humorous way, a warning that the link might not be entirely work-safe. He even pointed out that the nudity was *non-gratuitous*.

    Did you even bother to check out the linked pages? He's not promoting an inaccurate view of the festival at all -- quite the opposite, in fact.

  56. Damn Apache default config! by AltoidsSuck · · Score: 1
    It's all Apache's fault. Load is at 0.2 and running with the CPU 90% idle. For some reason apache.conf thinks you should never have more than 150 simultaneous open connections. Grrr. Apache should ship with an alternate config called slashdot.porn.conf with all the right performance tweaks. :) Anyway, server is all better now. At least until all those horny hackers wake up tomorrow morning and read slashdot...

    Don't be trash talking our ISP, Meer.net rocks the net. A quick shout out to JG and DG.

    -Bryn

  57. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll and/or humorless twit

  58. Collapse? Not quite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... collapse is not in the cards. the real question is what will become of a society with one arm far stronger than the other? I think it might mean better ping-pong players, and who knows where THAT could lead.

  59. Mind in the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I'm out of change, it's probably easier to go home and get some...

    Yeah, but after you're done you'll still need to find money for a phone call! :-)

  60. how BM has changed... by EvilStein · · Score: 0

    funny how an impromptu "city" in the middle of nowhere that was supposed to be free of laws, rules, technology/etc.. ... is now giggling over a VoIP phone & WiFi. heh.

    1. Re:how BM has changed... by btempleton · · Score: 1

      Free of rules and laws, yes, much more so than ordinary society, though less than the smaller Burning mans of the past.

      But free of Technology? What Burning Mans have you been to? Burning Man is crawling with technology, it's in love with technology, and has been the 7 times I have been.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    2. Re:how BM has changed... by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      "Free of rules and laws, yes, much more so than ordinary society, though less than the smaller Burning mans of the past."

      MUCH less than the past.

      "But free of Technology? What Burning Mans have you been to? Burning Man is crawling with technology, it's in love with technology, and has been the 7 times I have been."

      It's been before that... before the thing turned into a frat boy $350/ticket money pit. Oh well.

    3. Re:how BM has changed... by btempleton · · Score: 1

      Well, my understanding from those who went in the early days that for several years Burning Man wasn't about anything, not about art or tech but just catharsis, so it had no particular embrace of technology. But very shortly after arriving on the Playa, the theme camps arose, and the art cars, and of course the fire-oriented art which begins the love affair with tech.

      Burning Man changes every year, and while the old one is gone the new one isn't so much worse or better but different. I like the marriage of tech and art that it has become devoted to, myself.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  61. old news.. by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 2

    Telstra have been putting solar powered public telephones in the Australian desert since the 70's. They are backed up by solar powered microwave stations every so often so it's completely wireless. It's also cheaper than running cables out into the desert for just a couple of phones..

    1. Re:old news.. by hey · · Score: 1

      But unless it's been done in the US don't you know it hasn't been done. John Glenn was just the first American in space -- people forget Yuri Gagarin.

  62. Burning man Censors by themusicgod1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    exhibit A href="http://www.sktfm.tv">sean kennedy.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  63. i -heart- preview by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    try again: Exhibit A sean kennedy

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:i -heart- preview by ces · · Score: 1

      Looks to me like he was filming commercially in Black Rock City without permission.

      Wah ... I feel really sorry for him, it's not like Burning Man doesn't warn people about the camera rules repeatedly.

      For those of you who think this is "bad" and "censorship" remember that there are many people who would like to see cameras banned entirely from Black Rock City. The current rules are a ballance between privacy and artists reproduction rights and having the sleazoids who make "Girls Gone Wild" videos shove cameras in everyones face.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  64. Re:Lucky people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you kidding me? You like chunky white girls with floppy tits that go down to their belly-button? If wearing "fuck me boots" is all it takes, your standards are low even for the slashdot crowd.

  65. I thought Burning Man photos are not kosher by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    I thought that one of the rules of Burning Man was that you aren't supposed to run around photographing people.

  66. Obvious nut job - it's a comedy gold mine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Funny to observe the parent's post history - clicking on a few, they're all extended rants that mention how much he dislikes all the people around him. A discussion of MP3's, he drops the quote "It's nothing more than a bunch of rich brats who don't want to spend $10-$15 on a CD so that they can upgrade their beamer."

    It's a little odd to talk extensively about your own experiences on a technical message board, but it's downright strange to view Slashdot as your outlet for caustic rants about how much you hate the people around you.

  67. Another pic of her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  68. Nice butt, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heads up, man ass is the main focus of the first picture.

  69. OH NO!?! by waspleg · · Score: 1

    not threatening harassing phone calls!!

    i'm so glad my LANDLINE had those problems fixed eyars ago

    *cough*

  70. Please test the satellite link! by fiji · · Score: 1

    I would be interested to see the MOS scores over the link.

    Check out http://testyourvoip.com/ to get detailed analysis of a VoIP call.

    -ben

  71. But I can't dial 9-1-1 ! (FP) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First alarmist post about not being able to dial 9-1-1 on the VoIP phone? And what if the power goes out?!

  72. OT: Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can browse by any criteria you choose on iTunes. The top bar is able to be adjusted to display up to 21 different criteria, which you can traverse in either forward or reverse order.

  73. Hospitals do not make changes on a whim by sczimme · · Score: 1


    If something like a little WiFi+VoIP causes an piece of equipment to stop working then the equipment needs to be replaces/reengineered, because WiFi is here to stay and VoIP is gaining momentum, so it will have to be done sooner or later.

    What you might not realize is that hospitals routinely use equipment for a very long time; a 20-30 year lifespan is not unusual for certain types of equipment. The mission of the hospital is to use what works, and they tend to rely on time-tested tools and technology. They will not toss everything because of some new (in their eyes) widget.

    If you think wi-fi is necessary, I challenge you thusly: describe in ~25 words exactly which showstopping hospital problem will be solved by replacing/modifying any and all equipment that might be affected by 2.4GHz range RF. IOW, what benefits will they gain from wireless that will outweigh the expense of making the hospital wi-fi-friendly, particularly when their current equipment is still serviceable?

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Hospitals do not make changes on a whim by Aadain2001 · · Score: 1

      Who says they have to use wireless??? I'm saying that wireless will be present in more and more devices around town and in those carried by their patients/visitors. Keeping 20-30 year old equipment around in face of spreading WiFi signals that causes them to stop working Just Because(tm) isn't a sound reason. WiFi will soon include MAN networks (networks that cover entire cities), and then they will have no choice but to replace devices that the 2.4GHz (or whatever frequency we will be using then) signals interfear with. Best practice would be to shield all the new stuff so the Next Great Thing doesn't require yet another upgrade do to interference.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
  74. UCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    straight people - hug someone you think might be gay!

    white people - hug a black person! okay white people, we're going to have to share the black people.

  75. I thought that was a joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck! I thought that thing was a joke! DAMN IT. I could have saved myself a goddamn bus trip to Gerlach.

  76. Frowned on, not quite absolutely forbidden. by abb3w · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the What is Burning Man FAQ:

    Q. What is the policy on taking pictures?
    A. Film and video cameras are forbidden without permission. All video cameras must be registered and tagged. This is to protect the privacy of participants and artists alike. Use Agreement forms for personal video cameras will be available upon arrival at the Gate, the Greeter's Station or Playa Info. If you are considering filming or videotaping for professional purposes, you must have a commercial agreement on file with the Media Team prior to your arrival onsite. Commercial use of images taken at Burning Man without permission is subject to cunning legal action and punishable by death. This includes amateurs and professionals who capture images. Click here for further information.

    He's done this before, so he probably got permission for the camera. (He regularly does a panorama, it seems.)

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  77. Great, now my boss can call by ktlyst · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to convince work that there is no internet or phones at burning man. Not reachable. Please stop with your "innovation." art + tech + burningman

  78. Re:Great, cater to the lowest common denominator.. by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I might have overreacted. I read that as, "there's picturs of naked people, that ought to test my server", it sounded like they were just trying to get more hits on their site. Unfortunately the link wasn't working when I checked it.

    With the seeming increase of jerks at the event lately, I guess I got a little knee-jerk.

  79. Burning Man by sundling · · Score: 1

    Sure naked might get your attention, but that is far from what Burning Man is about. There are even some crossover between the open source software movement and the main form of Burning Man.

    While on the surface it would appear that Burning Man is a week long party where people walk around naked, that is only the surface and anyone who one experiences this level is missing out.

    No vending is allowed at the event, except for ice and coffee in center camp. There is something called the gift economy where everyone is supposed to give gifts to the community. So someone might cook pancakes for passers by, create some interactive experience or artwork. So instead of software for community enrichment, it's often artistic or even tangibles.

    Community is also fostered by the difficulty of survival in the desert where the weather can change dramatically to hot or cold, rain, duststorms. The weather is an important part of the event. This forces people to either be self reliant or group into larger groups and plan how they're actually going to pull off some huge endeavor in what are called theme camps. Some of these camps are as big as hundreds of people and they construct buildings and some pretty impressive stuff. Working towards a common goal and overcoming obstacles does wonders for creating bonds among people.

    At the event it made clear to everyone they are meant to be participants, NOT spectators. So everyone is supposed to add something to the event, not just gawk at the women.

    There is also the environmentally conscious side of Burning Man. Even though these fanstic buildings are created, it must all be packed out. The trash has to be packed out, everything. Leave no trace is a mantra.

    There is also a spiritual side to Burning Man. Each year, the night after the burning of the Man, there is a ornate hand made temple that is burned. People write messages on the temple to those loved ones that have died or add articles that metaphorically represent something you want to leave behind, like a picture of a girlfriend you want to forget.

    Now there are growing year round communities in several major cities like San Fransisco and Los Angeles where these people that have come together have events. Yes, I know all this because I am one of them and I'm even on the Burning Man webteam.

    You can find more information on the Burning Man web site. It's definitely an experience worth having!

    Paul Sundling

    1. Re:Burning Man by btempleton · · Score: 1

      And if you look at the photo galleries you will see where I point out only a small percentage of the population goes unclothed. However, that doesn't mean that nude or interestingly costumed using a phone in the middle of the desert doesn't make for an interesting photo. It is true that because of this, there are more nude people in Burning Man photos than there are at Burning Man. But this should not be surprising.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  80. The issue is latency, not bandwidth by MMHere · · Score: 1

    Satellite downlinks have plenty of "bandwidth." The uplinks are usually more limited in "bandwidth," but you can still push reasonable voice quality thru most satellite uplinks.

    The issue, however, is LATENCY. With minimum 500ms round trip times (250ms up to the geosynchronous bird, 250ms back down), it could be very annoying to talk over such a link. It'll work, but the feeling of interactivity between you and your conversational partner will simply be missing.

    Have you ever heard NPR reporters in the mideast using traditional (non-VoIP) sat phones while being interviewed by radio hosts state-side? You'll know what I mean...

  81. How about next year? by serutan · · Score: 1

    Now that Brad has shown us how relatively easy it is, or at least decidedly do-able, I predict a gradual spread of free phones at BurningMan in even more incongruous situations.

    How about a mockup of a typical fifties American living room with a couch, a couple of easy chairs, a black and white TV playing Leave It To Beaver, and a coffee table with a fifties style black rotary dial phone that really works. All the electronics including power would be in the phone and the table, invisible. Now that would be cool.

    1. Re:How about next year? by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

      No, everything would be powered by the idling gasoline motor in the powered couch and chair. This is Burning Man, after all.

  82. Solar VoiP by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    Well, Burning Man (BM? yuck) would be a great place to test out solar powered VoiP. Other parts of the country (much of the SE comes to mind) that wouldn't work so well. Too many cloudy days.

    But I really don't care how they power it - solar, pedal while you talk. gerbils, nukes... I just love the idea of functional phone booths where a phone booth should not be. If it can be completely wireless, so much the better!

    And finally, I think Solar VoiP would make a great band name. Feel free toe use it so long as I get some credit!

    1. Re:Solar VoiP by ces · · Score: 1

      It is an all too common myth that solar doesn't work when there are clouds.

      In fact photovoltaics and solar thermal systems like solar hot-water heaters work fine even with fairly heavy cloud cover.

      I live in the very cloudy PNW and there are plenty of solar powered emergency phones and other various equipment all over the place. Those little solar powered path lights at home depot work just fine here too even when we're having one of our several week periods of overcast skies.

      You do have to upsize your solar collectors somewhat around here though. For things like solar hot water or heat that really isn't much of a problem since you don't need much area in the first place. On the other hand it does make PV systems for home power around here a lot more expensive. But for something like a phone you don't need a lot of power in the first place.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  83. commercially by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    what the hell? Sean Kennedy is not a commercial entity, and as far as I know did not sell the 'sktfm.tv' video episodes, nor intended to; they were free to download from the beginning, unless this changed in the past few years or so. unfortunately, halfway through being free for download for a year or so were suddenly pulled. Sean Kennedy claimed to be the first open source person; everything he makes can be downloaded, ripped, and transmitted into any medium and every medium possible. Do you mean rantmedia? like..uh..rantradio and it's parent group rantmedia? a non-commerical radio station? it just doesn't make sense.
    And when an organization uses copyright ownership as an excuse to forbit someone to distribute their own works, I'd say that's censorship.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:commercially by ces · · Score: 1

      Be that as it may, Black Rock LLC has a right to control it's trademark use and has a right to control who may film at Burning Man.

      They require everyone with a camera to sign their filming agreement. It only authorizes personal use of images taken at Burning Man. *Any* other use requires the permission of Black Rock LLC. This includes things such as art projects.

      There are very good reasons for this, first and formost is to protect the trademark and copyright rights of Black Rock LLC and the artists who's work is on display at Burning Man. Second is to keep a ballance between those who want to film at Burning Man and those who would like to see cameras banned entirely.

      Their current rules are an attempt to prevent problems they've encountered in the past. They have every right to put them in place and the rules are far looser than those in place at many concerts or art exibitions.

      I have no idea what context Sean Kennedy's footage taken at Burning Man was used in. However I'm sure that if he had properly asked for permission it would have been granted. For that matter once the problem was brought to his attention I'm sure that if Sean's response was to ask for a permission grant he probably would have gotten it (assuming that not asking for it in the first place was an honest mistake).

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    2. Re:commercially by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      there is NO situation where you should have to ask to take video or picture footage, and even if this is not the case, footage taken 'illegally' or without permission being taken down off the internet via legal threatening is censorship, and should be stopped. Sure it's blackrock LLC's legal right to do so, just as it's the RIAA's legal right to lay 6 digit figure charges against unsuspecting filetraders. There are a lot of laws that are broken and/or can be used used to harm others, and this is a good example. both have the same effect; the suppression of ideas,expression and art.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    3. Re:commercially by ces · · Score: 1

      Um, no.

      Entirely different things. Burning Man is a private event and they have the right to ask people not do certain activities while attending just the same as if they invited people to their office or home.

      If someone was videotaping at my office or house after I'd asked them not to and they posted that footage to the internet after I'd asked them not to do so I think very few people would consider it censorship if I threatened to sue them to get it taken down.

      The fact is they've had problems in the past with porn video vendors taping footage at Burning Man. Many of the participants don't exactly want to appear in this kind of video. In addition there are people who don't really want their pictures taken at Burning Man at all. Some of the people who are running around painted blue and naked might have friends, family, or business associates who really wouldn't understand why they do this. I think they have a right to ensure that recognizable images of them at Burning Man not appear in a form availible to the public.

      Several years ago there was serious discussion of banning cameras entirely from Burning Man, the current rules are a comprimize to still allow people to film while respecting the rights of those who may not want to be photographed.

      If you really think there is NO situation where someone should have to ask permission to film then I guess I can come into your bedroom and photograph you having sex or photgraph you in the shower.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  84. cowards by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    Why the hell are these people running around blue or naked unless they realize that they can be seen? We need to wake the fuck up these people who are friends and family of these blue people, because they are the problem in this situation, ultimately; I'm sick of seeing different people catch harsh reactions from family members for being as they are. Here in Canada some people appear to be multicultural, for example, and although that does not really apply to different forms of expression beyond culture/"race",(such as painting ones self blue and running around naked), at the very least the two ideas can reinforce each other. In order for acceptance of such things as naked blue people to be widespread, more people have to be in the public's eye being both naked, and blue. Naked blue people should be commonplace, or at least relatively commonplace, and until people conceive of naked blue people in this fashion there will be trouble, and a sort of easy-way-out towards censorship in this manner.

    I am not disputing the fact that burning man has the right to censor; you've made it clear by their video recordings policy that they do have this right; I'm saying that they censor, and as a side note that censorship is wrong. whether censorship be right or wrong, however, they are engaging in it, on a big enough scale to matter.

    There is never an excuse to forbid someone to publish video, especially in a major event with many people involved, with video footage where everyone involved is obviously consenting

    And yes, you are perfectly free to take shower footage of me. [ oh and in case you think i'm kidding this summer at a rock concert where they were charging something like 4$ for a 15 minute shower, I showered in front of some 3-400 people.[hey i needed to go back to work showered] ] (more more porno for the people!) d:

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.