Slashdot Mirror


Windows Upgrade, FAA Error Cause LAX Shutdown

fname writes "The recent shutdown of LAX due to an FAA radio outage was apparently caused by a Windows 2000 integration flaw, possibility related to an old Windows 95 bug. An article at the LA Times claims that the outage was caused by human error, as the system will automatically shut down after 49.7 days (related to this Windows 95 flaw?), and a technician didn't reboot the system monthly as he should have. This happened after an upgrade from Unix to Windows. I don't think blame should be assigned to the technician who missed the task; rather, it seems a gross oversight for the FAA to guarantee that such a critical system will crash after only one missed maintenance task. Who's really at fault?"

11 of 862 comments (clear)

  1. Frist Prostage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Fristy yayah.

  2. first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    i win

  3. WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Look at all those links!

  4. a little off topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Who's really at fault?"

    well duh... Bush's!

  5. hum, guess they selected the wrong word... by sxpert · · Score: 1, Troll

    This happened after an upgrade from Unix to Windows.

    Shouldn't that read downgrade instead ???

  6. Fire some managers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Of course it will never happen.

  7. Re:Before the torrent of "windows sucks" posts... by hkb · · Score: 0, Troll

    You're fucking ignorant and I can't believe you were marked as insightful. You're more of a troll.

    Windows has a perfectly fine stable, secure, realiable base. Windows 2000/2003 isn't any less stable than Linux, and has a more robust security model. Hell, Linux hasn't even mainstreamed file/object ACLs yet. Sorry, the UGO model and hacking the NGROUPS_MAX and recompiling doesn't cut it anymore.

    What about a directory service that integrates well with Windows and Mac clients? Sorry, OpenLDAP doesn't cut it. It doesn't come close to Active Directory for ease-of-use and scalability.

    You people need to get off your Windows 95 kick. Windows 2003 ain't no Windows 95, despite your cluelessness.

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
  8. Re:"Upgrade"? by donbrock · · Score: -1, Troll

    Most geeks know this is a Downgrade. An upgrade would have been to Linux.

  9. OMG I LOVE NERDS! by Mr.+Vandemar · · Score: 0, Troll

    omg i love nerds. especially ones that love math. oh baby. oh baby. my name is beth.

  10. Mods stingy on points for ACs today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I saw only one AC post modded up. The remaining hundred or so were modded down or passed over -- quite a few deserving at least a +1. Meanwhile, some registered wiseguy cracks a terrible joke and gets a +5 funny. I thought the moderation was getting better these last couple of weeks... guess the elitist crowd is back.

  11. Re:What failed? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 0, Troll
    Don't deploy flawed software.

    So, that's what we're doing wrong! I'll go deploy the unflawed software right now.

    Thanks, I wish I had thought of that.

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.