Slashdot Mirror


When Galaxies Collide

neutron_p writes "An international team of scientists announced today, they observed a nearby head-on collision of two galaxy clusters. The clusters smashed together thousands of galaxies and trillions of stars. It is the most powerful events ever witnessed. Such collisions are second only to the Big Bang in total energy output. The event was captured with the European Space Agency's XMM-Newton observatory. Scientists are calling the event the perfect cosmic storm: galaxy clusters that collided like two high-pressure weather fronts and created hurricane-like conditions, tossing galaxies far from their paths and churning shock waves of 100-million-degree gas through intergalactic space."

55 comments

  1. I guess.. by j0nb0y · · Score: 1

    I guess if something like that hits us, we're pretty much screwed...

    Kind of a sobering thought. I don't see that we could do anything about it though.

    --
    If you had super powers, would you use them for good, or for awesome?
    1. Re:I guess.. by bandy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not as if we wouldn't see it coming. Of course, if we're still stuck on this rock...

      And don't forget the wipe-out-nearly-all-life gamma ray bursts! No advance warning on those puppies.

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    2. Re:I guess.. by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 1

      The FA says we're running into the Virgo Cluster - ETA "a few billion years". So there's still time to pack.

    3. Re:I guess.. by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      Hmm, not quite. The Andromeda galaxy is on a collision course with ours. Estimates say that the collision will take place in about 3 billion years and create a merger of the two galaxies. A collision between galaxies isn't like a collision between planets. I would predict a merger before a catastrophic explosion.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    4. Re:I guess.. by Cecil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And don't forget the wipe-out-nearly-all-life gamma ray bursts! No advance warning on those puppies.

      Although that's only because we don't know anything about them.

      If one started happening near enough for it to bother us, I suspect we'd notice *something* going on beforehand. Energy can't just appear suddenly and randomly, it has to come from some source. And gamma ray bursts are a LOT of energy. I'm way too lazy to actually look it up, but I think it's at least on the scale of like, if an antimatter star collided with a matter star and they instantly turned each other into 100% pure energy at e=mc^2 (m is enormous, c^2 is enormous, guess how big their product will be), it still wouldn't be enough.

      I mean, I'm with you on the whole "they're astoundingly big and powerful" thing, but I suspect for that very reason one wouldn't just pop up nearby without us noticing something weird well beforehand.

    5. Re:I guess.. by j0nb0y · · Score: 1

      hopefully we can get a decent space program by then. And fend off any asteroid collisions...

      Aw, who am i kidding. I'm sure we'll still be preoccupied with bush's national guard service and kerry's vietnam medals by then...

      --
      If you had super powers, would you use them for good, or for awesome?
    6. Re:I guess.. by Lord+Dreamshaper · · Score: 1

      we're still worrying what to do about asteroids heading our way. maybe well-placed nukes solve that problem, but think about the size of the nuke required to deflect a galaxy heading our way...

      --
      When all of your wishes have been granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed - Marilyn Manson
    7. Re:I guess.. by bandy · · Score: 1

      You're right of course.

      But I think it would be on the order of "say, that's weird"...."oh shit." One would have to happen far enough from us to be not fatal but still well-observable, not to mention that we'd have to be looking at it.

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    8. Re:I guess.. by Jormundgandr · · Score: 1

      Stars about to produce a gamma ray burst would actually be pretty easy to find. The problem is that the type of abnormally massive star that produces them isn't that unusual, and red giant stars, which are what a pre-gamma ray burst star would be, are downright common.

      So if, say Betelgeuse (of Ford Prefect fame) was 100 times as massive as it really is and decided to collapse into a black hole one fine day 427 years ago, the only way we'd know about it would be looking at it a few hours before the burst hit, saying, "oh, Betelgeuse finally went bust" and then promptly be vaporised (along with the oceans!) half an hour later.

      Stars don't really take that long to collapse, especially if they're the really big kind.

      --
      -sig removed for tax purposes-
  2. Wouldn't the Galaxies just pass through each other by Mystic0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since the celestial an planetary bodies are extremely far apart relative to their size, wouldn't the galaxies just pass through each other without colliding at all?

  3. Big Bang dead? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It the universe is expanding due to the Big Bang, then why would galaxy clusters ever meet?

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    1. Re:Big Bang dead? by finkployd · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering that myself, but I suppose even though the universe is expanding it is probably also swirling (for lack of a better 3 dimensional term) and I suppose that could cause some collisions. Especially if some of the galaxies are moving faster than others.

      Of course I freely admit I don't have a clue about this stuff, someone else want to give a better explanation how this is possible?

    2. Re:Big Bang dead? by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Think two cars driving along the highway, in the same direction (neighbors expanding away from big bang). Except that the one on the right is drifting slightly left, and sideswipes the other. Eventually. And then the crash goes into slo-mo for the next few thousand million years.

    3. Re:Big Bang dead? by wanerious · · Score: 1

      The rate of increase of separation between two galaxies due to universal expansion depends upon the distance between them. The greater the distance, the greater the relative coordinate velocity. When the distance between galaxies is fairly "small", as when they are members of the same cluster, they can be gravitationally bound, where the gravitational force overwhelms the weaker "repulsive" expansion.

  4. Aha, but! by empaler · · Score: 1

    "All of a sudden, causality decided to give physical laws and time the finger, and decided to instantly clash two random galaxies!"

    Um. Yeah.

    1. Re:Aha, but! by div_B · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "All of a sudden, causality decided to give physical laws and time the finger,

      Actually physical laws appear to have given causality the finger quite a while ago.

  5. RTFA by empaler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Or at least look at the 'artist's impression'.

    They may be small and far apart, but the rules of physics does not allow preclusion from stuff like gravity and whatnot.

    1. Re:RTFA by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Gravity is fairly weak. It's the "whatnot" that always gets ya.

    2. Re:RTFA by SloWave · · Score: 1


      Regarding the animation...
      So where does all the momentum of the smaller galaxy go? It seems like the pair of them should be moving together in the same direction as the smaller galaxy after colliding if they are going to merge.

    3. Re:RTFA by breadbot · · Score: 1

      Smaller galaxy cluster. But I don't know. Maybe the clusters got tangled up somehow? I haven't yet RTFA.

  6. hm.... by schnits0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    I felt a great disturbance in the force. As if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, then was suddenly silenced.

    1. Re:hm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not just stupid, it's fractally stupid.

  7. No. This has been understood for decades. by Bootsy+Collins · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It the universe is expanding due to the Big Bang, then why would galaxy clusters ever meet?

    The short answer is: because the Universe on these scales is not perfectly homogeneous. If it were, they wouldn't merge.

    The longer answer:

    Remember that the expansion of the Universe is an expansion of background space -- an expansion of the space in which everything is embedded -- rather than stuff moving through space. The rate of change of the relative separation of two hunks of matter can then be thought of as having two components: one from the expansion of space (objects staying in the same location, but the distances between objects are increasing because space is expanding), and one from the movement of objects through space (objects changing their locations in space). In the case of the latter -- the so-called "peculiar velocity" of an object -- if matter were distributed perfectly smoothly throughout the Universe, there'd be no reason for anything to change locations in space. But it isn't; and so there are net gravitational forces on objects that cause them to move. Whether the attraction of two objects "wins" over the expansion tending to separate them depends upon the situation.

    For a simple way to picture this sort of thing, consider a big rubber sheet with two marbles on it. Give one a nudge towards the other (its peculiar velocity), and then start stretching the sheet (the expansion of the Universe). Will they collide? Depends on the peculiar velocity, rate of stretching (expansion), etc. But it's certainly not the case that they always won't.

  8. I know, by empaler · · Score: 1

    My phys teacher used to gripe for hours on end about the whatnot. Oh, and the whatyoumightcallits. Now *those* were the really bad ones...

  9. Imagine a galactic cluster of th... by OccidentalSlashy · · Score: 0

    Ah, my karma's bad enough without being 'punappropriate' yet.

    --
    vicious, untreated political sewage...niche entertainment for the spiritually unattractive...worshipless pap
  10. I'm sorry by b-baggins · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just can't get my sky is falling hysteria worked up over a galactic storm that takes 100 million years to occur. I hope these folks aren't planning on watching the whole thing from beginning to end.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  11. What is it really, that's going on here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. Re:Wouldn't the Galaxies just pass through each ot by dougmc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    wouldn't the galaxies just pass through each other without colliding at all?
    Generally, yes. But gravity would still be in effect, and so the galaxies would certainly be twisted and torn up and the like.

    How would it affect the Earth? Well, as long as no stars come too close to us, we'd probably not really be affected at all. We might get thrown out of our galaxy or something, but as long as nothing smacks right into our planet or our sun, and nothing distorts our orbit signifigantly, I wouldn't expect any real problems other than the nighttime sky changing ...

    ... of course, this would all happen or not happen over 100 million years, so any changes would be very gradual, at least as long as no stars get within a light year or so from us.

  13. The Perfect Storm by Sabu+mark · · Score: 1

    Somewhere out there, an extraterrestrial equivalent of George Clooney and Marky Mark are trapped on a capsized starship.

    --

    What Would Jesus Do
    (for a Klondike bar)?
  14. Damn, I missed it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I get for playing Counterstrike all night. I hope they at least got some pictures.

  15. Our turn is coming by dpilot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Last I heard we were due to collide with the Andromeda galaxy. It must be around the hundred million or billion year range, though.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Our turn is coming by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2, Informative

      The last I heard was that two galaxies were colliding with the Milky Way and we just weren't aware of it until astronomers looked at the data the right way.

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

    2. Re:Our turn is coming by dpilot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought that was the Milky Way shredding the Magellanic clouds, and that that was largely a 'gravitational' collision. I'm under the impression that we have an up-and-coming collision with the slightly-larger Andromeda galaxy, and that the Milky Way will get the shorter end of the stick on that one. Given that both galaxies are about the same size, I don't think either will feel too good, afterward.

      The science fiction author Alistair Reynolds has a series of books that is partly driven by the impending collision. ("Revelation Space", "Redemption Ark", forgot the third. "Chasm City" shares the setting.)

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  16. Re:Wouldn't the Galaxies just pass through each ot by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    As they refered to it:
    "the perfect cosmic storm: galaxy clusters that collided like two high-pressure weather fronts and created hurricane-like conditions"

    Compare the planetary bodies to the molecules and atoms in the air. Compared to their size, they are pretty far apart, and yet affect one another when huge clusters collide. That's how I understand it.

    --
    ^_^
  17. Re:Wouldn't the Galaxies just pass through each ot by div_B · · Score: 1

    Compare the planetary bodies to the molecules and atoms in the air. Compared to their size, they are pretty far apart, and yet affect one another when huge clusters collide. That's how I understand it.

    But the molecules in air collide quite regularly, and just bounce off each other, to a first approximation. When far apart their influence on each other is minimal. The bodies in a galaxy on the other hand influence one another at a distance due to gravity, don't bounce around between one another, and two stars colliding would probably be quite unlike two billiard balls colliding ;)

  18. Not the first time... by miope · · Score: 4, Informative

    Obviusly, is not the first time it happens. Not so obvius, is not the first time this has been studied, either.

    By the way, there's a slighty more detailed article in space.com., some other useful links in the article, also.

    Excerpt from space.com:

    The smaller cluster most likely contained about 300 galaxies, while its larger neighbor about 1,000 galaxies, researchers said. But when the two clusters collided with one another, they formed a still unsettled super cluster about 1 million light-years across that should take another billion years to settle down completely, researchers said.
    1. Re:Not the first time... by miope · · Score: 1

      Of course, maybe this time this collision gives more useful information than the collision studied in 2001 (see parent article).

      Note: Apparently, the clusters involved in the collision studied in 2001 are not the same than the clusters involved in this collision (so, two different collisions :-) ).

      Well... it seems this post is a bit confusing to read :(

  19. Re:Wouldn't the Galaxies just pass through each ot by dan42 · · Score: 1

    This calculator gives some perspective to the comparison: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic /frecol.html#c1

    Just for interest sake, if you scale the time dimension to the same ratio as the space dimension (stars are ~10^19 bigger than a molecule), a molucule would collide with another (at STP) every ~100 years instead of 2E-10s.

  20. Re:Wouldn't the Galaxies just pass through each ot by div_B · · Score: 1

    Just for interest sake, if you scale the time dimension to the same ratio as the space dimension (stars are ~10^19 bigger than a molecule), a molucule would collide with another (at STP) every ~100 years instead of 2E-10s.

    Which is of course a lot more frequent than the observed rate of stellar collisions. The two situations are qualitatively very different of course, given that one is largely governed by long-distance gravitational attraction and the other by short-range electric repulsion, and so the comparison is really not a well advised one.

  21. NASA "Merger Website" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Contains further information, videos, pictures.

    http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/2004/0831galax ym erger_media.html

  22. It's hardly an "event" by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    It is the most powerful events ever witnessed. Such collisions are second only to the Big Bang in total energy output. The event was captured with the European Space Agency's XMM-Newton observatory. Scientists are calling the event the perfect cosmic storm

    There's issues with the implied past tense in this story - this 'event' is still continuing and will do so for many millions of years to come. The impression is that a whole pile of galaxies just had a massive fender-bender and now it's all over.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  23. Time by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Crap! Two galaxy clusters collide and I missed it!
    Anyone know what time it happened?

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  24. targeted advirtisement by tloh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did anyone notice the "Mergers & Acquisitions" ads by google? Considering the funding woos of NASA, perhaps......

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  25. rfta and note the 800 milion light year distance.. by phsdv · · Score: 1

    It defenitely should be in the past tense, it happend 800 milion years ago! To us it looks like it will continue for a few milion years, it probably did finish more than 700 milion years ago...

  26. Clarification by at_18 · · Score: 1

    smashed together thousands of galaxies and trillions of stars.

    In such an event, trillions of stars aren't smashed together. Some of the galaxies might merge, but individual stars would pass one next to the other with no harm - the space between them is much, much bigger than their dimension.

    1. Re:Clarification by Jormundgandr · · Score: 1

      With so many stars moving past each other, the odds are that at least a few would be locked in death spirals with inevitable conclusions. Please don't be a killjoy and ruin the image of the BEST demolition derby in the UNIVERSE.

      --
      -sig removed for tax purposes-
  27. It's a disaster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    such a catastrophe ;)

  28. Bastard operator from hell by Alosja · · Score: 2, Funny

    This seems like an good excuse for the network beeing down yesterday :)

    --
    A little stupidity is as unlikely as a little pregnancy
  29. Re:Wouldn't the Galaxies just pass through each ot by dougmc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    and so the comparison is really not a well advised one
    It gets worse. The stars are generally further apart (when expressed as the ratio of their diameters) than the molecules in a gas are at STP. And the stars in a general area are usually moving in the same general direction, unlike molecules which are all moving about randomly.

    Also, gravity will generally only make two stars collide under very specific conditions -- what will usually happen instead when two stars wander into the same area is that their paths will be deflected by the other, or maybe they'll go into orbit about each other. But without a way to shed the angular momentum, they're unlikely to ever collide unless their initial paths are *just* right.

    But if it ever happens (two stars actually colliding, especially big ones) ... I'll bet it's one hell of a show! (as long as you're far enough away to be safe from the resulting nova/super nova/black hole -- not that a black hole would be any more dangerous than the two stars that combine to create it, of course.)

  30. Re:Wouldn't the Galaxies just pass through each ot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What intests me is the how the merging would affect time in the regions that came across intense gravity fields. IANP, any info

  31. ouch by Casmira · · Score: 1

    that galaxy got quiet pwned to say the least

  32. Asteroids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard that the sun moves somewhat in harmony with the surrounding suns. If it didn't do that, the other suns would disrupt the asteroid cloud outside the solar system, sending asteroids into the system (not good).

    There is a sun that periodically moves close to our system, and there are theories that it's responsible for some mass extinctions, cuz it times well with the figures we got.

    Anyways, asteroids might be a problem if things get upset.

    -n

  33. Re:Wouldn't the Galaxies just pass through each ot by dougmc · · Score: 2, Informative
    There's not really any reason to expect any intense gravity fields, not more intense than you can find in a normal galaxy anyways.

    Well, a giant star has a large gravity field, and if two giant stars were to collide, it would be even larger, but that's really about it.

    If a large star got close enough to us to affect the local gravity field enough to affect time, we'd all be dead long before, so there's little reason to worry about that. It takes seriously strong gravity (by terrestial standards) to signifigantly affect time, and anything that came even remotely close to doin that would destroy the Earth first (not to mention distrubring our orbit, which alone could cause massive global catastrophes.)

  34. Completely forgot to mention by empaler · · Score: 1

    That's where I live. Well, 1500 metres or so away, anyway... Believe you me, I've heard about it.