Nokia Phone Gets Virus Protection
wan-fu writes "After all that talk about bluetooth vulnerabilities
and mobile phone virii there will finally be a mobile phone with virus protection. Nokia's 6670 smart phone will be released in October and features software from F-Secure. Perhaps this will raise the eyebrows of some other mobile phone manufacturers to step up and increase their security policies for their phones' operating systems."
Why not just make a phone that is secure in the first place and can't get viruses. This has to be the worst marketing ploy ever.
They do? Good thing I have a phone that just makes calls. Who would have thought of that nowadays?
a mobile telephone that is just that : a telephone. And I most certainly don't need a mobile telephone whose OS is so insecure that it needs an anti-virus program.
Automatic updates?? That would be interesting...
The best way to predict the future is to invent it. -Alan Kay
The first time I get a phone call that says "Hi! How are you? I call you in order to have your advice! See you later! Thanks," I think I will kill someone.
I don't think I know of a single person who keeps their virus definitions up to date (most of my friends use Linux, the rest aren't very computer-literate). Does anyone really think people will sit download virus updates for their frieking cell phone?
Robert Bindler
A Computer Science student's views on technology.
Good score for the marketing people. Buy our phones and get protection against those nasty viruses. Right now the chances of your phone getting infected are practically nil, and most phone viruses have been demonstrated by AV firms themselves to help seed a market for them in the future.
For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
Well, as long as I don't have to sacrifice my Britney Spears ringtones, it's ok with me...
Wait, I didn't mean Britney Spears ringtones, I meant Slayer ringtones! Yeah, rock the fuck on dudes!!!!
Join the TWIT army now!
The article states that there's nothing in the phone that makes it particularly susceptible to viruses and that Nokia knows of no capabilities within any of its devices that a virus might exploit. Fair enough, I suppose, but what happens when one day they release a version which has a bug in it.
The AV software subscription seems to be an monthly based fee type thingy. (Hats off to F-Secure, looks like they're right there on the bleeding edge of squeezing money out of everything).
What I'd really like to see is Nokia (and other manufacturers) taking their responsibility and offering online (or SMS based) free updates to their OS.
I don't want to be forced to subscribing into some monthly fee based bloodsucking anti-virus scheme just to be able to use my phone without having to worry about viruses turning my phone into SMS spamming zombie.
Even Microsoft releases patches every now and then, why not Nokia (and other cell phone manufacturers)?
And remember to upgrade your protection, otherwise you won't be safe, right? So let's make a deal, 9.99 e for a yearly subscription.
Now you are safe!
Until the next horrible virus... So don't ever forget to pay. OR ELSE!!
I do not moderate.
"a mobile telephone that is just that : a telephone. "
Yeah and cars are cars and planes are planes. No place for CD players, clocks, complex error prone computer systems and whatnot.
Telephony is just a feature and I can't see any particular reason why it should deserve a dedicated box.
I don't particularly want to carry a multitude of individual plastic/metal containers for each feature that I may need daily, such as a calculator, clock, camera, calendar etc.
So perhaps these damn thingies, phones, PDAs, laptops etc. should be called something new and neutral. Any ideas?
J
I do Symbian OS programming for a living (Symbian OS is the OS that was once EPOC on Psion and now drives a number of mobile phones, including Nokia Series60/80/90 and UIQ [Sony Ericsson P800/900/910]), and I have to say, from the security aspect it's one of the worst operating systems I ever saw. It has absolutely no security measures (besides a trivial buffer overflow checker in TDesC and derived classes), no permission system, nothing. The only really secure part that I saw in it was the Java sandbox.
So, my call to Nokia: get another OS vendor, try not to use Symbian OS anymore, and switch to e.g. Linux like Motorola did: it would be a relief for a lot of programmers, and help overall security on handsets and other mobile devices of your company.
P.S.: from the theoretical point of view, Symbian OS is great: it's AFAIK the most widely deployed microkernel operating system. But theoretical greatness doesn't help you with practical security issues...
A monkey is doing the real work for me.
Since all phone trafic travels through their networks and all software is propreietary there is no reason for viruses to be able to spread.
Analysing and removing the packages that contain virus data could be done on the server level much more easily than at the client level, also by charging for the service they are allowing users with phones that don't have virus protection to become infected and increasing the threat of infection to their other users.
Basically they are screwing everyone in order to eventually offer virus support.
I can see it now...
[Ring... ring...]
Hello?
How are you. I am back. My name is Mister Hamsi. I am seeing you. Haaaaaaaa. You must come to Turkey. I am cleaning your cell phone. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 0. Gule. Gule.
See here:
here
"virii" doesn't work as a plural.
Except you don't know what you are talking about. This article refers to the Nokia 6670 which runs the Symbian OS which allows 3rd party applications to be written in C++ or Java and installed on the phone. Therefore, viruses are just disguised as the latest piece of neat software and some people will blindly install them, infecting their phone. These mobile viruses simply infect a single host, as yet they cannot replicate between devices and i'm not sure how they could do as even when they are online they don't have anything more than a presence through the gateway. I'm sure i'll be proven wrong in the future.
My phone flashes up a warning when installing any new software, but you are relying on people actually taking some responsibility for their devices... something which the new virus outbreaks every day proves doesn't happen.
Ok, so they could be trying to make the operating system more secure, but your assertion that they could just "analyse packages on the server level" doesn't make any sense because that simply isnt the attack vector.
Not so simple to stop viruses at the server or network. The phones can use Bluetooth and data connectors to download programs. The first virus for a phone was spread via Bluetooth. Therefore the Network is not the only place where users can download (infected) programs. And would not be a happy day if the networks went back to limiting where you could download content or software to your phone from? And would not be a happy day if the networks went back to limiting where you could download content or software to your phone from.