Slashdot Mirror


MovieLink 2004's Top Film Download Service, So Far

An anonymous reader writes "The NPD Group has released some research on the fledgling pay digital movie download services. Numbers for the first half of this year show MovieLink as number one with a third of total users followed by MovieFlix with 13% of the market. It's a very small market though, with purchases equalling only 0.3% of the total movie market (and nowhere near the numbers of those trading on the free P2P services). Also of note, 80% of users are male and the top films purchased are sci-fi and fantasy."

21 of 147 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What about... by AoT · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its not the services that are illegal, its what everyone's doing on them.

  2. Back to P2P by Xenna · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Movielink is not catering to Europeans.
    MovieFlix doesn't seem to have any decent movies anywhere.

    Back to mlDonkey and Bittorrent...

    X.

    1. Re:Back to P2P by chazwurth · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is also apparently not catering to Linux or MacOS users, which is a shame, because I'd be willing to pay what they seem to be charging, at least on occasion.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
    2. Re:Back to P2P by ImaLamer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I assumed that mlDonkey version you speak of is for Linux, but if not here goes:

      Try Starz! on Demand, it's a subscription based service that lets you download hundreds of movies a month. Basically every movie shown on Starz is available for download. Plus you can watch Starz.

      Bad thing: It uses Helix, RealPlayer's DRM technology and last time I checked wasn't available for Linux (hmmm... I wonder why). Requires substantial bandwidth. Can't keep the movies, they expire after 2 weeks.

      Good thing: It's a good service, good movies and good quality too, at about 500 MB per movie. Good for someone like me who doesn't want to pay for cable or satellite, but will pay for a nice movies.

      I used the trial and stuck with it because it allowed me to watch a movie a day, when I wanted to.

    3. Re:Back to P2P by krymsin01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wouldn't. Even at around US $2.00 I'm not willing to pay for something that I only have a "24hr Viewing period" for. Sure, whatever their protection mechanism is could be defeated and I could get a copy of the movie to watch indefinately (think wargames playing 24hrs a day), but I could have just as easily gone to alt.binaries.movies.* or a bittorrent tracker site and just downloaded the same movie.

      --
      stuff
    4. Re:Back to P2P by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here here! The least the fsckwads can do is extend the viewing period. If you happen to be in a timezone ahead of the USA (Asia), you can NEVER watch a movie, becuase the movie is timestamped with yesterday@!#!@$!$@. Adn this is going to stop piracy (a lot fo which originates here in Asia) HOW?

  3. Internet Explorer Only by zapf · · Score: 5, Informative
    Looks like I won't be switching to Movelink soon. BitTorrent doesn't have the same nasty requirement.
    Sorry, but in order to enjoy the Movielink service you must use Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, which supports certain technologies we utilize for downloading movies. Click here to get the latest version of Internet Explorer.

    We do not anticipate supporting Mozilla or Netscape in the near future.
    They're probably trying to install Gator onto my machine anyways...
    1. Re:Internet Explorer Only by adrew · · Score: 5, Informative

      I got a different one using Safari on OS X 10.3.4.

      "Sorry, but in order to enjoy the Movielink service you must have Windows 98/SE, ME, 2000 or XP, which support certain technologies we utilize for downloading movies.

      We do not anticipate supporting Mac or Linux in the near future."

    2. Re:Internet Explorer Only by Wm_K · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Thanks for your interest in Movielink, the leading source for movies delivered directly over the internet. We want you to enjoy our powerful movie download experience, but it is presently unavailable to users outside of the United States."

      Why don't they just say "Sorry, but we only support Internet Explorer on Windows in the United States. We don't plan on supporting anything or anyone else".

  4. download movie services still lacking by Doppler00 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In general, I find that online renting of movies still lacking. They charge you more per download than if you were to go to a store to rent it. Second the view period is usually only 24 hours. And if these two factors are not enough to turn you away from a pay to rent service, the video quality is severly lacking compared to the DVD version (I have a 3mbps internet connection, a 2GB version of a movie shouldn't be a problem).

    There are also the questions of compatibility. Do you need special software for Windows? Will it play on a Mac, Linux? Probably not. I think this sums of the situation quite nicely:

    Sorry, but in order to enjoy the Movielink service you must use Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, which supports certain technologies we utilize for downloading movies. Click here to get the latest version of Internet Explorer.

    They are probably using some weird activeX components to launch a movie playing applicaiton.

  5. Nor do they cater to Non-IE users... by kcb93x · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...hence the following message upon visiting their site with Firefox 1.0PR:

    "Sorry, but in order to enjoy the Movielink service you must use Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, which supports certain technologies we utilize for downloading movies. Click here to get the latest version of Internet Explorer.

    We do not anticipate supporting Mozilla or Netscape in the near future."

    No thanks, I'll take my movies non-DRM'd to death, thank you.

    *follows X back to Shareaza and Bittorrent*

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  6. That shit is stupid. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pay anywhere between $1.99 and $4.99 so that you can use your own bandwidth to download a movie. You have ONE 24 hour window to watch the movie. You can't burn it to DVD. You have to pay to watch it again after the window is over.

    Netflix is a better deal.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:That shit is stupid. by forkboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Netflix has specialized videos that Blockbuster won't carry....pr0n and import anime, for instance.

      The first company to offer both movie and console game rentals for the same monthly price combined gets my business, for sure.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  7. Movieflix movies by Lost+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, with movie greats like "Zontar Thing From Venus" and "Matango Fungus of Terror" I just don't see why MovieFlix isn't #1.

  8. whoda guessed by RTPMatt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Also of note, 80% of users are male and the top films purchased are sci-fi and fantasy.

    Anybody else supprised that pr0n aint toppin the list?

    1. Re:whoda guessed by squarooticus · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do you think "fantasy" is?

      Duh. :-D

      --
      [ home ]
  9. 800 mb of fun! by mrshowtime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This service is great for someone who is in college and if their college has a really good connection and they also have access to that connection "privately" as most sysadmins will not allow anything as huge as the 800mb+ files to cross their system. I have a pretty fast, stable, cable modem, and it would take me several hours to download one movie, so it's not really a "gimme" yet. Once bandwidth gets cheaper and more readily available, you will see these services offered directly from your cable company. Most of the movies offerred you can just get off of PPV anyway.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  10. Don't know about Zontar, but by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mantango's suppose to be a classic. It's actually a Toho monster movie(one of the few non-Kaiju flicks). I imagine the dub leaves something to be desired though. They probably tried too hard to Americanize the thing...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  11. Surprisingly good quality by _dl_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've watched 3 movies so far and even though the regular prices are too high [but if you go through real.movielink.com they have a small number of movies $1 every week, which is how I watched mine], the limitations (24h after first view, IE, windows, etc...) are painful,... It does work suprisingly well.

    I have a 100inches front projection home theater and it looks almost as good as a good DVD, and the files are only ~540Mb(*)... They must be using some pretty powerful codecs (better than dvd's mpeg2)

    *: Or twice that for the "EQ" (higher quality) but again, standard quality was actually pretty good

    Just my experience

  12. video on demand by Wm_K · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The South-Koreans have a nice service as well vod.naver.com. The service is very cheap compared to those mentioned above, only about 2000 won for new movies (which is about $1,50). The quality is near DVD and is distributed by a p2p like network, on which i usually get speeds above 150KB. Besides lots of Korean movies (sometimes with English subtitles) they also have a gazillion American movies.

  13. Re:Hear hear! by blixel · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want to rent games online. I also want to rent movies online. Until a service exists wherein I can do both these things with the same subscription, nobody gets my business.

    You go girl.