Slashdot Mirror


Help Select Questions for Bush and Kerry

This is a strange post in that it has 50 comments attached to it already. These are 50 questions for Bush and Kerry selected by non-Slashdot moderators, as explained in our original call for help with the New Voters Project Presidential Youth Debate. At this point, where you come in is not only with extra-insightful moderation of these 50 questions, but with your "many eyes" trying to spot questions these two candidates have answered elsewhere so that the final questions presented to them are not repeats. The first 40 questions are from potential voters aged 18 - 35. The last 10 are from future voters 13 - 17. And that's enough explanation. From here we might as well jump right into the questions...

10 of 1,501 comments (clear)

  1. Re:13 - 17 #1 TEEN PREGNANCY/SEX EDUCATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Although this is an excellent question, it is not technically correct to begin the question with, "Considering the reality of the rise in teenage pregnancies." In the US, the teen pregnancy rate has been falling in recent year, despite scare stories from the Right Wing.

  2. Re:18-35 #1 ELECTION/VOTING REFORM: by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 3, Informative

    I agree, it seems a bit loaded because of what happened in 2000. Few and fewer still on /. complained about Lincoln becoming President without winning the popular vote.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_e le ction%2C_1860

    39.82% for Lincoln

    Or Clinton in 92 with 42.93%
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presiden tial_ele ction%2C_1992

    Or Wilson in 1912 with 41.9%
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._president ial_ele ction%2C_1912

  3. Re:18-35 #17 FOREIGN POLICY by bofkentucky · · Score: 3, Informative

    See Colin Powell's response to questions about American Imperialism

    "We've fought in wars all over the world and never took any more ground than was necessary to bury our dead."
    The free Market takes care of the economic side of imperialism.

    We have neither the need nor the resources to subjugate the world.

    --
    09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
  4. Re:18-35 #12 ENVIRONMENT by lpret · · Score: 3, Informative
    Didn't Bush address this in his State of the Union speech? After some googling, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20 030128-14.html

    1.2 billion dollars to fund hydrogen fuel research and implementation.

    Here's Kerry's response: http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/9341338.h tm?1c

    Kerry proposed greater use of ethanol, soy-based diesel fuel and incentives to build and buy more fuel-efficient vehicles. His 10-year, $20 billion plan envisions 20 percent of vehicle fuel coming from renewable resources.

    See what 2 minutes of googling can do?

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  5. A LINK TO DISPLAY THE DAMN QUESTIONS by Alsee · · Score: 5, Informative

    Having trouble finding the actual questions amongst all the replies?
    CLICK THIS LINK for the proper Slashdot sorting to find the questions.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. Re:18-35 #22 HEALTH INSURANCE by Kohath · · Score: 3, Informative

    Geez. Editing.

    Do you have a plan to offer financial assistance to the working poor to help them afford health insurance? What are the specifics of that plan? Does it offer relief for people with pre-existing conditions?

    ---

    I don't know whether I agree this is a good question. Basically, it amounts to:

    Can I have another government freebie?

    How about no? A grown-up is supposed to be able to pay her own way. What's your plan to grow up and eventually be able to pay your own way?

  7. Re:Um, that's how the founders did it by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is one of the best questions in this forum.

    To find out who your electors are, you need to ask the Secretary of State (it's probabably on their webpage).

    Each state handles the Electoral College differently. Some states do list the names of the Electors on your ballot.

    I believe this is the information you are looking for:

    The U. S. Electoral College.

  8. Re:18-35 #17 FOREIGN POLICY by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 3, Informative

    How do you respond to that, and what would you do to restore our nation's reputation around the world?

    Both canidates have already answered this question many times. Bush is in favor of spreading democracy the world over (as if it is as easy as spreading butter). Kerry has said he will push to restore the US' reputation and try to bring Iraq to a close multi-laterally and with the UN. This is one area where the canidates are suprising consistent in their answers.

    I do hope people in other countries see that the USA is pretty divided over these issues (just like many people in their own countries) and that Americans just aren't a big bunch of bozos with grease stains on their shirts. Remember, you can hate us, but only in four-year intervals (you gotta wait and see if you can hate us for the next four).

    --
    -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  9. Re:18-35 #1 ELECTION/VOTING REFORM: by bnenning · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, Wyatt, all the examples you cite show that the elected candidate as the one who got the most votes, so I'm not seeing your point.

    There have been 4 presidential elections including 2000 where the candidate who received a plurality of popular votes lost in the Electoral College. Arguing that the guy with the most popular votes "really" won is silly. Both candidates would have campaigned very differently if the election were decided by popular vote because swing states become far less important, and many voters would likely have made different decisions whether or not to vote for third parties.

    --
    How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  10. Re:CHARGING PRESIDENT WITH HIGH TREASON #1 questio by Lightning+Hopkins · · Score: 4, Informative

    I like this sort of brazan challenge to common sense. How do we know that the world is round?

    Well:
    It would take me all night to list all Bush's lies, but here's a few. The falsehoods told by George Bush (and most other politicians) can fall into five categories: Self-contradictions, falsehoods stated while ignorant or with a plausible after-the-fact claim to ignorance, statements that are only technically or half-true, lies by implication, and outright lies.
    Some outright lies:
    The single worst lie Bush has told, I think, is that the terrorists attacked us "because they hate our freedom," and that "America has been called to defend its freedom." That isn't true (defend it from what? Radical Muslims cannot take away an American's freedom; the government can), and it's clear that he said it mainly because if you can invoke the word "freedom," you've got a pretty good soundbite. If you can get Americans united in what they believe is the cause of freedom, you can get most of us to blindly play 'follow the leader' even to the point that we will eschew freedoms and the right to privacy in the name of freedom.
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/04/20 020409-8.html
    "They ["the people we're dealing with"] hate our freedoms."
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20 020328.html "They ["an enemy that are nothing but a bunch of cold-blooded killers"] hate what America stands for. They hate our religious tolerance. They hate our freedom of speech. They hate freedom of the press. They despise freedom. They despise freedom."
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20 010920-8.html
    " On September the 11th, enemies of freedom committed an act of war against our country. ... freedom itself is under attack. ... They hate our freedoms -- our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other. ... This is not, however, just America's fight. And what is at stake is not just America's freedom. This is the world's fight. This is civilization's fight. This is the fight of all who believe in progress and pluralism, tolerance and freedom. ... Freedom and fear are at war. The advance of human freedom -- the great achievement of our time, and the great hope of every time -- now depends on us."
    In fact, the Al Qaeda group attacked us because it is a group of Islamic extremists that believes that the force of what they call "jahiliyya" (infidelity), represented by the West and epitomized by America, is on a crusade against Islam. Usama Bin Ladin turned his focus from the Soviet Union to the United States when he became aware that the U.S. had stationed troops in Saudi Arabia, home of the Muslim holy lands. He came to see the United States as "the head of the snake," ultimately responsible for all the regional conflicts in the Middle East, citing America's apparent support for Israel in the Arab-Israeli conflict, the growing global effect of American culture, and other influences. In 1998, Bin Ladin issued a fatwa declaring it the duty of what he believed to be "real Muslims" to kill Americans.
    They don't give a shit about freedom. There was no terrorist group sitting around in a cave at one point that suddenly decided, "Hey, you know? America is way too free. Let's go hijack some airplanes and let's show 'em." Freedom doesn't enter into it. What they hate is what they percieve as our "imperialism" and what they call our "crusade against Islam." It's quite irrational, but that is the al Qaeda assessment of the world. If there is a madman on the loose, you should at least want to know what has driven him mad so that

    --
    Eh?