Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Stomps Bnetd in DMCA Case

base3 writes "The EFF reported that the Vivendi/Blizzard vs. the good guys case has been decided, and it doesn't look good. Some highlights from the ruling are: A clickthrough EULA isn't unconscionable (and thus enforceable); Fair Use rights can be waived in a EULA; First Sale rights (!) can be waived in a EULA; The DMCA's interoperability provisions are not a defense. If this ruling is allowed to stand, it will allow one-sided EULAs to force the waiver of the rights of First Sale and Fair Use. This, combined with the Supreme Court's recent assent to perpetual copyright, a few decades at a time, will destroy any semblance of balance in U.S. copyright law. Fortunately, the EFF plans to appeal the ruling."

9 of 773 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Plain Engrish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a press statement by Blizzard that says "Don't buy our products!".

  2. This is wonderful news! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yay our favorite game company won!

    Now the boycott on them can end! Enough of those pesky morals and ethics. I mean they make AWESOME video games. No one's gonna remember your sacrifice against a game company. So GAME ON!

    WOOO HOOO!

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  3. Thanks for letting us know!!.. by arhar · · Score: 5, Funny

    The EFF reported that the Vivendi/Blizzard vs. the good guys case has been decided, and it doesn't look good.

    Thanks for letting us know who the good guys are! I can never figure out who's right or wrong myself, and I like it when I can count on Slashdot telling me that.

  4. Cue Hip-Hop Beat... 1.. 2... yo, yo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    God fucking damn it!
    This is teh sucks.
    "All your base are
    Belong to us!"

    Blizz with the blitz
    Got the gamers in fits
    Fair Use has been dissed
    now the EULAs exist

    Vivendi gets pissed
    as STEAM clouds thier green visors
    As VALVE holds the mod
    community with incisors

    The game won't come out
    till legalistic advisors
    come up with a way to please
    the stockholder misers!

  5. Re:bnetd's case by rpdillon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sarcasm. Most /.'ers would know that a program ending in a "d" would be a daemon. inted, xinetd, httpd, dhcpcd, etc.

  6. Re:This is bad. by Yolegoman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Contract: CDMusic Publishing, Inc. (hereafter referred to as the "licenser") licenses this CD to be used as a coffee coaster by the buyer (hereafter referred to as the "licensee"). The licensee may not listen to, alter, copy, resell, give away, or otherwise do anything with this recording. The CD belongs solely to the copyright holder, and the licensee waives all rights to listen to this music, including on a player manufactured by CDMusic Publishing, Inc., using headphones manufactured by CDMusic Publishing, Inc. at a volume that would not allow non-licensees to hear the music. All other use, asides the already stated "Coffee Coaster" clause, is prohibited by this contract.
    Sign: ____________________________
    Initial: ________
    Date: ___________

    - Yolego

  7. Re:Plain Engrish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cooooooool...

    One less person to add to server load on the opening day of WoW. Your loss buddy.

  8. Re:Publicizing EULA Online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    One possible solution I see to this problem is creating an online database of EULA's from various offending products. Consulting this database before making your purchasing decision would be a prudent venture, I feel.

    Is this viable?

    No, it's against most EULAs.

    Also, I notice your username is technix4beos, so a word of warning. If you would look at the BeOS EULA, you would see that you are forbidden from publicly mentioning any opinion of the software or the company, Be Incorporated. Since all that's left of Be is a couple lawyers looking for something to sue, I would not recommend mentioning BeOS on the web, even though..

    Hold on, there's someone at the door.
  9. Re:It can be.. by Zorilla · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the copyright holder of windows forbids it..

    It might be stupid, but they could do it legally...


    It really isn't anything to worry about. Remember? Developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers....Woooooooooo!

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.