More Details and Analysis of Apple v. Apple
lothar97 writes "MacNewsWorld is reporting details about the Apple (Beatles) v. Apple (Computer) case. It's most interesting concerning the confidential settlements the two parties have previously signed: 'one of those passages in the court document strongly implies that Apple Corps agreed to allow Apple (Computer) to pursue digital music initiatives, but not package, sell or distribute any physical music materials such as CDs.' This might be a cause of 'move on, nothing to see here,' and Apple Computer might be able to settle on the cheap. Trademark infringement might be minimal, and both sides would want to keep this from going much further."
20 minutes into the future
So do we now know how many electron holes it takes to power the Albert Hall?
Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
This story seems to have a pro Apple Computer spin. Better break out the reality distortion field detectors.
1. How much is the Apple Corps worth? Is it publicly-traded?
It's not publicly traded, and it's probably worth ONE MILLION DOLLARS.
2. How much does Apple Computer have on hand that they could use in a corporate acquisition?
Apple has on the order of ONE MILLION DOLLARS cash reserves. Not to mention sharks with frickin' lasers on their heads.
It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.