House Candidate Lets Web Users Set His Schedule
brahn at actblue writes "From ABC News: Jeff Seemann, running for one of Ohio's seats in the House of Representatives, '...has an unusual approach in deciding how to spend his campaign. He asks Web surfers: Should he sleep in? Prepare for his debate? Campaign door to door?' (More coverage here and here.)
Best of all: Jeff is fighting back against Diebold and their paperless voting machines -- and they're based in his district!"
Sleep in, read slashot and surf for porn. I want someone that reflects my values.
Because letting bored internet users make plans for you is always a good idea.
its nice to see a new angle pop up every now and again, but if elected do you think he will still be letting the web votes run his time in office?
considering how Diebold is in his district and will proably crush him with massive donations to his opponent.
If he is very good and genuine, he may stand a chance, but I wouldn't bet on it.
Nifty Ideas for input, though. And I can appriciate a man who stands up for what he thinks is right.
If I had a real
I don't really think any more needs to be said.
Software piracy is victimless theft.
Are you sure this isn't just a plug for the next Maxis game?
Best of all: Jeff is fighting back against Diebold and their paperless voting machines -- and they're based in his district!
He's doomed.
$ whatis themeaningoflife
themeaningoflife: not found
Lose the flash. Lose the white on light-blue. Lose the red submit button. Lose the JavaScript.
And then Ramen noodles for lunch. Yum!
"An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
I thought this was a joke, especially after reading his last name, but it seems serious.
He's trying a gimmick, a bad one at that, to get elected. Getting "in touch with the community" doesn't mean letting them completely plan your day...
What happens when his opponent hires someone to use millions of proxies for him to drop out of the race? Or something similar?
got sig?
I have always wondered what would happen if one of our representatives hosted a web site that allowed people in his/her district to know what votes were coming up in Congress, how he/she is planning to vote and why, and allowed some informal polling and commentary on the issues. I know this isn't what this guy is doing, but I wonder if it isn't the logical next step. You'd have to think that that sort of system would be the ideal of a representative democracy, but alas I don't expect any career politician to actually document their position on everything and set themselves up to be held accountable to their constituency. Especially since if they ever run for higher office that sort of thing gets used against them.
OOO! Let me try. How about build a house with one room. Once inside, take away the door. Hilarity ensues.
"It attracts people to come and engage with your campaign in a way that is fun and interesting," Noble said.
I agree he's trying a gimmick, but is it necessarily a bad one? He's recieving press, he's getting his name out, and if he continues with schedules like the ones suggested in the article, he could make a very good name for himself.
No harm in him trying to make himself stand out from candidates that do sleep in, don't attend events, but have enough money to advertise their campaign to death. Don't communities want leaders that get involved rather than sit idly by?
He posts on DailyKos.com sometimes, so do a few of his campaign staff. From what I recall of his postings there he seems like he's a genuinely nice guy, definitely intelligent and aware of the issues. He started promoting this gimmick in a diary on DailyKos. It seems like an interesting idea to me, it's a good way to show people what kind of things he does as part of his campaign and it gives them a sense that he is responsive to them.
Best of all: Jeff is fighting back against Diebold and their paperless voting machines -- and they're based in his district!
I can see Diebold continually voting for him to "sleep in past noon" and "begin another cocaine binge" in an attempt to make him lose the election.
A sort-of on-topic question which occurred to me during the VP debate, when Cheney was chiding Edwards for missing votes in the senate: why is it so hard to get our congress-people to vote? "Missing votes" seems to be a ongoing and constant criticism of even our best political representatives.
Do they have to be physically present to cast a vote? If so, why? Can't we afford to get these people a blackberry or a treo or something? (I'm not being facetious, I just don't know.)
~jeff
If a politician ran on a platform of almost total transparency I would like to think he would get total voteage.
Republican or Democrat doesn't really matter when you worry they do something meriting impeachment behind closed doors.
Politicians that do this WILL win it's as simple as that.