Slashdot Mirror


Siemens Continues OFDM Push

Khoo writes "German telecommunications gear maker Siemens is backing a new kind of broadband wireless technology that will compete with Wi-Fi and 3G cellular services." As we covered recently, speed tests have been up to 360 Mbps and one of the latest rumours is that they will use it in conjunction with VoIP servers. That's unconfirmed, but particularly for new phone deployments, laying no wire would be nice. And Yes, Virginia - ITMJ is part of OSTG, like Slashdot.

38 comments

  1. Woot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    First post again mother freakers.

  2. To Clarify: by Enigma_Man · · Score: 5, Funny

    ITMJ, part of OSTG reports about OFDM to use VoIP?

    Good...

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:To Clarify: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This article is an example that acronyms do not support understanding. OFDM is "orthogonal freqency division multiplexing". In other words, it's a kind of modulation. It does not compete with Wi-fi. 802.11g uses OFDM too.

    2. Re:To Clarify: by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1, Funny

      ROTFL. BTW, did you RTFA? IMHO you should. YMMV. HAND.
      SCNR :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  3. Like... by wongn · · Score: 0

    Is new technology for wireless broadband transfer necessary? The 802.11 Wi-Fi standard is still being continually improved, and I can't think of any applications in which either 3G or Wi-Fi aren't the most ideal data transfer... things.

    1. Re:Like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The new 802.11 standards actually use OFDM already.

  4. VoIP for Mobiles is overkill by Gopal.V · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of course GSM was digital, YTF couldn't they route those 52 byte voice packets over UDP or something ?. Maybe aggregate them into 1500 byte blocks and push over ethernet or the equivalent with ATM ?.

    VoIP works , but I don't see the point for mobiles to run a full IP stack. (oh, yeah I work on a phone with an IP stack and it drains the battery like HELL when in packet services mode).

    1. Re:VoIP for Mobiles is overkill by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      that's exactly the point many people forget when they're hyping up voip for mobiles, that the for _mobile_ use networks already have been tuned for transferring voice as cheaply and well as possible.

      (that is, if it really gets cheap enough to build wide coverage other networks they would still have the upper hand- now, they might change gradually into providing general data services rather than clearly seperated voice functionality, but that ain't gonna happen anytime soon totally)

      so the ONLY reason to use VOIP over mobile networks would be artificially stupidly twisted pricing structure.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:VoIP for Mobiles is overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Because, BECAUSE YUO ARE GAY

    3. Re:VoIP for Mobiles is overkill by garcia · · Score: 1

      that's exactly the point many people forget when they're hyping up voip for mobiles, that the for _mobile_ use networks already have been tuned for transferring voice as cheaply and well as possible.

      For whatever reason I was thinking that the phone would allow you to switch VoIP networks at will. That way, if you were away from home, you could be doing your thing via your provider's network. Then when you got home you could be calling out on your own VoIP solution (whatever that may be).

    4. Re:VoIP for Mobiles is overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that people are looking to VOIP for mobiles shows that mobile phone services are way too expensive. If a technology that consists of adding another layer of overhead can capture people's imaginations, then you know that something's wrong. We're now in the odd situation that raw data over "some network" is often cheaper than when you use the same bandwidth for the original purpose of the same network.

      VoIP over mobile phone networks is the natural child of data over mobile phone networks and serves mostly as a straw competitor to the voice functionality of these networks, hopefully bringing prices down.

    5. Re:VoIP for Mobiles is overkill by edge_crumbler · · Score: 1

      Actually it makes a lot of sense to use VoIP on a mobile if the mobile is dual-mode WiFi and GSM. Why put WiFi on a mobile? Well from a VoIP point of view, WiFi, although it has small cells can actually fill in gaps that GSM doesn't cover very well, especially in-building coverage at 1900MHz (US) either at home or the office. This would essentially extend the carrier's network for free (for them). Although there a lot of technical hurdles to overcome IMO, it looks like Unlicensed Mobile Access (UMA) is coming to a phone near you.

    6. Re:VoIP for Mobiles is overkill by Tschepsit · · Score: 1

      Actually, it becomes much easier for the network to implement new features if the phone is IP-based. It means that the radio access network can be blissfully ignorant as it passes the packets to the application server. Upgrade the application server, and you've got a new feature without even touching the access network (unless it requires a new QoS level).

  5. t4c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    let's hear it for the t4c

  6. The problem with integrating new technologies ... by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    without adding the old ones too is very confusing and frustrating to users.

    Very few Seimens phones I have seen have bluetooth.

    Bluetooth has become the MAIN function I use my Sony Ericcson T616 for now - even above and beyond talking on the phone.

    I can control my iTunes, PowerPoint, RadioShark, ElGato TV, DVD, and just about any other program. What's even better is I can search for songs and view the song detail right on the phone + control the mouse on screen.

    Also with 802.11g which is backwards compatible with b - users will have to have this new standard to even operate - so lines or no lines - it's still confined.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  7. Distance? by grunt107 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One thing seemilngly always omitted in these 'speed' stories is distance. While a 3x speed increase over 11n - which is 2x better than 11g - is impressive, if the basic assumption that the speeds correlate over the same distance is incorrect, the speed is not all that great. It would take multiple repeater modules to make up for the shortage, limiting its usefulness.

  8. OFDM information by Mstrgeek · · Score: 3, Informative
    More onformation on OFDM this site has great information and links plus a forum based on OFDM

    http://www.wave-report.com/tutorials/OFDM.htm

    What Google Groups is saying about the topic

    http://groups.google.com/groups?q=OFDM&hl=en&lr=&s a=N&tab=wg

    --
    Chris Williams clw7500nc@gmail.com
  9. continued development by Exter-C · · Score: -1

    Its always good to know that we are researching more ways to radiate our heads in favor of greater profit margins for big business. Soon we will all wear lead lined caps and clothes and the truth about the increase risk of cancer and other health issues will become more apparent. Then we can all sue telco companies (and big business) for health reasons which will in the long term affect corporate profit..

    Its always good to have a bright outlook on corporate life..

  10. GNAA declares victory over Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    GNAA is a part of the Mookore Technology Group.
    GNAA declares victory over Wikipedia
    Zeikfried - Associated Press, Nigeria

    In a week which shall be recorded in Wikipedia infamy (and then vandalized and redirected to clitoris), the oft persecuted and never defeated internet missionaries of the Gay Nigger Association of America struck yet another powerful and telling blow against the powerful forces of bigotry and racism. Most notably, the growing zionist community on renowned internet pissing yard wikipedia.org.

    And the records have indeed tumbled, with an unheard of third successful survival from the digital shitheap that is "Votes For Deletion". Coming in spite a heinous act of self promotion and cyber terrorism by Pat Gunn/Improv (formerly known as Aharon Meshenstein prior to his infiltration of the United States), who listed and inspired mob vandalism upon the GNAA's entry.

    Fresh from his promotion of Wikipedia's $50,000 fundraiser for arms and supplies to the Jewish state of Israel, Improv launched a series of unprovoked and slanderous attacks against the well loved organisations leadership, all the while using foul and unholy necromancies to enlist the dead themselves to vote the entries deletion. Names such as "Wolfman" and "Demonslave" only adding to the damning list of evidence linking Mr Gunn to the occult.

    Though Improv's actions gained him a small majority, a shock last minute intervention from Pope John Paul II spared the pages untimely fate, although as yet unconfirmed reports have indicated that several hundred 8-year old negro children were driven to the Basilica to secure the pontiffs support. Others point towards the black curse cast upon the deletion campaign by the support of infamous Brawl Hall mouthpiece "Yoyo" as the main driving force behind the salvation of the aforementioned entry.

    But the details are likely to cause few sleepless nights among the group, only one of whom was willing to speak to the press. Namely GNAA Wikipedia contributor Popeye, who interrupted his drawing of pornography to give a brief dismissal the controversy: "Even with Improv's shady dealings, the sheer size and girth of a swollen GNAA phallus enables it both an identity and a vote of it's own. Making such discussion moot".

    About Wikipedia:

    Wikipedia, a content-free encyclopedia in many languages, started life in January 2001 and has already risen to the status of the internets premiere "trollpedia".

    Currently Wikipedia contains 363950 articles, 10032 of which are genuine, and 343 of them factually accurate. Leaving Wikipedia on an academic par with "Star Wars: Incredible Cross-sections: The Ultimate Guide to Star Wars Vehicles and Spacecraft" and "My First Book of Animals from A to Z".

    About GNAA:

    GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the first organization which gathers GAY NIGGERS from all over America and abroad for one common goal - being GAY NIGGERS.

    Are you GAY ?
    Are you a NIGGER ?
    Are you a GAY NIGGER ?

    If you answered "Yes" to all of the above questions, then GNAA (G

  11. Heh, gosh darn is this ever fast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Check out this performance graph compared to various broadband and wireless technologies... It's really, really fast, and seems stable as well.

  12. BUT... by enigmals1 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Did they use the new cover sheet for the TPS reports?

  13. TROLL ALERT - DO NOT CLICK LINK by dreamchaser · · Score: 1, Troll

    Trust me on this one, kids.

  14. 3G + VoIP = regular cell phone? by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I can buy a $$$$ device which supports 3G, and run a VoIP app on it so that I can ... talk, wirelessly, to anyone in the world? Wow... what an excellent invention!!!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:3G + VoIP = regular cell phone? by Talez · · Score: 1

      Yes. Instead of using up your included minutes or paying extortionate international tarrifs you can route it through a VoIP provider and pay cents per minute for a call to Uzbekistan.

    2. Re:3G + VoIP = regular cell phone? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      So I can call Uzbekistan more cheaply, all the while paying extortionate data transfer costs? How do I sign up?

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    3. Re:3G + VoIP = regular cell phone? by Talez · · Score: 1

      The idea is you have a carrier that can provide a mobile data cap. Like T-Mobile in the US or Vodafone and 3 over here in Australia.

  15. Not quite as fast as advertised... for now by Ingolfke · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the CNET article... "[Flash-OFDM] offers connection rates of 1.5 megabits per second." So the 360Mbps is in the lab, and is not likely to be out of the lab and into your pants (these are cell phones) for several more years. 1.5 Mbps isn't too bad for now though.

    Slashdot... news and commentary on par with CBS.

  16. Confusion... by Shoten · · Score: -1

    Okay, I've been spending too much time cleaning up my music collection today. I could have sworn for a moment that the topic was "Siemens Continues KMFDM Push"! Imagine my shock...

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  17. WTFOFDMLOL by wankledot · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't see why OFDM is getting treated like some new tech holy grail. 802.11a and g both use it, and have for a very long time.

    --
    My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
  18. 360Mbps..... by maokh · · Score: 1

    http://www.siemens-mobile.com/repository/676/67657 /MULTIHOP1_72dpi.jpg .....with 10 meter range, using 500MHz of spectrum. How is this technology practical? Good luck getting licenses in any industrialized nation!

  19. spongE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
  20. giving GSM a bad name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Look who's pushing GSM, Cellular One, AT&T, and Verizon. Yuck.


    You can barely make a voice connection on them and the unexpected billing charges will double your bill, and they want to sell picture phones? They're smoking dope.


    They press never criticizes its big advertisers, maybe the AARP will kick up a fuss.

  21. Why mark that as a troll? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Informative

    I agree. OFDM isn't some sort of holy grail. It doesn't do anything that somehow invalidate's Shannon's Law for channel capacity, and it is quite possible to come within 0.5 dB of Shannon capacity with other modulation schemes. It's nothing special, just another method for modulation that happens to have certain benefits in some situations. (Examples include higher multipath immunity.) The European DVB-T (Terrestrial Digital Video Broadcast) standard uses OFDM and it's been around for a while (at least five years I think.) As the parent said, 802.11a and g use OFDM also.

    OFDM is not a magic bullet. It's also not new.

    Yes, Siemens' 360 Mbps number is impressive, but to achieve that performance, they either used some very interesting tricks (OFDM not being the key here, possibly a MIMO multiple-antenna system, a technology that is still under heavy research.), or made tradeoffs (high bandwidth or high SNR requirements) that will make the system useless for real-world deployment.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  22. This is the technology Nextel is testing by FlyerFanNC · · Score: 1

    More at nextelbroadband.com. It's currently only available in the Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill/RTP, NC area. Too bad I live in Florida now.

    Well hmm... sun, warm weather and hurricanes *or* cold, snow, ice and Nextel broadband. I think I'll stay.

    1. Re:This is the technology Nextel is testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude since when does North Carolina have cold, snow or ice? According to weather.com they barely hit freezing with their lows in winter, much less their highs in winter. Move to Wisconsin and you'll learn about cold, snow and ice.

  23. Cell phone broadband by Kumorigoe · · Score: 1

    While the appeal of high-speed internet access over a phone is nifty to consider, exactly how much could you get out of it with those tiny screens?

    --
    "What I cary in this box is your utter subjugation."
  24. end of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every corporation is pushing his own thing. Microsoft is pushing this, IBM pushing that, Sun pushing other. and now Siemens. This is the end of the world.

  25. Better colours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0