Slashdot Mirror


Third World Research, Development & Innovation

tovarish writes "It is nice to see that countries like India are trying to research communication techniques in backward and rural areas. While tech savvy people like us enjoy the latest gadgets it is quite a challenge to develop gadgets which actually help the poor and illiterate. While India's satellite launches and outsourcing news are already covered in slashdot umpteen times, sometimes her sensible achievements should be covered too."

11 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. Flame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Her sensible acheivements should be covered too? Can we mark the article blurb as flamebait? Lets keep the bias out of the story. Please.

  2. Economic Uses by principor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's a book that gives a good use of communication in developing nations. It's by CK Prahalad, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. It gives the example of how installing an internet terminal in rural Indian villages has helped them set the market for their livestock. They can log on, check the prices for the day and then head to market as more knowledgeable sellers. This keeps them from being taken advantage of and does a lot to help both their confidence and economic prosperity.

  3. Must be hard... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... to be a nuclear power, a spatial power, to be the biggest democracy in the world and still be considered a 'third world country'...

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:Must be hard... by Reducer2001 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What about the US? How about we stop building weapons and educate our children? I mean, come on! Who are we going to use our nucular tipped bunker buster bombs against? A couple of tired 'terrorists' hunkering in a cave on the Pakistan border? Seems like using a shotgun to kill flies to me.

      I think a few well trained special ops teams could do the work of many of our over-powered weapons.

      You know, or not.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    2. Re:Must be hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You need more education on Indian Politics. We DO NOT elect an individual. We elect a party and then it is the decision of the party to field a candidate for the PM's post.

      We also cannot have an un-elected leader so our current PM has to win a seat in either our lower house (Lok Sabha) or the higher house (Rajya Sabha).

      Please keep to the topic.
      We are a democratic country. As for achievements is concerned, here is one - Electronic Voting Machines that was used for our last general elections without any trouble. While a developed democracy is a laughing stock of the world because of its 2000 presidential ballot problems in Florida.

  4. Definition of "Third World" by eutychus_awakes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here is a short list of web definitions for the "Third World". You might be surprised - it wasn't originally meant to mean what we now think it means.

    --
    This sig is a test. If this had been an actual sig, you would be reading something quite a bit wittier than this now.
  5. Re:Query: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While India's satellite launches and outsourcing news are already covered in slashdot umpteen times, sometimes her sensible achievements should be covered too.

    Outsourcing too .. what's not sensible about creating employment and encouraging education ones country ?

    Can you imagine a country refusing outsourcing? How stupid would *that* be?

    "No thanks, we want our economy to be shit and our people to starve so we dont want money and jobs."

    What would our own congress do?

  6. Re:Worlds by mOoZik · · Score: 5, Informative

    It goes back to the fifties and was coined by the French Alfred Sauvy, being analogous to the social classes in pre and post-revolution France. The first world is the U.S., Canada, W. Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, etc: they have highly developed economies, relying very little on agriculture, are very industrialized, and I'll venture to say democratic. The second world at the time was the U.S.S.R. and perhaps even E. Europe, depending on how you define it; they were also heavily industrialized. Thus, there no longer is a Second World. And finally, every other country was third world, which are often countries which are rural, not heavily industrialized, and generally poor.

  7. What I saw... by bayankaran · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last year I was travelling the length and breadth of this vast country.

    In the last ten years, the biggest changes in India are the spread of ATM's and mobile phones. When the state run BSNL started cellular services in 2002 in rural Indian towns, there were stampedes to get the application form.

    What you dont find is decent broadband and good roads. Broadband may happen soon with Reliance Infotech putting fiber. But no chance of roads getting better.

    And the country proves the trickle down theory favored by World Bank and IMF will not work. I am yet to see anything trickling down. And the country is liberalising for the last 10 years.

    Does that mean liberalisation is bad?
    No.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
  8. USA is a 3rd world country in science research by Cryofan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, it is true. America does less science research per capita than do many of the European nations, especially the countries that Rightwingers love to call "socialist", i.e,. Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, Switzerland, Netherlands, etc. All these countries and some others in Europe publish more science papers (in peer reviewed journals) than does America (some of them publish TWICE as many papers per capita as does America). Gee, I guess that blows away that neoliberal/laisseiz faire argument about America capitalism being the "driving engine behind improving technology, quality of life" etc., and how all those welfare states in Europe are just parasites on America....yawn....

    Also, America is even behind 3rd world countries like India & China in terms of science research papers when looked at on a per-capita-wealth basis (numbers of papers per unit of wealth per country). Note on the graph how much to the right America is when compared to, say, India. India publishes more peer-reviewed science papers more capita wealth than does America.

    THis is all based on the study entitled "Scientific Impact of Nations" by King for 2004. You can get a link to the pdf version of the paper and see a graph of science papers per per-capita-wealth here.

    Well, you learned something today, huh? Now go watch the debate Wednesday and listen to Bush and Kerry tell us about how America is the greatest nation on earth.....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  9. Re:Why does India need hi-tech just to survive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    India:
    Population: 1,065,070,607

    Japan:
    Population: 127,214,499
    (from wikipedia).

    Please keep these facts in mind before saying anything.
    Look at India's huge investment in the space program and nuclear weapons. In 1950, Japan had almost no investment in such wasteful programs. The Japanese were committed to a program of emulating the West and engaging in practical enterprises to raise the standard of living as quickly as possible

    India faced three wars immediately after partition. Two with Pakistan and one with China. Japan didn't face any. Nuclear weapons were a necessity for India.

    India has 21+ different official languages. Japan has one. The space program helped put educational and weather satellites in place. And India now sells satellite launches.

    It's extremely convenient to compare India and Japan, but it's really a wrong comparison.