Slashdot Mirror


Hard Goodbye to Alice and Bill

cuzality writes "Computer Shopper has decided to let 'The Hard Edge' go after twelve years and two months of 'edgy, sarcastic, reader-centric columns' by Alice and Bill. Many of us remember 'The Hard Edge' from all the way back when it was in the newsprint section of the inch-thick Computer Shopper, and it's always been the straight skinny direct from the Lab of Doom and Pepsi Cola. Though 'The Hard Edge' has met its untimely and abrupt end, Alice and Bill aren't splitting up: they will continue on together at AliceandBill.com, where they write about technology news and will be happy to accept your kind PayPal donation." (More below.)

"They are also signing up subscribers for an upcoming newsletter, but since they can't use the name 'The Hard Edge' (which is owned by C|Net, CS's parent company), they will have to use some alternate name, possibly 'Hedge Yard.' If you were loyal 'Hard Edge' reader, drop by and write them a nice note in their guestbook."

16 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. Many times the ONLY reason to buy CS by gambit3 · · Score: 5, Interesting


    As a previous poster pointed out, CS disappointed LONG ago. But I have memories of my lean years in college (in more ways than one), where, if I bought ONE magazine, it was CS, and if I bought it for ONE reason, it was to read The Hard Edge. And sometimes for Poor's Computer Cures. But it was the Hard Edge, along with the endless ads, that gave CS its trademark flavor. I have long since stopped even looking at CS -- let alone buying it -- since it stopped being its unique self, and tried to mold itself into a more traditional computer magazine. Don't we have enough of those already?

    Just because I know I didn't say it enough (OK, OK, I NEVER said it...):

    Thanks, Bill and Alice (or Alice and Bill?), for teaching me about computers by guiding me past the marketing hype.

  2. Computer Shopper "Disappointments" by mikeage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Come on, people, do you really _want_ 1000 pages of Computer Shopper, instead of browsing at any number of online searchable sites? I think pricewatch completely destroyed any need for an outdated, heavy, tiny print dead tree publication. Don't get me wrong... I miss computer shopper too, but nostalgically, not for it's uses.

    That said, Alice and Bill had a great column, which I did read religiously. Unfortunely, it wasn't enough to motivate me to buy the entire magazine.

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  3. Re:Computer Shopper disappointed long ago... by JDevers · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure there are many among us that spent their spare time in the early 90s pouring over the thousand plus pages of a ~$2 Computer Shopper just for the ads. Once I filled out the giant product advertiser card for every product in the magazine, a month later I wasn't the most popular person in the house when about 90% of the mail was absolute junk that even I wasn't interested in.

  4. Re:CS had articles? by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's what I always hated about it. Even before much product information was available online, I couldn't see the need to pay $5 for a big book of ads and almost no content. Why didn't the vendors pay to have their products promoted? If they did, somebody was making a big fat pile of cash on that magazine. That's probably why it overstayed its welcome by so long.

  5. My CS Experience by Himring · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought my first 386 through CS: 1MB RAM, monochrome monitor, conner 200something HD. I called the company back later to get a price check on a soundcard and the guy yelled at me -- he was stressed or something and only took purchases, no price check cowboy! I think the name of the company was Hitek or something. Later, my buddy paid waaay too much for a 486 through a company in CS called "Legacy Computers" I think it was. They promptly went out of business and so did his warranty.

    CS was a mammoth book of companies that apparently did not have to meet any criteria. The present online way of doing business with sellers, being able to check their consumer ratings, etc., is how it should be.

    No /. reader should be surprised by the death of any paper-based technical periodical, especially one replaced by the modern, searchable, web....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  6. ditto by HBI · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the web killed them though, along with consolidation in the clone market. Microsoft can be fairly blamed here as they made sure that with the onset of Windows, that writing drivers to their specifications was required to sell a system. Obvious advantages in mass-production were the result and the extinction of niche clone makers quickly followed.

    No more going to the Chinese guy in the industrial park to buy systems. I remember my first trip there back in the 80s when I had a 286 board that wasn't working with my SIPPs, this guy threw my board on a pile of DOA boards and ripped out a new one, mounted 1MB of RAM on it and sent me on my way. Woohoo! That was CS at work.

    CS was the heart of the hobbyist market of the 80s and early 90s. Drilling holes in toner cartridges and punching holes in floppy disks is long gone, as is building your own system as a common endeavor. CS' time has passed.

    I never liked the Hard Edge much anyway - they devoted too many pages to that. I would have preferred general interest stuff rather, more hole drillings and hardware mods!

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:ditto by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The chinese guy in the industrial park is still there if you live in the silicon valley. Other than that, he's become the chinese guy on ebay. Of course that eliminates the service aspect but as PCs are only getting easier to work on I see that as less of an issue. The last thing to be done to make PC hardware trivial is to actually standardize on fixed motherboard sizes so we can just slide them into place on rails. Er, that and the front panel headers need to be standardized. Then the bar to PC building will be basically nonexistent as things can just be plugged in wherever they will fit :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:ditto by HBI · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back then, Dell used to produce relatively standard systems, and hell, IBM invented the AT-style motherboard. In 1987 IBM forcibly made their hardware incompatible (with the PS/2 line) and has never looked back. Today, Dell has no incentive to use an ATX form factor, but all third party boards are ATX format.

      I think there are forces at work which will oppose any further standardization beyond the third-party ghetto that we both apparently live in. Yeah, rail mounted motherboards would be nice, and are very feasible, but we're going to have to wait a bit to get them. Even then, the big hardware makers aren't going to participate unless it is somehow in their interest.

      I'm kind of happy at the state of the market at this juncture, though. I have an ASUS Nforce motherboard at the moment and I can't think of an x86 board that was more stable and of such quality manufacture since the old Compaq boards of the early 90's in Proliants. I certainly couldn't get something so solid out of Dell or HP.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  7. I worked for one of those CS Companies by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked for an outfit here in Virginia Beach called "Galaxy Computers" about a decade ago. It was a russian couple essentially trying to exploit Americans. While they weren't a total ripoff-- they made an effort to ship things honestly, but FORGET about returns and refunds. There were two competitors locally who both were CS companies, but they were related somehow.. It was strange, kind a like a "russan mafia" thing...

    I liked it because I could get stuff at "cost" I remember proudly buying a 166 mhz pentium for "only" $800. Yikes. Aah to be 17 and living with my parents again...

    The boss actually took a liking to me when I wrote a defensive (and successful) letter to the BBB when we had a genuinely unrealistic customer. A few weeks later, he asked me to write another letter based upon a complaint, but I refused, because this person had a legitamite complaint. Sasha then informed me "They you quit!" I said, "No, I'm still working here. If you want me to leave, then you fire me." "NO, YOU QUIT!"

    Anyway, I think I worked for two more days before he actually fired me, which is the only job from which I've ever been canned..

    It's also the only job I've ever had a paycheck refused at a bank.. (and when that happened they paid in cash) But it was fun trying to find people the best deals, and put systems together. I genuinely loved building computers from parts, (still do) and I took pride in talking to people and finding out what they wanted. I'm nostalgic for the big CS book, and that's carried over. I now pride myself on finding the absolute best deals on stuff for friends using froogle/ pricegrabber/ pricwatch/ slickdeals/ techbargains/ half.com/ you name it, but it will never have the nostalgia of pouring over those pages, circling, dogearing, and calculating shipping costs...

    1. Re:I worked for one of those CS Companies by TheRealFixer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was pretty common, these "family-owned" businesses appearing to compete against each other, but in fact working together to corner the local market.

      I remember visiting a computer show some years ago, and seeing 4 different Korean-owned tables appear to compete with each other, with different flyers, different company names, even different prices. But watching them from a distance, you could see them share stock with each other. I realized that they were actually apparently from one extended family and that their "competition" was carefully arranged to give the appearance of shopping for the best deals.

  8. Rendered Obsolete by the march of tech by cyclocommuter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Way back in the late 80's up to the mid 90's, when web shopping was non existent or at its infancy and you can only get stuff mostly thru mail order, CS was the Bible. I used to enjoy reading CS cover to cover looking at comparisons of PCs, scanners, hard drives, image editing software, etc. I also enjoyed reading Hard Edge by Alice and Bill in their lab of Doom. Sadly, CS is now but a parody of its former self... made nearly useless by NewEgg, Amazon, etc., on the shopping front and by sites such as AnandTech, Tom's, HardOCP, etc., on the hardware analysis front.

    I am actually surprised CS/Hard Edge lasted this long... such is the furious pace of progress specially in tech... almost everything will be rendered obsolete sooner or later.

  9. Computer Shopper was the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For the "roll your own" computer builders, CS was THE source for finding low cost components for building the PC of your dreams at a fraction of the cost of Dell/Gateway. It's been made obselete by internet tools like pricewatch, but it's influence on us DIY-ers was huge.

  10. How about the OLD computer shopper? by nothingtodo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember reading it back in the late 1980s. Page after page of enticing computers and equipment at prices I could not afford! There used to be sections on various models, such as Apple, Atari, and so on. Didnt Don Lancaster write a column in there too? In the back was for sale and wanted sections for computer types listed in alphabetical order most of which are not with us anymore. I enjoyed looking at the Apple // clones and parts available to build your own and I remember a review they had on the Basis-108. There was also lots of BBS numbers to attempt to connect to. I saw some of these old rags in a used bookstore once and wished I bought them just for old times sake.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  11. old CS by Reglar_Joe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not only did I have a sub to both CS and Byte, but I frequented the compuserve CS forum, where Bill talked mostly about his Camaro. My only claim to fame is that I got a letter printed in Hard Edge, detailing my regrets with OS/2, the OS I tried so hard to love.

  12. Thanks to everyone for the support! by Alice_Hill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First - thank you to EVERYONE who said they liked the column. We loved doing it and still are reeling from the decision to replace us with a shopping section of products and prices. And to the person who said this news item was done as a cheap ploy to get PayPal donations - we wish! The %$%% site is down. Guess this isn't out month. But thanks to all, and I hope you'll check out Aliceandbill.com. We are funding it ourselves for Hard Edge readers and post every day, so we hope you'll like it. We are also "in talks" with a few mags about a new print home as well, so stay tuned.....Alice Hill

  13. Re:Actually by Alice_Hill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is true, the Hard Edge was named and writted by Rich Santalesa and Dave Harvey. We inherited the column when they left to start a magazine. Rich actually created the whole Shopper "Tech Section" which at the time had great articles on programming, and early pre Web stuff by Steven J. Vaugh Nichols, and of course Stan Veit's great "Whatever happened to..." column. (Stan has been so supportive since this happened.) The Tech Section when I was running it after Rich left was almost 35 pages or almost the entire size of an average magazine. Those Shopper pages were huge too, but we could run longer articles back when it was a phone book. The original Hard Edge was actually a whopping 4,000 words but finally got chopped to 1,800. It was hard to not have the room to do the weird charts and in-depth stuff we used to be able to do with all that space. But I think we managed to keep in some of the humor. It sure was fun to write. --Alice Hill