Slashdot Mirror


Cherry OS Claims Mac OS X Capability For x86

jediboytj writes "According to the MacWorld Article, Cherry OS, does what Virtual PC does for Macs, only the opposite. PC Users are now able to run Mac OSX at G4 Speeds (Company claims 80% of the speed of your PC). It also includes full hardware support: hard drive, CPU, RAM, FireWire, USB, PCI, PCMCIA bus, Ethernet networking and modem. The software is being distributed through electronic download at $49.99 USD..." Note: it does not come with a copy of any Apple OS. Anyone in Windowsland tried it to provide a thumbs up (or down)?

8 of 1,090 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Oh Boy! by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you put the laserwriter on an etherprint box of some sort, you can print to it using Linux (or Solaris) with netatalk. Laserwriters speak Postscript so nothing could be easier to support once you get them talking. I did it back in the days when a 486 was a tolerably fast computer and it only took me a few hours to get running including compiling the software and building a new kernel with appletalk support.

    I know you were just being a smartass, a time-honored tradition around here, but I couldn't pass up the opportunity to be informative.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Re:Finally... by over_exposed · · Score: 5, Informative

    You still need to buy a copy of OSX. It's gonna run you a *tad* more than $50...

    --
    "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
  3. Re:Looks... non-existent by Datasage · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not only that, but there is no information about the company on the website.

    Its got that feeling of an overnight company. The whois record was only registered in july.

    It wouldnt supprise me if its some company that took pearPC and is trying to sell it.

    --
    In America we are imprisoned by our fear of them.
  4. Re:But why? by vhold · · Score: 5, Informative

    The best reason I can think of is that all the things I'd want to use a Mac for, are almost totally not CPU bound, whereas all the things I use my PC for are massively GPU/CPU related (games). So basically, I could have most of the best of both worlds in one box. Mac for everything internet/creativity related, and the PC for games/proprietary-work-apps.

    There are lots of other reasons you could contrive, what if you had Mac friends that visit a lot but constantly lament being unable to use your PC? It fundamentally boils down to you wanting _both_, but you need more performance on the PC side, which I really think is more common of a case, just on games alone.

  5. Re:But why? by temojen · · Score: 5, Informative
    Is there Mac-only software that people would want to run on their x86 machine?

    Absolutely: Safari, Camino, and ie/Mac. Web developers can see what their site will look like and how it will function on a Mac without needing to get more hardware.

    I used to run Win2k on VMWare on Linux so I could see how my sites would look on a PC.

  6. Re:Finally... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Informative
    "Yay permissive Apple licensing!"

    According to the license you cant run the OS on an emulator because its not "Apple hardware".

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  7. Re:Try this instead: by isecore · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, but PearPC doesn't come close to CherryOS so far unproven claim of speed.

    PearPC does run Mac OS X, but at an absolute snails pace (Yes, I've tried it - Three hours to install, approx 1-2 minutes to open a finder-window).

    If CherryOS indeed runs it at a somewhat decent G4-ish speed I'd almost consider 50 bucks to be worth it.

    --
    I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
  8. Re:A Report From Maui by cmholm · · Score: 5, Informative

    MXS, the company behind CherryOS, Maui X-Stream, and the vx30.com web hosting service, isn't showing me a brick-and-mortar so far. Hitting the Google caches, I find 'contact' pages that alternately list a Wailuku and a Lahaina office, both of which were copyright 2003. I tried the Wailuku address during lunch. The office was empty, sign removed from door, and no listing on the building directory. I may try the Lahaina address for fun over the weekend.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.