Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Microsoft Advised To Learn To Love Linux

Posted by Hemos on from the start-facing-up-to-it dept.

mikael writes "ZDnet is reporting that the management guru Clayton Christensen (author of "The Innovator's Dilemma") has advised Microsoft to learn to love Linux. In particular he advises Microsoft to purchase "Research in Motion", otherwise they will see their applications sucked off from the desktop and onto handheld devices such as the Blackberry."

12 of 418 comments (clear)

  1. Extremely interesting... by jordandeamattson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As someone who has read much of Christensen's work, I am not surprised that he would make this suggestion (and I agree with it), but I am excited to see it out in public...

    I agree with him that the greatest threat that Microsoft faces is the unwillingness to destroy its existing business to create a new business.

    Why won't Microsoft bring Office to Linux? Because that would undercut the Windows business.

    Why hasn't Microsoft gone ahead with a truly revolutionary approach to a MediaPlayer or Handheld? Because that would undercut the Windows business.

    It is about keeeping the Windows business going. Think about it, how many differnet flavors of "Windows" have we seen for totally different uses and platforms?

    Yours,

    Jordan

    1. Re:Extremely interesting... by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why won't Microsoft bring Office to Linux? Because that would undercut the Windows business.

      Hafta take issue here....umm.. do you actually think that anybody in the Slashdot community would use Office if it were ported over to Linux? (I would, I don't mind Office as much as I dislike Windows, but I think I'm in a clear minority...)

      --
      My Favourite Meme
    2. Re:Extremely interesting... by DJ-Dodger · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about: they won't bring Office to Linux because there aren't enough potential customers to justify the cost of the port?

      There may be more Linux users than Mac users now, but I believe and I'm sure their market research must show, that a much smaller percentage of Linux users would actually purchase and use Office.

    3. Re:Extremely interesting... by HBI · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All I can say in response to this is that the Macintosh version of Office has always been a superior looking product, if not always superior operating. Version 5.1 for the Macintosh (circa 1992?) is still damn usable today.

      If they put out a crappy version, no one will use it at first. They'll be forced to improve. 3 revs later and it'll be decent.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  2. Interesting article, but by nmoog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But it seems wierd that the guest speaker at an event hosted by Research In Motion would advise Microsoft to purchase Research in Motion.

    That seems a little, um, strange.

  3. Two bits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1) MS Linux exists, and has existed, for a while. It'll appear whenever there's a business need for it.

    2) What's stopping MS from having a non-GPL applications layer which enables them to deply Office and whatever they'd want on THEIR linux. Assume they'd charge a little under the standard distro's, or even include it in the cost of Office for Linux.

    The only hassle will be hiding the DRM for said Office where it can't be seen/modified - so it can't go in the kernel, etc. Could a binary loadable MS Driver do this for them?

  4. Obvious, thanks a lot by MadMirko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's an obvious business tactic to mimic a competitor if he is successful. Microsoft has done that before, and still does: Look at their Monad shell, which is designed by a team with an extensive Unix background. Microsoft is slowly testing the open source waters (f. ex. FlexWiki).

    It's not like another poster said that they fear it would undercut their Windows business. Why would there be an Office for Mac?

    So in conclusion, thanks for telling me the world isn't flat, Mr. Christensen

  5. The Blackberry is not a Linux device by njdj · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The article seems confused. Microsoft is advised to develop Linux apps and "in particular" go for the Blackberry.

    But Research In Motion's Blackberry is not any kind of free-software platform. It runs yet another proprietary operating system, requiring (at the moment) proprietary development tools. It has nothing to offer over Windows CE (except possibly quality of implementation).

  6. Look at Novell? by e6003 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Netware (hammered throughout the 90s by Wintel servers) and Unixware (offloaded to Santa Cruz Operation after only about 3 years) was "all" that Novell had. They are going through a painful, but necessary and promising, transition into a software services company. I think the more accurate summation of MS' problem is that they've angered far too many people for far too long, and even if they take the Damascus road tomorrow they may find a severe lack of partners and customers would kill them instead.

  7. Re:What this love will consist of by korielgraculus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Half-baked port of .NET to Linux w/ large licence costs.
    That would be Mono then.
    to allow Linux to be a node in network managed by XP.
    And that one would be Samba!
    New 'Services for Linux', half-baked Linux layer for NT.
    Or how about Services for UNIX? Already up to version 3.5. Apart from that a very reasoned out comment.

  8. REALITY CHECK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here is a reality check for you guys caught in the Slashdot distortion field:

    - Microsoft had 36.8 BILLION dollars in revenue last year (up from 32 BILLION the year before)
    - Microsoft had 8.6 BILLION dollars in NET PROFIT last year (I wish I could fail that much)
    - Microsoft has 70 BILLION dollars of cash
    - Microsoft has seen revenue and profit growth for every year of their existence

    Thank You. Now wake up.

  9. How to kill Linux MS Style. by slashzero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Microsoft really wanted to get rid of Linux they should do exactly what they did to Java. Create a horrible version of Linux. Release it as an easy to use Microsoft branded version of Linux but purposely cripple it. People that don't know any better will try to use it. They'll notice that it's doesn't work as good as Windows (Due to the crippling by MS) Microsoft will then say that it's not their fault, it's innate to Linux then everyone will run back to Windows and believe that Linux is innately broken just like Java.