To be fair though I don't think Facebook is bound legally to internet principles.
Besides, Google opened up the federation protocol of Wave and a bunch of other technologies, and look where that got 'em!
Most average slashdot summaries (even including summaries that don't include statistics) are less confusing and ambiguous than this summary. But that's only if we are talking about _average_ summaries, not _typical_ summaries.
I'm not sure it's really a case of Mozilla trying to trick anyone... after all, they happily (well, probably not _happily_) admit that they aren'tfastyet
"Over time, the web will win because it always does."
Yeah, over time... "over time" linux will win too. It's true most of the apps from the app store could have been made identically as web apps. But then they wouldn't have been on the app store - and no one would have ever seen them.
I'm continually shocked at the amount of money the non-nerds (bosses, project managers, those other people who I'm not sure what they do except go to corporate lunches) at my work spend on the app store. MONEY! that's crazy - I've never seen people voluntarily spend MONEY on apps before! But Apple made a great system for "the normals". They don't want to trawl the web for nifty web apps (like this JavaSript platform game I may or may not be shamelessly plugging). The just want a happy little environment where they can buy stuff while pretending to be typing important emails during meetings.
I was going to say that pseudonyms are no help anymore, because other people will tag REAL stuff and point it at your pseudonyms. For example, I have NEVER put my real name on my blog. But search for my name on google and my blog is the first result. And it sure doesn't take much work to find my name from my pseudonyms either.
(This may have been addressed in the article, but I couldn't read it because it started with the word "Boffins")
It is a damn interesting piece of shit software - i had a go: it would take any of my inane wailings and put some decently picked chords to it. Sure they they were played through some horrible GM sounds: but they tell you the chords (and the file format is just a renamed zip file with a.wma file and and xml file which contains all the chord info)
I don't know how good you are at listening to a monophonic sound source and deriving the key and related chords - but I suck at it. This software is a toy, but it doesn't mean you wont get something useful out of it!
This document was written by Stephan Wanger who, according to his bio "serves on the Board of Directors of UB Video Inc., a leading supplier of video compression software".
I wonder if this has anything to do with him not particularly liking ogg?
I'm sure this measure really has very little to do with terrorism, buuuut... haven't most of Japan's recent(ish) terrorist attacks been instigated by citizens - Like the saran gas guys?
Have a read of the technical paper from the article - Quite interesting. They used fuzzing to find a heap overflow vulnerability. They go on to talk of "Blackbox Exploitation", which I later realise has nothing to do with the cinematic genre.
It goes against the "spirit of the GPL" like the TestDriven.NET guy went against the "Ethos of Microsoft's EULA". The software development world sure likes it's intangibles!
Yeah. Actually, 7 or 8 bits per character really seems excessive to me, and opens the door to additional attack vectors. Surely if people can't take the time to learn to communicate in 1 bit they should not be allowed to use the internet.
It's a good start by Microsoft. But I found that you can implement a more efficient DRM system by snapping off the rabbit-ear antennae on top of your TV.
I did it eight months ago and I found that when I go to bed now my brain doesn't feel like it's been mushed to pulp by ads and boring drivel.
Good luck you noble DRM!
If you say that it's environmentally irresponsibility to throw away computer equipment, your girlfriend can't get mad that you've got a cluster of Amiga2000s making your house look like a digital dump.
To be fair though I don't think Facebook is bound legally to internet principles. Besides, Google opened up the federation protocol of Wave and a bunch of other technologies, and look where that got 'em!
No, but it can print the individual parts that make up itself.
Most average slashdot summaries (even including summaries that don't include statistics) are less confusing and ambiguous than this summary. But that's only if we are talking about _average_ summaries, not _typical_ summaries.
7" LCD is convenient - but I'd have to know how many sheets-of-glass thick it is before I'd consider buying one.
I'm not sure it's really a case of Mozilla trying to trick anyone... after all, they happily (well, probably not _happily_) admit that they aren'tfastyet
I'm guessing it's because the real "hackers" don't accidentally click the send button.
"Over time, the web will win because it always does." Yeah, over time... "over time" linux will win too. It's true most of the apps from the app store could have been made identically as web apps. But then they wouldn't have been on the app store - and no one would have ever seen them. I'm continually shocked at the amount of money the non-nerds (bosses, project managers, those other people who I'm not sure what they do except go to corporate lunches) at my work spend on the app store. MONEY! that's crazy - I've never seen people voluntarily spend MONEY on apps before! But Apple made a great system for "the normals". They don't want to trawl the web for nifty web apps (like this JavaSript platform game I may or may not be shamelessly plugging). The just want a happy little environment where they can buy stuff while pretending to be typing important emails during meetings.
I was going to say that pseudonyms are no help anymore, because other people will tag REAL stuff and point it at your pseudonyms. For example, I have NEVER put my real name on my blog. But search for my name on google and my blog is the first result. And it sure doesn't take much work to find my name from my pseudonyms either. (This may have been addressed in the article, but I couldn't read it because it started with the word "Boffins")
I've also noticed that this fortune city personal hom page from 1999 is still under construction... Any one know when it might be done?
a professor of cognitive psychology dissed your product?
It is a damn interesting piece of shit software - i had a go: it would take any of my inane wailings and put some decently picked chords to it. Sure they they were played through some horrible GM sounds: but they tell you the chords (and the file format is just a renamed zip file with a .wma file and and xml file which contains all the chord info)
I don't know how good you are at listening to a monophonic sound source and deriving the key and related chords - but I suck at it. This software is a toy, but it doesn't mean you wont get something useful out of it!
Except even the people who ask us to please think of the children don't want this one!
Its brevity actually cheered me up a bit.
Take your tin foil hat off mate - Microsoft researchers are working out the perfect strategies, so there is no need to worry.
This document was written by Stephan Wanger who, according to his bio "serves on the Board of Directors of UB Video Inc., a leading supplier of video compression software".
I wonder if this has anything to do with him not particularly liking ogg?
I'm sure this measure really has very little to do with terrorism, buuuut... haven't most of Japan's recent(ish) terrorist attacks been instigated by citizens - Like the saran gas guys?
Have a read of the technical paper from the article - Quite interesting. They used fuzzing to find a heap overflow vulnerability. They go on to talk of "Blackbox Exploitation", which I later realise has nothing to do with the cinematic genre.
It goes against the "spirit of the GPL" like the TestDriven.NET guy went against the "Ethos of Microsoft's EULA". The software development world sure likes it's intangibles!
This release does have its own web server in it. It's creatively called "LocalServer".
Yeah. Actually, 7 or 8 bits per character really seems excessive to me, and opens the door to additional attack vectors. Surely if people can't take the time to learn to communicate in 1 bit they should not be allowed to use the internet.
That sounds pretty good! Unless the race goes for, like, an hour.
It's a good start by Microsoft. But I found that you can implement a more efficient DRM system by snapping off the rabbit-ear antennae on top of your TV. I did it eight months ago and I found that when I go to bed now my brain doesn't feel like it's been mushed to pulp by ads and boring drivel. Good luck you noble DRM!
Oh cut and paste. My good friend and bitterly enemy.
If you say that it's environmentally irresponsibility to throw away computer equipment, your girlfriend can't get mad that you've got a cluster of Amiga2000s making your house look like a digital dump.
1s and 0s as far as the eye can see!