XM to Launch Satellite Radio Handheld?

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

XM to Launch Satellite Radio Handheld?

Posted by michael on Friday October 22, 2004 @04:52AM from the jogging-to-the-beat-of-a-different-drummer dept.

g00set writes "Reuters is reporting 'XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc next week is expected to unveil a "wearable" device, marking the satellite radio industry leader's latest effort to woo audiences to the nascent format, analysts said.' In adddition, 'A radio industry executive said the device was believed to be a satellite-radio receiver with headphones that also had a hard drive enabling users to download XM content.'" There have been other rumors of this as well.

23 of 165 comments (clear)

XM Adapter for iPod by Power+Everywhere · 2004-10-22 04:54 · Score: 3, Insightful

I'm calling it here and now.

--
BLING BLING. Meet the architecture that's changing everything.
1. Re:XM Adapter for iPod by The+Spoonman · 2004-10-22 06:27 · Score: 3, Interesting
  
  except I don't believe the iPod has a way to play through audio from another source.
  
  Although I don't have one, I have been investigating getting one, and I think that is incorrect. There is at least one accessory available for the iPod that suggests otherwise: The iTalk turns your iPod into a voice recorder. I think the unit simply stores your voice notes as MP3s on the iPod, but perhaps with a few tweaks it could playback real-time audio instead of just recording.
  
  --
  Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
  http://www.workorspoon.com
A wearable satellite? by slowhand · 2004-10-22 04:54 · Score: 3, Funny

perhaps I should rtfm.

--
Busy aligning my non-linear thoughts.
Sign me up by erick99 · 2004-10-22 04:55 · Score: 4, Interesting

I have XM radio right now and I would sign up for a portable receiver to augment the "fixed" one sitting on my nightstand. I am curious though, if I lean over the antenna I can lose the signal, where is this antenna going to be put on your body to maintain a good skyward orientation?

--
http://www.busyweather.com/
1. Re:Sign me up by cbelt3 · 2004-10-22 04:57 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  XM Antennas look good on top of a propellor beanie or tinfoil hat. Sort of a shark fin thingy. Couple that with a GPS receiver, RFID implant, and your basic mind control implant that goes along with it, and you have an army of geeks at your beck and call.
As an FM guy and XM subscriber... by SamMichaels · 2004-10-22 04:58 · Score: 5, Interesting

I have to say that the quality of XM's audio has significantly decreased since I got the service in 2002. It resembles a poorly encoded 96k MP3 now. It could be that they have too many channels and they had to drop the bandwidth...but it sounds AWFUL. FM stations in the area have more highs, not to mention actual audio processing (the stuff that gives it that "radio sound").

If bandwidth is becoming a problem with all these channels, change the technology. Put an MP3Pro-like encoder on it...newer units sound crystal clear again and older units sound the same.

I'd sure like to hear the technical explanation from XM as to why the audio has sucked over the last few months.
1. Re:As an FM guy and XM subscriber... by SirDaShadow · 2004-10-22 05:13 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  Actually, after a few minutes of googling, I stand corrected. XM uses AAC with SBR at 64kbps. The "SBR" part is what makes it "mp3pro-like".
2. Re:As an FM guy and XM subscriber... by SamMichaels · 2004-10-22 05:19 · Score: 3, Interesting
  
  I haven't heard a noticeable degredation. I've subscribed in late 2001. Talk stations are pretty bad, but music hasn't been.
  
  It's easier to tell with an FM modulator. It used to have mad sibilance from the pre-emphasis...now since the highs are completely GONE (low pass at 10khz or something ridiculous?) and warbled, you don't hear that anymore.
  
  If my old Pioneer unit is no longer supported, don't you think XM would have said "we did technology improvements...you need to upgrade the firmware or buy a new unit manufacturered after XX"?
3. Re:As an FM guy and XM subscriber... by DAldredge · 2004-10-22 05:23 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  You do know this is a one way service and the bandwidth issue comes from the adding of channels, not the adding of subscribers. Don't you?
4. Re:As an FM guy and XM subscriber... by rob13572468 · 2004-10-22 06:26 · Score: 3, Informative
  
  the total bandwidth for the xm spectrum is 4.8 MB/s.
  
  given that, the average bitrate per channel is 48kb/s. of course, talk and news channels will be given less bandwidth and music channels given more. xm HAS been experimenting with different codecs/bitrates and has the capability to change them on the fly.
  
  perhaps the reduction in quality that you are hearing is simply a channel that has had its bitrate lowered so that another could be raised.
5. Re:As an FM guy and XM subscriber... by Fnkmaster · 2004-10-22 07:00 · Score: 3, Interesting
  
  This is just not true. TV/CRT whine is almost painful to my ears if a room is otherwise silent. My roommate always does this - turns off the cable box, leaves on the TV in his room, and I have to go down the hall, into his room to shut the damned thing off because it's so distracting. Now admittedly, all of my friends are in their mid-twenties, and have never been loud concert going types (well, I've been to a few, but not a regular occurrence), so maybe we just don't have the damaged hearing of many older folks. But any audio product built specifically for a half-deaf 50 year old audience isn't going to do too well.
  
  I'm assuming you are talking from experience re: XM radio? For me, it's just a matter of listening to XM radio and listening to a normal MP3 or AAC encoded file. You can hear the "hard cutoff" in frequency response which you can visibly see in a spectral analyzer. Even if your hearing in the high frequency range isn't too great (and admittedly, nobody hears very _well_ at those high frequencies), the cutoff sounds hard and unnatural and should be quite noticeable. It's not a bitrate artifact, since low bitrate artifacts sound very distinct (and can be heard on many of the talk channels, especially the news/weather channels, ouch). Apparently, some of the XM issues are also from the "neural analyzers" they use as part of the encoding process, according to some of the people who should know in the XM radio forums. But almost everybody seems to admit now that the hard frequency cutoff is an issue.
here are some pictures!!! by Anonymous Coward · 2004-10-22 05:00 · Score: 4, Informative

http://www.xm411.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=3164

This does not look dorky, there really doesn't appear to be room for a harddrive (ignorant industry exec!), the antenna is integrated in the headphones, and it's actually just an accessory for the Roady2 XM receiver.
*yawn* by Misch · 2004-10-22 05:04 · Score: 5, Informative

Sirius already has a handheld unit, the XACT receiver.

How small?
This small.

--

--You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
1. Re:*yawn* by Misch · 2004-10-22 05:38 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  There's no reason to be such an ass when pointing out an error.
  
  There is a handheld power unit that goes with it.
  
  It looks something like this.
  
  And if I get modded to -1, you're going the same way, as it is not a "farking car module". Troll.
  
  --
  
  --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
Re:Wearable != handheld. by Jeff+DeMaagd · 2004-10-22 05:05 · Score: 3, Informative

Have you actually tried satellite radio?

I haven't but I don't think that XM necessarily has the same problems that AM has because they are on different bands, and the property of RF vary depending on its wavelength. For many urban areas, XM also has terrestrial repeater antennas to minimize the risk of drop-outs.

Besides, for intermitten't problems, the signal is pre-buffered a bit with plenty of error correction to boot.

I'd be vaguely interested in it if I can dock this little thing to my car, dock it to my HT sound system, or to my computer sound system, and use external antennas that connect through the dock.

Satellite radio subscriptions are charged per-reciever, and for one person, it isn't worth owning multiple recievers.
Re:Wearable != handheld. by Average_Joe_Sixpack · 2004-10-22 05:08 · Score: 4, Funny

Just stick antenna in your pants and you'll be a hit with the ladies.
Cool! by eli173 · 2004-10-22 05:08 · Score: 4, Funny

A hand-held satellite launcher! Think of what Carmack could do with that!

Huh?

Oh, a hand-held radio satellite's still cool; miniaturization has come a long way.

What?

Oh.

Nevermind.
Re:Wearable != handheld. by phobos13013 · 2004-10-22 05:11 · Score: 3, Insightful

XM doesnt work in large hulking structures made of concrete or thick metal. Passing under bridges loses the signal, driving inside a concrete parking garage also, and if you live in a brownstone or large scale apartment complex, its useless unless the antenna is outside on the roof at least. If yr home is a wooden/vinyl siding or balloon frame or such, yr fine. XM has tons of great options and the features or great, but i dont see it making a huge impact in the personal audio department, more of a car audio system imo.

--
...and it should be known by now
Re:Cool Device by Jeff+DeMaagd · 2004-10-22 05:13 · Score: 3, Insightful

Paragraphs should be your friend. You aren't making any sense.

Personally, I'd rather a small subscription for a lot of stations, long playlists and no ads versus "free" radio's obnoxious ads, repetitious programming and only a few stations. As it is, there used to be some ads on some channels of satellite radio but they've both gone [i]away[/i] from it. I can't imagine the satellite radio companies making money charging subscriptions AND selling ads, because the no-ads is a major selling point.

I try to avoid "free" radio because of their stupid short playlists too. Die terrestrial radio, die.
Re:Wearable != handheld. by aelbric · 2004-10-22 05:22 · Score: 4, Informative

This is not entirely incorrect.

I have logged 40000 miles in my car with XM and have noticed the following:

Bridges: no problem
Parking deks: no problem
Tunnels: problem, but how long do you spend in tunnels

As far as indoors:
Home, Brick(portable device): no problem
Office: Can be iffy if mobile and dead spots can be encountered. But where it works I would not want to be without it.

The service is fantastic I would recommend it to anyone. Small price to pay to get real music choice and almost no commercial interruption.

--
nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
Re:Sirius... by skydude_20 · 2004-10-22 05:25 · Score: 3, Informative

They already do

--
Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
Re:Why? by skydude_20 · 2004-10-22 05:29 · Score: 4, Informative

No, none, zip, zilch commercials, just music (at least with Sirus, they're getting there with XM). And your favorite station is the same station no-matter where you are in the country.

--
Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
Re:Cool Device by joeljkp · 2004-10-22 11:16 · Score: 3, Interesting

Yeah, you're right about the HD radio. But that won't solve the commercials problem.

Also, Sirius is in Chrysler and Ford, so things may be looking up for them.

--
WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy