Slashdot Mirror


Alvin Submersible Retired After 40 Years Work

An anonymous reader writes "The legendary deep-sea manned submersible Alvin is retiring after 40 years of scientific work. Alvin has taken 12,000 people on over 4,000 dives, helping to confirm plate tectonics and continental drift. It discovered hydrothermal vents, salvaged a hydrogen bomb from the Mediterranean Sea and explored the Titanic. Alvin will be replaced by a larger vehicle that will come into service in 2008."

35 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. Keep Both by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there any reason not to keep Alvin going along with its replacement? I'm sure some country or foundation is willing to run it. There's nothing top-secret in it, is there, considering that it is forty years old.

    It is useful for a lot of research. Even though it is not as good as a new one, why not keep in it action?

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    1. Re:Keep Both by TAGmclaren · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It is useful for a lot of research. Even though it is not as good as a new one, why not keep in it action?


      At a guess, after 40 years of the pressure it's been subject to it may be cheaper to replace that guarantee structural integrity.

      Anyway, I hope "retire" is accurate and not a euphemism for scrap (which unfortunately happens sometimes). It deserves a pastures in a museum somewhere, at the very least.
      --
      Iran has endorsed
    2. Re:Keep Both by mikael · · Score: 2, Insightful


      It is useful for a lot of research. Even though it is not as good as a new one, why not keep in it action?


      Undersea exploration is like space travel. You can get more capabilities by eliminating the human factor; the space/energy requirements for
      manned submersibles can be reused for retrieved scientific samples, more powerful propulsion, longer exploration times, or greater depth (longer tethers).
      You can now get little itty-bitty ROV vehicles that can go down to 300 etres (1000 feet).

      These can be scaled up in order to go down to greater depths; manned submersibles are limited to 6000 metres.
      Remotely Operated Vehicles can go down to 7500 metres and beyond.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:Keep Both by jrp2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is there a "wet smythsonian"?

      I certainly agree, but why would they need a "wet Smithsonian"? Get it close on a ship and truck it to the site.

      Here in Chicago we have a big-ass WWII German submarine on land in a museum. Yes, it is near Lake Michigan (several hundred meters), but it is definitely on land, now indoors.

      I have no idea how it got from the lake to the museum, but this was done 50 years ago, and it is much, much larger than Alvin. I am quite confident Alvin could be dropped on a flatbed and trucked to the main Smithsonian (or whatever museum) quite easily (at least relatively easy compared to the German sub). It is definitely a "wide load", but not much more than one of those pre-fab houses you see on the highway occasionally, and D.C. is accessible to the ocean via the Potomac so you can get darn close by ship and truck it the last several kilometers.

      --
      The only athletic sport I ever mastered was backgammon - Douglas William Jerrold
    4. Re:Keep Both by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK, so it *isn't* really 40 years old. There can't be much except the outer shell which hasn't been
      replaced over the years. But, when it was made, it was made a little too small. You can't change that. Also, the new (competition) replacements
      can dive deeper and thus explore much more of
      that almost unknown world.

      Most of the expertise and folklore (care and feeding if you will) needed to babysit it are pretty
      much locked up in extraordinary dedicated folk who have spent most of their *life* playing with this wondrous toy.

      Don't look for an owners manual. There isn't one.
      Jokes about Buses aside, the competition is better, so it's time to move on.

      (It would be *really* dangerous to hand this over to some other institution. Consider the ongoing problems with the decomissioned UK diesel subs and
      Canada - some poor scientist in XXX country could
      *die* if you just hand over Alvin without thought). Better to give it to the Smithsonian...

      (But I think it's a safe guess the Wood's Hole folks will have a wake...).

    5. Re:Keep Both by ScottyUK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think he meant wet as in "seaborne", more wet as in "National Marine Museum", akin with National Air and Space Museum. A museum dedicated to "wet stuff" - marine equipment/history.

      --
      Nice weather for penguins...
    6. Re:Keep Both by axioein · · Score: 5, Informative

      To me, this is old news. As I worki at WHOI, we have been tossing around ideas for a new Alvin for a long time.

      To correct a few other posts, on fatigue: the factor of saftey of Alvin is incredibly high. Meaning the operating depth is incredibly low for the hull. You can check the ASME boiler code. No one actually knows the crush depth of the sphere. They re-wrote the book when they built the spere. They built three spheres from the get go. One to be tested to failure. Instead of failing it caused the pressure chamber to explode. The rapid decompression also did nothing to the hull.

      Related to that there are only two original pieces of Alving left: the name and the robotic arm. The rest has been replaced. Many times.

      As many others have said cost is another factor. Sea Cliff, Alvin's sister sub, is housed at WHOI. I thought, wouldn't it be great to get two subs going? Looking over the systems it would take a lot to overhaul the entire system. The cost of operating Alvin is also climbing each year, as key compenents are harder to find. Our budget is also quite limited. Operating two submarines would be impossible. We would need a second support ship to be able to handle the second submarine, and no one would be willing to convert WHOI's two other Deep Sea ships to handling a submarine. As they do valuble research on their own using other tools. To convert Atlantis to handling a second sub, would be near impossible with out overhauling the entire ship. Lab space on ships is quite precious and I doubt any one would want to give it up. As the two subs will be different an many if not all aspects, they would not beable to share parts, doubling the inventory on the ship taking away even more room. Also Alvin's view ports aren't set up the best. Since the sub was experimental they didn't know what would work out best. It has about 180 degrees of view, but only one person can see any one third of that. Meaning the scientist can't see what the pilot sees with out displacing him. As some one else said: scrab the obsolete. It costs somwhere in the neighbor hood of one to two million dollars to run the sub each year. We deffinately don't have the resources to deal with twice that. We are stretched to the limits already. WHOI gets minimal amount of Goverment funds already. The cost that a scientist will pay for a trip in the submarine doesn't actually cover the entire dive.

      If you want to read more on Alvin I suggest Water Baby. An excellent tale of a submarine and it's life.
      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail /-/0195 061918/qid=1098555276/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-829162 3-6347207?v=glance&s=books

    7. Re:Keep Both by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, the Navy Museum in Washington, DC. They already have the Trieste (the ship which reached the bottom of the Marianas Trench) there, it would be quite cool to have the two most famous submarines in the same place. Alvin WAS used for Navy operations (as were two sister ships) so it should qualify.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:Keep Both by cvdwl · · Score: 2, Funny
      Someone better tell WHOI, they have 97 dives planned for 2005 and 19 dives left this year! At the end of the first link, there's a reference to an Alvin "overhaul", not retirement, overhaul.

      --
      ... grumble, grumble, grumble, mutter, mutter, Millenium... Hand... Shrimp, I tol' 'em, I tol' 'em.
    9. Re:Keep Both by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but there is a subtle difference in the types of technology. The manned submarines that reached the deepest part of the ocean were thick skinned vessels with no manipulators or propulsion. Alvin was submersible with a large glass window, manipulators, and self-propelled, allowing the ability to examine specimens.You can see how the technology has evolved; lighting and propulsion migrate to the sides to maintain a hydrodynamic shape. The visual field expands to 180 degrees at each end.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  2. Simon, Theodore to continue on by egg+troll · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll miss that rascally little Chipmunk and his whimsical adventures.

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    1. Re:Simon, Theodore to continue on by lxt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you think he'll form a splinter group, possible called "Sea Wings" or similar?

  3. DSV-2 by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those who don't know, DSV Alvin is better known as DSV-2 in most of serious historical documents.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  4. Parts by nounderscores · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd hate to think of how much it would cost to replace some of the heavily fatigued major components that have been compressed and decompressed so many times.

    And who is willing to make another alvin hull?

    Might be better to build 2 of the next generation once it is proven, or build 20 of the original alvins from scratch, than to try and extend the service life of a sub that's given more than its due.

    1. Re:Parts by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'd hate to think of how much it would cost to replace some of the heavily fatigued major components that have been compressed and decompressed so many times.
      Such replacement has been done incrementally over many years. No part currently installed in Alvin is original, or (IIRC) any older than about 10-15 years.
      And who is willing to make another alvin hull?
      Any number of the firms around the globe who are currently involved in building deep submersibles. Alvin was the first, and is far from unique. (In fact the Navy has two Alvin type submersibles (built from spare hulls) in mothballs in San Diego (Sea Cliff and Turtle).)
    2. Re:Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are no longer in mothballs. the Turtle was retired several years ago, and is now in a museum on the east coast. the Sea Cliff was retired just a few years ago, and WHOI got first crack at seeing if any of the Sea Cliff equipment could be borrowed for the Alvin. After looking into it, they decided that it would cost less to just build a new Alvin replacement than to alter the existing one.

  5. Interesting... by Stevyn · · Score: 3, Funny

    But what about Simon and Theodore?

  6. Keep it going until the replacement? by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why not keep it going until at least its replacement has been proven to work reliably? It would suck to keep Alvin in mothballs and then find out its replacement craps out after 2 months! Is there any reason not to keep it going until then? You know, kind of like Hubble and its replacement?

    1. Re:Keep it going until the replacement? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After 40 years of under going immense pressurization/depressurization cycles, it's probaby not as safe as it should be. This is a manned submersible after all.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  7. Alvin is great and all, but by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

    and explored the Titanic. ...if only it could have missed the Titanic, we would have been spared some DiCaprio acting, and more importantly, 3:30 minutes of ear-pearcing Celine Dion.

    But aside from that, good work Alvin, and good retirement!

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Alvin is great and all, but by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...if only it could have missed the Titanic, we would have been spared some DiCaprio acting, and more importantly, 3:30 minutes of ear-pearcing Celine Dion.

      At least in Titanic, DiCaprio was somewhat fitting for the part. In Gangs of New York, using DiCaprio was like casting Tinker Bell for Captain Hook's role.

  8. 40 years ago... by statebelt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...cars still had fins and we hadn't gone to the moon yet. C programming was still way in the future (but LISP already existed). What an amazing piece of machinery to have had a useful life of 40 years. One can only dream that something that we build lasts that long. -Thomas

    1. Re:40 years ago... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

      Programmers and nerds are weird. The only things that amazes then from the year 1964 are that:

      * we hadn't been on the moon yet (granted, that's a landmark in human history)

      * C was way in the future

      * LISP already existed

      Well hmm, I guess it's all a matter of personal perspective...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  9. Alvin and its contribution to geology by thedogcow · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've always been fascinated by discovery of hydrothermal vents via Alvin.
    Hydrothermal vents are located on divergent plate boundaries (i.e. the Atlantic Rift in the middle of the Atlantic).
    Here exist these vents (black smokers) warming the very cold water to around 400C.
    The fact that life (tubeworms) is sustainable in these highly toxic environments is simply short of amazing.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
  10. Keeping both is a waste of money by October_30th · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It is useful for a lot of research.

    In the life of every scientific instrument comes the time when its capabilities are so much overshadowed by the more contemporary technology and its maintenance is such a drain on the funds that it simply must be retired. Sure you can do research with it, but it's low grade. They simply are not useful for good research anymore and maintaining them will take away funds from more important, new fields.

    Personally, as a scientist, I don't much care what happens to what is essentially scrap metal at that point. In fact, I personally dismantled the equipment I did my PhD Thesis on in order to build another, better one. No tears shed there.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  11. hmmm. by say__10 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please tell me they are going to name the successor 'Simon' or 'Theodore'.

    --
    Home of the midwest loser - www.say-10.net
  12. I also vote for keeping alvin alive, or elsewhere by multi-flavor-geek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live right on the shore od lake Superior, and although only 1300 feet deep, there is strange stuff down there, and there are other places like Lake Tanganika, and Lake Baikal, that are incredibly deep, freshwater, and largely unexplored. Lake Tanganika may actually be an excellent research location considering that Africa happens to be ripping in half at that point.
    How many people vote fo keeping Alvin alive as a more mobile research vessel, to research places other than the oceans, but some of the more confined bodies of water.

    --
    Like arts? Like cheesy little Indie mags? Check out www.artwerkmag.com, and don't laugh at the bad coding please.
  13. I remember Alvin by Mr.+Protocol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of the best columns I ever wrote, and certainly one of the most fun to write, I wrote inside the Alvin. Not, I hasten to add, at the bottom of the ocean. It was in drydock down at Scripps Institute in San Diego at the time. I learned a lot about all sorts of things on that trip, including things like the esoteric outer reaches of battery charging, when you've got tons and tons of lead and acid to charge.

    The magazine in which the column appeared was offered the opportunity to take Mr. P. on a dive, an opportunity which he would have accepted in a New York minute (hey, after all, he went for a boat ride on Grand Prismatic Spring: 160 degrees and no life jackets - what would be the point?), but as the trip would have cost the magazine the entire budget for publishing an issue, Mr. P. stayed sadly dry.

    Alvin was an envelope-pusher from day one. The two halves of the titanium sphere that was the crew compartment were held together by one of the hardest titanium welding jobs ever done. The "penetrators" that carried the electronic wiring through the hull were always a concern. The inside of the sphere was unheated, so it "sweated" for the whole 12-hour dive. The pilot would check things out by wiping some of the "sweat" off the seam of a penetrator, if it looked like a "lot" of water, and would taste it for salt. Salt would have been a very, very bad sign.

    Alvin did have an emergency ascent capability. Explosive bolts would shear the sphere clear of the boat-shaped outer chassis which contained the ballast, batteries and engines, allowing the sphere, a giant bubble, to race to the surface. The conning tower, though, was permanently attached, which meant that the sphere would spiral vigorously during the entire ascent, which would take twenty minutes or so. It was expected that the crew, under the best of circumstances, would be violently ill by the time they reached the surface, but they'd be alive.

    This capability was never used, thank heavens.

    Mr. Protocol wishes to thank Tom T. Tengdin for that golden opportunity.

    1. Re:I remember Alvin by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Informative
      Alvin was an envelope-pusher from day one. The two halves of the titanium sphere that was the crew compartment were held together by one of the hardest titanium welding jobs ever done.
      That's both true and false. Alvin's first two hulls were steel, not titanium. While she was unique in her role, she didn't particularly press the envelope with them.

      The titanium hull was not installed until she had been in service many years.
      Alvin did have an emergency ascent capability. Explosive bolts would shear the sphere clear of the boat-shaped outer chassis which contained the ballast, batteries and engines, allowing the sphere, a giant bubble, to race to the surface.
      Incorrect.

      Alvin has not one but *three* emergency ascent capabilities.
      • Electromagnetic release of ballast plates. (Also used to initate a normal ascent.)
      • Electromagnetic release of the battery tubs.
      • *Manual* seperation of the sphere and forward chassis from the remainder of the submarine. (No one is certain if this will work.)
      Lastly, Alvin also has the ability to shed her arms and the experiment rack/ROV garage. This is used both if they get entangled or if they need to shed weight.
  14. Age concerns by Fortran+IV · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Check out the history of Alvin at the Woods Hole site and you'll see that concerns about fatigue in a 40-year-old pressure hull are misplaced. Alvin has been repeatedly overhauled, with pressure hull and other components replaced. The vehicle has undergone recertification by the U.S. Navy every few years, most recently in 2002. In fact, Alvin has gone deeper in recent years; until 1994 the DSV was only certified to 4000m, not the present 4500m.

    However, the next Alvin will be larger (27 more cubic feet in the pressure sphere, adding about the volume of a good-sized coffin!) and have greater range, both horizontally and vertically. As "Rosco" pointed out above, operating two DSV's at once would be much more expensive. And frankly, any lesser facility than Woods Hole that can afford to operate a DSV would probably prefer to build their own.

    Still, I'm sad to hear Alvin will be retired. Alvin was the first name I learned in deep-sea research as a child, as Jacques Cousteau was the first for shallower waters. A long and brilliant career, averaging (even with overhauls and most of one year stuck on the sea floor) better than a dive every four days for forty years.
    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  15. USN DSVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "DSV-0" Trieste - the bathyscathe that reached Challenger Deep, retired 1966, also called X1
    DSV-1 Trieste II - an updated bathyscathe design, retired 1984, also called X2
    DSV-2 Alvin - a deep diving sub, reaching only half as deep as the two Triestes
    DSV-3 Turtle - Alvin's identical sibling, retired 1998, USN
    DSV-4 Sea Cliff - another Alvin class DSV sub, retired 1998, USN
    DSV-5 Nemo - another Alvin class DSV sub, retired 1998, USN

  16. Aluminaut is retired, too by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Aluminaut, the other deep-diving research submersible from the 1960s, is also retired.

    They're all gone now, the record-holding vehicles of the 1960s. The Concorde, the SR-71, the Saturn V, Alvinn, the Aluminaut. All gone, with the will to replace them gone as well.

  17. Woods Hole Oceanographics Announcement by OctaneZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Suprised no one has alinked to the actual WHOI announcement.

    There was also a very good NPR Science Friday Discussion on this back in August.

  18. The next best thing to being there by jalefkowit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I feel almost like I've taken a dive on Alvin myself... I work for an ocean conservation group, and this summer one of our staff scientists got the chance to go along on a NOAA expedition that used Alvin to dive on some Alaskan seamounts (mountains at the bottom of the ocean).

    Before he left for the trip, I talked him into keeping a journal of it for our organizational blog. Each time he made a new entry, he would e-mail it to me from Alvin's mother ship in the Gulf of Alaska, and then I would post it to the site in as close to real-time as possible. (He wanted to post the entries directly, but we were lucky to get e-mail access for him aboard ship, much less a reliable Web connection.)

    You can read the archived journal here: Jon's Journal

    (The software defaults to showing the journal entries in reverse chronological order, so the one on top is the last one. Scroll to the bottom and read up to start from the beginning.)

    We both just kind of figured it would be something interesting to try, but the result was really cool -- he did a great job describing what it's like to be on an Alvin expedition.

    It was actually near the end of his trip that I first heard that Alvin was slated for retirement. From a mechanical perspective, it makes sense; she's seen a lot of wear under some of the most demanding conditions imaginable. It's that very history that makes it hard to imagine seeing her put to pasture, I guess. Here's hoping that we as a people have the vision and commitment to keep exploring the paths down which Alvin took those first tentative steps.

  19. Re:Rescued hydrogen bomb? by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sure; it was in January 1966. A B-52 collided with the tanker it was refueling from over the coast of Spain. The airplane disintegrated and dropped four thermonuclear bombs. One landed intact near the town of Palomares, two burst open on impact and scattered radioactive debris, and one fell in the ocean. It took three months of underwater operations to find and recover the sunken bomb, and a huge cleanup effort to get rid of the radiation on land.

    The film "Men of Honor" opens with Carl Brashear, the first Black diver in the Navy, losing a leg in the recovery effort.

    rj