Slashdot Mirror


The Joypad That Became A Rotary Controller

jaromil writes "Speaking of human/computer interface, so simple, so neat, a usb knob to switch among desktops can give us quite some feeling about operating a machine... how about such controls around the monitor?" The knob in this case is switching between different effects possible with EffecTV. This make me wonder what creative uses people are putting Griffin's PowerMate to.

40 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Wait a minute by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Funny

    knob...can give us quite some feeling...

    I think I already have one of those.

    1. Re:Wait a minute by uberchicken · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah. I'm suspicious. The caption for LifeTV reads "My seeds flow on the net". Uh huh.

  2. Very bad idea by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "how about such controls around the monitor?"

    As any mouse user can tell you, taking your hands off your keyboard is damaging to your productivity.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Very bad idea by flakac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As any mouse user can tell you, taking your hands off your keyboard is damaging to your productivity.

      My wife is a mouse user, and quite frankly, I don't think I'll ever convice her that the mouse is a productivity killer. While I mysef, having grown up with command line interfaces (MS-DOS 3.1 anyone?) on the PC, I really doubt that Joe User has any sort of shell installed (Cygwin or MinGW MSYS) at all. I may prefer to use command-line tools, but that doesn't mean that all people do. So to answer your point, most mouse users, just like my wife, need the mouse to function. Just because you or I may be able to work more efficiently without one doesn't mean that the vast majority of people could function without one.

    2. Re:Very bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Parent has never edited audio or video. Taking your hands off the keyboard is only bad for clerical work. Broaden your horizons d00d.

      If you are clerical than taking your hands off the keyboard may be even a sin.

    3. Re:Very bad idea by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "As any mouse user can tell you, taking your hands off your keyboard is damaging to your productivity."

      Doesn't using Lynx all the time get old after a while, though?

    4. Re:Very bad idea by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 3, Funny

      It doesn't take very much to draw the conclusion that using the web and being productive are not capable of intersection.

    5. Re:Very bad idea by toddestan · · Score: 2, Funny

      A lot depends on what you're doing. I don't suppose you control your web browser with just a keyboard?

  3. Wow. big news. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow! Knobs are useful? I never would have thought..(/sarcasm)

    I only have 16 knobs attached to my PC via USB/Midi.

    1. Re:Wow. big news. by metlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not just that, there has been something similar by Apple - don't remember what it's called.

      And musicians have been using such stuff since time immemorial.

      A sonification lab I used to work at has been using such an off-the shelf knob made by Apple for quite sometime.

  4. iPod... by eobanb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you think about it: weirdly, the iPod is a rotary controller that became a joypad. The first iPods had the mechanical scroll wheel and then they moved to the touch wheel....but the latest generation also rocks left, right, up and down. I personally love these kind of interfaces. Scroll wheels on mice are similar, as are just plain old dials, but they requre you to lift up your finger/hand repeatedly to scroll far enough in either direction. The iPod doesn't. What if that kind of interface was more widespread?

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

  5. Move the rabbit ears a little to the left... by Matey-O · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Solitare is on channel 4...

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  6. De-Evolution? by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We went from knobs that were attatched to our televisions to buttons that evolved by having remotes and such.

    So today I look at this and I see, the knob but for computers of today and I ask myself, is this proof that old but simple technology is still useful today even though we evolved and changed the standard from knobs to buttons/touchpads/screens

    1. Re:De-Evolution? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the switch from knobs to buttons in itself a de-evolution in user interfaces in a few respects.

      I think knobs are great. They give a more linear feel to a control rather than just holding down a button. With a button, you are held captive by how fast the maker wants to allow the setting change. With a knob, a quick twist, or turning as quickly or slowly depending on fine/coarse tuning, is all that is needed.

      Both knobs and buttons have their places though. I suspect buttons are used because they are cheaper, and bean counters love cheap.

  7. ummmm by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Informative

    Virtual Desktop Manager from microsoft

    Manage up to four desktops from the Windows taskbar with this PowerToy.

    http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/pow ertoys/xppowertoys.mspx

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  8. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    /me fails to understand what the great benefit of knobs is.

    The great benefit is that knobs are *cool*. They make things look needlessly complicated, and therefore awesome. I want knobs and blinking lights and switches and big levers and pipes and wires everywhere in my computer room! A glowing panel full of unlabeled buttons! And one of those freaky monitors from the movie Brazil! And a cooling system half the size of my room, full of some weird green liquid like in Serial Experiments Lain! It would be the *best* computer room *ever*!

  9. Some notes on USB interfacing... by enginuitor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The fact that the author used a USB game pad as the electronic base of his device brings up an issue which increasingly plagues electronics hobbyists... Manufacturers are beginning to see many useful protocols (such as RS232) as obsolete and completely remove support for them from their products. While the average American consumer, who uses arbitrary metrics and units-of-measurement-become-buzzwords (megapixels... gigahertz... etc.) to judge the worth of a device, would not care much about seeing those ugly trapezoidal plugs disappear from the back of their computers, it presents a huge problem for us hobbyists who rely on good-old '232 and similar "old" interfaces for easy communication with a computer. Anyone who's ever written (or tried to write) USB interface code knows that's Hell to work with. Fortunately, though, there are solutions... including handy interface chips which handle all the nasty USB work and provide a simple asynchronous serial interface on the project end. However, I still will never buy a motherboard without RS232!

    1. Re:Some notes on USB interfacing... by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've written USB firmware from scratch for the 68HC908JB8 microcontroller...yes, it is tough. But once you get everything working, you don't have to do much to change from one type of device to another. The problem is that there isn't a huge amount of free USB firmware out there for all the various USB microcontrollers. That's because most people, like me, finally got around to writing firmware when it became their job to do so.

      However, USB is powerful and should be adopted by hobbyists. If you really need a serial port, there are many premade serial-to-USB converters and chips.

    2. Re:Some notes on USB interfacing... by khrtt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anyone who's ever written (or tried to write) USB interface code knows that's Hell to work with.

      From personal experience, serial interface code is even usually more of a hell to work with than USB. The personal experience I'm talking about includes about 20 of each of USB and serial interfaced devices, both firmware and drivers.

      You see, USB has some structure to it, control and data channels (called "pipes"). Control channels define a standard format for messages. Both control and data channels support error control by retransmission, and some other nifty features. You don't have to re-invent anything, the whole protocol has been designed for you, OSI layers 1 through 6 for custom devices. Standard device classes that have a device class defined for them effectively have application layer defined too. You can use your valuable design time to concentrate on functionality. Implementation is non-trivial, but you can easily lift most of it from some sample code that the USB chip vendor gives you with their SDK.

      With serial ports, on the other hand, you have to design and write the whole darn thing, layers 2 through 7, every time over again. The first time you do it, it's fun, almost like a class project from school. Then it grows old quickly. For a data channel, you basically need a simplified version of TCP/IP. For control you need guaranteed delivery of command packets. Not rocket science, but consider that USB does it all for you right off the bat.

      Besides, you rs232 geeks should know that you can by a USB-to-serial adapter chip for, like, 50 cents. Stick it on your board, hook up to USB, and voila - you got yourslf a serial interface on both the host OS and the firmware ends, only much faster. Highly recommend:-). Can't give you a reference off the bat, but I think TI makes one of these.

  10. 16 knobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    I only have 16 knobs attached to my PC via USB/Midi.

    16 knobs and what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt... st. peter don't you call me cause I can't go, I owe my soul to the company store.

  11. Re:Good idea? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Call me old-fashioned but I find pressing Alt-number or Alt-arrow more than adequate.

    Unless you happen to have a kajillion keyboard shortcuts, like I do in Gimp. Please stop thinking Windows + Word + Excell, or pretend you're so cool because "what's wrong with the old studd?", and realize many people actually use off-keyboard controls quite productively.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  12. Re:PowerMate any good? by spinlocked · · Score: 4, Funny

    The PowerMate is rather pricy at 40 dollars. Is it any good?

    It's OK. Nicely machined, sexy looking, works under Linux but certainly not worth $40. I've bought more useful gadgets for a lot less.

    It's one of those things you initially think will be great, but one day, in an idle moment you look at it and think: I haven't touched that device in 6 months. And then you think about selling it on eBay, but never quite get round to it.

    --
    # init 5
    Connection closed.


    Oh... ...bugger.
  13. Re:Bad idea. by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mac OS can do the real thing too -- and with more eye candy than Windows or Linux!

    So yeah, actually ALL major operating systems can do virtual desktops, just not by default (and Linux doesn't do it by default either, since it defaults to TWM!)

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  14. Oblig. reference by jgalun · · Score: 3, Funny

    My monitor goes all the way to 11!

    Er, 12 actually.

  15. technology comes full circle by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We went from knobs that were attatched to our televisions to buttons that evolved by having remotes and such.

    Part of the reason that buttons on TVs became attractive is because it reduced the overall foot print of the TV. I have one 19 inch TV circa mid 80s that measures 25inches across, and one 27 inch tv that measures 24 inches cross, the key diffrence is the 19 inch has the old style turnknob and the 27 inch has but a handfull of buttons. More picture but smaller footprint, it's a good tradeoff, so long as you don't loose the remote control.

    But who in this day and age would want to flip through the 100+ channels available on cable TV? Those who remember tuning in UHF might remember this noice *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK*! This would be far too impractical, but at the same time round volume controls are back in fashion. Unlike buttons they allow us to choose how fast we turn the knob, and we can remember there and abouts how far to turn to get at the right loudness level. I don't consider this to be de-evolution at all because the controls are often digital rather than an old style pot the likes of which gets cloged up with dust and dirt and becomes scratchy over time, but rather an evolution of what works and bringing to forth to the next level. Besides it's a hell of alot easier to spot the volume control if it's a knob rather than buttons.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  16. Re:Griffin Powermate... by tepeka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree - it's amazing. I bought one for my 76-year-old father, who uses a CRT iMac and has bad enough vision that he can't get a driving licence anymore. It's set up to trigger the Mac's Zoom feature. Twist it to the right, and the screen zooms in on the cursor position, twist it to the left and it zooms back out. Click it once and it magnifies the cursor position four times, click it again and it returns to 1X. It's a great bit of kit. He looked at me like I was mad when I showed it to him first, but now he raves about it. Of course, it helps that OS X has a great accessibility feature to use it with...

  17. Re:Oh right on! by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if Griffin would consider starting building keyboards with integrated knobs, alongside or in place of numeric keypads?

    Y'know what'd be better - Apple putting the (presumably patented, since we haven't seen it on anyone else's hardware) iPod scroll wheel into a keyboard or even on a standalone USB panel. As several have said, it's more usable than anything else because you can scroll long lists without repeatedly removing your finger. Physically grasping and moving a Griffin Powermate involves reconfiguring the way you're moving your hands and they can't be continuously spun as easily as the iPod wheel.

    The Apple mouse continues to live without a scroll wheel though, which is, IMO, a much needed addition (FYI, I was under the opinion that moving from the 5 buttons of my Razer Boomslang to the 1 button Apple mouse would never work, and I've got them both hooked in now - I never use the Razer and the only bit I miss is the scrollwheel. All the other functions can be achieved more quickly with one hand hitting hotkeys on the keyboard as I click). I really miss a useful scrolling tool on my mac, and a nice little touchwheel on the edge of the keyboard would be quick, simple and fluid to use while I'm typing.

  18. ActiveWireInc.com by MacFury · · Score: 2, Informative
    ActiveWireInc.com

    Makes a USB controller card for a very reasonable price. They even make add on boards to easily control motors and such. You should check them out. I talked to the owner of the company and he was very helpful in answering questions about the board, and helping me plan the design of my computer controlled camera mount.

  19. Re:Oh right on! by igrp · · Score: 3, Informative
    Y'know what'd be better - Apple putting the (presumably patented, since we haven't seen it on anyone else's hardware) iPod scroll wheel into a keyboard or even on a standalone USB panel.

    That's an interesting idea. According to this article, Apple did not invent the iPod scroll wheel though. Apparently it was designed by Synaptics.

    Apple does, however, have a patent that covers mice with a rotary dial.

  20. Not such a bad idea by uberdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If your productivity is text oriented, then yes, taking your hands off of the keyboard is damaging to productivity. If it is graphic oriented, then a mouse, or graphic tablet is better. What if your productivity is music oriented? You're better off with a piano keyboard than a typewriter keyboard. In short, matching the interface to the task will always give you better productivity.

    Having said all that, a horizontal thumbwheel mounted on the edge of the keyboard, underneath the spacebar allowing me to scroll sideways from desktop to desktop would be cool.

  21. That's nice, but... by jlanthripp · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Contour ShuttlePro is nicer. My stepdad, a retired cinematographer and photographer, is into video editing and uses one on his PC. All the buttons and the wheel itself are programmable and so forth. Definitely worth the ~$100US price tag IMHO, if you're constantly editing video. It should be quite nice for gaming as well, though I haven't tried it for that yet.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  22. Ob Simpsons by igw · · Score: 2, Funny

    "please refrain from tasting the knob" -Ralph Wiggum

  23. Pong by wkitchen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh man, that would be perfect for playing Pong.

  24. Innovations in computer controls by Thai-Pan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you think about it, the major innovations in computer interfacing hardware have pretty much been the keyboard, the mouse, and the mouse wheel.. Not too much to it. I can't help but wonder if there's space for more to come along.

    I think the iPod's new touch wheel that also tilts around is pretty snazzy. Imagine if they put one of those suckers on your laptop right next to the regular touch pad. "Turn the wheel" to scroll around, do so while pushing down on the right side to switch applications, press up or down on it to scroll a page at a time... Maybe I'm dreaming again, but I think it's a pretty versatile control system that really isn't used to its full potential.

    1. Re:Innovations in computer controls by arose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate all touchpads and the like (haven't used an iPod, but should be the same), the problem is lack of tactile feedback except for the drag on your finger.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  25. Haptic interfaces, kinetic perception. by torpor · · Score: 4, Informative


    In the field I work in (synthesizers), the perceptive nature of our customers (musicians) when relating to a user interface is indeed a tricky and wonderful force to behold. Rotary knobs, and the general 'feel' of a system as a result of simple interface kinetics, is fairly well-established in this field.

    I've always viewed the standard computer interface (keyboard/mouse) as being curiously unburdened by progress and change; you cannot say the same for the synth business, where there is no one standard for how you ought to use knobs.

    I've got two PowerMates, both on each side of an Apple extended keyboard, they are without doubt among the most precious peripheral I have on my desk. I've also got a couple of faderfox boxes, an LV1 and an LX1, which are also awesome primary/secondary interfaces, as well offering endless rotaries for various nefarious uses..

    The attempt by Microsoft to commodotize their 'peripheral assets' (MS Natural keyboard) while providing pitiful support (beyond HID) for application authors, and the tendency of other interface mfr's to vector off into 'cool but ultimately useless plastic hack' (anyone remember the Cyberman?) is fairly common. Once again, its all about the operating system.

    But you know, if you want to know more about endless uses for rotary knobs, look no further than the audio/synth/pro-media tool markets. Especially of the 80's and 90's .. a veritable wasteland of proprietary hack after propietary hack, all with their own individual utility lifespan, designed to give muso's a haptic kick or two.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  26. Re:Griffin Powermate... by torpor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have two, one on each side of my USB keyboard, and I have to say that once you've used a 2-Powermate setup for audio/video/midi editing, you'll wonder how you'll ever go back to that primitive mouse interface.

    In fact, I rarely use my mouse any more, actually, except when I really need to. Everything I need to do is way more fun from either side of my 'pinball rotary' setup. No more right-hand-only RSI .. well, at least not as a result of any mouse activity, anyway ..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  27. wearable computing by FrenZon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some time ago I used the powermate in a wearable computing project using tones and computer-synthesised voice as feedback.

  28. Physical User Interfaces by Tony.Tang · · Score: 4, Informative

    Phidgets (http://www.phidgets.com/) is something that has recently become extremely cheap and accessible to software guys like me who HATE hardware. Phidgets make it really easy to build physical user interfaces (think nobs, switches, pressure sensors, etc.) without needing to do any hardware stuff yourself.

    They are extremely easy to use, as you can see by these undergrad projects (http://grouplab.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/phidgets/gallery /index.html).

    Full disclosure: I am a member of the lab from which this stuff was developed.

  29. Built into my keyboard already :) by PontifexPrimus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a Logitech Cordless Desktop MX connected to my linux box, and using Hotkeys I can easily set the volume with the spinning disc in the top center of the keyboard. This is very useful since I often watch movies with large volume ranges and I can very quickly and very precisely adjust the loudness that way. I especially like the fact that the disc doesn't have a fixed "start" and "end" position but rather spins freely, making it similar to the iPod scroll wheel.

    --
    -- Language is a virus from outer space.