Slashdot Mirror


What Makes Apple's Power Mac G5 Processor So Hot

An anonymous reader writes "58 million transistors can drive a lot of power. Apparently, Apple appreciated the choices IBM processor architects made when designing the 970 family. This article provides the 64-bit architecture big picture for the 970 family (A.K.A. the Power Mac G5) and the critical issues in IBM's 64-bit POWER designs, covering 32-bit compatibility, power management, and processor bus design."

22 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. Circular Logic by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it's so hot, maybe it's not cool enough.

  2. What Makes Apple's Power Mac G5 Processor So Hot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Insufficient cooling?

  3. ob Memory by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    18 exabytes ought to be enough for anybody

    -GillBates0, 2004.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:ob Memory by PureCreditor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Umm....what about addressing subatomic particles ? =)

  4. Re:What Makes Apple's Power Mac G5 Processor So Ho by sky289hawk1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The fan belt on its search engine doesn't drive the radiation air emission unit fast enough! SHE NEEDS MORE POWER!

  5. Teflon underside by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should make the G5 powerbooks have a teflon underside.

    "Turn it over, and you can cook dinner".

    1. Re:Teflon underside by 21chrisp · · Score: 2, Funny

      My old OC'd PIII doubles as a space heater.

    2. Re:Teflon underside by Reducer2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah ha! The REAL cause of global warming. OC'd CPU's.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    3. Re:Teflon underside by NathanBullock · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine the problems trying to type while your laptop keeps sliding around on your lop.

    4. Re:Teflon underside by sp00 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why turn it over? Just make a heatsink cooker like this guy did.

  6. Re:The Athlon64 is very cool by strictfoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Holy fuck dude... your room temp is 109.4 degrees Fahrenheit (thank you google)?

    Open a window or buy an air conditioner or something!

    --
    I've just signed legislation that'll outlaw Russia forever. We'll begin bombing in five minutes.
  7. Re:So sick of it by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1, Funny

    nah, the proper solution is to develop the convenience store liquid nitrogen market.

  8. Re:So sick of it by BobWeiner · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obligatory PC Weenies link that fits the topic at hand.

    --
    The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
  9. Re:Increased Pointer size by Myolp · · Score: 3, Funny

    After reading the privous post, I somehow got to think about viagra spam... "Increase The Size Of Your Pointer Now! Buy A 64-Bit PowerMac G5 And Get That Extra Size Today!"

  10. Re:The Athlon64 is very cool by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 2, Funny
    a few degrees more than the room temperature of 43C


    Holy Crap! You must be really roductive !
  11. Re:The Athlon64 is very cool by Compact+Dick · · Score: 3, Funny
    Holy Crap! You must be really roductive !
    And if you were to move to my place, spelling errors would decline! ;-)

    Cheers!

    -- CD

  12. PC vs Mac cooling. by coobachey · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the past few years where PC' Fanatics have gone to great measures in extreme clocking and tweaking to push the speeds to the limits, Mod'rs have ran into and pretty much conquered heat issues along with other roadblocks. Technology that has been adapted by PC and PC-part manufacturers, I'm no Mac expert but even thumbing through the latest magazines I have yet to stumble upon a "Mac" mod or a how-to on making them extreme, is this due to proprietary or licensing issues? Or can a Mac be reverse engineered the way PC's can be? Granted Macs are not worthless and have good reviews from most of its users that know the systems. Still I find it limiting and where PC has prevailed. Heat on a slower clock speed processor should not be an issue. How many fans does a G3, G4, G5 have these days (1 case)? Laptops would be even worse as for PC portables are highly concerned about heat themselves.

    "Make it idiot proof, Someone will make a better idiot" -- Tweak

    Coob

  13. Re:Increased Pointer size by SnapShot · · Score: 5, Funny

    The C++ standard template library uses MAGIC PIXIE DUST and MOONBEAMS for the data structures. Java Containers, on the other hand, are held together with PURE THOUGHTS and KITTEN WHISKERS. That's how they avoid using pointers... ;-)

    --
    Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
  14. Re:atoms in one universe by pclminion · · Score: 5, Funny
    So, what happens if you want to use your fancy computer to model two universes?

    Simple. Since we've got a computer capable of simulating the entire universe, we'll just use it to simulate a universe which contains a computer which is capable of simulating more than one universe.

  15. Re:CPU power defeated by bloated software? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

    the single-tasking 80 column display days

    _80_ columns?! Why, you young punks had it good! When I was a boy, we only had 40 columns, and we felt grateful, as our fathers had no video display at all. Grandfathers? They used their fingers or an abacus.

    You've come a long way, baby.

  16. Re:Increased Pointer size by bar-agent · · Score: 2, Funny

    As an aside, did you know that Java has garbage-collection as a side-effect of using pure thoughts to hold its data structures together? And the kitten whiskers are what allows the JIT compiler to work so well.

    On the other side of the fence, C++'s usage of magic pixie dust and moonbeams is what gives it its flexibility -- and by that I mean the ability to program in the procedural style or object-oriented style or template style, etc. The downside is that magic and moonbeams aren't really...reliable. So you end up shooting yourself in the foot, and every compiler is different.

    --
    i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  17. Re: uh oh... by rekoil · · Score: 2, Funny

    That would go a long way to explain the "disappearing sock" phemonenon...