Nissan Exhibits IEEE 1394-Compatible Car
Dirak writes "High-speed IEEE 1394 optical fiber networks have gone off-road with new Nissan's prototype vehicle demonstrated this year's at 11th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems. The prototype is equipped with 7 cameras on the body and a 12-inch LCD monitor in the front and another in the rear seat area. Thanks to the in-vehicle IEEE 1394 LAN, which is capable of high-speed communications at 400Mbps via optical cable, the front and the rear seat monitors can display various information simultaneously, for example. The application of optical fiber also means that the weight of the cables can be reduced to about one-half the weight of a conventional wiring harness."
... somebody will get modded up for making an 'insightful' point about how impractical it is for whatever oversimplified reason.
"Derp de derp."
I love the idea of multimedia in the car, but just one problem:
"The prototype is equipped with 7 cameras on the body and a 12-inch LCD monitor in the front"
Wouldn't this be more than a little bit distracting for the driver? I mean, what's more interesting, watching the red light change green or watching neo take the red pill?
1394... WHY?
Probably because the technology in supporting electronics and chipsets, not to mention programming knowledge, has been massively subsidized by the mainstream computing market. Going off and reinventing the wheel with their own transport system just isn't rational in such a case.
The general rule of thumb is 1 MPG for every 100 lbs. This would boost fuel economy by about .5 MPG.
.5 MPG here factored in with 150 thousand miles over the life of a car factored in with gas at $2.00 US per gallon would save you something like 70 thousand dollars over the life of the car.......is that right? Whoa......Actually, I never thought about it in those terms, but even if it saved me $5 thousand dollars, it would be worth it.
Don't think that's a big deal then eh? OK then.
Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
Perhaps it's not that special, but it's interesting. I don't know if you've played around with your car's electrical system, but they can be an absolute nightmare when something goes wrong. I had all sorts of problems with my first (crappy) car, mainly stemming from a ground cable coming loose. Auto electrical systems are not a fun thing to work on. Traditional wiring can rust, connectors can break, faults in other parts of the car (especially grounding problems) can screw up totally unrelated parts of the car... I had my headlights refuse to work when I accidentally connected my car radio incorrectly, even though it worked fine etc etc etc. I've installed a lot of car radios and in older cars there is no uniform system for wire colours or even power colours. It can take longer to figure out which cables connect to which than it does to actually mount the radio and speakers...
By moving from a traditional wire loom to an optical system with a protocol like 1394 not only are you avoiding physical problems like weight and corrosion, you're also making everything much easier to troubleshoot and install.
Personally I think this is great. It's not too dissimilar to the comparison of VoIP to PSTN.
Putting syrup in coffee is some form of blasphemy.
This could be that lean mean war driving machine that I have been looking for! Not that I can afford a new car, or a slightly used car, or a moderatly beaten car (I am in the market for a severly beaten near the point of death car).
Hell, who am I kidding, most of my vehicles have more electronic stuff in the stereo then they do in teh rest of the car.
Like arts? Like cheesy little Indie mags? Check out www.artwerkmag.com, and don't laugh at the bad coding please.
Even on a modern motorcycle, it can get ugly. I've had to replace the harness on a 1999 BMW motorcycle, where it weighed almost 25 pounds and required the removal of every single body panel and parts of the rear subframe to get to parts of it. It was rated as a ten hour job for a skilled mechanic.
Compare this to the wiring system on a 2005 BMW K1200S, where the wiring harness is replaced by a four wire cable that run everywhere: two wires for power and two for data. Each section of the bike, like the instrument cluster, has a box in it that reads the signal and routes the power where it needs to be. The whole system weighs 6 pounds, and a 19 pound weight savings on a motorcycle is significant.
An on-vehicle LAN solves a hell of a lot of problems, and IEEE 1394, with its prioritization protocols and huge bandwidth, is a great idea.
This is not my sandwich.
Just a reminder, if you depend on physical security and have 1394 ports powered, any 1394 device can read your system's memory through DMA.
Turn them off in the BIOS if this is an issue for you (the linked article suggest globs of epoxy...).
Coming soon to a sensationalist news story near you.
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
All this technology in the car and I still can't plug my laptop in and get the report as to why the check-engine light is on, and I still can't swap general parts with my other car. I assume there are marketing reasons for those issues, but isn't there some standards committee who could oppose the situation? Diagnostics software/hardware and interchangeable parts are some useful and well understood computer features, are they not?
Maybe it's different there...
:)
You'd be hard pressed to see a new car here in Australia that doesn't have air conditioning.
For that matter, ABS is on almost all (if not all) new cars, and I don't think I've see a new car in the last 5 years without power steering as standard.
Either it's different there (and you guys get ripped off) or you're not too in touch.
Brake lights are moving to LEDs these days, so the power draw will be lower than you'd expect.
Cars are also filled with all kinds of nasty electromagnetic fields, which copper cabling hates.
Pick your poison.
(also, if you use proper connectors, optical cabling doesn't mind vibration all that much)
---
Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
(I read with sigs off.)