Slashdot Mirror
XBox Owner Sues Microsoft
drusoicy writes "Reuters is reporting that Sean Burke has filed suit against Microsoft because his XBox system stopped reading discs (games or otherwise) after less than one year of use. Many XBox owners can relate, as XBox hard drives are known for crashing. 'The defective XBox's stop working after minimal usage, after unreasonably, unconscionably, unusually and unexpectedly short amounts of time,' the lawsuit said. The suit will probably become class action, and seeks to represent anyone who has purchased an XBOX since the 2001 launch."
Come on, you have guarantee don't you ?
... I think I should sue M$, I chipped my box, and now it reads pirated copies violating a bunch of laws ...
Walk in and have it changed....
lawsuit for hardware failure? What the hell is this ?
Hmm
STOP BEING DAMN STUPID !
Maybe Microsoft should go back to what it does best: Selling reliable, affordable and cutting-edge software. This hardware thing just isn't panning out as planned. Locution: The act of transforming Captain Picard into Locutus.
*rolls eyes*
_raises middle finger_
This actually has been a large problem and is one of the reasons people mod their boxes. As stated earlier, the drive does not spin down if there is a disk in it. This puts tons of excess wear on the drive. Design flaw.
If you mod your box you can rip your games to a large HDD any only use your DVD drive when playing on !Live.
-nB
whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
(I know, I know, don't feed the trolls...)
Dishonest? Exactly how is getting the MANUFACTURER to willingly honor its own warranty dishonest?
Let's say you and I enter into a contract that states that I will replace a product that you purchased from me if there are any defects. If you submit a product to me where you claim there are defects (your worn out widget is not as pretty as a new widget), and I decide to replace the product, there is no dishonesty. The manufacturer is free to decide its own policies for replacement of a product. Being consenting adults (or corporations), we are allowed to decide certain things for ourselves, such as when to do something, or whether we want to do something. I believe this is called free will.
If the manufacturer is stupid enough to have an overly open warranty policy, and a consumer utilizes that warranty policy, I fail to see where the consumer is being 'dishonest'.
Most likely, IHBT.
The comment I replied to made no mention of any failed expectations of the shoes in question but rather, was seeking a replacement because the warranty was about to expire. Perhaps Nike would honor a replacement of the shoes but my question is whether or not that seems very honest. If you are sending the shoes back because the warranty is about to expire but they are functioning fully as expected, you may be well within the rights described in the warranty - my statement wasn't concerned with that, it was concerned with whether or not this was a very moral behavior to take.
Perhaps you don't see how the person is being dishonest in asking for a pair of replacement shoes when nothing is wrong with them [on any return like this, the consumer would be required to state a reason and is obviously not going to say, "Because the warranty is about to expire." and thus, they will write something else - a lie - thus, dishonesty.]
It's funny being called a troll by someone who hasn't even posted 24 comments yet. Don't call me a troll in the future.
I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
I'm not sure which is worse: your teaching blatantly lying to you or you believing him/her.
Free Shoes from Nike
"Punter"?!? I mean I know what a lorrey, a lift, a boot, a bonnet, and petrol are, but "punter"? Why can't you guys speak English? :)
Ben Hocking
Need a professional organizer?