Slashdot Mirror


NASA Considering Early Retirement of Shuttle Program

Rei writes "While publicly assuring the public that it has no plans to do so, leaks have indicated that NASA has been quietly investigating plans to get rid of the Space Shuttle as soon as possible, and finish the International Space Station with disposable rockets, even as NASA works on achieving Return to Flight in 2005."

9 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    duh, bush needs war $ :)

  2. Get Rid Of it.! by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    They should have got rid of it as soon as it got off the assembly line. The Shuttle Programme was supposed to create an inexpensive, safe, and reusable rocket. Unfortunatly, they got ripped off. Not only that it is not safe, but it is also highly expensive. And if it explodes/implodes, it is not reusable.

  3. America going down the drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    The Chinese will take over space exploration, America's in too much of a mess, I mean how stupid to cancel X Plane development projects in the early 1990's. Everyone knew the Shuttles would eventually fall apart!

    Bush has destroyed the country the keep SUVs full of gas. SUV drivers are nothing but gluttons who have ruined America!

  4. Re:Kerry by OzzyRulez · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You're all just a bunch of anonymous cowards!

  5. This is not suprising. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    16 years of republican control during the last 24 years have brought about the typical bourgeois short-term thinking that has resulted in the virtual annihilation of the USA's space capability.

    More englightened leadership would have started working to ensure the developmnent of a more up-to-date alternative.

    But it may be too late now, the aerospatial talent is either retired or scattered thanks to the aerospatial industry post 9/11 debacle, and there is definitely no replacements for those lost talent, as the bourgeois shortsightedness send bright students into law school rather than engineering.

  6. Re:Why not just.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Sorry, but astronaut outsourcing is already here. An Indian woman, Kalpana Chawla, is one of the seven killed in the Columbia breakup.

    * I demand to be modded up as Funny!! (I will accept Troll also, as I will burn in Hell. (Or be reincarnated in the lowest caste level.))

  7. Re:Why not just.... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Everytime some shuttle explode is because some management guy hid some engineering specs so he can get a bigger paycheck when his engineers deliver the projects faster. Fire the management team! Outsource them to Mars!

  8. Buncha Useless Fucktards by mikelieman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If the shuttle wasn't the only ride around, they wouldn't get ANYONE to ride on it. Damn things a deathtrap...

    Howsabout we just say... "Build it like your kids gonna ride it, cause we're gonna send em on the first flight for a little field trip..."

    --
    Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  9. Re:Ermm, actually its not funny... by vsprintf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    India has the neccesary "intellectual" labour and which it doesn't, the US can easily transfer the skills; and technology .

    And then the U.S. would be doing what in space exploration? Calling tech support and asking how it's going?