Slashdot Mirror


Physicists Finally Solve the Falling-Paper Problem

neutron_p writes "The so-called "falling paper" problem has long intrigued scientists. James C. Maxwell pondered the tumbling motions of playing cards in 1853. Why don't flat things fall straight down? Pieces of paper fall down, then rise into the air, then glide along, then again rise... It occurs in a seemingly chaotic manner. Now researchers at Cornell University have solved the falling paper problem by calculating the motions of a scientific journal page in flight and there were a few surprises." There's also a story in the Cornell Sun.

49 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now they just need to solve the 8+ folds problem...

    1. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      She found special toilet paper that met these requirements and bought a roll for $85.
      $85 for a roll of toilet paper!? Man, and I thought the double-ply I bought was expensive.
    2. Re:Yup by LilGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

      It was either pay $85 for extra credit, or do something unmentionable. Apparently she's not that easy.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
  2. NewsFlash!! by thegoofeedude · · Score: 3, Funny

    Paper is affected by air as it falls! Astounding. ;-)

    1. Re:NewsFlash!! by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 3, Funny

      The real news is that they actually found an interesting use for those "pages of a scientific journal."

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    2. Re:NewsFlash!! by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 5, Funny
      The real news is that they actually found an interesting use for those "pages of a scientific journal."
      There was a joke among physicists - I first heard it in the early 1990s- that said that a certain physics journal (I believe it was Physical Review Letters, or "PRL") was growing so quickly that its expansion was actually faster than the speed of light. There was, however, no violation of relativity, because no information was being conveyed.

      --Mark
      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
  3. Re:Umm... by M51DPS · · Score: 5, Funny

    air currents? Dumbass scientists with nothing better to live for than proving evolution and why pieces of paper fall slowly. Why not cure cancer you retards?

    You know, when they finally do find the cure for cancer through a process that involves falling paper, I bet someone is going to feel awfully silly.

  4. Bah. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    This is just a rehash of an old study showing why open-faced peanut butter sandwiches always land face down.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  5. Paper! by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has anyone combined this with other falling-object problems?

    For example, if one butters one side of the paper, will it still land face down, even if it's floating about?

    Since cats fall on their feet, what happens if you wrap playing cards on each of their legs? Will their happy flight downwards be interrupted by randomly flying limbs?

    What if you wrap the cat in a piece of paper that has been formed to make a Moebius strip, butter the other side of the animal, then tie it together to another cat? I suspect this may be the way to create time travel or a perpetual motion machine.

    I hereby ask everyone to funnel funds towards this dynamic Cat, Toast, and Paper Research. I approximate we have about 4 years to prepare to salute our new Paper Machie Strawberry Jelly Cat Overlords.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Paper! by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Funny
      What if you wrap the cat in a piece of paper that has been formed to make a Moebius strip, butter the other side of the animal, then tie it together to another cat? I suspect this may be the way to create time travel or a perpetual motion machine.

      It's probably been asked before, but this gave me an idea: take a long strip of bread, butter one side of it, twist it and connect the ends to make a mobius strip, then drop it. What happens?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Paper! by xbytor · · Score: 2, Funny

      That should read "Strawberry Jelly Hypo-allergenic Cat Overlords". Funding committees are very picky about things like that.

    3. Re:Paper! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Logically, you would be compelled to butter both sides. To do otherwise would show that science is not infallible (double negative, but I like the sound) and would anhilate all existance.

      Hmm...

    4. Re:Paper! by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Funny

      It lands on the outside.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    5. Re:Paper! by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny

      What if you wrap the cat in a piece of paper that has been formed to make a Moebius strip, butter the other side of the animal, then tie it together to another cat? I suspect this may be the way to create time travel or a perpetual motion machine.

      You're theory is good, except that it fails to take into account the sheer impossiblity of attaching anything to a cat.

      --
      Everything seemed to be going so nice
      'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
    6. Re:Paper! by Tobias+Luetke · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fascinating idea, Imagine a beowulf cluster of this.

    7. Re:Paper! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Unfortunately, you can't butter two sides of a one-sided object. If you were truly compelled to do so, you would be driven mad. It would be like putting someone who is compelled to sit in corners into a round room. It's just cruel. Also, science has long been proven fallible. Scientists love to prove accepted theory wrong. Also, everyone of true scientific bent knows that the way to 'anhilate' all 'existance' would be to throw a pessimist and an optimist into a locked room.

    8. Re:Paper! by Igmuth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, as long as you don't observe the sytem. As soon as you do so, the waveform collapses, and the toasts hit the floor.

    9. Re:Paper! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wrong. Use a stapler.

    10. Re:Paper! by drawfour · · Score: 2, Funny

      A most interesting thing happened to me the other day. I dropped a buttered piece of bread and it landed on the non-buttered side! Come to think of it, it was the same day the Red Sox won the World Series...

  6. But .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    by calculating the motions of a scientific journal page in flight

    ... they still need to repeat the experiment with different types of journals; psychology, home decorating, sports and paranormal to be absolutely sure.

  7. They used a scientific journal page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..and it was well behaved and obeyed the laws of physics. I want to see what happens when they repeat it with a bible page.

    1. Re:They used a scientific journal page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As soon as the page is ripped from the bible, the scientists will burst into flames.

  8. Simple Solution... by Paster+Of+Muppets · · Score: 2, Funny

    Paperweight - stop it going floating in the first place.

    --
    Due to lack of disk space this user has been discontinued
  9. Failing paper?? by nightfire-unique · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hmm.. was I the only one who read that as:

    Physicists Finally Solve the Failing-Paper Problem

    Oh, if only :~(

    <mutter>back to studying I guess.</mutter>

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  10. Related Stories by SuperJason · · Score: 4, Funny

    Notice the "Related Stories" section. It is blank. This doesn't relate to anything. Does that tell you something?

    1. Re:Related Stories by Mikail · · Score: 4, Funny

      I immediately thought of the applications for games. Say you throw around a stack of papers to befuddle your opponents. I can see the headlines now... "Doom 4: Now with realistic falling paper motion!!"

      --
      If life is a waste of time and time is a waste of life, let's all get wasted and have the time of our lives.
  11. buttered toast is flat by bushboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, a possible answer to why Toast ALWAYS falls butter side down in uncontrolled experiments !

    Of course, this still doesn't mean we can get a perpetual motion engine by strapping said toast to a cats back, but we can hope !

    I see a new form of energy just round the corner, CatToastOnics !

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:buttered toast is flat by Lally+Singh · · Score: 4, Funny

      That was already answered a while back. It has to do with the speed of rotation, combined with the height of the average table. If you were at a different height, the toast would fall butter side up.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
  12. Re:Usefulness by 26199 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Probably not, since it's unpredictable... which could translate to, say, random 30ft drops. Which would be rather unpleasant if you happened to be 29ft from the ground.

    You'd need a parachute to deploy when you got close to the ground ;-)

  13. Re:Usefulness by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Parachutes made of paper?

  14. Re:Better Parachutes? by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, it's easy ... just fold it about nine times and it should fit.

  15. Re:Usefulness by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if this could be used in some way for parachutes.

    Step 1: Flatten self into a 1mm-thick sheet.

    Step 2... Uh, actually, we seem to be running into a problem at step 1.

  16. Now I Can... by brandonp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure a cure for cancer would be nice, but atleast I can use this to calculate how many of those leaves from my neighbor's damned tree are going to end up on my lawn.

    Maybe now I can bill him for raking...

    Brandon Petersen
    Get Firefox!

  17. Re:Navier Stokes Equation by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do smooth initial conditions always lead to smooth solutions?

    Well from personal experience I know that if she has not waxed then there will be a major reluctance to be a smoothie on my part. So the answer is yes.

    Where's my million bucks?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  18. Re:Usefulness by 3770 · · Score: 5, Funny


    The flattening is not the problem. That will be achieved. Timing is the problem.

    You need to flat yourself _before_ you hit the ground.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  19. Re:Umm... by Reaper9889 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They've problery already found the cure. Now they just try to calculate were it landed... Everything got an purpose...

  20. Re:Umm... by EggplantMan · · Score: 2, Funny
    Just two words for you: Dumbass Retard.

    Congratulations. Within the span of two words you have personally offended (along with the parent poster):

    • people who can't speak
    • donkeys
    • mentally retarded people
    In the future, I would kindly request that you try to be more politically correct and just say 'fuck you'.

    HTH. HAND.

    --

    ?-|||-----x<*))))><
  21. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    'fuck you' is offensive to people who have no or non-functional genitalia, you insensitive clod! That includes most of the slashdot editors, a large portion of the trolls, victims of ritual female genital mutilation, mules, and Barbie.

  22. Re:Navier Stokes Equation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "There is a $1,000,000 prize for the answer to the question: Do smooth initial conditions always lead to smooth solutions?"

    Hmm. Tell you what... I'll submit a "yes" and you submit a "no" and whichever of us wins will split the money with the loser. Sound like a good deal? :)

  23. In Other News by Christopheles · · Score: 1, Funny

    The army has made deals with major defense contractors to provide soldiers with large pieces of paper to replace their now-obsolete parachutes.

  24. A Superior Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Physicists Finally Solve the Falling-Paper Problem"

    Step 1: Get rock.
    Step 2: Put rock on top of paper.

    Optional Step: Remove rock when access to paper is required.

    (Patent Pending)

  25. Re:That's my prof! by sinnfeiner1916 · · Score: 1, Funny

    this is slashdot. and that's a sport.

    --
    The More Laws, the less Justice --Marcus Tullius Cicero
  26. Re:Umm... by I7D · · Score: 3, Funny

    Interestingly, when scientists were making progress in cancer treatments, I asked a similar question of "cancer? Dumbass scientists with nothing better to live for than proving evolution and curing cancer? Why not solve the falling paper dilemma you retards?

    --
    Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
  27. Re:Usefulness by fbjon · · Score: 2, Funny

    It shows that there are applications of this which we might not fully understand after reading an article on the Internet.

    Hey, we don't even have to read the article in order to not fully understand it!

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  28. Re:Usefulness by mdfst13 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You need to flat yourself _before_ you hit the ground."

    I think that the bigger problem is that you would want to *unflat* yourself afterwards...

    Of course, if you could do that you could probably do without the parachute.

  29. Ignoble Awards 2004/5 by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think we may have a winner....

  30. Re:Umm... by fermion · · Score: 3, Funny
    Well, paper falling is classic physics. The classic physics in which we assume the divine is deterministic and try to understand the nature of that determinacy for the purpose of better understanding the nature of the divine, and thus becoming more one with the divine. Evolution can be argued the same way.

    OTOH, curing cancer is a pseudoscientific attempt to interfere with the clear intention of the divine. In fact, by curing cancer, and going beyond the understanding of the divine to the prideful attempt to compete with the divine, we are surely condemning ourselves to eternal suffering. All to prevent a few years of suffering in this life. How gauche.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  31. Experiment with a Ruler by florescent_beige · · Score: 3, Funny
    Take a regular 12" ruler preferably one of those wooden ones or stiff plastic. Hold it on the long edges between your thumb and middle finger (I mean, your thumb on the 6" mark and your index finger on the 15cm mark). Heave it into the air at about 45 degs (up not down), trying to give it some backspin.

    With any luck it will fly around a bit, swoopishly. The circulation caused by the back-spin generates lift, same as airfoil-shape induced circulation (faster airflow on top, slower on the bottom) as per that well known Kutta-Joukowski formula s * b * mu * gamma.

    Which is apropos of nothing. Also, the Navier-Stokes equations can't be solved around a singularity like the edge without a simplification which usually takes the form of an assumed boundary layer of some sort (probably laminar at these Reynolds numbers which makes it a lot easier). Also, N-S is initial-condition sensitive because the solutions have bad scale missmatch, so you'll want to use your duodecaduple precision math library.

    I didn't really understand from the blurb if they were talking about bendy things like paper pages. That would make it a fluid-structural coupled problem. Very tricky. The hardest part of that is getting the fluids guys to return the structures guys' phone calls.

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  32. Re:Note Air Force involvement by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's not surprising to see the Air Force funding further study on this subject.

    What is surprising is the reason the Air Force is so interested in this subject. Nothing related to aeronautical engineering or operational missions... They're looking to improve their staffing and paperwork flow. Because right now, throwing your Staff Summary package out the window at HQ appears to work better than walking the damn thing around directorate admin offices.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.