Slashdot Mirror


DoubleClick On The Blocks?

A reader writes: "Many sources report that DoubleClick - the world's leading supplier of cookies - may be up for sale. " There's also an AP report out as well. The online advertising market has been hard lately - but there's also been a widespread perception that DoubleClick has been resting on their laurels.

3 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. Or maybe... by bizpile · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe we should take up a spreadfirefox.com-like donation and buy Doubleclick and then distroy all the data they have collected over the years.

  2. Re:Double Click is a dinosaur by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually at work we solved it company wide. we block doubleclick and other sites like it at the proxy.

    we save HUGE amounts of bandwidth by using AD blocking rules in the proxy. to the point that most offices asked why we upgraded their bandwidth only a day or two after setting up the rulesets.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  3. outrageous expiration date cookies by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Need to be taken out back of the Interweb and beaten to within an inch of their lives. Twice."

    Make that three- they (and many other advertisers and other sites) needlessly set cookie expiration dates to 2040 and whatnot; I wouldn't mind it so much if they didn't collect like a plague; every few weeks I go through my cookie list and there are literally thousands of cookies from a hundred different advertisers all set to expire in a zillion years. It's absurd, and clearly they don't get it- these cookies should have an expiration of maybe one year at the absolute most. A month or so should be fine in most cases.

    I think someone should write a plugin for the various free browsers that punishes bad cookie lifetime params- maybe it inversely sets the actual expiration date in an inverse fashion if the requested date is too far off. For example, over a year, start actually going back down for each year they add. So a cookie marked good until 2040 will actually be good for about a few hours- or less.

    Users will bitch, site developers will be forced to look at why it's happening, and the answer from the internet community will be "set more reasonable cookie expiration dates and it won't happen". They'll be in the uncomfortable position of trying to explain why they need such long dates.

    Either that or simply allow the user to set a maximum cookie retention time. What I'd REALLY like is a browser that doesn't save cookies for sites I haven't bookmarked, or combine the ideas- cookies for sites not bookmarked aren't saved very long.