Slashdot Mirror


US Ready to put Weapons in Space

An anonymous reader writes "The Guardian reports "America has begun preparing its next military objective - space. Documents reveal that the US Air Force has for the first time adopted a doctrine to establish 'space superiority'." If this goes ahead, it will be in violation of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty which forbids the militarization of space."

4 of 1,023 comments (clear)

  1. meteor defense by ericdano · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd really like to see a meteor defense started. That is the single most likely thing that could wipe out the whole planet. And lately, we've had a lot of close calls......

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:meteor defense by Erwos · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll bite.

      Basically, they have nothing in common except shooting something upwards. ICBMs are on a parabola path - that is to say, they start on Earth, arch, and then come right back down. It is a very, very quick process - a full-blown nuclear war need only take half an hour.

      The targets are very small (relative to an Earth-killing celestial object), intentionally spoofing your radar, and very, very close to the target (again, relatively). The good news is, they're packed with explosives, and since they're so close, a laser defense system could at least conceivably work. The Israelis supposedly have something working that could handle tasks somewhat like this (Arrow II?).

      Compare this to a meteor. Meteors (that we would worry about) are very large compared to an ICBM. They're moving really fast, yes, but with an active detection system, we would probably have a couple years of notice. What's _best_ is that the meteor would be moving on a relatively stable and straight path, and we only need to deflect it - if we knock it off course a year out, it's a non-problem. Blowing the thing to meteor bits is overkill.

      This is not quite as easy as it sounds, but I think it's doable with today's technology.

      So, really, they are two separate problems. ICBM defense requires a highly accurate system that can engage many, many small targets at close range. Meteor defense requires a system which can engage a single, huge target at massive distances.

      I knew that "Collisions in Space" course would be handy someday.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  2. Uh... guys... by boomgopher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There has been this thing called "Space Command" in the Air Force for a long time now. There has even been talk of branching the space forces from the Air Force for a long while - like over ten years or so?

    I call alarmist BS, nothing new here.

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  3. Re:No Violations Here by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hmm- would my favortie space based weapon- guided 2-meter crowbars as a Weapon of Minimal Distruction- be legal then because it's specifically designed only for assasination inside of reinforced concrete bunkers?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.