Slashdot Mirror


2004 Election Weirdness Continues

I've read dozens of submissions about election anomalies in the last week and they show no sign of slowing so I've decided to post a few of the main ones here to let you all discuss them. The first is the Common Dreams report that shows that optically scanned votes have a strange anomoly in florida: the Touchscreen counties roughly matched up to party registration numbers, but optically scanned paper ballot counties showed strangeness like one county where 69.3% registered democrat, but only 28% of them voted for Kerry. Palm Beach County, Florida logged 88,000 more votes than there were voters; that machines in LaPorte, Indiana discounted 50,000 voters; in Columbus, Ohio voting machines gave Bush an extra 4,000 votes; in Broward County, Florida voting machines were counting backwards; Lastly, precincts in New Mexico gave provisional ballots that will never be counted to as many as 10% of all their voters.

13 of 2,013 comments (clear)

  1. Liars by Izago909 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's all a democratic ploy to discredit or dethrone our duly elected Pope. The first rule of the Democratic process is: Do not talk about the Democratic process. The second rule of the Democratic process is: Do not question the Democratic process...

    1. Re:Liars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Stupendously. I am in a similar position, although different. I've an undergrad in Physics and Metaphysics, an MBA from the best Ivy League school, and graduate degrees in Ecology, Library Science, and Architecture. I'm currently a PhD candidate in Art History at one of the top 2 universities on Terra, and I'm 17 years old. I volunteer weekends at the local soup kitchen. My wife, kids, neighbors and dog adore me, and I although I am not white, I am a credit to my race. And get this: I voted for Bush!

    2. Re:Liars by Lendrick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Faith based initiatives are antidisestablishmentraistic bullshit.

      Be honest here. This entire post was just an excuse to use that one word.

  2. How not to write voting software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Officials found the software used in Broward can handle only 32,000 votes per precinct. After that, the system starts counting backward.

    Rule #1: Do not use signed shorts to count the total number of votes.

  3. Re:Big fucking suprise by chill · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't trust this government.

    I hereby revoke your membership in the tinfoil hat club. The correct phrasing is I don't trust government.

    Your statement implies there is/was/will be a government you trust. That thought is just plain scary.

    -Charles

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  4. Tinfoil hats by b1t+r0t · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is there anywhere I can invest in tinfoil futures?

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  5. 16 bit number? by microbox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Secretary of State spokeswoman Jenny Nash said all counties using this system had been told that such problems would occur if a precinct is set up in a way that would allow votes to get above 32,000

    Somebody PLEASE tell me that that has nothing to do with 32,000 being close to the maximum value of a signed 16-bit number.

    Who writes this software?

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  6. Re:Random noise? by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Funny
    I have 2 pens on my desk. I could count them repeatedly for years without any sort of weird quantum effects creating any uncertainty in my measurement.

    We're talking about counting ballots. These are macroscopic measurements, and any actual physicist (not a pretend one, like you) should understand that there's no problem at all in measuring things accurately unless they're really tiny and moving really fast. Either you're a liar or the most incompetent physicist ever.

    I bet if you got pulled over for speeding you'd try to convince the cop that there's no way he could possibly accurately measure your speed and at the same time know what road you were driving on.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  7. Re:Big fucking suprise by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your statement implies there is/was/will be a government you trust. That thought is just plain scary.

    Yeah, I was going to trust a government that was run solely by me, but that was because I paid myself off...little do I know I'm double crossing myself, and won't really support myself when it comes time to vote.

  8. Re:False Alarm by tjstork · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe a lot of people -liked- what happened in the Bush administration.

    --
    This is my sig.
  9. Re:Black Box Voting by demachina · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hagel's name is circulating as a possible candidate for President in 2008. Don't be surprised if he wins :)

    --
    @de_machina
  10. Re:Big fucking suprise by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hereby revoke your membership in the tinfoil hat club.

    Liar, you don't have the power. There's only one member of the Tinfoil Hat Club who holds the power to revoke membership, and he/she would never reveal himself to Them by actually using it.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  11. Settle down, now... by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think it's inappropriate to refute his post with such floccinaucinihilipilification.