Slashdot Mirror
Skype Founder Interviewed On Engadget
prostoalex writes "Niklas Zennström, the ever-elusive CEO of Skype, is interviewed by Engadget. Turns out Skype currently has more than 13 mln users in 200+ countries. The interview also discusses the future of Skype and VOIP applications in general."
Ok, this lil program is closed-source but works with little lag, and decent sound.
;P )
We know that there's nothing special about the audio, it's known.
We know that there's nothing different about the latency of the lines (software cant change network hardware on telco side
Can somebody explain why we couldnt do something like this by using UDP packets over a tunnel? GnomeMeeting should provide the rest..
TCP's the killer here. Drop it and you have less lag (no negotiate).
Ok, first of all, I must say:
:)
;)
I love Skype. Really.
Since I got it working I have been calling my family for affordable prises. It makes it possible for me to call my parents, my grandparents, my siblings in Norway, and allso Friends studying in other countries all over the world. And for this I love Skype..
But!!!
There is always a but.
Skype has introdused a rather strict paying system, and in fact, it markt me as a possible fraud, thus making it impossible for me to pay.
Why?
Because I managed to use my credit card in a country from which it didn't origin. And; I did this three times, thus blocking it for ever beeing used at Skype.
This is all well and fine, as Skype must secure themselves and their customers. BUT; They inform about this nowhere. In their questions and answers, not even in their live help. I spendt one week talking to customer support, trying to get things to work, but instead of beeing honest and tell me that, sorry, I don't think it is going to work they had me try again tomorrow.
At the end of the week they were nice enough to tell me that all IP's from Argentina was blocked. Too late
So. Allthough they provide a nice new service, they still lack in customer support.
All grudges aside, I had a friend in norway buy credits for me, and now I am a happy ignorant skype user
Besides access to a lot of cool technologies, it offerred one of the only places around where you could go & call out (albeit cryptically):
"Hey, anybody out there wanna talk to me right now?"
Of course, there were many more males prepared to jump the entry hurdles into Ham Radio, then as now.
But, today, we have Skype... Since September 2004, I've had the pleasure of meeting:
- a plastic surgeon (from India) in Israel
- a Palestinian woman in Jordan
- a Swedish-speaking student in the Far North of Sweden, with whom to practice my Swedish
... all via Skype!
;-/
I've also used a Kenwood TS-2000 HF / VHF / UHF transceiver remotely (it's a bit like the now dated JavaRadio, but with Transmit Capabilities for licensed Hams).
ALL I NEED TO KNOW IS:
What do I need to provide so as to be able to use Skype exclusively on an Intranet?
Has anybody done this -without- an Internet connection?
Skype seems a bit bloated though; the Windows executable weighs in at just over 10 MB. For a small VoIP application, I find this pretty rediculous. How could they possibly make it take up so much space?
"We use Skype mostly, and mobile phones to receive calls from people not on Skype."
Miss Cleo told me that they use mobile phones to call 911.
No, really--did you even read that quote you cut-n-paste'd?
There is a skype for pocket pc as long as you are in range of wifi...
This "911" / emergency call issue is regularly rolled out as a "problem" with VoIP, due to the concern about the perceived lack of reliablity of IP based networks. While it is legitimate to address it, I don't think it is the issue it is made out to be.
If you consider what life was like 20 years ago, each house only had one land line, and all the land lines in the neighbourhood were attached to the same exchange. From the individual end user's point of view, there was no redundancy at all. If your land line failed, you couldn't go next door to use your neighbour's phone in an emergency, as their's was dead too. All you could do was jump in your car and go to the hospital, police station or firehouse.
Today, not only do we still have traditional land lines, we also have cell / mobile phones, and we still have cars. If we add VoIP into the mix, in sum, we have significantly more available "emergency communcations" resources as individuals than we did 20 years ago. That's why I don't think "911" / emergency call services is the issue it is made out to be when thinking about deploying VoIP.
The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
They (or somebody) sold a cordless handset.
On their shop they sell a "CyberPhone":
"Plugged into the USB port of your PC / laptop, you can chat using the Cyberphone just as you would on a normal telephone. "
Cool. But it still means I have to be at my PC to make/receive calls.
Hey Skype: sell cordless CyberPhones and you're on!
"And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
Hopefully, on day, someone will devise a plan that puts a number of radio antennas spaced every few miles across populated areas. The area covered by each antenna could be called a "cell". Each would be connected back to a single operator of some sort, tying them all together.
With this antenna infrastructure in place, maybe we can then possibly have phones that make use of these antennas. We could call them "cellular phones", meaning that they are of the antenna cells.
The operator of the antenna infrastructure could then link their network with the local baby-bell's network, allowing user's of these radical new "cellular phones" to talk to people who have existing land lines.
I can't wait until someone implements this idea. I think it's be pretty spiffy to be able to carry a phone with me that I can use most anywhere, any time.
Imagine, being able to talk to someone on the phone while out at the movies! Or while driving! The future holds such promise!
and if you're referring to using UDP over tunnels to get around the problems NAT causes, look up "NAT traversal" in google. It is being introduced to both IPsec and SIP.
Skype doesn't do anything special, other than lock its "customers" into a proprietory VoIP network.
I think skype will kill itself.
The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
The invented fasttrack, not Kazaa. Thats like blaming the car companies for people drinking and driving. They sold their idea, then end purchaser choose what to do with it -- not them. Come on, we've been through this before.
From the FAQ
http://www.skype.com/help/faq/index.html
Does Skype contain any advertising or spyware?
No.
Wow, that's really extra terrestial, as I thought that ther are only 192 international recognised countries !
EG: Hi Hello? ...and now is that better? /. I could go on but you get the idea.
CEO:Anyone there?
EG: Can you hear me?
CEO: Yes I hear you loud and clear!
EG: Great! So this is the first Voip app that "Just Works"?
CEO: What? Can you repeat that.
EG: I SAID THIS IS THE FIRST VOIP APP THAT "JUST WORKS"
CEO: Nope. Didn't get that try adjusting your mic.
EG: MMMmm ok, do you hear me now?
CEO: OOoh yeah thats nice and clear but getting a little echo, try turning down the speakers a little.
EG: Righty ho
CEO: I said try turning down your speakers.. ok thats good.
EG: OK, the great thing about Skype is that it "just works" right?
CEO: Yes.
EG: Do you think that Voip and Skype especially will be bext big thing after P2P?
CEO: Yeah! Thats absolutely right Skype is the BEST in tech thats so easy to use your grandma can use it.
EG: Err OK? Do you include any spyware or malware in Skype?
CEO: You Bet! Skype will be on every platform from windows to hand held pcs. There's just no excuse anymore even linux users can join the fun.
EG: Rigghht. So you're sure you'll be a success?
CEO: What! No way! We would never do anything like that ever!
Hey
or would you prefer to only be able to use Sony batteries in your Sony devices, Ford petrol (gasoline) in your Ford car, etc.
I'm certainly pro-open source, however, I think open standards are far, far more important than the open / closed source issue. If the best tool for the job is closed source, that's fine. I use closed source Adobe Acrobat under Linux rather than xpdf, as I find it better and quicker to use. I would abandon Adobe Acrobat if Adobe closed the PDF specification though, as the open specs of PDF are more important to me than the Adobe Acrobat software itself.
The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf