Slashdot Mirror
IT Literacy Test
crumley writes "The Educational Testing Service just announced a new
test that is designed to measure information technology literacy. The test is supposed to measure the ability of students to use software to solve problems, and not just how to use particular programs. So has anyone out there taken a test like this? Did it seem to measure critical thinking and problem solving skills?"
is there another name for a text only UI?
What's wrong with the standard acronym CLI (Command Line Interface)?
Back in 1999, I was a chemical engineer looking for a change of pace. Purdue was desperate for computing folks, so they offered a program called Information Systems and Technology Eduction Program.
The entrance exam was a test that determined your ability to think logically and break down the wholes into their parts with appropriate linkages. It included block diagram puzzles and other assorted logic statements and questions. Not a single line of code anywhere in it (that would have defeated the purpose). I took the test, did well, and was hired.
So, these things have been around for quite a while, at least since 1999.
I was going to respond to a comment by someone else, but nothing previously posted merited a response of any sort (with the possible exception of the bitter guy who seems to hate ETS).
Personally, from a psychometrics point of view, which is something I have a more than passing interest in, ETS is incredible. They have data sets that are invaluable, and have done a lot to further the field of testing. Yes, they do make a lot of money, but I can say that they also earn that money.
If you think otherwise, consider it this way--for every test that they publish there are literally thousands of hours of research, testing, and retesting that have been done. Those doing this work need to be paid, and they typically demand fairly generous salaries (IRT analysts aren't that common, and certainly earn their pay).
Now, that said--wait a few years before you spend a ton of money on this one. That time is critical in making absolutely certain that the test really predicts success or ability. In a few years, we'll know.
"We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
You probably mean "Gesundheit".
Hope that helps. Have a nice day!
To answer your question....I took ETS's CS Subject AGRE 4 years back after completing my Bachelors....and found it pretty interesting.
The exam webpage (no time to dig it up) lists a few CS categories that they'll test on, and happily, these include all the core areas of CS. From memory, the list goes roughly as follows:
Formal Languages and Automata Theory
Algorithms
Languages and Compilers
Computer Architecture
Logic
Databases
All questions were multiple choice like the regular GRE test (the pattern has changed since), but I liked the fact that they focussed on the "core" CS subjects, which every Bachelor's CS course should cover.
New buzzwords like "IT" frighten me....hope they continue to adhere to fundamental knowledge than buzzwordish software/peripheral areas.
An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
Keep in mind that those are the people that brought you the AP high school tests, GRE, SAT, CLEP etcetera http://www.ets.org/tests.html
This is a test of familiarity with basic office application paradigms -- do you understand how to use the two dimensions in a spreadsheet or the relationship between database fields and data? It has nothing to do with administration (although I've encountered admins who didn't understand either of those things).
What I'm listening to now on Pandora...
If you had taken/seen the computer-based GRE, you would know ETS went out of its way to make a platform-independent test environment. The word processor, for example, had some functions common to MS Word, but not all of them were. It did not superficially resemble Word, Emacs, or any other text editor I'm familiar with.
Live free or die
HTML and CSS is mainly for screen viewing. Word processing is generally for print.
I just use MediaWiki markup. Dead easy and I can create emphasis (as opposed to italics), strong emphasis, lists (ordered or bulleted), nested lists, tables, mathematical equations and all without leaving my wondrous keyboard and without having to learn key combinations. One of these days I will set up my own MediaWiki installation...
For note-taking, I can do things like indent extra detail. What's so bad about being a geek?
The Educational Testing Service just announced a new test that is designed to measure information technology literacy.
You know, that concept sounds a whole lot like the "European Computer Driving Test" that all the kids here are taking these days.
(Spudley Strikes Again!)