Welkin: A General-Purpose RDF Browser
Stefano Mazzocchi writes "Many consider the Semantic Web to be vaporware and others believe it's the next big thing. No matter where you stand, a question always pops up: Where is the RDF browser?
The SIMILE Project, a joint project between W3C, MIT and HP to implement semantic interoperability of metadata in digital libraries, released today the first beta release of a general purpose graphic and interactive RDF browser named Welkin (see a screenshot), targetted to those who need to get a mental model of any RDF dataset, from a single RSS 1.0 news feed to a collection of digital data."
Should I get a cock ring?
First Post! Seriously, Imagine a beowolf cluster of those!
HAHA, FP!
MOD ME UP BOYS!
Wow, 1 comment in and the screenshot is slashdotted.
I wonder if anyone was injured by the shrapnel.. and if slashdot will be hearing from lawyers.
well it's nice to see that java web start actually works for something other than that strangely addictive millitary game
worked a treat for me - loaded all the jars with just one click
78354f3a8444e5d4e05292f6ff361964422a0cc504d9fdbd9f 17979425a56 ba6fbf96b070 4d1cca66c4b 23436897b546 14587866e9e 1f288d6e2068 3723de0cc42 eecf40c78848 8bbbced7747 f4079ccc5603 20b9d9d19bd 477b51c6cb04 77a2b9d074c b7a198532910 3c22bdbe42d 558e5292f5db f04bcbf7868 3fc1066c984b e6b85c72e95 36790b0ce130 47b0d749903 814612b3efad c8c80ac561e 753ca7252780 260fa0ae075 9b4829bd79dd 42028ecd55f 53ae552054bf 135b3d28094 f7a67ce760ce 3cc8e80ab5e 306d313d37bf 73ce685f9cf d706820ca7b8 ac9cad5566f 3081cce0ebc4 3c3f8038aba 93363ae78a38 0c5fb0fceb3 e556bc058aee b96ddc9d145 48a810539011 8d663e7028e 5aeac17b2382 94f008ff7c8 e360e6192593 8cc5318bef4 079c86e257da 125b4a603b3 63db654c9fb2 eeea5b657ea 537dfd6c7552 720a544a572 ef78d37fc36b ebf9d3e8fae b2cd4b9c2619 12eaa205764 91653f454f85 ed80650b011 a9d00fbfd229 526a223eaaf 7bc7e7690cd0 0a2e188a2e5 59087419897a 4063d7a43f
91b16f77687438a099896ea69466689314649
e63aaccecc4ec988830e0d3b129cc8d40c0a4
6fe5c064cd8afc32f3af0d436f90a506ee274
9afe02ca70d387d4b4b566f6e72dacf2c9820
bce74afb46346cdfe703d38ec702750c3aa42
f8f4de392e5ffcc9f65108edb51c78f9a9922
73f24552d12652c852a223bfdb69974e03c14
612be7b633d2d6182b1e355d86c87cb653604
fed471c19bc3ada261ab4bed80f0d9b413c75
535374a9b3bab99a6511bddc6e14b8d140aec
4f0af877b5e608e91269c7573fed08e582fcb
57be36efb224bb81a02144d6ec88d7daf45af
42e6dbb00b3d96dcb931362b5a305285fe320
fe8eb192208af48af617f509714c0d581b0e8
4d62e5555eec81161e8579f74fde617c476af
870e79f84090101da8b11b82579f9b4fd9f66
add8463caf86fc0ab97494d5d18b5b8effdff
14eda36939d1421a8f2ae08d248656fd5bc52
7009817315c5ef1e85cd39289cf64376cca57
754f9f8c4d159c44290ad7351dd3eb492d9bf
e50368f927796791d6e1bb050fa969e96871b
452037c39a244d979a8bcbac1c1163d874d60
9b4ce370b0f7ef000ec3bd58eaaed25de268d
03687ec994122cf10f8ee20ab0589c8e506d3
47fab4eb3a495765e0c565ab7a7db293f97d1
f475f0a57df485256ff4ec420ef176950eb0b
251857c41ab2b55962ec0ce9a684a6e9dead8
e4a2bd13359a165225349410d5d63b97f010b
7ee4e5cbb4a9c2630f322c59aec368f458dcc
3c921485a538fe7d4f134e926d4b48247a49d
c7f67d5a2a3022f12187f0b50035ffa41aa8c
89b56019a6a1d8214b59b060b8cfc7cd0f48d
1194e749f177f23013
. . .relate their own ontologies out of English text. . .
Which would be perfectly dandy, if we were storing data for computers to use for their own purposes.
So long as we are storing data for interpretation by human minds we circle back to your own arguments for why the semantic web is silly.
Some developers get so wrapped in the AI that they entirely neglect that their own I is part of the system.
KFG
I thought XML was supposed to do that?
[ phone number]phone number[/phone number]
No, all XML was supposed to do is add semantics to the web. The idea that it could be used to merge databases was a later addition by people who really don't seem to understand the concepts.
To merge databases all you really need is a previously agreed upon semantics. Since there is an "X" in XML those semantics are not inherent in XML itself and must be included with the data.
The thing is, that if one includes the semantics with the data (or simply agrees on it ahead of time) the inclusion of tags is completely unneccessary and thus verbosely redundant.
"Yo, dude. First field is going to be name. Second field address. Third field phone number."
name, address, phone number
As opposed to:
"Yo, dude. The name tag is going to be name. The address tag is going to be address. The phone number tag is going to be phone number."
[name]name[/name]
[address]address[/address]
It's all very silly and smacks of making things complicated because you think complicated must be more advanced than simple somehow.
KFG