Slashdot Mirror


Windows Source Code Seller Arrested

prostoalex writes "New York Times says William O. Genovese Jr., 27, of Meriden, Conn. has been arrested by the Feds for selling source code for Windows NT and Windows 2000 operating systems. It's not perfectly clear whether Genovese was selling the portion of the code that was leaked earlier this year or if he had access to other portions of Windows source code. The timing, though, coincides, as the code leaked in February, the same month NYT claims the entrepreneur obtained the source code."

4 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Disgusting by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Informative

    Despite what people think, there is no right to privacy or "personal integrity" in the US Constitution. Maybe there should be, but as now there isn't.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  2. Re:Who can really gain from this code though? by Scoria · · Score: 4, Informative

    Any malware developer could probably derive a benefit. They are unscrupulous, and it is usually more trivial to examine uncompiled software for vulnerabilities.

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  3. Re:Disgusting by ZB+Mowrey · · Score: 3, Informative
    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated...{snip}

    This is generally construed... and has been promulgated by SCOTUS... as a right to privacy.

    --

    Self-referential sigs are rarely entertaining.

  4. trade secret != copyright by mangu · · Score: 3, Informative
    Microsoft's source code is copyrighted, ... Moreover, the source code is a trade secret of Microsoft.


    OK, make up your mind, which is it, a trade secret or a copyright? Because copyrighted works are intended to, eventually, become public domain, one cannot copyright a trade secret. Or, at least, that's more or less how it's written in the U.S. Constitution.