Slashdot Mirror


Winamp Down for the Count

Artifex writes "BetaNews is reporting that the doors at Nullsoft have been closed: 'The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL and the door has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned. Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital audio player with minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.'" The Register also has a story.

15 of 815 comments (clear)

  1. Time to open it up! by dogas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Much like Netscape did when it was in its death throes, I think it would be great if they could open up the source and allow an online community to develop for it.

    Just think, in a year or so it could be the next iTunes killer..

    --
    'When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.' -HST
    1. Re:Time to open it up! by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just think, in a year or so it could be the next iTunes killer..

      Nah. Nullsoft/AOL would have had to have a music store from the getgo in order to compete with the vast library that iTMS has amassed. iTunes is now synonomous with cheap music with a decent interface.

      Nullsoft/AOL would just not be able to compete at this late stage in the game. Others have tried but it seems that Apple is continuing to win that battle.

      Is this good? Maybe not. We certainly don't want a single viable option for music playing/purchasing but I really don't think that an open source project from Nullsoft/AOL will be able to compete *now*.

    2. Re:Time to open it up! by martingunnarsson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First, there might be licensed stuff in the Winamp source, codecs for different fileformats or whatnot.
      Second, iTunes is one if the good guys, we don't wanna kill that!

      --
      Martin
  2. Re:It's successor? by Bricklets · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which one do you think will likely be its successor?

    Knowing what AOL did to their Netscape division, it'll probably be Windows Media Player.

    --
    Little Bricklets
  3. Might as well... by nordicfrost · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Winamp was one of those Must Have Apps for Windows, and heralded much of the MP3 success. After that half-yearly re-install of Windows, WA was one of the first apps to go back in. So you could play MP3s while reinstalling Office etc.

    But after it went to version2, things became less rosy. Version 1.x worked a charm on my old 266/512mb peecee, but the 2.x series was dog slow and ridden with feature creep. I wonder if all the dumbass features in 2.x was something AOL mandated in the app. Rest of story: I went Linux, the Mac and never looked back.

    Kudos to the original Nullsoft team, you did a great job!

  4. Don't really need more updates by millwall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm still using v.1 and it still "Kicks the Llama's Ass".

  5. Re:Oh no! by lumpenprole · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Foobar 2000.

    Tried it once, never looked back. And I was a huge Winamp fan.

    http://www.foobar2000.org/

    --
    Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
  6. Re:sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it's just you. What the hell does that even mean, it needs to move forward? It plays music files, it lets you choose them and fast forward them. What the hell else do you need? A built-in web browser and tax advisor?
    Ridiculous. Or, in /. speak, rediculous.

  7. Re:It's successor? by kalidasa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, I was just thinking that: as they once called the Ottoman Empire a prison of nations, they should call AOL a cemetary of independent software projects.

  8. Re:sweet by TravisWatkins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because then you might as well just use MPlayer?

    --

    "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
  9. Re:It's successor? by Number6.2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just remember: Corporate America isn't about *you*. It's about enhancing "value" to "shareholders".

    This means that if they have to make 1000 employees miserable by laying them off for a quarter (or eight) so the financials look rosy for Wall Street, they'll do it.

    And if they have to gobble up a superior technology as a bargaining chip, they'll do it.

    Corporate America is the ultimate communal reptilian brain: cold, efficient, ruthless, amoral, it WILL achieve it's goals, no matter who it has to hurt. Things are very black and white in Corporate America: profit/good loss/bad.

    Open Source, on the other hand, is very mamillian: there are others "like it", there's a *community*. Altruism actually has a place in this scheme.

    And it drives the lizards crazy. If one lizard attacks another lizard, no other lizard intervenes. If a lizard attacks a mamal, all of the mamal's kin come down on that lizard like, well, a pack of wild animals.

    Hence...the antipithy between Corporate America and Open Source.

    This is a metaphore, to be sure: some businesses "get it". These are the businesses that can plan further than a quarter ahead at a time, or are big enough that they can say "screw the Street" and take a short term hit (IBM?)

    Companies are like lizards, they are always prey to bigger lizards.

    Open Source is like a herd of (your favorite heard animal here). They can only be taken down by a BIG lizard or another pack based life form.

    enough

    cheers
    6.2

    --
    "If god did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" --Voltaire
  10. Cui bono? by revscat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why would Google do any of those things? WA never made a dime for AOL, and in that respect was a poor investment. I'd say the same thing if Google were to do what you suggested. Unless they can make money off of it, it wouldn't be worth their time.

    Open sourcing it would be much better.

  11. Textbook Example of "What Not To Do(tm)" by slcdb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pay a hundred-million bucks for a company with a killer app and a helluva group of innovative engineers. Now that you own the company, make sure all those engineers know you are in charge by stifling the creative process. Strangle that som'bitch til' it's dead; I mean, until there is virtually NO innovation left. Revoke all of the "Next Big Things" that the engineers create. Casually compel the founder and creative genius to leave the company while you're at it. Persevere until all development -- whether it's creative development, or even just suck-ass development -- has all but ceased.

    Voila! You've just shown the world, in textbook fashion, how to flush $100m down the toilet. Not to mention the fumbling of a precious opportunity.

    --
    Despite what EULAs say, most software is sold, not licensed.
  12. A Winamp Tale by poena.dare · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So I had heard about this kewl file format called MP3 and I needed a player. I looked around and found Winamp for $10...

    From: Nullsoft [mailto:sales@winamp.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 3:59 PM
    To: M Smith
    Subject: Winamp Registration Code

    *** Thank you for registering Winamp ***

    (etc, etc)
    Since Winamp is uncrippled nag-free shareware, this key doesn't do anything in Winamp. You can, however, for fun, enter the key into the 'shareware' tab of Winamp's about box.
    (etc etc) Now here's the important part:
    This registration is valid for ALL versions of Winamp, past, present and future.
    (etc, etc)
    ---
    Justin Frankel
    Nullsoft, Inc.
    ---

    ...and it did kick the Llama's ass. I've got bad eyes and it let me make the control panel DOUBLE SIZE, which was a godsend.

    I went through, hrm, 8 or 10 OS upgrades. I almost never downloaded a new version. It did only a few things and it did it well.

    My happy world came to an end when I moved to Windows XP and Winamp stopped working. So I got the latest version and found that after 5 years my registration code didn't work anymore. So I wrote NullSoft:

    From: M Smith
    Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 3:24 PM
    To: 'support@winamp.com'
    Subject: Ode to a support person

    In a desperate attempt to contact someone at NullSoft, I send this letter to you.

    Dear Human Being, presumably one employed by NullSoft:

    Back in 1997 I paid 10 hard earned dollars for Winamp. I just downloaded the 5 Pro version and discovered that my registration key doesn't work! Could this please be remedied? Here's the text of the email you sent me ages ago:
    (etc, etc)

    To which I got back this message:

    From: support@winamp.com
    Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:46 AM
    To: M Smith
    Subject: Re: Ode to a support person

    Dear M Smith,

    Thank you for writing WinAmp, My name is Larry, I will be assisting you today.

    You can find your Registration Key in your confirmation e-mail. If you do not have your confirmation e-mail, you can also retrieve your Registration Key by viewing the details of your purchase using the lookup at the address listed below:
    (etc, etc)

    Hrm. Larry appears to not have read my email, for, Lo! I did have a conformation email, in fact, I sent him a copy of it.

    NOW, I remembered the whole "AOL buys NullSoft" thing and it occurs to me that I'm in the hands of an organization with infinite cruelty and infinite patience. I tried to break through again:

    From: M Smith
    Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 7:28 AM
    To: 'support@winamp.com'
    Subject: FW: Ode to a support person

    Larry,

    You obviously are not a human being, because a real human being would notice:

    1) I DO have my confirmation email - it was pasted at the end of my email.

    2) My registration key (NNNNNNNN) is obviously not the format that Winamp uses today.

    3) Since I paid for the product BEFORE Nullsoft ever used Digitalriver for order fulfillment, looking up my order would be fruitless.


    Either the human Larry was incensed at my sarcasm or the Perl Script Larry couldn't handle the language for I haven't heard back from NullSoft/AOL/Time/Warner yet.

    So I bumble along with the latest freebie version of Winamp feeling generally dispossessed - I have a lifetime agreement with NullSoft and the parent company won't take my phone calls, so to speak. I tried sending email to Justin Frankel and it bounced - now I know why.

    Anyone know know a lawyer who will take on a class-action lawsuit for 1/3rd of $10?

  13. Re:I disagree by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but you and I strongly disagree on this! Winamp 5 is the best Winamp I've used. I really wish there was an OSX version of it, as a matter of fact!

    iTunes is nice, and since getting an ipod, it's more or less a requirement, but it still lacks features that Winamp 5 brings to the table.

    You mention that Winamp5 is unstable and slow, and that may be on your hardware, but on mine it flies (On both a 3Ghz P4, and a AMD1600 system), and it resolved all instability that Winamp3 brought to the table. In contrast, itunes is a f'in power hungry beast! On Windows it slows the whole system down at times, something Winamp5 has never done, and even on my dual 2ghz. Mac, it can freeze the whole system at times. Not too cool... If Winamp5 were out for the Mac, and gave me ipod features simuilar to itunes, itunes would never be used again on my systems.

    You also bitch (sorry... When you call things a "steaming turd", you're bitching, rather than making a point) about how Winamp 5 was moving away from being free, but only the pro version was. The regular version has more than enough capabilities for 99% of the users out there, and for those who wanted more, they could pay a small fee to upgrade it to the pro version. Not a bad deal IMHO, and it's a helluva lot better than a time-limited trial.

    Not to mention the streaming media capabilities that Winamp5 offers: The .nv video format provides freekin' great quality, considering it's rather meager bandwidth requirements. It allows you to do much more than itunes does in this respect, and again... All for free.

    As for your comments about people reverting to winamp3... I haven't met anyone who feels that way. In fact the opposite's true, from what I've seen. I know several people who had wrote Winamp off after v3, but came back loving it after v5 hit the streets.

    Finally, I have to point out that their library is the best I've seen. It automatically updated and removed dead tracks as they were shuffled around, which is something itunes still doesn't pull off that well, and the way it imports both video and audio files has allowed me to do some very granular sorting by putting the files into named folders.

    As an example, I can search for, and find items with such wide-ranging search terms as "Rated-G animation", "Industrial music", "Sheep on Drugs", "The Simpsons", "Rock Music", "Rated-R movies", and "Kids Television", and get very specific, meaningful results. This allows anyone in my house to quickly pull up media without having to know how I've sorted my collection. itunes doesn't even come close to this level of organization.

    Summary: I hope this isn't the end of Winamp. They lost me w/Winamp3, but really made up for it with v5. I hope someone either buys the source, or it's open-sourced. This would be a very sad ending for such a great piece of software!